Topic:
Ok now I have a question
|
|
Ok, so I'm 42, Steve is 30, we've been together since I was 40. I'm not a cougar or jaguar. So, what am I?
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
Ok now I have a question
|
|
I don't know what the age gap is. But I think any woman who is younger by more than a few years would be considered a cougar. Frankly, I hate that label, I think it's demeaning. Society sees nothing wrong with men dating younger, but if a woman does it, she has some horrific label slapped on her.
|
|
|
|
Ok this is geting off topic. The issue is affordable health care for all. Again wether the mom or dad takes the children to the hospital or feeds them healthy or whatever has nothing to do with health insurance for everyone. So I'll ask again how is it a womans issue like Michelle Obama said it is? I answered this already, but I don't believe Ms. Obama meant it's ONLY a woman's issue but it that it is ALSO a woman's issue. I think, in that particular speech, she was targeting women, trying to get them to see that in her perspective, universal health care is a good thing. I'm sure somewhere, other people have specifically targeted other audiences. ![]() I know but the thread went to who takes the kids to the doctor. Nothing to do with affordable health care for all. Well, while it wasn't completely on point, perhaps, it was about affordable health care being a woman's issue. Which is how the short tangent came about. It really wasn't off-base. Ms. Obama did target an audience and her targeted audience did respond, at least on here. ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Ok this is geting off topic. The issue is affordable health care for all. Again wether the mom or dad takes the children to the hospital or feeds them healthy or whatever has nothing to do with health insurance for everyone. So I'll ask again how is it a womans issue like Michelle Obama said it is? I answered this already, but I don't believe Ms. Obama meant it's ONLY a woman's issue but it that it is ALSO a woman's issue. I think, in that particular speech, she was targeting women, trying to get them to see that in her perspective, universal health care is a good thing. I'm sure somewhere, other people have specifically targeted other audiences. ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
We need to be nice to Eileen
|
|
Oh dang, for a minute, I thought I was going to an auntie again
![]() ![]() ![]() As for your neck ((Ei))) schedule the surgery, just do it. I will come and hold your hand and you can recuperate with Steve and I. He will cook fried turkeys and cobbler and I will make you apple waffles until you're on your feet again ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
CIVIL DIVORCE?
|
|
Well, in most states, divorce is no-fault, it doesn't really matter how he feels about it or whether he wants it or not. He doesn't have to sign. It makes things a little more difficult but you can still file and get a divorce. Just do it, often, that's the catalyst for someone to move on.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Parent or Hanger-On?
|
|
I wonder why the assumption is he's using the kids to show he's a good father? Why is it we don't assume he IS a good father and has nothing to prove at all?
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Parent or Hanger-On?
|
|
I have my girls every weekend. And that's the way I had it put in our divorce settlement. My ex wasn't working at the time an dit was the best arrange ment at the time. We talk about when she started working we would change the placement to hhalf the time. When she started working she doesn't want to do that now. But then she claims I get to do all the fun things with them because I have them on the weekends and she only gets to see them a few hours a day during the week because of school and her work. What does she think I'm gonna do with them on the weekends just stay in the house? She accuses me of trying to spoil them and wanting to get them to like me more than her. I work with her and let her have them on some weekends if she plans something. Then in return I had them more than half the time during the summer. She still doesn't want to go to court to change placement. When I talk to her about the child support that she was still recieving during that time she seems to think she still deserved it even tho she didn't have the girls. Now I see to her it's about the money. So I'm gonna have to go back to court now and get this changed. Like Mr_Music said damned if you do damned if you dont! Sorry for the rant but this topic hits real close to home. I'm sorry you have to go through that. You can change a custody/visitation order without going to court, if both parties agree and you trust each other to live up to your agreement. If not, then court is necessary. It's also necessary for any adjustment in child support. Depending on where you live, there are father's rights attorneys who will help you out with this for little money down and monthly payments. Good luck to you! ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
Parent or Hanger-On?
|
|
I would not accept this custody/visitation arrangement because it would deprive me of weekends with my children. Every other weekend would be more reasonable.
