Community > Posts By > sexysweeti

 
sexysweeti's photo
Mon 07/14/08 11:46 AM
The answer to the question is yes, Bush and Co. are evil. To send our soldiers to die for oil and kill all those innocent iraqi's was evil.

Israel also thinks they can just take what they want and I think the Israel government is evil as well.


North Korea was part of the evil of axis until Bush decided to use Clintons plan which he rejected when he took office and try to look like he had accomplished something before he left office. So I have an idea for Cuba...Start building nuclear plants and Bush will drop sanctions. It is all about what is in Bush's and Israel's self-serving interest. Bush wanted to be a legend. He will get the legency he deserves, the worst, criminal president in history.




sexysweeti's photo
Sun 07/13/08 06:02 PM


I believe the high prices of oil is in a large part due to speculation and hedge funds.

Friday, May 23rd, 2008


Cashing in on Commodities: What’s Driving the Oil Bull, How Much Further It Will Go, and How Investors Can Profit
Editor’s Note: This is the second installment of a new Money Morning series highlighting investment opportunities created by the global bull market in commodities.

By Jason Simpkins
Associate Editor
Exactly 12 months ago, West Texas Intermediate crude oil was trading at just under $63 a barrel.

Yesterday (Thursday) futures prices for that benchmark grade of crude oil hit the latest in a succession of record highs, punching through the $135-a-barrel mark on the New York Mercantile Exchange, before sliding back.

In other words, in only a single year, crude-oil prices have more than doubled, soaring 115% - and setting 27 separate new records along the way. And while a short-term correction may be in the offing - especially with fears of a U.S. recession ebbing - the reality is that oil prices are nowhere near the end of their run, meaning the United States is really an economic system that’s at the crossroads

Sorry I don't have the link for that you will have to verify it youself. The point is that

"in only a single year, crude-oil prices have more than doubled, soaring 115% - and setting 27 separate new records along the way"

Source Wikepedia

Institutional investors are organisations which pool large sums of money and invest those sums in companies. They include banks, insurance companies, retirement or pension funds, hedge funds and mutual funds. Their role in the economy is to act as highly specialised investors on behalf of others. For instance, an ordinary person will have a pension from his employer. The employer gives that person's pension contributions to a fund. The fund will buy shares in a company, or some other financial product. Funds are useful because they will hold a broad portfolio of investments in many companies. This spreads risk, so if one company fails, it will be only a small part of the whole fund's investment. Institutional investors will have a lot of influence in the management of corporations because they will be entitled to exercise the voting rights in a company. They can engage in active role in corporate governance. Furthermore, because institutional investors have the freedom to buy and sell shares, they can play a large part in which companies stay solvent, and which go under. Influencing the conduct of listed companies, and providing them with capital are all part of the job of investment management.
-----------------------------------------


http://seekingalpha.com/article/80484-oil-price-rise-demand-supply-speculation


Hiding as commercial accounts, thru a Commodity Futures Trading Commission exemption to avoid speculative position limits, these institutional-investors use commodities index-futures to hold positions in oil. But not as traditional buyers of oil would, but as financial speculations. This feeds the demand side, without ever, actually demanding oil. Eighty two percent (82%) of WTI futures [net increase from 01/01/03 to 03/12/08] was purchased by institutional-investors [Testimony of Michael Masters before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, p.3, May 20, 2008
----------------------------------------------

Still, there might be hope for us because as we speak they are being exposed, this is a short summary of the hearing held on June 3 2008

http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=cong_test





Thank you for bringing this out...I tried to raise this on another post but no one responded.

This is all part of the global Kabaal we're in... it's like cutting our nose to spite our face.

Every time I hear a politician say "it's gonna be a boon" for..., I want to scream "it's gonna cost us more than what it's worth!!!!"




