no more than people 'downplay' what Obama has been successful in, or what democrats do, or what liberals get right...


its called a topic of interest, and mine have to do with the interests I see need imporvement

umm,, is the wite huse an actual institution that whits are involvd in that is run by 'young blac americans'?>

lol, I missed that

I thought we JUST NOW GOT ONE black person in te oval office who is obstructed by hundreds of others in the government from doing much of anthing,,,ol

and people wonder why they the DHS is "gearing up"... with these gangs out of control, they need help with finding these idiots... it's these types of people that are causing the DHS to wiretap and stick their nose in everyone's business...

So you compare him to Ron Paul?

However, if RP had had the ability to sign executive orders forcing his policies and agenda on America, I'm sure we wouldn't be in this mess we are in today!

The thing is, even with the power of the executive, RP would never rule by decree.

umm,, who mentioned Ron PAul...????

A Paul-bot?

I edited out the various examples included in the article below. The full article can be read at http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/black-on-white-violence-why-it-matters/

Both the rate and ferocity of black-on-white violence is nothing short of a national scandal. All decent Americans, and certainly all those who claim to care about race relations, should be as attentive to and concerned about this phenomenon as they are attentive to and concerned about anything else.

Not everyone sees it this way. Below are three objections that are commonly stated.

Objection #1: Blacks don’t have a monopoly on violence and whites don’t have a monopoly on being the victims of violence. Violence is part of the human condition. So, why should we attach more importance to this kind of violence than we attach to all sorts of other kinds?

Reply: Of course, what is said here is true. Still, that blacks constitute a small minority of America and yet comprise, overwhelmingly, the majority of perpetrators of interracial crime is, or should be, more than enough to convince the thoughtful that black-on-white violence is a very real problem.

Moreover, it isn’t just the interracial violence here itself that is a grave cause of concern, but the especially savage character that this violence all too often assumes. Just a cursory perusal of any random selection of black-on-white attacks readily reveals the mercilessness that an alarming number of black predators show toward their white prey.

Objection #2: Granted, black-on-white violence is a reality, but it is a reality begotten by a legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. If there are blacks who hate whites, it is because there were first whites who hated blacks. As the title of a 1960s television broadcast on The Nation of Islam put it, black animus toward whites is “the hate that hate produced.”

Reply: As scholars black, white, and other have repeatedly demonstrated, the dysfunction that marks the black underclass today was either non-existent or far less pronounced in years past—i.e. at times not as far removed from slavery and during which racial discrimination against blacks was both more ubiquitous and more overt.

This consideration aside, if the proponents of this objection were made to say aloud the implications of their position, the shame and ridicule that it invites just might force them to abandon it.

...

Objection #3: The race of the perpetrators and victims of these horrible crimes is irrelevant.

Reply: If this is true, then so too is race irrelevant while discussing America’s past. After all, if it is slavery that is immoral, then the races of master and slave are immaterial. And if it is immoral to segregate people along the lines of race, then it is irrelevant whether the segregationists are white or non-white.

There is no point mentioning that the Ku Klux Klan consisted of white supremacists who sought to torment blacks. Deserving of condemnation is not white supremacy, but any sort of supremacy, not the tormenting of blacks, but the tormenting of anyone.

But if race is relevant to discussions of American slavery and segregation, then it most certainly is relevant to speak of race in connection with most interracial violence in America at present.

And it most certainly is mandatory that all morally committed people start assigning this issue the priority that it deserves.

blacks have more opportunity to victimize whites, as they have a much higher likelihood of having o cross paths with whites than vice versa

the numbers are not that shocking once one researches probability and statistics as they relate to this reality,,,

The point is that there is a growing number of black-on-white race-based hate crimes, and those race-based hate crimes get less media attention than any white-on-black race-based hate crimes.

I still see no numbers backing this claim up

and I see no proof it is somehow racially relevant and not an extension of growing crime in general,,,


not to mention, the disconnect many have between what constitutes an interracial crime from an actual 'hate crime'

Well, when mobs of black thugs begin attacking black victims, then I will know that the mobs aren't using race to choose their victims.

Right now, the mobs appear to be targeting victims based on the race of the victims.

evidence?

what defines a 'mob' and how many does it take to actually participate to be seen as a 'mob'?

and where is the information about victims being only white?

I mean 'mobs' of kids ,both blacks and whites, attack EACH OTHER at sporting events and concerts,,,, separate incidents at one occasion count as a 'mob' , right?

does that mean the mob targeted based upon race? just curious...

In the crimes cited in the OP, there is no evidence that the mobs attacked a general population regardless of race. In one case, the attackers were yelling anti-white slurs.

really? n genral population?

lets recount

1.500 blacks attending a party billed as “An All Black Affair” fought and destroyed property in and around a downtown restaurant.


PROPERTY IN AND AROUND THE RESTAURANT,, how is that NOT the general population?

2. 200 black students rampaged through the campus, assaulting people and destroying property. One person was stabbed. Only one was arrested.

THROUGH THE CAMPUS,, no mention of the race of those assaulted or the property owners,, and only 1 arrest ,, wondering where the 200 number comes from,,,???



3. small group of blacks beat and robbed riders on a New Jersey commuter train, sending four people to the hospital

BEAT AND ROBBED RIDERS ON A TRAIN,,, ,, seems like a crime of convenience, unless they were required to pick black victims for t o not be 'racial'





4.blacks at the University of Minnesota robbed and assaulted four separate groups of white students over a weekend.


FOUR SEPERATE GROUPS OVER A WEEKEND,, doesn't seem like a 'mob' attack,, seems like four different crimes lumped together



fearmongering media at work again

Alright, I will concede that the cases cited in the OP don't give any direct evidence that the victims of the crimes were targeted because of race.

Perhaps I was assuming invisible racism ... that thing that you just know is there but you can't prove.

indeed

If it is permissible for one party to assume what can't be proven, then it is acceptable for all parties to do the same thing.

I posted the probability and statistics and you were unable to understand them. You constantly tout the opposite of the truth.

I absolutely agree

not everything in life has the kind of two dimensional black and white 'proof' that can be copied and pasted on an nternet forum

Many, many videos on youube showing negro hatred towards whites to be dismissed as just nothing to see.

This phenomena must be addressed and the mongrels need to be put to sleep.

As well as their Mammas and sperm donors.