Topic: questions that believers are afraid to answer | |
---|---|
which as i say, Faith? Without senses wouldnt everything be faith? without senses it would be the same...you simply would not know Some day, can I have the sesame street version of that particular process of logic? |
|
|
|
which as i say, Faith? Without senses wouldnt everything be faith? without senses it would be the same...you simply would not know Some day, can I have the sesame street version of that particular process of logic? it's simple ..you only need faith where knowledge in something lacks |
|
|
|
once again funches I say to you, "Are you new" or just dillusional
|
|
|
|
which as i say, Faith? Without senses wouldnt everything be faith? without senses it would be the same...you simply would not know Some day, can I have the sesame street version of that particular process of logic? it's simple ..you only need faith where knowledge in something lacks Intentionally obtuse? Thank you so much; however you chose the wrong process of logic to respond to. |
|
|
|
once again funches I say to you, "Are you new" or just dillusional explain what you talking about feralcatlady my delusional friend |
|
|
|
which as i say, Faith? Without senses wouldnt everything be faith? without senses it would be the same...you simply would not know Some day, can I have the sesame street version of that particular process of logic? it's simple ..you only need faith where knowledge in something lacks Intentionally obtuse? Thank you so much; however you chose the wrong process of logic to respond to. it's commonly called "in denial" |
|
|
|
My question is for the person choosing the path of knowledge, what verbally/written described stepping stones do they walk on in that process?
|
|
|
|
My question is for the person choosing the path of knowledge, what verbally/written described stepping stones do they walk on in that process? if they choose to limt themselves to only knowledge that is verbal and/or written then you have answered your own question |
|
|
|
Edited by
Differentkindofwench
on
Thu 12/13/07 01:22 PM
|
|
No, but thank you for the wonderful display of written dance moves.
|
|
|
|
No, but thank you for the wonderful display of written dance moves. ..er..feisty wench...you posed the question and then limited the knowledge they were seeking as verbal and/or written knowledge ...so isn't it logical that's the path they should start from .. |
|
|
|
er...no, your mind chose which sequence of words to reply to and which to ignore....
Enjoy your evening. |
|
|
|
er...no, your mind chose which sequence of words to reply to and which to ignore.... Enjoy your evening. sorry feisty I chose only the combinations of words you yourself wrote which were the words "verbal and written"...sorry but I seen that trap coming a mile down the road |
|
|
|
Interesting variation from some of the world's most well known and greatest thinkers: Wisdom and knowledge must be "ensnared" huh, who'da thunk it......
|
|
|
|
Interesting variation from some of the world's most well known and greatest thinkers: Wisdom and knowledge must be "ensnared" huh, who'da thunk it...... why...how was your question not answer ..please tell |
|
|
|
er...no, your mind chose which sequence of words to reply to and which to ignore.... Enjoy your evening. sorry feisty I chose only the combinations of words you yourself wrote which were the words "verbal and written"...sorry but I seen that trap coming a mile down the road |
|
|
|
er...no, your mind chose which sequence of words to reply to and which to ignore.... Enjoy your evening. sorry feisty I chose only the combinations of words you yourself wrote which were the words "verbal and written"...sorry but I seen that trap coming a mile down the road No problem, even falcon's have blind spots, ya just got a get a little higher to reach it. |
|
|
|
Touche!
|
|
|
|
this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation I'm new here, and I found this question which, I know, has had a lot of replies since, and I can't be bothered going through them all. ![]() I thought I'd have a go at answering it, although whether people will see it as "rational" is another thing. Whatever beliefs we have on how the universe came into being, we are faced with the problem of something coming from nothing. Yes, Christians believe God created the universe. So where did God come from? We believe He has always been, which is impossible, of course, but we believe it anyway. If we are to say someone created God, then we have to ask who created THAT being? Someone else? Then who created THAT one? And then who created the next one? We can go on indefinitely. But if we dismiss the concept of God, are we much better off? The universe just started? How? With the big bang? How did that happen? I'm no scientific expert, but isn't the belief that it started with an inrush of hydrogen or something? If so, where did the hydrogen come from? Was it something else? Where did that come from? No matter what we believe, we have problems. If we believe in God, we either have to accept that He has always been, or there was an endless number or beings going on creating each other beforehand. If we dismiss God, then we have to accept that the universe had to have come from nothing. |
|
|
|
You can't write a rational answer to irrational ears.
|
|
|
|
or there was an endless number or beings going on creating each other beforehand. sounds rational to me |
|
|