Previous 1 3
Topic: FISA Legislation
mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 08:16 PM
Here's how the Senate voted on 'a bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes.'

http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-they-voted-on-fisa.html

This basically immunizes telecom companies from lawsuits and give warrantless eavesdropping privileges to the President, which is just what Bush Jr. wanted.

Here's how the Presidential candidates voted:

Obama: Yea
Clinton: Nay
McCain: Did not vote.

I'm not going to speculate at this time as to why McCain was absent for this important vote.

I am disappointed that Barack Obama and other Democrats caved in to the President.

I'm with Hillary on this one.

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 08:26 PM
(crickets chirping)

I guess no one cares about the government spying on you.

frustrated

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 08:39 PM
I cant find out what is contained in the bill.
They said 70 of the senators weren't even told. (top secret)
Supposedly they voted in the blind.
All I can find is the part about the amnesty for the telecom companies.
I didn't spend a lot of time looking, but I suspect there was a deal cut so the Dems could get something they wanted!

I' was going to look more later and didn't want to comment before then!
Does anyone know what was in the bill?
I mean the specifics. I know it was about surveillance, but what are the rules?

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 08:55 PM

I cant find out what is contained in the bill.
They said 70 of the senators weren't even told. (top secret)
Supposedly they voted in the blind.
All I can find is the part about the amnesty for the telecom companies.
I didn't spend a lot of time looking, but I suspect there was a deal cut so the Dems could get something they wanted!

I' was going to look more later and didn't want to comment before then!
Does anyone know what was in the bill?
I mean the specifics. I know it was about surveillance, but what are the rules?


I'll probably still vote for Obama, because, look at the alternative.

But I was disappointed he voted with the other Democrats on this.

Hillary voted against it.

I think the Dems caved in to the President on this one.

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:05 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Thu 07/10/08 09:07 PM


I cant find out what is contained in the bill.
They said 70 of the senators weren't even told. (top secret)
Supposedly they voted in the blind.
All I can find is the part about the amnesty for the telecom companies.
I didn't spend a lot of time looking, but I suspect there was a deal cut so the Dems could get something they wanted!

I' was going to look more later and didn't want to comment before then!
Does anyone know what was in the bill?
I mean the specifics. I know it was about surveillance, but what are the rules?


I'll probably still vote for Obama, because, look at the alternative.

But I was disappointed he voted with the other Democrats on this.

Hillary voted against it.

I think the Dems caved in to the President on this one.


I dont think it gives as broad authorization as the illegal wire tapping Bush was allowing, but I cant find what it allows or doesn't allow!

Do you? Do you know the specifics?
They said it was a blind vote. I dont think they should have allowed it to be that way, but like I said I think there was some kind of deal cut between the parties!
From what I read it gives the telecom companies immunity for past violations, and they had heated debates over some of the rules, but that's all I can find!
There weren't many who voted nay though!
What can you do? I'm still voting for Obama too. I'm disappointed but what can you do?

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:21 PM



I cant find out what is contained in the bill.
They said 70 of the senators weren't even told. (top secret)
Supposedly they voted in the blind.
All I can find is the part about the amnesty for the telecom companies.
I didn't spend a lot of time looking, but I suspect there was a deal cut so the Dems could get something they wanted!

I' was going to look more later and didn't want to comment before then!
Does anyone know what was in the bill?
I mean the specifics. I know it was about surveillance, but what are the rules?


I'll probably still vote for Obama, because, look at the alternative.

But I was disappointed he voted with the other Democrats on this.

Hillary voted against it.

I think the Dems caved in to the President on this one.


I dont think it gives as broad authorization as the illegal wire tapping Bush was allowing, but I cant find what it allows or doesn't allow!

Do you? Do you know the specifics?
They said it was a blind vote. I dont think they should have allowed it to be that way, but like I said I think there was some kind of deal cut between the parties!
From what I read it gives the telecom companies immunity for past violations, and they had heated debates over some of the rules, but that's all I can find!
There weren't many who voted nay though!
What can you do? I'm still voting for Obama too. I'm disappointed but what can you do?


I don't know the specifics, and of course they cut some kind of deal, but cutting a deal where the President gets most of what he wanted anyway stinks to high heaven to me!

In my opinion, they capitulated.

Why didn't Hillary vote for it, if it's such a great deal?

I think it just keeps the door open for the telecom companies and the President to spy on anyone they damn please.

no photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:22 PM
clinton...presidential candidate?????

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:23 PM

clinton...presidential candidate?????


OK. My bad.

FORMER Presidential candidate.

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:26 PM
Edited by mnhiker on Thu 07/10/08 09:28 PM




I cant find out what is contained in the bill.
They said 70 of the senators weren't even told. (top secret)
Supposedly they voted in the blind.
All I can find is the part about the amnesty for the telecom companies.
I didn't spend a lot of time looking, but I suspect there was a deal cut so the Dems could get something they wanted!

I' was going to look more later and didn't want to comment before then!
Does anyone know what was in the bill?
I mean the specifics. I know it was about surveillance, but what are the rules?


I'll probably still vote for Obama, because, look at the alternative.

But I was disappointed he voted with the other Democrats on this.

Hillary voted against it.

I think the Dems caved in to the President on this one.


I dont think it gives as broad authorization as the illegal wire tapping Bush was allowing, but I cant find what it allows or doesn't allow!

Do you? Do you know the specifics?
They said it was a blind vote. I dont think they should have allowed it to be that way, but like I said I think there was some kind of deal cut between the parties!
From what I read it gives the telecom companies immunity for past violations, and they had heated debates over some of the rules, but that's all I can find!
There weren't many who voted nay though!
What can you do? I'm still voting for Obama too. I'm disappointed but what can you do?


