100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: 3 myths | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I am Talking about living off of government assistance. And fraudulent people on assistance. Lazy people. I Know all about people needing help when not making enough money. These people are working. I dont how many times that we have said that, lazy , unproductive people living off government assistance not people working and needs assistance or those fallen on hard times. I dont get what we are saying is so hard to grasp for some of these leftist folks Good lord. It's not hard to understand. Unfortunately librals cannot agree on things conservative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying that unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom on tax payers money? Absolutely not! There's always room in the world for a new Jeffrey Dahmer, or Charlie Manson. I say no adult should be allowed to parent a child. Let them find their own way through the forest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying that unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom on tax payers money? Absolutely not! There's always room in the world for a new Jeffrey Dahmer, or Charlie Manson. I say no adult should be allowed to parent a child. Let them find their own way through the forest. How do you feel about men without children who are being over taxed to pay for children they chose not to have? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely not! There's always room in the world for a new Jeffrey Dahmer, or Charlie Manson. I say no adult should be allowed to parent a child. Let them find their own way through the forest. leftists comes up with the most bizarre analogies , they really do, its like me saying the reason why Trump beat Hillary Clinton was because the Patriots lost to the Eagles in the superbowl and only if Brady scrambled to his right vs his left. what does Charlie Manson and Dahmer have to do with myths of government assistance? Unless you are tying to get the thread locked? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am Talking about living off of government assistance. And fraudulent people on assistance. Lazy people. I Know all about people needing help when not making enough money. These people are working. I dont how many times that we have said that, lazy , unproductive people living off government assistance not people working and needs assistance or those fallen on hard times. I dont get what we are saying is so hard to grasp for some of these leftist folks Good lord. It's not hard to understand. Unfortunately librals cannot agree on things conservative. [/quote its called " spin" and we have the queen of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying that unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom on tax payers money? Absolutely not! There's always room in the world for a new Jeffrey Dahmer, or Charlie Manson. I say no adult should be allowed to parent a child. Let them find their own way through the forest. How do you feel about men without children who are being over taxed to pay for children they chose not to have? US taxes are low relative to those in other developed countries. In 2015, US taxes at all levels of government represented 26 percent of GDP, compared with an average of 34 percent of GDP for the 34 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). I would say that the perception of 'over taxed' is based entirely on how valued the children in question are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely not! There's always room in the world for a new Jeffrey Dahmer, or Charlie Manson. I say no adult should be allowed to parent a child. Let them find their own way through the forest. leftists comes up with the most bizarre analogies , they really do, its like me saying the reason why Trump beat Hillary Clinton was because the Patriots lost to the Eagles in the superbowl and only if Brady scrambled to his right vs his left. what does Charlie Manson and Dahmer have to do with myths of government assistance? Unless you are tying to get the thread locked? the problem is with the wording, you can put a period after "should be allowed to be stay at home mom." SHOULD implies that there is some absolute type of stay at home mom that SHOULD not (under any circumstance)be able to be home being MOMS. the sarcasm is a reference to the idea that the alternative is to leave kids at home with NO mom and the potential consequence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Easttowest72
on
Sun 06/17/18 02:37 PM
|
|
Looks like an attempt to avoid answering the question. I was a working mom. My kids stayed with my mom, mother in law and daycare.
