No matter.

The point being, evolution is the improvement of a thing, like language skills. Devolution is simply not paying attention to which direction one is going.

A = A, no matter if you were a caveman, or an astronaut.

If you want the whole story of your myth, it is Plato's Banquet, or sometimes called The Symposium.

Audio books of a few different translations on the internet archive compliments of me.

Well, you finally got something right. And who said progress was not possible? Good going.

[a man] is one name comprised of a name signifying some material difference and a name signifying some form.

Even 2500 years ago it was taught the distinction between

"man" and "a man". Class and member of a class.

Then you have not been alone long enough.

I would settle for just being tolerated.

Well, now ain't this a fine thing. The question as stated makes no sense at all to me and no one has figured out the answer.

For one thing, it is not a complete sentence. A perfect what?

If, on the other hand, the sentence is a natural ellipsis, then I would assume it would be, "If I could be a perfect man."

Now, it could be argued both on scientific grounds and religious grounds, that "a man" is comprised of one male and one female--because neither alone, by definition is capable of supporting life. So,

The answer has always been obvious. I could never be perfect, however, with a mate, we certainly could. I have never been capable of thinking in terms of "me". Nor, with our biological makeup, I fail to see how it would be possible for anyone--that is human.

One could change their body, their mind, all they want, perfection is not possible by definition of man. A man is one male and one female.

Does anyone know where Voyager is at the moment?

I lived a bit in Toronto in the early 70's before I went into the service.

At that time, their humor index was a lot higher, I wonder what has happened?

Sorry about the humor, I often toss something out to test a person's response to an absurd statement, if they respond in a serious manner, oh well, life has been hard.

Actually, she is so beautiful, I was taking it slow.

I figure in a year or so, she might even stop laughing.

And everyone is wishing they were hi also.

luck.

Now you done it. I will have to live with a broken heart for the rest of my life. pout.

Actually, our own body is a collective.

What I was getting at is that since there is one definition of man, be it one or many, the statement is non-sense.

If what you do, is truly in your own best interest, it is in everyone's best interest.

Looking for a real MAN...from TORONTO!


Would you settle for an imitation artificial synthetic dude from Vermont living in Inkster?

Oh, I almost forgot, and don't even date?

I know it would be a great sacrifice on my part, but what the hell.

breathing.

One, there is no use of language that is valid, that violates the original naming convention.

And if you identify with a picture of your body, well, good luck with your hollow graphy.

However, that was a good demonstration of being neither here, nor there.

http://www.archive.org/details/The_Factory_Grammarian

http://www.archive.org/details/Why_Study_Plato

You are always right.

yuk.

You know, my first mother in law bought me a white shirt one time. I thanked her very deeply for it. Took it out of the package, put it on, and went out and tuned up my car with it.

That was the last time it was white.

a suit? yuk.

now that is a dork.

Proof: Every environmental acquisition system must acquire something from the environment yada yada yada.

A woman is the life of man.

etc. etc.

and since she is the only path to life for man,

I win. Bla!

Who?