Well, it can be a thing in dating for sure, hihi.
I was talking to this guy and for the first time in yonks it felt quite good. I didn't have a romantic spark but the fact he wasn't demanding (shall we meet, I'd like to phone etc etc) was a relief!
Then we got talking about meeting -again without pressure- and I was up for it. Haven't felt that way in yonks either. But then... where do you meet? I can't officially go inside a restaurant or café...
So it then became clear I didn't have a QR code, and of course he did. He didn't make a fuss about it at all, but since it was clear we had very different points of view on the matter (we didn't argue, but it was clear) I decided to leave it at that.

I know happily married couples that turned out to have this difference of opinion and got into dire straits. One woman I know got shunned and emotionally blackmailed time and again by her husband because she didn't want to, he did. In the end she gave in. Quite appalling of him to do that, but alas...
But if previously happily married couples have great difficulty dealing with this, then it isn't smart to get involved with someone you don't see eye to eye with on this.

So there you have it...
Now for finding someone who's still natural like me... I know there are hundred of thousands but it won't make finding each other any easier.
Although, maybe it does. It can also be seen & used as another quick sifting and sorting thing. I mean, if we don't see eye to eye on such an important matter we're not going to be a match. We couldn't even talk about it, not support each other, not ask the other for advice etc.
So it wouldn't make for a great start.

To add to that... when do you ask?
I never like to throw in such heavy topics very early on. But maybe in this case it is better to ask as it is basically a deal-breaker.

Without a vaccine pass .. dating will certainly be more challenging .. not impossible . Under our new traffic light system .. green means freedom for the vaccinated but not for the unvaccinated .

Compatibility when it comes to personal values is important . If non vaccination is a deal breaker it will significantly reduce your dating pool but ultimately may save you lots of wasted time . Better to ask from the onset .. why waste each other’s time .. if it is a deal breaker .

I don't think non vaccination was a deal-breaker for him. Otherwise he would've left himself.
Him being vaccinated was a deal-breaker for me :) as well as the different points of view.

I was referring to non vaccination as something you value but of course his view point is just as important . Better to establish that sooner rather than later .

Omicron may change restrictions yet again . There are lots of activities you can do outdoors that are not restricted . Can always get takeway coffee and go for walk on the beach . If you want to socialise at New Years or enjoy a pub atmosphere etc you may find your choices are restricted .

Outdoors could be an option, but we're still in wintertime here and it's too cold for me. Also the wind here, I live a stone throw from the North Sea. Always very strong wind in this village, even during summer but at least then it's warmer. This village is renowned for wind & storms. It's the worst on the island come to that.
One reason I don't like the beach. Too cold, way too windy.

Another option could be in the only town on the island. There is at least one restaurant that doesn't ask for QR codes. And since it's in town centre one could even look around a bit there :)
But then I'll have to first find a great guy of course!

Vaccinated or not vaccinated isn't the issue I have with dating since I won't date anyone stupid enough to date me.

Try Vaccine deaths.com and cv19 Vax reactions.com

I would say it doesn't come out of a man other than through blood. my reasoning for this is simple, messenger rna is simply a protein molecule that closely resembles the viral infection it is trying to structurally mimic AND is identifiable by the immune system. when the mrna protein is spotted by the immune system the system then creates antibodies to remove the protein and those antibodies happen to fight off the real viral infection in the process. once the proteins are eliminated the antibodies are remembered but the virus is still unidentifiable by the body so if the body hasn't killed off the infection then another shot will be needed until the infection is gone.

this changes when we talk about coronavirus however because corona is a tiny virus inhabiting a larger virus inhabiting the body and the larger virus is identifiable by the immune system hencethe need for only one mrna shot, unless the tiny virus happens to mutate then a new mrna shot will be needed.

I hope this information was helpful because I needed to see a lot of clinical trials at clinicaltrials.gov to get the information for and share with you. I also broke it down to not so complex because big words are confusing.

Experimental poisons.

If I were wanting children, I would be very concerned if a woman had taken these experimental substances.

If a woman wants children, then I think there is need to be concerned over even the possibility of secondary affection by an mRNA carrier, let alone the quality of his sperm if he is to be the father.

Otherwise, I don't think there is likely to be much physical danger. Of course there could be some but there is always some chance of danger in interacting with a new person.

When it comes to the attitude over the whole mess, well.. that's something else. I try to forgive people being duped, given that most don't understand how the world works and are susceptible to the massive marketing campaign that governments ran to sell private company's products that had barely been tested.

show me legitimate proof

do you know that mRNA technology has been studied since the 1980’s .. as a possible treatment for cancer . Would your view point change if this groundbreaking technology proves to be a viable treatment for cancer/stroke ?

Yes, I do know that the technology has been posited for some time. In some countries, it even reached the stage of animal testing. It was deemed too unreliable and too dangerous to be used on humans.

The carrier was altered slightly, enough to justify new testing. If anything, the carrier is worse that what had been tested before, especially on growing organs (such as for infants, the kidneys and sperm).

This is not 'groundbreaking technology' unless you think that any whacky idea that fails to perform as wanted is groundbreaking.

If the problems with it ever are sorted out, and if it ever can be used to safely cure something (cancer or not) then I won't have to change my viewpoint about it, since I support (or at least, do not oppose) anything safe and effective.

I'm going to keep this short and simple.

mRNA stands for Messenger Ribonucleic Acid. mRNA is naturally used in the body to inform tiny proteins called Ribosomes that control how proteins are produced in the cell. Proteins have a whole number of functions, and modernly, we are still woefully uninformed on all of the uses of said proteins. An interesting realm discovered within the past 20 years is that certain proteins actually are continually passed down to modify gene expression which is essentially the turning on and off of certain genes.

To answer your question, it's likely the immunity itself would be passed down, but the mRNA itself would not be passed down - although it's possible it could be passed down, I'd say unlikely because the cell shuts down practically all of its processes significantly before cytokineses. The proteins will most likely be passed down.

Now, what does this mean for the next generation? Probably little considering viruses are evolving all the time - and the effect wares off a time later anyway.

According to Dr. Robert Malone that the mRNA has a shedding affect that can be transmitted through bodily fluids. They call it a vaccine, but it isn't.

I just read some stuff about and by him. Also saw he got thrown off of Twitter. F(kers!
If this is all safe and wonderful, why do they have to ban people that tell another story? It's a direct violation of free speech.
If they were telling the truth they wouldn't do that.

As for the dating part... currently not dating so it's not a concern, but I hope to meet someone at some point and then it might be a concern. It's not for nothing that I chose to remain natural.

It is always good to read from someone with some understanding of the technology, instead of only relying on the propaganda fed down from the interested parties in the UN.

But I wonder what 'immunity' you are talking about, and how you think that can be passed on if the mRNA adjustments are temporary.

thanks for saying that. Let's stick to evidence and discussion, respectfully. I am not vaxxed nor will I ever be.
I have family members on both sides of the fence, and we talk about it if they want and we don't talk about it, if they don't bring it up. They all know where I stand and I know where they stand. No love lost between us, or my many friends who are vaxxed. They too know I am unvaxxed and none of my friends "sweat" me about it, nor do I to them.

thanks for saying that. Let's stick to evidence and discussion, respectfully. I am not vaxxed nor will I ever be.
I have family members on both sides of the fence, and we talk about it if they want and we don't talk about it, if they don't bring it up. They all know where I stand and I know where they stand. No love lost between us, or my many friends who are vaxxed. They too know I am unvaxxed and none of my friends "sweat" me about it, nor do I to them.