Because their head are so filled with falsehoods and they are so blinded by their own hatred of themselves, that the truth has no meaning for THEM ?

Conservatives absolutely baffle and exasperate Liberals. Why? Because Conservatives appear to have solid beliefs while the Liberal is lucky if he can formulate some vague, hazy philosophy of things. When the Conservative argues with the Liberal, the Liberal feels he must lash out for fear of discovering that his whole imaginary world is just that: fiction.

So, Liberals preach "tolerant", but only tolerance for THEIR viewpoints. Anything else is heresy. Just try confronting a Liberal with the facts about global warming and he'll practically start foaming at the mouth. The mind of the Liberal cannot acknowledge that a Conservative is right because the fuzzy Liberal mind is like a shaky house of cards. If the Liberal realizes he's wrong about one thing, it totally destroys their whole imagined reality he has constructed for himself.

So when Liberals scream like threatened children when you talk about FOX News, or Rush Limbaugh, it is because their brains are not wired to accept contradictory information.

Liberals cannot do this. It would destroy their carefully-crafted dream world existence.

" I, _____, take you, ______, to be my wedded husband. For years I have prayed that God would lead me to a fool like you and I am confident that His will is being fulfilled today. With deepest joy I will take you for everything you got from this day on. As you have pledged to me your life, love and your house, so I too happily give you my promise that one day you will regret this day for the rest of your life…………………………………… "

Really fellows don't you agree that wives start lying to their husbands at the altar, then they just get better at it with time.

...why, are so many liberal/feminist women jealous of Sarah Palin accomplishments ???

Is it Palin's "sex appeal" combined with the abrupt and audacious way she captured the national limelight during the 2008 presidential campaign...made women jealous ?

Was it because the devil in the red dress wasn't orating like a professor, it roused an unquenchable forest fire of rage and loathing in the breasts of many women, perhaps of the toiling [gray mouse in a pantsuit] variety, who projected onto her their own career resentments and personal frustrations ?

I mean, feminists have long blamed male oppression for women’s cat fights. Will this time (2012) feminists engage themselves again in personal insults at Sarah Palin ?

Who more than any of their feminist standard-bearers seems to not only have “had it all” but to have done it all, and still remained her soul ?... Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi ???

Are the attacks rooted in something much deeper than simple political disagreements ?

I think, that what the feminists hate is that on the job, Palin is one of the boys.
" That Palin thinks like a man, or logically, is what has made the left livid. As appropriate to their modes, they respond emotionally. The men in their movement, who have become one of the girls in terms of thinking, respond with personal insults, even going so far as to mock the looks of her baby, as Bill Maher recently did.

And you know what, liberal women have a real hard time with a woman that becomes successful while thinking outside their enclosed box. They like to control all people with abortion, health care, euthanasia, open borders, public school religion, attacks on Christianity and the Bible including attacks on sexy fertile bunnies (like Sarah) and they will always support government control, degenerative sex culture and the wiccan culture of death, any time and every time before common sense, logic and sense of responsibility of others.

In my opinion, liberal women are nothing else but frustrated hens that hate the roosters and do not come close in their looks to a well centered and grounded conservative hen like Sarah.

Bottom line, woman (liberal or not) will always be jealous about other woman's looks before anything else, she will be jealous about later.

So, do they hate Sarah because of what she is and represents to them ?...or simply because they are jealous of what she accomplished & accomplishes on her own as a strong independent and beautiful woman ??????????????

maybe ur zipper's down ... wwwwwow, what a great way to pick up women unzip, and let the "magick"do its work.
Thanks sweety !!!

Like for instance, a woman I have never spoken to but see her looking at me at the supermarket...what are the signs that she is taken or not ? ....besides the ring on her finger of course.
Is there a body language unique to single women like a dress code, mannerism, tone of voice or a way of carrying a conversation with man ?...and most important, how it all differs from a way a married woman would go about "getting a man"

OOH YEAH !!!! I completely forgot about the Adam and Eve situation !!!!

OK, lets see here...this lines work like a charm for me.

