Community > Posts By > brewer77

 
brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:32 AM




Again, I think you need to stop the stereotyping and generalities and document.

I cant seem to get you to understand my respectful request for you to answer my questions or follow the debate,

Hey, Mr. Brewer.
You're pretty new here. Welcome.drinker
It's ok. A lot of us are very familiar with the dodging, generalizing and name calling. That's why we stop attempting to debate with those do that.
I debate with those willing to debate intead of making excuses for their Savior-in-Chief Hussein.



Well, I like to point it out anyways. Intelligent people who read this will see that they have nothing to stand on and have nothing to offer besides the talking points they get in their morning e-mail at best.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:29 AM

I think it's slightly strange of us to examine Islam and it's abuses with out discussing Christianity and it's abuses down through history. Because we can not legally kill homosexuals in this country doesn't mean we don't make their existence as unpleasent and the religious right wants to make sure the inequality continues, but we focus on Islam? Why? Our attitudes are no better.


Christianity has rebuked that history and even the babylonian/roman church has apologized. You really think american churches are boiling witches and stoning adulteresses?

The fact that you can even draw a parallel calls into question your objectivity in matters of religion.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:26 AM


Overthrowing the US government after giving eminent domain to China as collateral would be a response that our founding fathers would be on board with. I sure wouldn't stand for such an action by our government. But hey, I'm sure China would just forget about the loans..... Funny how your response didn't mention the condition for advocating the overthrow - that being eminent domain given to China as collateral for our debt. I guess some are not capable of critical thinking.... If you are dwelling on that, you miss the whole point. No one can foresee the consequences of continued US debt compilation but some can speculate if they can think critically. Of course some won't understand the far reaching consequences of our debt until the day when Chinese troops come in through Mexico to get their money back. Hint - it's not about the troops coming.




Alrighty, let's do this the hard way.

Apparently you don't understand emminent domain. Article 5 of the Bill of Rights says the government must make fair compensation for the land seized and that it has to be for a public purpose.

So hypothetically, we have a government that can't pay its bills. How in Creation is it then to pay for land it's going to give away to settle debt, especially because of inflation at that point would mean it would have to pay more than the debt was worth.

Anticipating that you'll say "Well, they'll just get it from the Chinese." Ok, why would the Chinese throw good money after bad and pay out ANOTHER 600 billion to get the other 600 billion they're owed? If it's the land they crave at that point, all they have to do is wait for the fire sale and deal legally with the lawful owners of the property and cents on the dollar.


And what 'public purpose' would be served by just handing it over carte blanche to the Chinese. Never mind the inconvenient fact that the Chinese never demanded a mortgage on the land when they forked over the money for the loans and therefore have no legal collateral to stand upon. They can't legally foreclose on anything!

Why would it go to all this trouble when all it would have to do is default? And if China rattles the saber, what do you suppose we're keeping those nukes for?

See, you folks on the fringe think everyone is stupid, so you have no trouble believing the gorvernment and the Chinese would act just as stupidly. The Chinese, in taking 'collateral' the debtor doesn't legally possess and the Executive and maybe Legislative branches of the U.S. government trying such a hair-brained scheme that the Judicial branch is going to slap down.

And as for the military option, one need only look at how badly the Chinese military is already tied up in places like Tibet, putting down its own insurrections.

There are loons in the country that loathe this administration so much that they are obsessed with these paranoid scenarios giving them what they want the most- legitimacy. So they sit around all day and concoct these diatribes that can so easily be shot down.

I hope they read Glenn Beck's newest book and follow the advice about arguing on the facts.

-Kerry O.


Trillions is the kind of money people start shooting over, take all that babble and flush it down the toilet.

Besides, they dont have to shoot to have war. In war you try to cripple your enemies infrastructure, make supplies unavailable, cause division among the population. China can do all that economically by for example using another currency without ever chambering a round.

The scenario of china calling in our debt is an absolutely real threat.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:21 AM

brewer-

Although the "fair tax" is a better idea than the current system, it is still an unconstitutional tax. (direct taxes must be apportioned) Further, the government is immoral to lay claim to another person's property (income, in this case).


I agree in principle, but still support the fair tax.

