Proved what point?

And some men has misogynistic views that help shape their overall philosophy in life.

Yep. Friedrich Nietzsche is well known in Philosophy of his famous quote "Man should be educated for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior; all else is folly... Let woman be a plaything... The happiness of man is: I will. The happiness of woman is: he wills... You are going to woman? Do not forget the whip!" unquote.

So you think man is a metaphorical banana? That to eliminate his misogyny, you must peel layers of layers off his misogynistic shell so you can leave him all buck naked to the cold?

That can be one example of misogyny. But it can be just his traditional view of woman being into what he think is the appropriate gender specific role in the man/woman relationship. Call that misogyny? Some may differ on that.

Women have their own ideological stance too. It is called feminism. And trust me, there are many schools of thoughts within feminism as well.

How can you say it is the "man" problem? Seems to me that they have been dominating the gender war for quite some time.

a pacifist to another pacifist: war suck! see ya around

Men mainly. That is because due to the nature of our jobs. Usually our works consist of heavy lifting and other physical demanding task that when women tries to do some of them, they pretty much become a reliability more than any way useful.

I don't argue all the time. I do get into debates which can be me and the other person arguing about whatevaa within the debate.

Paranoia is the correct word. not phobia

You're not fat dude.


not true. it can add a few pounds as the expression goes...

Is the background of the second picture a snap shot of you being in your hometown in Oregon?

Recycle news.


Moral panic moral panic!!!!

run fo yo lives yo!!!

It seems to me that the op loves to undermine religion in general.... carry on...

Don't feel bad. I do that too often. That is why I wish people would wait for awhile for quoting me. And it isn't the spelling alone, it is grammar and logic too.

LOL

Love the way you spelled medieval as it is like this -midevil

rofl

it is like you have created a new word.

There was a decent chick flick romantic movie I did like that wasn't necessarily from the good old days. The movie was from one of my fav. director called "Before Sunrise."


Punch Drunk Love is second on my list. Great movie.

Look like she finally got something purged out of her system.

I agree. I never said I didn't respect you as a person on the matter of what we were discussing about. The beliefs, well that is something else entirely. And I thank you for you feedback, and maybe, if you are willing, we can still have fun discussing other things as much as I assume we both enjoy discussing with others about whatevaa.

Well if we can all elect myself as the glorious cupid, then everybody will be able to find love easily. That is why I think my view of the subject can be beneficial and practical for everyone who is in the process, or trying, to find the special someone in their lives.

Why hate the genius in me?

How about maybe you can agree with this analogy? Me and you are not a laser beam and a flashlight. How about me and you are dancers in a night club with different moves and totally 20 ft. apart, but not keeping our eyes away from each other while others are in the way of our view?

I am capable of having a decent conversation. You are just being difficult due to my understanding of your misunderstanding of what points I am trying in vain to convey to you.

It is odd that you would go on about for the sake of others by protecting them from your feelings as it is nothing but bad feelings.

Taking your time proves the point. The more time you put in on trying to determine if you can actually have genuniune feeling is totally without merit a stupid and sad thing to do. It seems to me you think lust is parastitic to the word infatuation when in fact love is something in a total different realm of these urges. I don't know how one can be so confused of them being grouped up into one thing coupled with love being under them. I see all three of them clearly seperate.

To me lust is a primal urge. It is not what I percieve by what the convention of what everyone else says on that matter as characterized as a feeling at all. Infatuation is mainly consist of intrusive thinking, or neurosis that is caused by the brian maybe. But I am not an neurologist to make that claim. So usually I find comfort that both can be the after-effect of the due process of what goes on in the brain, but love is an entirely different matter itself when it is something of an idealized feeling of something perfect and eternal. And sadly, can wither away when thinking about it may indeed make the feel of the feelings deteriorate to nothingness.

Trust me. I took my time to response to your quote. It is not because I percieve it to be your pretension to be accurate or anything, but I want to make clear of you have obviously made completely unclear.

I am a laser beam. You are a flashlight. The former loves to penetrate precisely where the mark is, while the latter seems to be trying to go on about seeing, once again, the "woods for the trees." LOL







Yes or no. I am not sure what you mean. If you mean "questioned" as by scrutinizing it, then no because that would deny the feel of the feelings.

I don't decieve myself of what love is actually is.

Not everyone. Kinda a strange premise to say everyone I'd dated and then go on about seeing if I had one night of feeling that I love them all. That is impossible.

Maybe I don't go on about being a victim of past failures. I don't know your life history, but...

Sorry your life is that sad that you cant enjoy the finer things in life. a man is there to be used. not the other way around...... try it you may like it. in life you have to enjoy and take risks.... i had on last night and cant remember wat his face looked like but can remember everything else it only human nature.... are you virgin



Well I think that it is fair for her to at least try to understand from her perspective, and possibly explore what she mean by this stance.

To me she has not say anything about the man was decieved at anyway by her using him. Some people don't mind being used by someone as long as the exchange is mutual from the both side of the party. You can say that in most cases in casual sex, one side usually play the role as the user while the other play the role of the used. So as long as one does not give false pretense to the other that there will be more than just sex afterward: like a meaningful relationship.

That really ticks me. You see I have hard time seeing - that waiting for the feeling to be there before deciding to tell that person what you feel. It has to be inherently there first before it is actually be recognized by the faculty of your own mind to make sense of it. Feelings is not something like a plant that need to be watered and nurtured. It's already there before you have concieved it!