100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Why Good People Should Be Armed | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I've thumbed through some of the views on here and only give mine! 1)Its your Right to bear arms fought for and Blood Shed by American Patriots 2)Its your Right to protect your Family from All Threats of danger (animal or human) 3)If you have whepons of any type you need to be prepared mentally and physically to use Deadly Force in case of any type of Threat of your Family,Yourself or defending your property"its the Law"for now anyhow! 4)When i was in the Armed Forces many others and myself took the Oath to Protect our Nation and Citizens of all Threats,Foreign or Domestic ! In other words I fought for these Rights and will Die Defending these Rights "Abroad or Here" as well as anyone else's Rights i Swore to Protect until I'm Dead! No Debate needed,A Fact!! The Old Saying Goes" until you Pry My Whepons from My Cold Dead Hands" Honor and Ancestral Pride Is Deep In Me! And its Pride not Anger that Motivates me! I Served Fought and will Die Defending these rights with an empty Weapon and My Last Breath!! These are the men and women who should be REQUIRED to be armed at all times!!! Agreed! 
Military, Police, Security, Intelligence, Firefighters... I'd even extend this to people who are responsible for the safety of multiple people at once... Such as Busdrivers, Pilots, Captains. Psych evaluations every 3-6 months! 
and Tyrants love People who have those Schnapsideen! Psych evaluation every week for some!!! 
You need yours immediately! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway maybe they think being on barrys side will help them when the SHTF... surprise, surprise, barry doesn't care about any of them... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 12/09/13 09:38 AM
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway maybe they think being on barrys side will help them when the SHTF... surprise, surprise, barry doesn't care about any of them... Idiot liberals scare me more than any person with a gun, bomb or weapon.... those I can defend myself against. Liberals want to take away my....EVERYBODIES ability to do so! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway when the 2nd amendment was written, there was a consensus that we should not have an ARMY during peacetime,, but instead a 'well regulated' militia of citizens to protect the 'STATE'. times have changed as we now have a STANDING army,, ,citizen militias ARE our voluntary army,,, I already get it,, and it still is irrelevant as to whether a 'good' person 'needs' to have a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway maybe they think being on barrys side will help them when the SHTF... surprise, surprise, barry doesn't care about any of them... no, it has nothing to do with anyone but myself, actually and my FREEDOM to CHOOSE not to be able to take life so easily or put those around me at risk of doing so |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway maybe they think being on barrys side will help them when the SHTF... surprise, surprise, barry doesn't care about any of them... Idiot liberals scare me more than any person with a gun, bomb or weapon.... those I can defend myself against. Liberals want to take away my....EVERYBODIES ability to do so! paranoid people with guns scare me and no one in this thread has YET to state they want to take anyones gun,,, I personally have YELLED and repeatedly stated that I don't,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 12/09/13 09:49 AM
|
|
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. Diane Feinstein (b. 1933) Gun owner with concealed carry permit PLease someone tell me again they are not wanting to ban Firearms! the right to bear 'arms' was written when the 'arms' available were much different 'arms' did not necessarily mean to include any and every weapon possible to manufacture, or could walk around with bazookas if we so chose and IM sure some extremists would propose that we 'need' to be able to do that,, but I think its quite preposterous and I don't believe the founding fathers meant anything that extreme or preposterous in their writings are SOME guns prohibited? yes , as they should be is that the same as the millions of guns in ownership being 'taken' from citizens? no is that the same as merely and simplistically 'banning' the peoples right to arms? no not anymore than recalling a certain make of cars is 'banning' the ability for citizens to own and drive cars or regulations on how cars must be built in order for sale is,,,, balance, is a wonderful thing,, extremism,, not so much The 2nd amendment was written that the people be as well prepared and on equal to their military. The people, citizens, of each state are its militia, as the Constitution states. Someday you'll get it, but by then I'm sure it will be too late..... for you anyway maybe they think being on barrys side will help them when the SHTF... surprise, surprise, barry doesn't care about any of them... no, it has nothing to do with anyone but myself, actually and my FREEDOM to CHOOSE not to be able to take life so easily or put those around me at risk of doing so Barry bombing brown skinned women and children is your idea of protection? You scare me more than any terrorist! You said it yourself. Gov't has altered the landscape, creating a need for standing armies in peacetime because they have declared a forever war to promote their agend of power over the people....those they are supposed to serve..... and that was the main reason for the 2nd amendment! As a matter of fact..... I swore an oath to protect my country from people like you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are facts from 2003. (still very relevent)
The Congress finds the following: ... (1) Police cannot protect, and are not legally liable for failing to protect, individual citizens, as evidenced by the following: (A) The courts have consistently ruled that the police do not have an obligation to protect individuals, only the public in general. For example, in Warren v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App. 1981), the court stated: `[C]ourts have without exception concluded that when a municipality or other governmental entity undertakes to furnish police services, it assumes a duty only to the public at large and not to individual members of the community.’ (2)(A) Every year, more than 2,400,000 people in the United States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals–or more than 6,500 people a day. This means that, each year, firearms are used 60 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives. (B) Of the 2,400,000 self-defense cases, more than 192,000 are by women defending themselves against sexual abuse. so,get slaughtered! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
some serious Hoplophobia evident in this Thread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did I state that congressional and presidential decisions which lead to the death of children is 'my idea of protection'?