Congress doesnt care whether taxes are constitutional, they pretend they are with the support of their kangaroo court.

Operating on that knowledge, we have this idea that will create so much economic growth the corporatocracy just might let it happen. The bill essentially eliminates the IRS, and gets rid of over 50% of the lobbying positions in washington. The prebate provides the lowest cost model I can think of to still give a monthly check to the poor and is a good weaning step towards freedom. Plus the growth will cause federal revenues to rise dramatically and gives a possibility to pay down the debt some.

I think it is possible the current administration could push the people into taking up arms or create a scenario where china or the UN makes a go at occupying us. However I think it is possible to incrementally work back towards freedom as well and I can accept the fair tax for the above reasons.


brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:12 AM




Do we have the right to interfere with their Laws in Iraq?


I don't think we do legally, but that doesn't mean we can't bring sanctions against a country who does such things. But we are talking about a people that live in the ancient past. It maybe a century or two before there is any change in that fundamental practice. The fear of public disgrace is a pathetic inhumane excuse to kill a group of people that in 99% of cases is not violent or worthy of being killed.

I can hardly type this makes me so angry. I don't know how I could ever have any respect for a people or religious institution that would condone such a thing. In fact I can't, and I put the blame squarely on religious interpretations of ancient religion. Oh but homophobes had no involvement in the writings in the bible..


Oh please, you hate homophobes and they hate homos. Whats the difference. Its cool to pick a side and be against something, its lame to pontificate like you are the moral and good one. Its no different than their insistence god is on THEIR side.


Actually I do not hate homophobes, but their ignorance distresses me for sure. There is a huge difference even if I did hate them. But I am sick to death of explaining them to people that it wouldn't bother to take the time to research it on their own. But I would not expect you to have responded in any other way.


Oh and you know me so well, I have been here like a week?

What is ignorant about not liking something? Why does not liking gays make one afraid of them? Why is hating someone for your reason morally better than hating someone for another persons reason?

The OP is talking about lives being taken in the most hideous of ways and all your thinking about is oil independence.. ugh

No I am explaining yet another unintended consequence of being so tied to every country in the world for critical economic things. It makes us impotent abroad to prevent any human rights abuse. I am on your side likely about human rights abuse, but we have to tolerate this because we need the oil. We have to tolerate the opium in afghanistan to have any hope of winning. We have to give china most favored nation trade status while they do unspeakable things because we need their manufacturing.

Im trying to point out that the social and economic are related.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:06 AM





Reconsidering the closing date does not mean it will not close.

We need to be concerned with all the other prison camps that are doing the same thing that Gitmo has done.

It is going to take some time.

Hell Obama has only been in office for 8 months, not long enough to do anything of great magnitude.


he's wrecked the economy...he's takin' over two car companies...and...handed them over to the unions...he's nationlized the banks...he's nationalized student loans...he's on his way to quadrupling the national debt...unemployments reaching 10%...the US currency is worthless...he's trying to take over 20% of the economy with government run healthcare...our allies are in shock...and...our enemies are all in agreement with a forgein policy...thats a fuggin' joke...Regans cry was..." tear down this wall "...Obama's cry is..." tear down this country "...and he does it...every chance he gets...the list goes on and on and on...so I ask...nothing of great magnitude ?...tears


What a bunch of garbage. I don't think you said one true thing the whole rant. You have blamed him for Bush blunders and exxagerated to the point of unbelievablity.

You know you guys could make better selling points if you would be truthful.


Name individually which one of those things are not true. Every one of them is a fact as far as I can tell, you always make one sweeping generality ( like the klan does) and refuse to post any sort of fact to back it up. Its a few keystrokes away on google, If you want to debate you need to provide data.


I only want to debate ligimate information.

There is way too much lies and inaccuracies there to even begin. I would say do your research and come back when you have been better informed. It is not my job to school the fox zombies.


Thats a cop out and everyone can see that. If you could respond you would but I suspect you are actually incapable. Who said anything about a job/ You are the one arguning with me and these "fox zombies" or whatever. If you are going to do it than prove yourself. I dont think you can or you would have by now. Its no harder to do than what you are doing right now if there actually was any substance to your views.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 09:03 AM





Reconsidering the closing date does not mean it will not close.

