who said no one wanted to ban them? I remember commenting about extremists on both sides

no 36412/52/30,,,try it again , its 23

I find time for life like anyone else, it takes me little actual TIME to type , for instance, in this past HOUR< I have posted 9 times already,,,


so I find a life that includes an hour of posts, the same way others find a life that includes an hour of watching tv, or browsing youtube,, or any other hobby or activity someone chooses to include in their day,,,

and then, being capable of MULTITASKING Helps as well,,,,

Oh gawd... Soulman's math skills are as good as his reasoning skills?

The nerve!!! commenting on someone's post count?

Funny enough, if you shuffle through all MsHarmony posts... you'd be hard pressed to find one that DIDN'T make sense.
I'd pick that over 6700 garbage posts any friggen day!

Paranoia self-destroya!

I spend an average of 12 hrs a day on computers, repair, programming (my business), and I comment often with the site always open, but never in my wildest dreams could I ever post 36,000+ comments in only 4 years and still have a life.

It's all I can do now with my work, my charities, my weekends away, and my personal life to post as much as I do.

I'm just not that full of myself I guess to think people need my opinion over their own realities

HAAAAAA,,,this from someone who watches 45minute and 20 hour youtube videos,,,




I cant AFFORD to have 'weekends away',, , I have little outside life because I have a CHILD who depends on me that I have to be home with

and I actually post on many topics n RESPONSE to others, instead of making a focused effort to repeatedly STIR UP a topic of fear and divisiveness,,,

a one track mind may not be able 'in their wildest' dreams to post so much about their obsession ( I mean, how many different ways can someone post the same thing?)

as someone else can simply responding to hundreds about their opinions

lets all get off the 'high horse' and stop being so 'full of ourselves'

shall we?


apologies in advance , yellow rose

another stinking Hypocrite!

where?

except the Louse holds Public Office and has tried repeatedly to ban Guns along with other Public Officials!
Tell me again they aren't doing their damnedest to ban Firearms out of the Hands of Civilians,those Hoplophobes!
Open your eyes for once,and see what those Officials who you think are Saints,are really up to

1. never stted officals are 'saints'...consistently of the opinion that they are as human and fallible as any other person in any other occupation

2. I don't know who 'they' are, , consistently of the opinion that there are extremists on both sides of the gun debate,,, some probably holding public office,,

I haven't read the topic all the way through, because frankly it is probably the same as every other gun-debate topic.....and it's an old, old, old debate.


I honestly don't even know why there is still a debate...I thought our forefathers settled that debate in the constitution...so why is is there still a debate?

yep,about 60% in the Senate,and below 50% in the House!


"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." -The Dalai Lama

because the founders did not make an absolute statement about the CURRENT weapons nor did they make an absolute statement abut guns in the hands of EVERY CITIZEN

its ambiguous enough, with times changing, for their to be debate


and simply , people often have a hard time finding a logical balane when they have an extreme opinion about 'every' and 'all' of anyone ,,,,

I agree with the Dalai Lama

"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it is reasonable to shoot back with your own gun. Not at the head, where a fatal wound might result. But at some other body part, such as a leg."

I can see you haven't got a Clue about Firearms!

its not my quote, its the dala lama,, and if he doesn't have a clue,, may I ask why the choice to include his quote in your pro gun position?

I understand that comment.

When someone with a gun is trying to kill you, you may only have time to make one shot with your own gun. So, you shoot at the largest part of the other person's body so that your bullet won't miss.

I understand the comment too, even if I don't agree with it being a reasonable absolute,,,

my point was, obviously, the Dala LAma is a bad example of support for guns of ALL Types in ALL Situations

he merely made a statement about reasonable action IF people have a gun, and even there,, he obviously didn't agree with those who allegedly follow their 'manuals'


so I Was just curious why his quote would be introduced in a discussion about gun regulation,,,,

It seems this thread has ran it's course. When it comes to the time that members are attacking others instead of staying on Topic it is time to move on.

Therefore this Topic is being locked.

Site Mod
Kristi