Topic: Would you convert to Scientology | |
---|---|
No. The only way to change a person is to change themselves. Others may ask, but most will understand that you will live your life the way that you want.
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one |
|
|
|
I dont think those sceince goofys would like me very mutch,I like my duckhunting and going to that church out in the swamp where all the birds are I think its a gift from god when your setting there in the boat and havent seen a thing all morning and all of a sudden 1000 duck fly rite over your head and all you can do is sit there and watch the grace of their flight into the rushes your setting in(just dont stand up,they will run you downor knock you out of the boat )and no I didnt even think about shooting,it was way to beutiful to mess up.Now thats a church to me
|
|
|
|
Would you join the Church of Scientology if your significant other was a Scientologist, and asked you to become one ? |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Tue 02/12/08 09:24 AM
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one |
|
|
|
No, I would not convert to anything for anybody!
|
|
|
|
First off, If scientology was even a religious based idea then maybe. But, it no more than a book written by an idiot. I have read Dianetics, Yes. It is nothing more than an elaborate "Pyramid Scheme!" L. Ron Hubbard was actually a very smart man because he knew there was a sucker born every minute. You have got to be kidding me. Scientolgy does not belong in the religious forum's because it is not religion based. It is based on something call endgrams. WTF! LMAO. Get a clue people!
|
|
|
|
First off, If scientology was even a religious based idea then maybe. But, it no more than a book written by an idiot. I have read Dianetics, Yes. It is nothing more than an elaborate "Pyramid Scheme!" L. Ron Hubbard was actually a very smart man because he knew there was a sucker born every minute. You have got to be kidding me. Scientolgy does not belong in the religious forum's because it is not religion based. It is based on something call endgrams. WTF! LMAO. Get a clue people! |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above |
|
|
|
I wouldnt convert 2 ANY religion let alone scientology just 2 please a signifigant other |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Tue 02/12/08 09:25 AM
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above |
|
|
|
First off, If scientology was even a religious based idea then maybe. But, it no more than a book written by an idiot. I have read Dianetics, Yes. It is nothing more than an elaborate "Pyramid Scheme!" L. Ron Hubbard was actually a very smart man because he knew there was a sucker born every minute. You have got to be kidding me. Scientolgy does not belong in the religious forum's because it is not religion based. It is based on something call endgrams. WTF! LMAO. Get a clue people! |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above When Spider and I agree on a threads lack of credit you know you have reached the deep end. |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above |
|
|
|
Keep in mind that they would separate you from your kids. If you didn't join your significant other would be forced to write you a letter saying they were breaking off all contact with you. If you had kids that would include them too. That if you joined they could station you anywhere and make you do basic slave labor and of you didn't like it and tried to run they would bring you back and punish you by making you work a more menial job locked away somewhere with no contact to the outside world. Name one What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above When Spider and I agree on a threads lack of credit you know you have reached the deep end. |
|
|
|
MirrorMirror,
Seriously, you state that Christian churches practice kidnapping and torture and then you say "I better not do that rabbit, because there is a very real chance that someone would get offended." when Rabbit asks you to name one that does that? How much more offensive can you get, if you have accused Christians of perpetrating such terrible crimes? What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above It's (a), because you make a statement of fact, but refuse to provide factual support for that statement. It's (b), because you make a very damaging and unsubstantiated claim against Christians. It's (c), because you aren't taking the subject very seriously. Say what you will about Rabbit, but the dude is worked up about very real violations of human rights, being commited today by CoS. Human rights should be unquestioned. Human rights violations should be taken seriously and claims should be investigated. So your post is (d), all of the above. It's also just this side of Libel...if you had named a church in particular, it would be libel. I'm sure we could spend all day coming up with what was wrong with that post, but I'm done. |
|
|
|
nope! I'm happy with Oden the Moon and Mother Earth
|
|
|
|
Edited by
SmileyToo
on
Tue 02/12/08 09:55 AM
|
|
First off, If scientology was even a religious based idea then maybe. But, it no more than a book written by an idiot. I have read Dianetics, Yes. It is nothing more than an elaborate "Pyramid Scheme!" L. Ron Hubbard was actually a very smart man because he knew there was a sucker born every minute. You have got to be kidding me. Scientolgy does not belong in the religious forum's because it is not religion based. It is based on something call endgrams. WTF! LMAO. Get a clue people! Curt is so right. I am a Christian, worship the one and only God who gives me a freewill to decide to mess up but doesn't hold it against me. Treats me like His kid. |
|
|
|
all I can say is that I wouldn't convert to anything for anyone. I accept people for they are and I want someone that accepts me the way I am without trying to "fix" me. I'm not broken...
|
|
|
|
MirrorMirror, Seriously, you state that Christian churches practice kidnapping and torture and then you say "I better not do that rabbit, because there is a very real chance that someone would get offended." when Rabbit asks you to name one that does that? How much more offensive can you get, if you have accused Christians of perpetrating such terrible crimes? What would you call the above post? a) Gratuituous assertion. b) Character assasination. c) Childish games. d) All of the above It's (a), because you make a statement of fact, but refuse to provide factual support for that statement. It's (b), because you make a very damaging and unsubstantiated claim against Christians. It's (c), because you aren't taking the subject very seriously. Say what you will about Rabbit, but the dude is worked up about very real violations of human rights, being commited today by CoS. Human rights should be unquestioned. Human rights violations should be taken seriously and claims should be investigated. So your post is (d), all of the above. It's also just this side of Libel...if you had named a church in particular, it would be libel. I'm sure we could spend all day coming up with what was wrong with that post, but I'm done. |
|
|