Could you keep up with 30 years younger partner.

In what way , do you wish you had one, or you already have?

You like the older woman then.

Yeah, if I wanted to die in a week.

DVD or Blu-Ray?

I think no

But it's up to you, bro!

let's try

Hey Eythn

Heyyy

In terms of physical fitness, it depends entirely on the two people involved, in my opinion many in their 50's can be more energetic in what they do than many in their 20's.In a romantic relationship perhaps it's more being on the same page in what you both want in life, with similar maturity and values.

In general I think not but it depends in what way.

Some will still be physically fit but mentally stagnated in routines and old-fashioned beliefs that don't match with the younger generation. I come across this an awful lot.

Others will mentally be up to speed with the younger generation but couldn't keep up physically.

Bear in mind 30 years is one helluva age gap to bridge!
It's a generation difference, not just a mere few years.
A good gauge, if you have kids, is to ask yourself this question: can you keep up with them in all aspects?
Or think of yourself 30 yrs younger and all the things you did, could do, then. Can you still do these things?

And for men the big problem can be ED. Most men 40+ can still get it sort of erect, but no longer the way it used to, and should in order to truly satisfy a woman. Semi-erect can't do that.
Some then tend to say "I've finally mastered it!" while in actual fact they've lost their ability to have a proper erection.
Just adding that as this may lead to embarrassment for the man and dissatisfaction for a much younger female partner.

Personally I wouldn't want a partner the age of my children. That feels off.

Oh and there's the added embarrassment of people constantly thinking you're the father of the other.
Not just embarrassing for you, also to the much younger partner, and also your & their family.
If you have kids, it'll be horrible for them that daddy has a partner as old as -or younger than- they are.
It creates an awkward situation wherever you go...

It's interesting that you only have to watch a James Bond film to usually see 007 depicted as a 40/50 something (Daniel Craig the most recent actor to play James Bond is 56 years old now). Where the Bond Girl, is usually depicted as a 20 something, but maybe it only happens in the movies the large age gap attraction. I must admit, when I see a guy in his late 40s, early 50s, with a woman maybe in her late 20s, it really looks right they make what I would call a very attractive couple, it's just my opinion. (Interestingly, Daniel Craigs wife in the real world is only 2 years younger than him).

Daniel Craig was 37 in his first James Bond movie and I cannot recall any of the 'Bond girls' in his movies to be in their 20s, nor really depicted as such. More early to mid 30s.
And the last one (the woman) is now 39, so 35ish when making the last movie in which he was 52ish.
Nowhere near a 30 year age gap in reality. In the movie the idea of course is that he is still quite in his prime, so would have to appear younger than the 52 he actually was at the time.
And he pulled it off. I mean, hotdammmm!!!
Goes to show that if a man makes an effort he can maintain healthy looks & body. After his Bond-days Daniel kinda lost it. Still okayish, but no longer devilishly handsome.

This is why I said depicted as an age, not the age of the actors. I am not very good guessing ages from appearance it can vary so much between individuals. I have always had the impression from watching many James Bond films, Bond is depicted as a guy in his mid to late forties, and the Bond girls mid twenties, this is only how I see them. This puts an age gap of between say 20 and 25 years, still a significant age gap, and whenever I see that on film and in real life they do make a very handsome couple because of the age gap, in my opinion. My only similarity with Daniel Craig is we both originate from Manchester in the UK, after that it all ends, sadly.

yes without a doubt..

Yes