I was thinking more about the wealthy and investors in big corporations using their free money Bush gave them in tax cuts to invest "Hiding as commercial accounts, thru a Commodity Futures Trading Commission exemption to avoid speculative position limits, these institutional-investors use commodities index-futures to hold positions in oil." . Because jobs sure weren't created with it.

sexysweeti's photo
Sun 07/13/08 02:20 PM
I believe the high prices of oil is in a large part due to speculation and hedge funds.

Friday, May 23rd, 2008


Cashing in on Commodities: What’s Driving the Oil Bull, How Much Further It Will Go, and How Investors Can Profit
Editor’s Note: This is the second installment of a new Money Morning series highlighting investment opportunities created by the global bull market in commodities.

By Jason Simpkins
Associate Editor
Exactly 12 months ago, West Texas Intermediate crude oil was trading at just under $63 a barrel.

Yesterday (Thursday) futures prices for that benchmark grade of crude oil hit the latest in a succession of record highs, punching through the $135-a-barrel mark on the New York Mercantile Exchange, before sliding back.

In other words, in only a single year, crude-oil prices have more than doubled, soaring 115% - and setting 27 separate new records along the way. And while a short-term correction may be in the offing - especially with fears of a U.S. recession ebbing - the reality is that oil prices are nowhere near the end of their run, meaning the United States is really an economic system that’s at the crossroads

Sorry I don't have the link for that you will have to verify it youself. The point is that

"in only a single year, crude-oil prices have more than doubled, soaring 115% - and setting 27 separate new records along the way"

Source Wikepedia

Institutional investors are organisations which pool large sums of money and invest those sums in companies. They include banks, insurance companies, retirement or pension funds, hedge funds and mutual funds. Their role in the economy is to act as highly specialised investors on behalf of others. For instance, an ordinary person will have a pension from his employer. The employer gives that person's pension contributions to a fund. The fund will buy shares in a company, or some other financial product. Funds are useful because they will hold a broad portfolio of investments in many companies. This spreads risk, so if one company fails, it will be only a small part of the whole fund's investment. Institutional investors will have a lot of influence in the management of corporations because they will be entitled to exercise the voting rights in a company. They can engage in active role in corporate governance. Furthermore, because institutional investors have the freedom to buy and sell shares, they can play a large part in which companies stay solvent, and which go under. Influencing the conduct of listed companies, and providing them with capital are all part of the job of investment management.
-----------------------------------------


http://seekingalpha.com/article/80484-oil-price-rise-demand-supply-speculation


Hiding as commercial accounts, thru a Commodity Futures Trading Commission exemption to avoid speculative position limits, these institutional-investors use commodities index-futures to hold positions in oil. But not as traditional buyers of oil would, but as financial speculations. This feeds the demand side, without ever, actually demanding oil. Eighty two percent (82%) of WTI futures [net increase from 01/01/03 to 03/12/08] was purchased by institutional-investors [Testimony of Michael Masters before the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, p.3, May 20, 2008
----------------------------------------------

Still, there might be hope for us because as we speak they are being exposed, this is a short summary of the hearing held on June 3 2008

http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=cong_test



sexysweeti's photo
Sat 07/12/08 11:20 AM

Ahhhhhhh, the return of voodoo economics/Reaganomics ahhhhhhh


Look in the hedges, you will find the money there.

sexysweeti's photo
Sat 07/12/08 10:54 AM


Vote Obama!drinker

Zero corporate ties or influence!

Of course since you've researched his campaign, you already know that.
Right?huh



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fanta.....Fanta..... Why do you keep posting false statements. So Obama has zero corporate ties!!!!!:laughing:

What's with you? How come your thinking is so screwed? think

Let us get to the matter of Obama's corporate contributors and ties.

First there is Exelon, his largest contributor, shelling out $160,000 to Obama's campaign!

Let us not forget Rezko, his slum landlord patron! This tells us everything we want to know about Obama. How can anyone accept money from a slum landlord, particularly when there are so many black people who are forced to live in substandard houses/apartments. But why should Barack care about poor people whether they are black or white! Rezko not only gave him money but a great deal on the property adjacent to his home. Families are losing their houses and Obama gets a sweetheart deal of a mortgage. tears

Then there is Boeing! Come fly with me! Obama is sure flying high with Boeing's big contribution!