" Can you please tell me the way ? ” ...she says ” Which way ? ”...you say ” The way to your heart ”

" The night is young, the moon is bright, if I follow you home, will you keep me for tonight ? "


...and on me, in a dark smoky bar after midnight on a rainy saturday night.

" Can I take a picture of you ?...so, I can show the gals what I want most in my life ? "

" My friends over there dared me to come over here and try to talk to you...so, why’s a man as good looking as you sitting all alone ? “

.....you, just hate me for saying that women should cook for a man.

OK, but why woman allow men to cheat ( not that they promote it, of course ) but why allowing it to happen in the first place ?
Maybe because they are very comfortable with the relationship or they are too scared to let the cheater go, or is that the ratio of woman to men is so high that its hard for a red blooded male not to be tempted ( and women do understand this very well )

Some say its because the girlfriend, wife or significant other is slacking at home, either not giving her mate the attention he needs or that the wife or girlfried are not willing to be open-minded enough to be more adventurous in the sheets. And it's not something the guy planned to happen, it just happened, like a accident... one thing lead to another.

And what about the other woman that he cheats with ?
She says, that it was because the man needed someone to listen to him and understand the pressure he is under at work and how important it is for the woman in his life to be more understanding.

Do you agree that it has been argued that some woman make it unpleasant for a man to be himself, either she is too critical, demanding, nagging, always in a bad mood, makes him feel like she is alway disappointed in everything he tries to do for her ???????????

......the bottom line is that, without a willing woman (often married) how can a man commit THE SIN ?

Well ????????????? how ????

" Single, will follow you home for better or worse "

Fairies...they're just so darn cute.

Spoken like a true feminist ...or are you ?

You lucky dog you !!!...you met an honest woman and you let her go !?!?!?

You want anything to do with "my billy club" ???...then you know what you have to do first. And make it spicy baby.

If you want a patient man who "takes his time over & over again" then you better make sure he is not hungry.

Here right here !!!!.....HERE I AM !!!!

OK ... but if woman doesn't cook for a man, then what right she has (if any) to expect sex from him ?

FINALLY, PROOF THAT HELL DOES NOT EXIST:

A chemistry student at the University of Washington has ended a centuries-long reign of terror by major religions that have been threatening believers with perpetual agony in eternal hellfire if they question “God’s word” – as stipulated by ministers, priests, popes and scholars poring over passages not “written by God” (who did not even leave any notes) but penned by other men with similarly controlling agendas.

Of course, the impossibility of a disembodied soul (or spirit) feeling corporeal sensations such as cold, rain, heat or fire has made the concept of “roasting in hell” like a chicken basted on a rotisserie a nonstarter from the beginning.

Despite this insurmountable contradiction, the notion of an eteral fiery pit filled with pitchfork-loads of freaked out souls was imposed by exasperated church leaders who finally resorted to saying “to hell with everyone” tempted toward the strong human propensity to enjoy sex and other pleasures of the flesh.

Now, thanks to a student’s answer to a bonus question on a recent mid-term university exam, threatening anyone with hell is now just a laughing matter.

Ironically, even deliciously, an act of lovemaking clinched the argument against hell.

With “eternal damnation” now proven false, daily demonstations of direct casue-and-effect… reaping what we sow… treating others as we wish to be treated… sending out vibes and actions that come back around – for good or ill – with interest… and plain ol’ karmic rebalancing provide all the incentive anyone should require to “do the right thing.”

Who needs hell, when paying for our own perversity and screw-ups right here on Earth – and receiving the benefits of our good deeds – is so inescapably inevitable? Even if we dodge the law, there’s no fooling our sickened bodies, stricken conscience, or our souls. And who needs that?

To hell with hell.

HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs using Boyle’s Law, which states that gas cools when it expands, and heats when it is compressed. One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today.

Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

So which is it ?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, “It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you,” and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct……leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting “Oh my God.”

THIS STUDENT RECEIVED AN A+

You don't like man...are you afraid of man ?

I wonder, where ohhh where the honest Juliet is of mine...not here that's for sure.