We need to be concerned with all the other prison camps that are doing the same thing that Gitmo has done.

It is going to take some time.

Hell Obama has only been in office for 8 months, not long enough to do anything of great magnitude.


He is the one who promised to close gitmo in 12 months, now he has flip-flopped.

He was going to end "dont ask dont tell". Nope, not that either after all.

He was going to end the war and bring the troops home. Now not so much. And hes going to start his own war with iran.

He was only going to tax income over 250,000. Now its everyone in the country, forced to buy insurance or get fined/taxed.

Wow, some change..


He went as far as he could with closing gitmo, right? If congress holds him up, that is not his fault.

-----It has nothing to do with congress, he has executive power. Go back and read a middle school level book on how the government works.


Don't ask don't tell? In the military? That is not going to be so easy to do. Complicated issue there.

-----He is the one who promised to do it. It requires one stroke of the pen for the commander in chief, ball point pens are not complicated.


He said the troops would start returning home within 16 months, I think. He has only had 8 months.

------He has already said he is reniging on that promise and is likely sending MORE troops and is starting a NEW WAR with Iran!


Healthcare and Income taxes are two different things, tying them together is not logical.

-------I agree but it is your savior obama who says he is taxing people who make over 250,000 to pay for his health care proposal.

I am noticing a current among obama supporters, you support him and attack all his detractors. Yet you dont even know what his plans are. The ones who do know what he has said and done, the informed electorate, are against him. the ignorant are for him.


I am not sure why I am explaining anything to you though, I believe you have shown you do not like him because he is not white, if I am not mistaken.



You are absolutely mistaken. Not only have I argued at length that the people who oppose obama do not do it only for race, I have mentioned two black men, Thomas Sowell and Herman Cain, who i would vote for in a heartbeat and so would 90% of the people who dont like obama.

Check them out, if you dont start supporting them you are a racist.

http://www.hermancain.com/

http://www.tsowell.com/


Very funny. If all else fails be the mirror huh?

-----------Please explain what that means.

Okay you just believed alot of racially prejudice propaganda tools that lead to demonizing the race in general then? I am trying to remember why had dismissed your rants.

-------------Where have I done that? You know how to operate the quote button so get to it.

Oh I remember you are the one who is using the old and very overly used communist ploy to demonize the president....lol Yea I remember.
And you had bought into a few of the racists greatest hits too.

---------Again, quote it. I posted a detailed and documented explanation of which of obamas ideals are in the communist manifesto.

You do know communism was real right? You do realize it is the second most popular political philosophy on earth and the most popular if you go by number of adherents. This is from the congressional record, look at how many of these goals have happened since 1963:

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Note by Webmaster: The Congressional Record back this far has not be digitized and posted on the Internet.

It will probably be available at your nearest library that is a federal repository. Call them and ask them. Your college library is probably a repository. This is an excellent source of government records. Another source are your Congress Critters. They should be more than happy to help you in this matter. You will find the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto interesting at this point.

Webmaster Forest Glen Durland found the document in the library.

Sources are listed below.

Microfilm: California State University at San Jose Clark Library, Government Floor Phone (408)924-2770 Microfilm Call Number: J 11.R5

Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88th Congress, 1st Session Appendix Pages A1-A2842 Jan. 9-May 7, 1963 Reel 12




It is cool. I just hope noone believes all the propaganda you throw around because it isn't accurate.

This is all my opinion here of course.




Again, I think you need to stop the stereotyping and generalities and document.

I cant seem to get you to understand my respectful request for you to answer my questions or follow the debate, I figre maybe I need to kind of outline it for you or something.

Heres how it should go.

For example:

1) Dragonness makes a statement about a policy

2) (right here is a link where obama repudiated this policy or said he was for it)

-----------

Or you are quoting something another person posted.

1) (quote by other person)

2)Dragonness makes her case by disputing a particular fact or piece of evidence

3) (Here goes the link to the credible source, or a quote from the source or some sort of chart, graph, etc. to document her claims)


-------------





brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:49 AM


Do we have the right to interfere with their Laws in Iraq?


I don't think we do legally, but that doesn't mean we can't bring sanctions against a country who does such things. But we are talking about a people that live in the ancient past. It maybe a century or two before there is any change in that fundamental practice. The fear of public disgrace is a pathetic inhumane excuse to kill a group of people that in 99% of cases is not violent or worthy of being killed.