Of course, we do not want to forget Commonwealth Edson! Wow!

You are familiar with Goldman Sachs, another big corporate contributor to Barack!

Also, we have York Capital Management handing out cash to the man who would be president!

So, how come you claim Obama has no corporate ties? Bull**** .... these corporations are coming to Barack with money in their hands and Obama is drooling over it. drool


Obama doesn't have zero lobbyist ties but I don't think McCain wants to touch that hot topic. Obama is going up against some powerful and influential lobbying groups. That is why McSleeze told the AIPAC that Obama would endanger Israel and appeasement does not work....which I'm sure he meant intelligent, rational, thought out plans and diplomacy with our allies do not work.
It only took Bush 7 1/2 years to learn a little diplomacy, probably because he wanted to leave office believing he had accomplished something with North Korea. But he will still be a sideline cheerleader for control of the MiddleEast. No matter how much their policies have failed and damaged America, McSame is clinging to them because that is his only hope. I can't believe anyone could not see how they have damaged America and still believe in their failed policies. Not only is our economy a mess but why must our soldiers keep dying to protect Israel? It is time to say goodbye to the neo-cons.


"NO LOBBY IS FEARED MORE or catered to by politicians than the Jewish Lobby. If a politician does not play ball with the Jewish Lobby, he will not get elected, or re-elected, and he will either be smeared or ignored by the Jewish-owned major media.

All Jewish lobbies and organizations are interconnected and there are hundreds upon hundreds of them. The leaders of the numerous Jewish Lobby Groups go to the same synagogues, country clubs, and share the same Jewish investment bankers. And this inter-connectedness extends to the Jews who run the Federal Reserve Bank, US Homeland Security, and the US State Department.

In other words, “Jews stick together.” Americans must know how extremely powerful the Jewish Lobby is and how it operates to undermine America’s interests both at home and abroad. At home - by corrupting America’s political system, and abroad - by dictating American Foreign Policy against America’s best interests.

Here is a list of the major Jewish Lobby Groups & how they work:

American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC): AIPAC has a staff of over 150 employees and an annual budget of over $60 million Here derived from private contributions from wealthy Jews and Jewish-owned businesses. In other words, “money corrupts & Jewish money corrupts the American political system absolutely.”

~ AIPAC has many “PACS” attached to their Lobby. PACS are “Public Action Committees,” sanctioned by Federal Law, that give huge donations to political candidates. PACS are the means by which AIPAC and all Jewish lobbies utilize the immense wealth of Jewry to bribe US politicians. AIPAC is currently lobbying for the US to attack Iran Here & Here. AIPAC’s Executive Director is the powerful Anti-Christian Jew, Howard Kohr."

AIPAC do not endorse a canidate but to put it mildly the AIPAC have definitely tilted to the right in recent years.

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=231


The facts of Jewish Media control....

http://www.libreopinion.com/members/standarteslc/jewishquestion03.html

And still there are Jewish Liberals who are frustrated at the US policy in a pro-Israel direction often against the US National interest.

"The genesis of this is really the frustration on the part of a very substantial portion of the American Jewish community that despite the fact that there is broad support for a peace-oriented policy in the Middle East, there doesn't seem to be the political will to actually carry it out," Ben-Ami said. "We have not been effective at transmitting the message that there is political support for these positions in the American Jewish community and their allies."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/14/AR2008041402647.html



sexysweeti's photo
Sat 07/12/08 09:00 AM

the big O

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

O-ba-ma smokin

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 06:54 PM


why don't the republican party just say. after eight years we started two wars, we have almost single handily. wipe out the middle class. we have giving tax breaks to all our rich freinds.that would work. hell there go to lose the white and the senate anyway,


I think Sen. John McCain should offer a public apology for what the Republican Party has done to this country for the past 7 years.

