Community > Posts By > Peccy

 
Peccy's photo
Tue 11/27/12 02:53 PM

So how far off course was flight 77?laugh
My understanding is that it was on approach and veered off. But I'm sure your over active imagination will refuse to let you believe that. As far as your concerned, the flight made a bee-line for the pentagon...but I understand why, because the conspiracy theory loses impact if the government wasn't behind everything. And since you like those annoying emoticons so much laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh .......slaphead

Peccy's photo
Tue 11/27/12 07:30 AM
Wasn't directing it at you David, was directing it at these troofers

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/26/12 08:09 PM




We find it absurd that three buildings fell as described and even more absurd that a plane could penetrate the protected air space over washington after both towers had been hit.


I find it absurd that you find it absurd.

Also, Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon, was approaching the Reagan National Airport before it changed course and headed for the Pentagon. The last time that I checked, the Reagan National Airport isn't protected air space. Commercial aircraft are expected to be there.
How far off course was it from its flight plan?laugh noway
If I may interject here, if you had ever flown into Regan (as I have), you would know that it's not that far (by air) to the Pentagon. So if it veered off course, it could be there in a matter of minutes and there is absolutely no way jets could have scrambled that fast. Even if they were airborne, the chances of them being close enough to intercept were almost nil. Not to mention shooting it down near downtown DC would have meant thousands of innocent casualties. What would you have proposed they do?


Flight 77 was indeed off-course, but when it approached the airport, it might have given people the impression that it was going to land there.

Peccy has a point about shooting down the Flight. It really was a no-win situation.

Did federal officials make mistakes during the event? Sure. However, those mistakes do not imply that the events of 9/11 as explained by federal officials are false.
One one hand, the however many passengers and a building that could withstand a lot more than the average structure; or, at least 1/4 mile of complete destruction and the all out chaos that would have followed?...what would have been your choice if the government was so wrong?

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/26/12 08:03 PM
Who knows?

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/26/12 08:01 PM
I would venture to guess that more people are raped in prison due to the confinement. Easier to walk a few hundred yard to another cell-block than to ride across town in traffic......lol

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/26/12 07:56 PM
I am sometimes, are you?

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/26/12 07:54 PM
Why do women cheat? It's pretty obvious if you think about it. The man wasn't fulfilling their needs (and no not all sexual) so she decided that she needed to look elsewhere. It works both ways though, men cheat too. Actually, according to recent statistics, polls, whatever, men tend to be more likely to cheat.

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/26/12 06:18 PM


We find it absurd that three buildings fell as described and even more absurd that a plane could penetrate the protected air space over washington after both towers had been hit.


I find it absurd that you find it absurd.

Also, Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon, was approaching the Reagan National Airport before it changed course and headed for the Pentagon. The last time that I checked, the Reagan National Airport isn't protected air space. Commercial aircraft are expected to be there.
How far off course was it from its flight plan?laugh noway
If I may interject here, if you had ever flown into Regan (as I have), you would know that it's not that far (by air) to the Pentagon. So if it veered off course, it could be there in a matter of minutes and there is absolutely no way jets could have scrambled that fast. Even if they were airborne, the chances of them being close enough to intercept were almost nil. Not to mention shooting it down near downtown DC would have meant thousands of innocent casualties. What would you have proposed they do?

Peccy's photo
Sun 11/25/12 06:55 PM
Welcome to Mingle!

Peccy's photo
Sun 11/25/12 02:32 PM


Proof


Obviously. But, can you give an example of what that proof would look like?
Well proof would look like an old bearded man donning a robe...lol.... Proof would consist of something tangible, not hearsay. Something that will not only convince me, but any skeptic.

Peccy's photo
Fri 11/23/12 09:56 AM

During his fourth Thanksgiving presidential address, President Barack Obama referenced the recent, long and bruising campaign season, urged the country to unite behind his administration and, for the fourth year running, neglected to offer verbal thanks to God.

“As a nation, we’ve just emerged from a campaign season that was passionate, noisy, and vital to our democracy,” Obama said. “But it also required us to make choices �“ and sometimes those choices led us to focus on what sets us apart instead of what ties us together; on what candidate we support instead of what country we belong to.”

“Thanksgiving,” he continued, “is a chance to put it all in perspective �“ to remember that, despite our differences, we are, and always will be, Americans first and foremost.”

The president’s call to unite behind his administration follows a bitter election, in which his opponent, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, won independents 50 to 45 percent, and whites 59 to 39 percent.
The official proclamation is lower-profile than the address, and the neglect to verbally thank God — as the original celebrators of Thanksgiving convened to do — angered some conservatives.

“Yet again, President Obama’s Thanksgiving message eschewed any direct reference to thanking God, making this the fourth straight year in which the president of the United States has ignored the central message of the holiday in favor of political grandstanding,” the conservative Big Government reported. “This year, Obama’s central message was that now that he’s been re-elected, Americans should agree with all of his policies. His unity routine sounds strangely empty after a campaign in which he focused on dividing Americans.”

“Obama’s lack of overt religiosity has been a source of controversy,” the pro-life LifeSiteNews reported, “with polls consistently showing that a large number of Americans are unaware that Obama is a Christian, or doubt the claim.”
Actually even though I do not agree with his politics, I have no objection to the Pres not thanking an invisible and unproven deity. I think it's time people stop living in the past anyway.

Peccy's photo
Fri 11/23/12 09:46 AM

Of course Mingle2 is world wide but the fact is that almost no Americans hate India. In reality, they don't spend much time thinking about India for any reason.
This is true, I for one am too busy to "hate" somewhere I have never been. Besides I don't hate anything, well except spinach!

Peccy's photo
Thu 11/22/12 08:39 AM
LOL......this survey amazes me! 1.2% said none of the above, either the government did or didn't. What was the sample size and where was it done?

Peccy's photo
Mon 11/19/12 03:37 PM

Hmmm....duplicitous much?
lol

Peccy's photo
Sat 11/17/12 06:07 PM
Sounds like the tag-lines from every late night infomercial out there!

Peccy's photo
Thu 11/15/12 12:20 PM




laugh laugh laugh All these non business owners who do not understand running a business coming out and attacking business owners who understand running a business is the same thing as republican politicians lacking science degrees attacking scientists who have science degrees.
I own a business, true it's only a sole proprietorship with me and a few computers and a degree, yet I am one. I think you need to look in the mirror when you talk of non-business owners laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Peccy's photo
Wed 11/14/12 09:37 AM

I'm pretty sure if there really was an effective boycott of Papa Johhn's or any other company, the company would wise up and change its ways long before it actually had to close. Especially when all they had to do was raise their prices. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
They won't close, remember, any press is good press. It's much ado about nothing.

Peccy's photo
Wed 11/14/12 08:15 AM
A pizza with no meat? Oh my!

Peccy's photo
Wed 11/14/12 07:33 AM

All the other major restaurant chains are doing the same...hiring and going to part time workers.
Exactly, Papa John's is just following suit of what the other major chains (not all food) have been doing for years. Wal-Mart does the exact same thing and has been doing so for years. This was well before Obamacare was even hatched. So why doesn't their BS get exposed to the media? I think that Obamacare is a bad idea, but it seems that big companies are using it as a "chicken little" excuse for some things. The sky is falling!.................lol

Peccy's photo
Wed 11/14/12 06:59 AM


I'm not getting on Lib's or Repubs, they both suck and are destroying this country. I just think it's a stupid topic, not worthy of the screen it was made-up on.
yet worthy enough to respond to.
1. This is a forum, the expressing of opinions is the main cog of this wheel.

1 2 9 10 11 13 15 16 17 24 25