I don't know the specifics, and of course they cut some kind of deal, but cutting a deal where the President gets most of what he wanted anyway stinks to high heaven to me!

In my opinion, they capitulated.

Why didn't Hillary vote for it, if it's such a great deal?

I think it just keeps the door open for the telecom companies and the President to spy on anyone they damn please.


Fanta,

Here's more information:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080711/ap_on_go_pr_wh/terrorist_surveillance

'Its passage was a major victory for Bush, an unpopular
lame-duck president who nevertheless has been able to
prevail over Congress on most issues of national security
and intelligence disputes.'

explode explode explode explode explode explode
frustrated frustrated frustrated frustrated frustrated frustrated


Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:34 PM
At least there are rules on it now. He was doing it without anyone's knowledge until he got busted!

Still Id like to know what the rules are!
I do think some wiretapping is necessary, but with rules and closely monitored!

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:37 PM
Ive read that. It tells nothing about what the rules are.
I think just the fact that there are rules now signifys a defeat for Bush!
He didnt want any rules!

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:42 PM

At least there are rules on it now. He was doing it without anyone's knowledge until he got busted!

Still Id like to know what the rules are!
I do think some wiretapping is necessary, but with rules and closely monitored!


Here's what's contained in H.R. 6304:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6304

Excerpts:

‘(3) may not intentionally target a United States person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States;

What about unintentionally targeting?

‘(4) may not intentionally acquire any communication as to which the sender and all intended recipients are known at the time of the acquisition to be located in the United States...'

Ditto.

‘(i) there are procedures in place that have been approved, have been submitted for approval, or will be submitted with the certification for approval by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that are reasonably designed to--

‘(I) ensure that an acquisition authorized under subsection (a) is limited to targeting persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States; and

‘(II) prevent the intentional acquisition of any communication as to which the sender and all intended recipients are known at the time of the acquisition to be located in the United States;

So if you're on vacation outside the country, you're fair game?

I'll let you read the rest of the document yourself and decide for yourself if it's reasonable.

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:46 PM
That's odd, because here's what I found!

Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter pointed out that 70 senators have not even been briefed on what the warrantless spying program entailed.

"There's an old expression: buying a pig in a poke. It means buying something that you don't know what it is you're buying. Well, that's what the Senate is being asked to do here today — to grant retroactive immunity to a program where the members don't know what the program is," Specter said.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92398782

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:48 PM

That's odd, because here's what I found!

Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter pointed out that 70 senators have not even been briefed on what the warrantless spying program entailed.

"There's an old expression: buying a pig in a poke. It means buying something that you don't know what it is you're buying. Well, that's what the Senate is being asked to do here today — to grant retroactive immunity to a program where the members don't know what the program is," Specter said.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92398782



In other words, they've been had.

Too bad their ignorance affects the rest of us! explode explode explode explode

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:51 PM


That's odd, because here's what I found!

Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter pointed out that 70 senators have not even been briefed on what the warrantless spying program entailed.

"There's an old expression: buying a pig in a poke. It means buying something that you don't know what it is you're buying. Well, that's what the Senate is being asked to do here today — to grant retroactive immunity to a program where the members don't know what the program is," Specter said.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92398782



In other words, they've been had.

Too bad their ignorance affects the rest of us! explode explode explode explode


Also from that article:

'Republican presidential contender John McCain spent the day
campaigning.'

Great dodge, McCain!

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 09:59 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Thu 07/10/08 10:02 PM
http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=92398782&m=92398748

NPR radio!!


The new bill is a revision of the 1978 bill.
The immunity is to protect the telecom companies from lawsuits for allowing the warrant-less taps Bush was secretly doing!

The new bill pretty much allows what was already legal, with a few exceptions, since 1978! (not as bad as it seems)
I think the Bill you showed is the 1978 Bill!

The new Bill stops Bush from the illegal taps without giving him immunity for breaking the law. (I hope!)

I wonder what exactly the new provisions consist of??

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 10:04 PM

http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=92398782&m=92398748

NPR radio!!


The new bill is a revision of the 1978 bill.
The immunity is to protect the telecom companies from lawsuits for allowing the warrant-less taps Bush was secretly doing!

The new bill pretty much allows what was already legal, with a few exceptions, since 1978! (not as bad as it seems)
I think the Bill you showed is the 1978 Bill!

The new Bill stops Bush from the illegal taps without giving him immunity for breaking the law. (I hope!)

I wonder what exactly the new provisions consist of??


I wonder too.

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 10:10 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Thu 07/10/08 10:11 PM
I guess we will never know!
Good Night Hikerdrinker
Good Night JSH!!drinker

mnhiker's photo
Thu 07/10/08 10:11 PM


http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=92398782&m=92398748

NPR radio!!


The new bill is a revision of the 1978 bill.
The immunity is to protect the telecom companies from lawsuits for allowing the warrant-less taps Bush was secretly doing!

The new bill pretty much allows what was already legal, with a few exceptions, since 1978! (not as bad as it seems)
I think the Bill you showed is the 1978 Bill!

The new Bill stops Bush from the illegal taps without giving him immunity for breaking the law. (I hope!)

I wonder what exactly the new provisions consist of??


I wonder too.


FISA Amendments Act of 2008:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6304eh.txt.pdf

Fanta46's photo
Thu 07/10/08 10:12 PM
I'll check it out tomorrow!glasses

Previous 1 3