I can hardly type this makes me so angry. I don't know how I could ever have any respect for a people or religious institution that would condone such a thing. In fact I can't, and I put the blame squarely on religious interpretations of ancient religion. Oh but homophobes had no involvement in the writings in the bible..


Oh please, you hate homophobes and they hate homos. Whats the difference. Its cool to pick a side and be against something, its lame to pontificate like you are the moral and good one. Its no different than their insistence god is on THEIR side.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:48 AM



No human should be discriminated against for sexual orientation as long as it is with consenting adults.

It is an international issue. There should be pressure put on them from all nations to stop the practice.

The middle east is majority Muslim. I see no way the whole middle east can be pressured to do anything, much less change centuries old Laws.


Pressure can still be put on them.


Sure, and then they can raise oil to 400 a bbl and crush us in a week without ever firing a shot.

America has all the oil we need, they just wont let us have it. Same reason they sent our manufacturing overseas. We would never submit to global government while self sufficient. We are the only country in the world except maybe russia, that has everything we need domestic. We dont have to deal with those people and the fact that we do is proof of corruption at the highest level. Everyone knows you want your energy, manufacturing, and military industry to be domestic so no enemy can disrupt your necessities.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:44 AM



Reconsidering the closing date does not mean it will not close.

We need to be concerned with all the other prison camps that are doing the same thing that Gitmo has done.

It is going to take some time.

Hell Obama has only been in office for 8 months, not long enough to do anything of great magnitude.


he's wrecked the economy...he's takin' over two car companies...and...handed them over to the unions...he's nationlized the banks...he's nationalized student loans...he's on his way to quadrupling the national debt...unemployments reaching 10%...the US currency is worthless...he's trying to take over 20% of the economy with government run healthcare...our allies are in shock...and...our enemies are all in agreement with a forgein policy...thats a fuggin' joke...Regans cry was..." tear down this wall "...Obama's cry is..." tear down this country "...and he does it...every chance he gets...the list goes on and on and on...so I ask...nothing of great magnitude ?...tears


What a bunch of garbage. I don't think you said one true thing the whole rant. You have blamed him for Bush blunders and exxagerated to the point of unbelievablity.

You know you guys could make better selling points if you would be truthful.


Name individually which one of those things are not true. Every one of them is a fact as far as I can tell, you always make one sweeping generality ( like the klan does) and refuse to post any sort of fact to back it up. Its a few keystrokes away on google, If you want to debate you need to provide data.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:40 AM



Reconsidering the closing date does not mean it will not close.

We need to be concerned with all the other prison camps that are doing the same thing that Gitmo has done.

It is going to take some time.

Hell Obama has only been in office for 8 months, not long enough to do anything of great magnitude.


He is the one who promised to close gitmo in 12 months, now he has flip-flopped.

He was going to end "dont ask dont tell". Nope, not that either after all.

He was going to end the war and bring the troops home. Now not so much. And hes going to start his own war with iran.

He was only going to tax income over 250,000. Now its everyone in the country, forced to buy insurance or get fined/taxed.

Wow, some change..


He went as far as he could with closing gitmo, right? If congress holds him up, that is not his fault.

-----It has nothing to do with congress, he has executive power. Go back and read a middle school level book on how the government works.


Don't ask don't tell? In the military? That is not going to be so easy to do. Complicated issue there.

-----He is the one who promised to do it. It requires one stroke of the pen for the commander in chief, ball point pens are not complicated.


He said the troops would start returning home within 16 months, I think. He has only had 8 months.

------He has already said he is reniging on that promise and is likely sending MORE troops and is starting a NEW WAR with Iran!


Healthcare and Income taxes are two different things, tying them together is not logical.

-------I agree but it is your savior obama who says he is taxing people who make over 250,000 to pay for his health care proposal.

I am noticing a current among obama supporters, you support him and attack all his detractors. Yet you dont even know what his plans are. The ones who do know what he has said and done, the informed electorate, are against him. the ignorant are for him.


I am not sure why I am explaining anything to you though, I believe you have shown you do not like him because he is not white, if I am not mistaken.