Then run as an Independent.

'My friends, I'm embarrassed at what the Bush
Administration has been doing to this country and can't be a
part of it any more.'

'I'm leaving the Republican Party and running as an
Independent to make a real difference and improve the lives
of poor and middle class working families.'

He could then pick Ron Paul as his running mate.

If he did that, his chances would improve.


John McSame could never stand up against the Zionist lobbyist and media who want to bomb, bomb, bomb....bomb, bomb Iran

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 05:21 PM



WASHINGTON — National Republican leaders will unveil a Web site Friday that they hope will encourage grassroots participation in the shaping of the party's 2008 platform.

Republican leaders say they believe the site, www.gopplatform2008.com, will create an online community allowing anyone with access to a computer to offer ideas, to comment on others' ideas, and even to submit videos explaining their views.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6485676

Im going to go register!
This might be fun!!!laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh


Fanta,

From the second link you listed:

'What the site certainly will generate for the Republican
National Committee is a ready-to-go database of contact
names for future fund-raising.'

Do you really want to get on their spam list and have them call you up for money?


I'll be invisible to them!
I'll be Osama!!laugh laugh laugh laugh
You can be Laden!
Im telling you it cant fail!noway noway


I will be binforgotten :smile:

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 04:40 PM

The bill has existed since 1978 though.
I see no more reason to be paranoid or make a big deal about it just because the Senate renewed it!

Bush already got caught breaking this law once. Surely the telecom companies wont take the chance of being granted immunity for helping him break it again!

I dont think the law will be as generous to them a second time!


Why not? They were too big and important to touch. I found Chris Dodd's speach on the Senate Floor on Fisa to be quite interesting. He says now we will never know if the president broke the law because it will never have it's day in court.

http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/4476

http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/4476

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 03:39 PM





Here's how the Senate voted on 'a bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes.'

http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-they-voted-on-fisa.html

This basically immunizes telecom companies from lawsuits and give warrantless eavesdropping privileges to the President, which is just what Bush Jr. wanted.

Here's how the Presidential candidates voted:

Obama: Yea
Clinton: Nay
McCain: Did not vote.

I'm not going to speculate at this time as to why McCain was absent for this important vote.

I am disappointed that Barack Obama and other Democrats caved in to the President.

I'm with Hillary on this one.


you got your info from a blog. i do not use blogs as credible sources. Obama did not vote on Fisa, however he did vote yea on the amendment to FISA that would have held the telecommunications companies accountable and answered the question of the legality of Bush's actions.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00019


The FISA vote was going to pass wheather Obama voted against it or not. Republicans would have used it against him to make him look weak on terrorism and put fear in people. After all the time spent on compromise???, how can the layman have any idea what is behind it, when the majority of the Senators are not priveledged to classified information from Bush??? I'm speculating that McCain is one of the priveledged Senators who does have access to the classified info on FISA. It is ridiculous and I think what angers me most is our Senator's will not all come together and demand to know, and they all failed.


So, essentially Obama was duped because he was an uninformed, new to the job, junior Senator who feared Republican attack dogs in the media because they have done so many damaging attacks thus far? huh?


If you are really interested read this article from Washington Post, it is the same plan of attack as usual.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/29/AR2008062901878.html


You said it, not I. If you got a problem with it I suggest you should have clarified your original statement. You did a far better job painting Obama as a clueless Senator with little power and easy to be duped than I ever could have.


Karl Rove don't you have more important places to be? laugh You must have read the article. laugh

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 02:59 PM




This man,

Gramm, whose extensive ties to Enron proved problematic during the firm's implosion several years ago, was serving as a lobbyist for the international banking and subprime mortgage giant UBS until April. As Mother Jones documented, Gramm played a key role in the subprime meltdown during his time in the Senate.


Is John McCains economic advisor, and will probably be his Sec of Treasury if elected!



