100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: D.C.'s gun ban gets its day in court | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 03/17/08 02:13 PM
|
|
I think there are some good arguments for the right to own firearms, but thinking it will help you if you need to resist a modern Army, you are focking crazy!
EVEN,,,, If they dont have tanks or helicopters!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or it was a modified semi-auto. fyi, it was a mack 10 i said no, i'm not buying a gun from someone on the street. that's just nuts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think there are some good arguments for the right to own firearms, but thinking it will help you if you need to resist a modern Army, you are focking crazy! EVEN,,,, If they dont have tanks or helicopters!!! i would only hope that our service men wouldn't fight against the people |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh but toasted u know they would
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
once again....any service man or woman who believe's in the vows he or she took would not fire upon U.S. citizens. Actually regardless of what they believe i've heard that something like 80% said that they wouldn't fire on American civilians. I know many that would join them though. Even if this weren't true if you change your tactics I.E. use guerrilla tactics, IEDs, etc. it is possible to fight an army being out gunned, equiped and manned. But once again.....i seriously doubt few, if any soldiers would fire on the American public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh but toasted u know they would the ones that i've known, my brother included, would not. that action in itself would be unamerican. the military should never be used on the people |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propoganda is a heavy tool man!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh but toasted u know they would the ones that i've known, my brother included, would not. that action in itself would be unamerican. the military should never be used on the people If they won't! The argument for defense is kinda silly then, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh but toasted u know they would the ones that i've known, my brother included, would not. that action in itself would be unamerican. the military should never be used on the people yes u are right toasted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If they won't! The argument for defense is kinda silly then, right? no, not at all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im for private ownership of firearms.
The argument that the right is granted, to resist Gov tyranny is not a good one! Maybe in 1776, but not today...  Self-defense, recreation, these are all good arguments. The thought that you could stop a trained military unit is kinda ridiculous!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im for private ownership of firearms. The argument that the right is granted, to resist Gov tyranny is not a good one! Maybe in 1776, but not today... Self-defense, recreation, these are all good arguments. The thought that you could stop a trained military unit is kinda ridiculous!! that doesn't mean you shouldn't have the right to defend yourself or your rights if the government decides you don't need them anymore and will use force |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK,
But not a good argument!! The Grunts are not what you see interviewed on CNN! One Infantry platoon of grunts is (est. on a good day)-36 MEN. They are mean, fit, often tired, scared, often sadistic, young, and full of a mixture heavy on brainwashing and hormones, and armed! They are very familiar with their weapons, and shoot them often enough to be called an accurate shot. What are you going to do??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
being that i've been shooting since the age of 5 and do so regularly? i'd lose, but i'd still do better than your average joe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
being that i've been shooting since the age of 5 and do so regularly? i'd lose, but i'd still do better than your average joe You'll never understand! Even if it happened. What would happen, say you put up a good resistance? Anarchy, innocent lives lost, hunger, no play station???? World opinion, interference by foreign powers (now with a new motivation). Are you prepared for that?  Id rather fight it with intelligence, and by not being complacent!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
toastedoranges
on
Mon 03/17/08 03:23 PM
|
|
i'm more prepared than you'd think
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i'm more prepared that you'd think Now, if we want to pop a cap in some dumb as, who dont believe **** stanks, then I'm all for it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im for private ownership of firearms. The argument that the right is granted, to resist Gov tyranny is not a good one! Maybe in 1776, but not today... Self-defense, recreation, these are all good arguments. The thought that you could stop a trained military unit is kinda ridiculous!! yep that is what the british thought to never underestimate the power of enough people with no guns it would even be a harder job with guns you can get bigger and better ones but hopefully this will never come to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im for private ownership of firearms. The argument that the right is granted, to resist Gov tyranny is not a good one! Maybe in 1776, but not today... Self-defense, recreation, these are all good arguments. The thought that you could stop a trained military unit is kinda ridiculous!! I daresay that you are missing the point....Rights are not granted - they are inherent & unalienable. They are either acknowledged by your government, or they are denied by force, whether it be economic pressure, public safety, martial action, etc.,etc.. Our Founding Fathers recognized that Natural Law trumps government authority. Many repeatedly stated that a standing army could not withstand an armed revolt by the majority of the people, and tailored the Constitution so that it might always be so - that we would always have recourse to Natural Law, and the arms to both protect our country AND overthrow our government, if necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all i can say is this, those in the military have taken an oath to defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. If the government tries to disban firearms there will be a big mess as servicemen will be obligated to tell them all to kick rocks. My problem is they will do it slowly. Limiting your ability to buy them little by little as they have been doing. This, by definition, is an infringement of our right to keep and bear arms. There really is no argument to what they mentioned in the constitution. There are just being trying to twist words in their favor. Hopefully there will be no further firearm restrictions. But you all know and i know there will be. yep Adj4u, Your Green Man is trig! i hope that is a good thing 
|
|
|
|
|