You are absolutely mistaken. Not only have I argued at length that the people who oppose obama do not do it only for race, I have mentioned two black men, Thomas Sowell and Herman Cain, who i would vote for in a heartbeat and so would 90% of the people who dont like obama.

Check them out, if you dont start supporting them you are a racist.

http://www.hermancain.com/

http://www.tsowell.com/

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:29 AM




It's not an all or nothing proposition-- I can honestly point to the fact that it's almost unknown for people in the United States to die of starvation. And where does the money come from to accomplish that? From, as you're fond of saying, the point of a gun, or from a society that recognizes that taxation with representation can accomplish many great things?

So if you're into scratch-n-sniff, you might want to recalibrate your own arguments. 'Cause the rich in Mexico have to live behind their own private little armies, bristling with barrels of guns to protect themselves from the poor.

-Kerry O.

----------------
Brewer said:

Look, if you advocate using armed force to confiscate wealth from your neighbor to accomplish charity we have a fundamental different view. I think charity should be voluntary, not legislated.

Mexico is a socialist country and by fomenting class warfare for political gain for a few decades now their liberals are forced to pay people like me to protect them. Why you want to bring that about here is beyond me.


-----------------
Which, of course, I didn't, but I guess it's always easier to twist someone else's argument and yell 'The British are coming! The British are coming!' than to refute what's been offered.

-Kerry O.


Yes you absolutely did! You advocate taxing people (using armed force to confiscate wealth from your neighbor) in order to give poor people food or health care. I believe it should be voluntary and there is enough caring people to raise money for any cause, and if we get rid of our marxist income tax system we empower them. You do know if we completely got rid of the income tax and just relied on excise taxes, tariffs, etc. we would have the same level of funding as we had in 1997. The government was not exactly small in 1997.


As a follow up on the food pantry deal, remember your earlier quote:

"I can honestly point to the fact that it's almost unknown for people in the United States to die of starvation."
--Kerry O

So I would say relying on private donations works fine, even in these hard times nobody is starving.









brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:21 AM




"Most soup kitchens and homeless shelters are run by private groups from private donations."

They've been running low on food and donations for a couple of years.
Food pantries are almost empty.


When times are bad that always happens it is happening here too. People are being asked for donations but they aren't coming in because people don't have the extra themselves. This is why depending on private donations and funding doesn't work.

Sure that's a good option for those people that don't want to be asked to contribute.. let someone else do it.. but it doesn't work.


Yes, more people are needing help and less people can help. Depending on that, doesn't work.

It's been getting bad for a couple of years now.


I'd say it's been bad here a lot longer, by about 3 to 4 years. Every time I get the local shopper/paper there's requests for donations.


Thats how you raise donations, you advertise, among other things.

It is not that people have a problem being asked to contribute. We are being forced to contribute by a thugocracy. The manner in which they use the money they extort makes the problem worse and destroys all hope of economic security for generations to come.

You cannot frame your argument around the situation we have. It isnt working right now because we have a fundamentally flawed economic, banking, and tax policy. If you can tax your way into funding anything you can do it privately with far less fraud, waste, abuse, corruption, and bureaucracy.

Thats sad you have been reduced to a mentality where you think nothing can be done without one giant governmental "one size fits all" solution.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:14 AM

"Most soup kitchens and homeless shelters are run by private groups from private donations."

They've been running low on food and donations for a couple of years.
Food pantries are almost empty.


Thats what happens when you let a national bank control your economy for the benefit of wealthy hostile foreigners. Now everyone is broke with only the government left to look to for help. That is the grand design, crush us until we submit to globalism.

The 20-50% of peoples income that is stolen by the imperial federal government would go a long way to filling the pantries back up.

-------------



Thomas Jefferson
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The
issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to
whom it properly belongs." — Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President.

Andrew Jackson
"If Congress has the right [it doesn't] to issue paper money [currency], it was given to them to be used by...[the government] and not to be delegated to individuals or corporations" — President Andrew Jackson, Vetoed Bank Bill of 1836

James Madison
"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance." — James Madison

"A great industrial nation is controlled by it's system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world--no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." — President Woodrow Wilson

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:08 AM

the Federal debt isn't all that bad. In terms of absolute dollars it is the biggest its ever been. But as a percentage of our economy its not such a crisis. Our economy is bigger too. When you make more money you can take out a bigger mortgage or finance nicer cars


oops that was BIG




Wait until you see that graph with all the stimulus and health care money in it. It will be vertical.

brewer77's photo
Sat 09/26/09 08:06 AM

Reconsidering the closing date does not mean it will not close.