Do you really think McCain who swore off lobbyist and who claims the high ground of conducting a "respectful" campaign would actually make Gramm his Sec of Treasury? :wink:
ALL I know for sure is that lobbyist are not working for nothing and they're not working in our interest. How many Federal lobbyist does McCain have working in his campaign. Isn't it like 59?

"Gramm who called Americans "a Nation of Whiners") was a lobbyist for a foreign bank during the same time he served as an advisor to John McCain. He also had a hand in the mortgage meltdown, and crafted McCain's response to the mortgage crisis: screwing borrowers to save lenders."


Its all mental.......
Its in your mind....
Watch Fox and repeat after me.

Gas is not $4.00 a gal.
Jobs have not disappeared.
Food, ahhh food is cheap!
Fanny mae and Freddie Mac are not $11 billion dollars in the hole.
Pay is up, and employment opportunities are vast!

Vote for me Mr. McConfused!


frustrated huh :laughing: what oops shocked scared rofl


I think McConfused might be a better description than McSame, he really is different than Bush....Really he is. laugh I feel for him, embarassed he needs to be napping, not flipflopping around like a whale out of water.

He was truly transformed when he gave Bush that big ole hug at the revival I mean the republican convention. devil He wants to give us the CHANGE WE DESERVE, that could be a sign that the slogan he tried to imitate came from an anti-depressant ad. Whoa! We will all need them anti-depressants if he is elected, but what does that matter to the rich who run this once great country of ours? sad

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 01:19 PM

This man,

Gramm, whose extensive ties to Enron proved problematic during the firm's implosion several years ago, was serving as a lobbyist for the international banking and subprime mortgage giant UBS until April. As Mother Jones documented, Gramm played a key role in the subprime meltdown during his time in the Senate.


Is John McCains economic advisor, and will probably be his Sec of Treasury if elected!



Do you really think McCain who swore off lobbyist and who claims the high ground of conducting a "respectful" campaign would actually make Gramm his Sec of Treasury? :wink:
ALL I know for sure is that lobbyist are not working for nothing and they're not working in our interest. How many Federal lobbyist does McCain have working in his campaign. Isn't it like 59?

"Gramm who called Americans "a Nation of Whiners") was a lobbyist for a foreign bank during the same time he served as an advisor to John McCain. He also had a hand in the mortgage meltdown, and crafted McCain's response to the mortgage crisis: screwing borrowers to save lenders."

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 12:34 PM



Here's how the Senate voted on 'a bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes.'

http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-they-voted-on-fisa.html

This basically immunizes telecom companies from lawsuits and give warrantless eavesdropping privileges to the President, which is just what Bush Jr. wanted.

Here's how the Presidential candidates voted:

Obama: Yea
Clinton: Nay
McCain: Did not vote.

I'm not going to speculate at this time as to why McCain was absent for this important vote.

I am disappointed that Barack Obama and other Democrats caved in to the President.

I'm with Hillary on this one.


you got your info from a blog. i do not use blogs as credible sources. Obama did not vote on Fisa, however he did vote yea on the amendment to FISA that would have held the telecommunications companies accountable and answered the question of the legality of Bush's actions.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00019


The FISA vote was going to pass wheather Obama voted against it or not. Republicans would have used it against him to make him look weak on terrorism and put fear in people. After all the time spent on compromise???, how can the layman have any idea what is behind it, when the majority of the Senators are not priveledged to classified information from Bush??? I'm speculating that McCain is one of the priveledged Senators who does have access to the classified info on FISA. It is ridiculous and I think what angers me most is our Senator's will not all come together and demand to know, and they all failed.


So, essentially Obama was duped because he was an uninformed, new to the job, junior Senator who feared Republican attack dogs in the media because they have done so many damaging attacks thus far? huh?


If you are really interested read this article from Washington Post, it is the same plan of attack as usual.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/29/AR2008062901878.html

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 07/11/08 11:54 AM

Here's how the Senate voted on 'a bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes.'

http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-they-voted-on-fisa.html

This basically immunizes telecom companies from lawsuits and give warrantless eavesdropping privileges to the President, which is just what Bush Jr. wanted.