To say an unwed mom can't find childcare and the poor kids would be left home all alone is absurd. From what I've seen, these single moms have no problem finding childcare to go clubing and then a night at a hotel. They manage to find enough free time to get pregnant again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like an attempt to avoid answering the question. I was a working mom. My kids stayed with my mom, mother in law and daycare. To say an unwed mom can't find childcare and the poor kids would be left home all alone is absurd. From what I've seen, these single moms have no problem finding childcare to go clubing and then a night at a hotel. They manage to find enough free time to get pregnant again. and what if someone is estranged from their mother and not married and has no daycare money? do you know daycares can be 135 a week PER kid, on the low end? When was the last time you had to use a daycare? and before you say there are programs to help with daycare costs, they are a part of the WELFARE programs supplements. fifty hours a week of DAYTIME watching someone's kid is a bit different than one night/evening too. and what does 'free time to get pregnant' have to do with daycare costs? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. What if everyone feels this way and we all decide to sit home and wait on a check? Single dad's also. If having a child gives you everything you need, everyone would just have a baby. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. What if everyone feels this way and we all decide to sit home and wait on a check? Single dad's also. If having a child gives you everything you need, everyone would just have a baby. what if EVERYBODY worked around the clock and let someone else supervise and raise their kids their whole life? the list of what ifs can go both ways. but its not likely many would decide to 'sit home and wait on a check' that affords them a whopping buck fifty per meal and buck fifty for everything else they may need outside of a meal, live in crime infested neighborhoods with their kids, and have people constantly making assumptions about their character and looking down on them for their need. its not living a life of riley, regardless of how many who have NEVER used or needed it may say so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. What if everyone feels this way and we all decide to sit home and wait on a check? Single dad's also. If having a child gives you everything you need, everyone would just have a baby. what if EVERYBODY worked around the clock and let someone else supervise and raise their kids their whole life? the list of what ifs can go both ways. but its not likely many would decide to 'sit home and wait on a check' that affords them a whopping buck fifty per meal and buck fifty for everything else they may need outside of a meal, live in crime infested neighborhoods with their kids, and have people constantly making assumptions about their character and looking down on them for their need. its not living a life of riley, regardless of how many who have NEVER used or needed it may say so. Section 8 is paying over $1000 A month for these women to live in nice homes. You use 24/7 As an exaggeration to going out working like the average person. I spent time with my kids everyday. Because single mom has supper to feed them, homework to help with etc. That's a part of parenting. Yes it's tough after working all day. But that's what we chose when we had kids. Liberals feel so entitled. It's scary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus headstart begins at 3 and pre-k at 4. Unless women are breeders, the accident gets old enough for school. Nothing wrong with kids spending time with grandma, aunt, dad, etc, so mom can work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus headstart begins at 3 and pre-k at 4. Unless women are breeders, the accident gets old enough for school. Nothing wrong with kids spending time with grandma, aunt, dad, etc, so mom can work. Exactly!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. So two people decide to have a kid and you expect the government to pay the cost until the kid is in grade school.. about 5 years, while Mom stays home and " baby Daddy" is nowhere to be found. You want the taxpayers to pick up this cost? Is that it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. So two people decide to have a kid and you expect the government to pay the cost until the kid is in grade school.. about 5 years, while Mom stays home and " baby Daddy" is nowhere to be found. You want the taxpayers to pick up this cost? Is that it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. What if everyone feels this way and we all decide to sit home and wait on a check? Single dad's also. If having a child gives you everything you need, everyone would just have a baby. what if EVERYBODY worked around the clock and let someone else supervise and raise their kids their whole life? the list of what ifs can go both ways. but its not likely many would decide to 'sit home and wait on a check' that affords them a whopping buck fifty per meal and buck fifty for everything else they may need outside of a meal, live in crime infested neighborhoods with their kids, and have people constantly making assumptions about their character and looking down on them for their need. its not living a life of riley, regardless of how many who have NEVER used or needed it may say so. Section 8 is paying over $1000 A month for these women to live in nice homes. You use 24/7 As an exaggeration to going out working like the average person. I spent time with my kids everyday. Because single mom has supper to feed them, homework to help with etc. That's a part of parenting. Yes it's tough after working all day. But that's what we chose when we had kids. Liberals feel so entitled. It's scary. conservatives feel so superior ... its scary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being sarcastic. My question was clear. Do you think unmarried moms should be allowed to be stay at home mom's on tax payer dollars? yes, I believe kids deserve to be taken care of (the physical stuff) AND provided for (the financial stuff). In lieu of the two parents designed to fill both roles, I think they should have support systems in place to help them do both, even if it is 'taxpayer'money until there is another way. What if everyone feels this way and we all decide to sit home and wait on a check? Single dad's also. If having a child gives you everything you need, everyone would just have a baby. what if EVERYBODY worked around the clock and let someone else supervise and raise their kids their whole life? the list of what ifs can go both ways. but its not likely many would decide to 'sit home and wait on a check' that affords them a whopping buck fifty per meal and buck fifty for everything else they may need outside of a meal, live in crime infested neighborhoods with their kids, and have people constantly making assumptions about their character and looking down on them for their need. its not living a life of riley, regardless of how many who have NEVER used or needed it may say so. Section 8 is paying over $1000 A month for these women to live in nice homes. You use 24/7 As an exaggeration to going out working like the average person. I spent time with my kids everyday. Because single mom has supper to feed them, homework to help with etc. That's a part of parenting. Yes it's tough after working all day. But that's what we chose when we had kids. Liberals feel so entitled. It's scary. conservatives feel so superior ... its scary |
|
|
|
|