We need to be concerned with all the other prison camps that are doing the same thing that Gitmo has done.

It is going to take some time.

Hell Obama has only been in office for 8 months, not long enough to do anything of great magnitude.


He is the one who promised to close gitmo in 12 months, now he has flip-flopped.

He was going to end "dont ask dont tell". Nope, not that either after all.

He was going to end the war and bring the troops home. Now not so much. And hes going to start his own war with iran.

He was only going to tax income over 250,000. Now its everyone in the country, forced to buy insurance or get fined/taxed.

Wow, some change..

brewer77's photo
Fri 09/25/09 09:01 PM


Understanding global warming, suitable for age 4 and up:

Take a glass of water and put ice in it so some is coming out the top, but it does not touch the bottom, just like the ice caps.

Let it thaw.

Notice it doesnt overflow...because the ice was already displacing itself in its solid form.

Thats whats so funny about the global warming science, a child can prove its bunk as far as man having anything to do with it, and furthermore it raises crop yields and allows farming farther north. Generally periods of warming increase prosperity, a warming trend ended the dark ages...gee, wonder what factories we warmed the atmosphere back then with?..


I like science.happy

http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/player/environment/global-warming-environment/antarctica-ice.html


I like science that isnt done by people financed by political groups.

brewer77's photo
Fri 09/25/09 08:59 PM

I bee tinkin maybee he done be wanting a spanking? pitchfork


Send some pics and well see..lol...

brewer77's photo
Fri 09/25/09 08:57 PM



Is there some sort of genetic defect in certain people that causes an inability to see taxation as an all or nothing affair?



Is there one that in certain people that makes them so paranoid they constantly imagine IRS agents with guns drawn at their doors waiting to shake them down?

--------Not at all you tool. You know damn well I was making a point about the ultimate result of government utopia is extortion. It just makes you mad because its true.


We are not being indebted by limited and decentralized government as described in the constitution. There is no constitutional authority for the vast majority of what the federal government currently does.



So you say, yet the income tax IS part of the Constitution and the Supreme Court has had ample opportunity to check the other two branches of government in this regard, yet hasn't in the ways you postulate they simply must.

-----------Slavery and prohibition were at one time part of the constitution. Most amendments since the civil war are contrary to the spirit of this country.


We dont want a socialist utopia and a marxist tax structure.

Doesnt mean we dont mind paying for some things, and if your going to tax, do it this way:

www.fairtax.org



Yeah, on paper it looks real nice. But Social Security is the third rail of American politics-- as GWB can now attest, anyone trying to play games with it is committing political suicide. Besides, Social Security taxes are already capped at a certain dollar amount, above which you pay no further tax no matter how much you make. (You did know that, right?)

--------Yeah, thats the cap that obama intends to raise. It is political suicide because of fear politics and special interests. None of that makes it sustainable. It is the worlds biggest ponzi scheme.


Plus, once you add in state sales taxes, state income taxes, property taxes, et al, and account for the money no longer paid by corporations, I'm betting the _real_ flat tax rate would be about what it is now.

-------Who said anything about a flat tax rate? at leas READ the links if your goal is to find the truth and not to feed your ego.


And because the rich have the money to lobby Congress at a level the little guy will never, ever see, how long would it be before the middle class would be doing all the paying and getting nothing back for it?

-Kerry O.

--------The precise point you make here is why we need the fair tax.

www.fairtax.org

With the pre-bate and the consequent economic growth, the poor get a break and the system becomes fair. We eliminate the IRS and the cost of all that apparatus. Over 50% of all lobbyists in washington are for tax code matters. Its why its so long and cumbersome. We eliminate 50% of all lobbyists with one bill. Pretty damn exciting, especially as it gathers steam.

brewer77's photo
Fri 09/25/09 02:49 PM
Apparently all you people were spanked.