my idea of protection involves lots of things, using common sense, being perceptive, making safe choices,,,etc,,, my idea of what it takes to protect a country includes tough decisions tat I would never want to have to make, so I don't run for office,,,,because those decisions often involve weighing the cost of life where there is no chance that people wont die , whatever the decision,,, the country needs no protection from me,, it needs protection from those who try to incite it by invoking fear tactics,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did I state that congressional and presidential decisions which lead to the death of children is 'my idea of protection'? my idea of protection involves lots of things, using common sense, being perceptive, making safe choices,,,etc,,, my idea of what it takes to protect a country includes tough decisions tat I would never want to have to make, so I don't run for office,,,,because those decisions often involve weighing the cost of life where there is no chance that people wont die , whatever the decision,,, the country needs no protection from me,, it needs protection from those who try to incite it by invoking fear tactics,,, Yep,and the Gungrabbers are in front doing just that! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Mon 12/09/13 10:11 AM
|
|
hoplophobe
A person who is afflicted with an irrational fear of firearms. Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer are classic examples of hoplophobes, whose blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution would make our Founding Fathers roll in their collective graves. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hoplophobe http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Hoplophobia 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did I state that congressional and presidential decisions which lead to the death of children is 'my idea of protection'? my idea of protection involves lots of things, using common sense, being perceptive, making safe choices,,,etc,,, my idea of what it takes to protect a country includes tough decisions tat I would never want to have to make, so I don't run for office,,,,because those decisions often involve weighing the cost of life where there is no chance that people wont die , whatever the decision,,, the country needs no protection from me,, it needs protection from those who try to incite it by invoking fear tactics,,, Yep,and the Gungrabbers are in front doing just that! no doubt, extremists on both sides are the 'no one should have guns crowd',, as well as the 'everyone should have a gun' crowd,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hoplophobe A person who is afflicted with an irrational fear of firearms. Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer are classic examples of hoplophobes, whose blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution would make our Founding Fathers roll in their collective graves. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hoplophobe http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Hoplophobia
who here has an 'irrational' fear of firearms,,lol Im sure its not me,, I have a 'respect' for the death gun use can so easily cause that's different than an 'irrational fear' I do have quite a rational fear of firearms in the hands of those who are unstable or criminally inclined,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hoplophobe A person who is afflicted with an irrational fear of firearms. Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer are classic examples of hoplophobes, whose blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution would make our Founding Fathers roll in their collective graves. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hoplophobe http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Hoplophobia
36,000+ posts in 4 years..... she has no time to know what the real problems are.....she's too busy telling everyone to find out the reality.
That's like 70 posts a day, every day..... where does she find the time? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tell me one more time they do not want to ban them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hoplophobe A person who is afflicted with an irrational fear of firearms. Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer are classic examples of hoplophobes, whose blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution would make our Founding Fathers roll in their collective graves. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hoplophobe http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Hoplophobia
36,000+ posts in 4 years..... she has no time to know what the real problems are.....she's too busy telling everyone to find out the reality.
That's like 70 posts a day, every day..... where does she find the time? not really, brush up on the math 36000 posts/52 months on site / 30 days per month more like 20 posts daily average considering I type for a living at about 80 wpm, and a post can be one word, or one paragraph,, its not time consuming FOR ME, at all but anyhow, its an irrelevant diversion from the topic,, as usual,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 12/09/13 10:41 AM
|
|
hoplophobe A person who is afflicted with an irrational fear of firearms. Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer are classic examples of hoplophobes, whose blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution would make our Founding Fathers roll in their collective graves. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hoplophobe http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Hoplophobia
36,000+ posts in 4 years..... she has no time to know what the real problems are.....she's too busy telling everyone to find out the reality.
That's like 70 posts a day, every day..... where does she find the time? not really, brush up on the math 36000 posts/52 months on site / 30 days per month more like 20 posts daily average considering I type for a living at about 80 wpm, and a post can be one word, or one paragraph,, its not time consuming FOR ME, at all but anyhow, its an irrelevant diversion from the topic,, as usual,,, Actually, it's more like 30 posts a day, every day.....where do you find time for a life? I thought I lived on my computer, because that is the nature of my business, but you must be Johnny Mnemonic! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i saw that 10 people were attacked by sharks in Hawaii in 2013... maybe they should think about banning surfing and swimming there now...
since obviously "some people" know better than the general public, we should just sit back and let the government "protect" us from ourselves, as the liberals seems to think. that way, we wouldn't have to worry about getting shot... if we didn't want to work, the libs will give us everything we need the world will be policed so we won't have to worry about terrorists, and the police, who are our "friends", will right there to watch and protect us... |
|
|
|
|
