Could be related to the fact that when one sense..in this case sight..is obstructed, the other senses become more keen. Blind people have much better sense of hearing and smell then people with sight.
Just a possibility of primitive reflexes.

You pull out a gun and blow the clients head off.
You claim self-defense and show the police the evidence that the client is a murderer.
You save taxpayers a ton of money on court costs and penitentiary costs.
You save an innocent persons life and their loved ones.
And you walk away a hero with a clear conscious.

The names change but the song remains the same.

Yes, that is all you can do is laugh because the alternative is to face the truth.
It is funny though how Comey was not only Hillary's big protector but also it was Comey that used a fake dossier paid for by Fusion GPS, a democratic financed "research group" to launch this whole Russian collusion investigation.
No wonder after nine months of investigation by numerous committees there is still no evidence of collusion!

Hillary's emails came to light from her Benghazi scandal and a Romanian hacker named Marcel Lazăr Lehel, aka Guccifer not the deep state. It was only when a District Court(not part of the deep state) ordered the Justice department to investigate Clinton's use of a private server with classified data.
The deep state headed by Comey and Lynch did everything they could to cover up until Lynch was caught meeting with Bill at the airport. If not for that secret meeting being uncovered, we would not have heard a peep from Comey about the "investigation".

Well don't want to get off topic, but I guess Hillary's email scandal is a prime example of the deep state protecting one of their own. Everyone knows what Hillary did was criminal, deleting 30,000 emails that were under subpoena, keeping classified data on an unsecured server and emailing secret data. The only thing that kept her from facing jail time is Comey. It was his OPINION that she didn't have the INTENT to break the law. It is interesting that the statue for that crime does not say anything about INTENT. You or I would be in jail now if we did the same.

Your right, those who elected Trump don't care about the deep states legitimacy, just the opposite. And it was a historical loss for the Dems and the deep state.

It may be more about the deep state protecting one of their own(Hillary)from such embarrassment and also trying to maintain a fake legitimacy after such a historical loss.

Iran-Contra is just one example among hundreds that the US has influenced political outcomes in foreign countries. We had covert CIA help for the mujahideen in Afghanistan to get rid of the Russians back in the 70's and 80's.Remember Panama? These are just a couple that involved covert military use. There are hundreds more that involve money,blackmail,propaganda, assassinations etc. that are not public knowledge.
The point being that these Congressmen on these select and intel committees know a lot more then we do and act surprised and outraged that anyone would try to influence our political process is laughable!

Russia is probably funding groups like ANTIFA and BlacklivesMatter among others that cause division and strife in our country.
But will they investigate these groups and where they get their money publicly? NO!

This whole public display of a Russian meddling scandal is a deep state
political scam plain and simple.

What are you talking about? Russia collusion is not a domestic affair, it is between Trump and a foreign entity which the CIA,NSA and DNI have jurisdiction. Secondly The FBI, CIA and DNI have already Testified on this issue in public hearings so your statement that the intelligence agencies wouldn't have anything to say about it is False.

Being pulled out of their water and suffocating to death.

Exactly the opposite. Every intel head including the DNI(Director of National Intelligence) testified they saw no evidence of collusion. I guess you have better sources? Maybe NBC or CNN? LOL

Except for Obama's birther issue, all the above had hard evidence to support government investigations.

As for the birther or citizen issue with Obama, I recall it was certain media outlets and private citizens or groups(Trump included) that questioned his birth place. I don't recall months of investigations by any formal government agency, select committee. Not one.

Yes and they all become millionaires the same way by inside trading and lobbyists, and an outsider may change the status quo.

Any REASONABLE and INTELLIGENT person of any political persuasion can see through the politics of the Russian collusion/meddling scam.

After watching the recent Senate Intel Committee update briefing, I was almost laughing out loud at the sheer hypocrisy and lack of integrity of this so called "investigation".

To see Dems and Repubs, especially Intel members feigning outrage that Russia would try to meddle in our elections or political process is so disingenuous, it isn't even funny.

Everyone except maybe young millennial's know that Russia has been trying and succeeding to some degree to influence our elections and politics for decades.
Every Senate and House Intel Committee, every FBI, CIA and NSA employee and most informed Americans know the US government spends billions of dollars a year trying to influence elections and politics in foreign countries (including Russia) around the world every year.

Just look at the recent disclosure that the Obama admin spent millions of taxpayers’ dollars and resources trying to undermine Benjamin Netanyahu's re-election in Israel. And that is one of our allies!

Should the Intel agencies investigate Russian (and other foreign countries) attempts to influence our political processes? Absolutely, and they have done so every day for the last 20 years to see their techniques and sophistication. But why make it so public now? For sheer political reasons!

Russian Collusion? After over nine months of investigations by every intel agency, numerous House and Senate committees, still not one shred of evidence the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. By now if there was any evidence at all it would have been released or leaked.

To see the deep state’s desire for a political witch hunt, one must only look at the appointment of the special prosecutor Robert Mueller to the “investigation”.
First, according to the federal statute, there must be evidence of a crime for there to be an appointment of a special prosecutor. Where is this evidence and what crime has supposedly been committed?
Instead this special prosecutor is in search of evidence of a crime, a big difference in what the statute states.

Even assuming the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians, collusion is not a federal crime (except in the unique case of antitrust law).

Whether you love him or hate him, the truth is that President Trump is neither a true Republican nor Democrat. He is an outsider that poses a serious threat to the deep state or swamp we call Washington.
The real power brokers on both sides, Pelosi, Schumer, Ryan, McConnell and the Bush’s and Clinton’s that control politics and power in the country will do anything and everything under the sun to hold on to their power including endless “investigations” to undermine his presidency.

This is the one thing both sides will work together on, bipartisan deep state corruption to undermine the will of the people and serve the global corporate interests instead.

When a beautiful, intelligent, witty woman your interested in lives so far away

Trump won white women by 54% to Hillary's 42%, just not the uneducated ones.
A voting block she SHOULD have won...but she was such a horrible candidate even the educated women didn't want her!

The fact is that Trump won the popular vote across the country until they started counting California. So what is more "united"? Most people in most states or just more people in one state controlling the government?

One last thing for those who always pull the B.S. about "Hillary winning the popular vote" . Donald Trumps campaign was geared to win the "electoral college" which of course was the right strategy. However, if the election was based on the "popular vote" he would have campaigned a lot differently and included California, New York etc which he did not do. Given this, there is no data to support Hillary would have won the "popular vote" if that was indeed Trumps objective.

MS...you just proved my point. The link you provided takes you to the "dishonest" media site....the picture shown in your link is the same one in the very first post of this topic(along with the pic of the actual crowd). If you think there is 3500 people in the pic shown in my post, you may have double vision and should get eyes checked :)

"spurious accusations of the Republican propagandists"?
WikiLeaks has exposed the truth about Hillary and the complete corruption of this administration. Unfortunately the main stream media has not reported most of this info to the American public...including yourself or you would see just how deep the corruption is.