Wonder if they have a special prison for ex cops.

Im not really a dating person and its my first time on a site like this, help me fix my profile?

Hell they should put him in jail just for coming up with such a lame alibi..

Good points, green eyes. 123 times? That must have taken a long time.

That is possible and likely. The ineteresting thing is the potential for him to be telling the truth, not that the meds made him do it, but that the meds may have caused him to not know what happened (slept through it). That would depend on the cut that killed her and how quickly it happened though, I imagine as long as she was alive, it would have been a noisy confrontation.

What is against him is it was certainly something personal, that is ALOT of energy and strength to do such a thing.

You should read a little closer,

The reversal is significant given Kavanaugh has repeatedly cited his Catholic faith and Jesuit education in defending himself against Ford's accusations. In his opening statement Thursday, Kavanaugh twice referenced his years as a student at the Jesuit-run Georgeown Prep school in Maryland. Ford has accused a drunken Kavanaugh of assaulting her at a house party in the summer of 1982, when he was a student at the school. Kavanaugh has vigorously denied her claims.


It matters a lot.

The point is easy enough to understand, the details are never COMPLETELY identical. But presidents have had affairs while in office, and potentially sometimes IN The office.

Warren Harding fathered someone else's child, WHILE IN OFFICE.
Eisenhower had an affair with his driver, WHILE IN OFFICE.
GHW Bush was also accused of having an affair with a staffer, WHILE IN OFFICE.

so yeah, the 'only the democrats' or 'only the republicans' rhetoric continues to be just more distracting nonsense.

A solution to Hillary wanting to take away our guns is to take away her security. Let her live an ordinary life as a woman who has to defend herself. Let her drive to work down a long dark highway at night with a chance of having a flat tire. That doesn't suggest violence.

lol, And I stand by what I stated, which is consistent with my posts. Men have been unfaithful, regardless of political affiliation. I didnt mean every detail of their unfaithfulness was the same, just that the 'immoral' choice to BE unfaithful was.

and the original question was this

"Well.. how about having sex in the white house as a president . With a young intern And then lying about it to the world. Only to admit it when cornered
Which republican president did that?"


which, I also answered.

I would have no way to know who has had an affair with whom or where.
I can say though that IF a Republican was ever in the whitehouse, with an intern, and 'cornered' in media about it, they lied too.

Hmm,, I dont know, what republican president has been 'cornered' or asked about their marital or extra marital relations? Probably just as many have lied about it when they were.

Well.. how about having sex in the white house as a president . With a young intern And then lying about it to the world. Only to admit it when cornered
Which republican president did that?

and Im sure the Republicans wont be in the news with any allegations or scandals of their own.

You know, because its those damn liberals and democrats who are of such inferior character and integrity who cause ALL The troubles and are at the root of EVERY problem, unlike the virtuous country saving republicans whoa re all just trying to make the world a better place ... NOT.
[/quote

Got ya.. some now that the Dems got shot down and their plan failed.. miserably, the game plan is to just say

"well. well.. you guys just wait.. your side will do something wrong soon... you just wait and see..." ;)

Their little plan to derail the judge is going to hurt them in the polls.... and they deserve it.

Hypocrisy is alive and well.

First, it is interesting to note how quickly the overgeneralizations and tired political stereotypes have been used to blur and distract from the issue with what happened with Kavanaugh.

Democrats are an 'angry mob', but the white nationalists who rallied in Charlottesville had 'good people', interesting, but not surprising. Politics is a ridiculously "its the other guys' topic.


It is also interesting how 'the democrats are guilty' rhetoric is prevalent in these threads, yet I dont think ANYONE keeping this topic going is a registered democrat(just a hunch)

In comparing Clinton to Kavanaugh, what one is forgetting is the BEHAVIOR under questioning was not combative nor uncooperative, there was no LAME excuses like personal calendars, alleged virginity, evil look alikes, farts, or sensitivity to spicy foods

and the mistress never claimed an assault or even brought forth any complaints AT ALL, that was all CERTAIN republicans, who if the same standards are applied, USED Lewinsky and hung her out to dry after.

Another key difference is all women went to the PUBLIC media instead of authorities, with the allegations

Another key difference is in the grown women who accused Clinton did not appear to be doing so in an attempt to maintain anonymity,(all women went to the PUBLIC media instead of authorities), with the allegations so publicity was a potential motive there.

Another difference, The alleged incidents with Clinton were also at a time when they were GROWN women, one who met him in her hotel room.

Another difference is the proof of harm, which none of the women had either, as none (to my knowledge) had sought counseling or had evidence of any other sort that a trauma had occurred to them. One of the women signed an affidavit that nothing had happened to her (Broaddick) until interviewed by certain republicans, nothing fishy there.

and none of the women, to my knowledge, took or passed any lie detectors. There was PLENTY room for doubt, and much less to corroborate their claims.


PLENTY of difference in what happened then and now, except of course, the party allegiance in saving their 'guy'. (democrats and republicans)