Now, wait just a damn minute! If you were in this woman's position, you would have your kids for 4-1/2 days every week, as well as half of the holidays. The father would have his children 2-1/2 days every other week, and also half of the holidays. You would already be having the kids for an extra two full days every single week, and 4-1/2 days extra every other week -- days that their father would NOT have them -- and you'd still demand that you believe you're entitled to more time?? Again, it boils down to "damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't". He'd get b!tched at for not taking his kids, but he still gets b!tched at because he'd allegedly be having them for "too much of the time". Make a decision already! I agree with you here. Just because it's "traditional" that woman have primary custody, doesn't mean it's right. Fathers have every right to have as much time with their kids as the moms. Sometimes they don't want to or can't but that should be an individual decision. My ex and I share custody 50/50, every other week, we split holidays and summers equally. If one has something going on, the other will take our son, no questions asked. We also split his expenses 50/50 and there's no child support. I realize this is an anomaly. We don't always like each other or get along but we made the decision to be parents and it's our responsibility to put aside our own personal feelings and do what's best for our child, regardless. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Parent or Hanger-On?
|
|
Wow,This womon needs to chill.I would bet if he wasn't telling her what the plans were,She would realy be pi$$ed. I doubt it, she cannot stand the sight of him nor his voice..... (her words).Without getting into it too deeply, she has a new partner who does not believe she is over her ex, his constant phone calls are causing arguments between her and her new partner, especially now that this new guy knows her ex took three years to move out when they were going through the divorce. My ganache for my rum truffles is ready,I'm going to make a mess in the kitchen. See you all later. Toodle pip. ![]() ![]() Now I see where she is coming from somewhat.It is horrable when you can't stand the sight or voice of someone.I totaly agree with (sv) last post. ![]() Well, she married him and had kids with him, she's stuck with him. Those were her choices and she needs to deal with the consequences. As for her new beau, sounds to me like he's causing as much trouble as she is. If he can't deal, he needs to go. And, sometimes what others see is closer to the truth than what we'd like to believe about ourselves. She let him stay for 3 years? And answers her phone every time? Sounds to me as if he may just have a point. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Parent or Hanger-On?
|
|
The only thing I have a possible issue with is taking them on his dates, unless he's been with the same woman for a good while. Frankly, it's not going to be too long when his kids would rather spend their time with their friends than with mom and dad so they should take what they can get now.
As for your friend, she can always not answer her phone. I'd bet at one point, she complained that she didn't know what was going on with the kids and now he's making a point of keeping her informed. Sounds to me like she has a control problem going on. |
|
|
|
Kristy, those pics are awesome, glad you had a good time! I am sooooooooo looking forward to our cruise next September, it'll be my third and I have nothing but good memories
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
Cell Phones and bathrooms
|
|
I hear that a lot. And I'm thinking, ewwwww, as well. Seriously, you can't wait to answer your phone til you're done? That's what I do. Or I wait until I'm off the phone before I go in. Unless someone's dead or dying, there's nothing that important that it can't wait.
Though, years ago I had a boss who dictated EVERYTHING into a dictaphone, whenever the thought crossed his mind. I had MANY tapes to transcribe where he was eating, drinking and in the bathroom. Despite many requests to please stop, he wouldn't. I finally just started transcribing every sound I heard (burp, slurp, flush, farts, you name it). He got my point. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I'm not sure where the racist stuff came in, so I won't comment there. But, I don't think that making a call out to women is considered sexist, nor do I think that if you're opposed to health care reform you would be considered sexist. My take is that women are TRADITIONALLY primarily responsible for this aspect of family life so therefore Ms. Obama wrote a speech appealing to that particular audience. It's basic communications 101 in college (or high school), you write your speech for your intended audience. She, at that moment, was appealing to women and why, in her belief, they should be advocating health care reform.
This isn't an issue of men against women, black against white, Democrat vs Republican etc. It's an issue that affects EVERYONE one way or the other. We should start looking at the issues unemotionally and try to figure out a solution that is workable for the majority of the people most of the time. It is never going to be perfect for everyone all of the time, life just doesn't play out that way. My personal opinion on health care reform: it's long overdue and it's coming whether we like it or not. As to the shape it's taking now, there are many many aspects I don't necessarily agree with, mostly, I don't believe that the government has a clue on how to run something this large and complex. There should be some sort of government-funded program where everyone can get free quality healthcare 24/7/365 if they don't have access to a private policy. Private policies should be affordable for both individuals and businesses that provide it. If you or your business opts to keep a private policy in place, you should get some form of tax credit to offset the difference between the government policy and private policy. Tort reform is ABSOLUTELY necessary. The rub comes in as to how to pay for it. Taxes will, of course, go up, but how to do this somewhat equitably? My thought is a federal sales tax. One cent of every dollar spent goes to pay for (and is dedicated SOLELY to) healthcare. Only the poorest of the poor will feel the affect of that. Most of us will never notice the difference, except for in very large purchases. Just my thoughts on this early Saturday morning. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() I had a problem with mine too. I tried to hook it up to my emachine. Can you see the problem? ![]() ![]() ![]() Umm, yeah, probably didn't work out too well ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
No, we were having a problem with the security setup because comcast changed my user name and password without letting me know. We got that straightened out but the person at Comcast (as usual) just didn't have a clue. Steve actually finally figured things out on his own.
|
|
|