Here's how the Presidential candidates voted:

Obama: Yea
Clinton: Nay
McCain: Did not vote.

I'm not going to speculate at this time as to why McCain was absent for this important vote.

I am disappointed that Barack Obama and other Democrats caved in to the President.

I'm with Hillary on this one.


you got your info from a blog. i do not use blogs as credible sources. Obama did not vote on Fisa, however he did vote yea on the amendment to FISA that would have held the telecommunications companies accountable and answered the question of the legality of Bush's actions.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00019


The FISA vote was going to pass wheather Obama voted against it or not. Republicans would have used it against him to make him look weak on terrorism and put fear in people. After all the time spent on compromise???, how can the layman have any idea what is behind it, when the majority of the Senators are not priveledged to classified information from Bush??? I'm speculating that McCain is one of the priveledged Senators who does have access to the classified info on FISA. It is ridiculous and I think what angers me most is our Senator's will not all come together and demand to know, and they all failed.

sexysweeti's photo
Sat 07/14/07 11:34 AM
But don't forget it does take passion to love...and don't ever feel guilty for not feeling what you don't feel and don't ever think that love can be forced from anyone cos if you have to force it, it is not love. I don't know your situation...all I know is that the need for love is a great passion and will indeed make sex more fulfilling.

sexysweeti's photo
Sat 07/14/07 11:00 AM
yeah, passionate sex is nice...but if you do happen to attract like two magnets that damn passion will drive you crazy when it rebels against reason and even intuition. Plus there is no gaurantee that the chemistry for great passion will be there...and I think I might just feel empty. I hope I don't sound too negative...I am more like Cinde****arella..."I want the fairy tale." ohwell

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 06/29/07 04:30 PM
Hi Wildflower, I don't know you by name...my name is Brenda. And I am very surprised to here that you are in China. It is good to hear that China is a peaceful country.


I think for financial reasons, we need to stabalize Iraq and be paid back for the war. Because I do think if we leave, other countries are going to be in there for the oil. Even if they don't agree with the dominance of America. I don't agree with it either. So then the other countries would feel obligated to help stabalize and would have financial interest, or maybe not.
Wasn't it Alphganastan that fought and fought and fought, until Russia retreated. They never stop fighting.

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 06/29/07 04:11 PM
Hi Andrea, I never wanted to think this way...I just wanted our young men out of there. But I think we will be a bankrupt country if we leave.
Maybe China would go in and become the superpower.
We would be owned by China. I have been hearing that they are going to be the next superpower for quite sometime. I hate predicting things like this.

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 06/29/07 03:59 PM
Oceans if we left Iraq what do you think the other countries would do? Would they then go in for the oil?

sexysweeti's photo
Fri 06/29/07 02:07 PM
"The main feature of a friend is its ability to disappoint." Pierre Desproges.



Having the head uppercuted, opening up the lips to be the taste of blood, break the nose against all doors of the universe. Agree.

Having the hoses out of the stomach, felt the claws of vultures arisen to their highest, suppress nausea to vomit of grief. Agree.

Having the heart scratched, swallow the broken glass of most major disappointments, to piss fluid and howl in a desert without echo. Agree

Monitor constantly the end of the horizon and the massive herds which arise from it. Agree.

Being prepared to the assailance of the rain who fall from heaven as rocks to maim. Agree.

Digest the blades abruptly cropped from the earth for we tear up the way. Agree.

Learn how the attacks of in the shade can be violent when they crush you by rear. Agree.

Agree to all fires, all hell and all the tests.
Agree to always recover, the more quickly as possible and the better.
Agree to smile again and really, to continue advancing, ignore the fear and not let the courage trickles among the pavement.

But die by hands and mouths that were so beloved no thank you. Feel the venom in the eyes known by heart flying... No thank you. Test the empty at present even where stretched the hand in balance won... No thank you.