100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: it would be these two | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Give it a rest?
Or what? You'll order this thread locked?
Any word on whether the other animal has been rounded up yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
give it a rest folks,,, any president is going to be presiding in time when OUR country can be held accountable for the deaths of children in other countries its not proof they approve, want, or decided to kill children its a cost of weapons in general, they hit whom they hit and the alternative of doing NOTHING at all, to prevent being the one who kills kids,, defeats the purpose of trying to DEFEAT those who would kill children and innocents,, its a decision all PResidents are making in that white house move on, trying to use that as proof of whether a parent in the white house cares about children,,,, and ,, my GOSH, is someone here above a 100 IQ the outrage about TREYVON martin stemmed from no one being held ACCOUNTABLE for the boys death there was no similar circumstance with the little boys death (Even though both parents had gun residue on their hands as well),, someone is IMMEDIATELY identified and charged,,,, there is no SIMILAR case,,this year no matter how many interracial crimes people keep pulling out their bum,,,,, 
whatever, no sitting president has whined about one killing of 1 kid, while killing hundereds at the same time... you should give it a rest, your backing of this joker is bordering on insane... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
give it a rest folks,,, any president is going to be presiding in time when OUR country can be held accountable for the deaths of children in other countries its not proof they approve, want, or decided to kill children its a cost of weapons in general, they hit whom they hit and the alternative of doing NOTHING at all, to prevent being the one who kills kids,, defeats the purpose of trying to DEFEAT those who would kill children and innocents,, its a decision all PResidents are making in that white house move on, trying to use that as proof of whether a parent in the white house cares about children,,,, and ,, my GOSH, is someone here above a 100 IQ the outrage about TREYVON martin stemmed from no one being held ACCOUNTABLE for the boys death there was no similar circumstance with the little boys death (Even though both parents had gun residue on their hands as well),, someone is IMMEDIATELY identified and charged,,,, there is no SIMILAR case,,this year no matter how many interracial crimes people keep pulling out their bum,,,,,
whatever, no sitting president has whined about one killing of 1 kid, while killing hundereds at the same time... you should give it a rest, your backing of this joker is bordering on insane... oh I see shouldn't be upset about one kid, only groups of kids,,, lol, makes perfect sense,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You claiming all who call yer BS and/or disagree with you as having an IQ of less than 100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
give it a rest folks,,, any president is going to be presiding in time when OUR country can be held accountable for the deaths of children in other countries its not proof they approve, want, or decided to kill children its a cost of weapons in general, they hit whom they hit and the alternative of doing NOTHING at all, to prevent being the one who kills kids,, defeats the purpose of trying to DEFEAT those who would kill children and innocents,, its a decision all PResidents are making in that white house move on, trying to use that as proof of whether a parent in the white house cares about children,,,, and ,, my GOSH, is someone here above a 100 IQ the outrage about TREYVON martin stemmed from no one being held ACCOUNTABLE for the boys death there was no similar circumstance with the little boys death (Even though both parents had gun residue on their hands as well),, someone is IMMEDIATELY identified and charged,,,, there is no SIMILAR case,,this year no matter how many interracial crimes people keep pulling out their bum,,,,,
whatever, no sitting president has whined about one killing of 1 kid, while killing hundereds at the same time... you should give it a rest, your backing of this joker is bordering on insane... oh I see shouldn't be upset about one kid, only groups of kids,,, lol, makes perfect sense,,,, kids are kids... out of site, out of mind, huh... makes perfect sense... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You claiming all who call yer BS and/or disagree with you as having an IQ of less than 100. nope, claiming those who have had the explanation of why a minors death going unaddressed or charged for WEEKS being reason for protest and still keep simplifying it to be about the crime being interracial in nature as having less than a 100 iq |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 08/25/13 11:35 AM
|
|
give it a rest folks,,, any president is going to be presiding in time when OUR country can be held accountable for the deaths of children in other countries its not proof they approve, want, or decided to kill children its a cost of weapons in general, they hit whom they hit and the alternative of doing NOTHING at all, to prevent being the one who kills kids,, defeats the purpose of trying to DEFEAT those who would kill children and innocents,, its a decision all PResidents are making in that white house move on, trying to use that as proof of whether a parent in the white house cares about children,,,, and ,, my GOSH, is someone here above a 100 IQ the outrage about TREYVON martin stemmed from no one being held ACCOUNTABLE for the boys death there was no similar circumstance with the little boys death (Even though both parents had gun residue on their hands as well),, someone is IMMEDIATELY identified and charged,,,, there is no SIMILAR case,,this year no matter how many interracial crimes people keep pulling out their bum,,,,,
whatever, no sitting president has whined about one killing of 1 kid, while killing hundereds at the same time... you should give it a rest, your backing of this joker is bordering on insane... oh I see shouldn't be upset about one kid, only groups of kids,,, lol, makes perfect sense,,,, kids are kids... out of site, out of mind, huh... makes perfect sense... blah blah blh,, yeah we talk about school shootings, we talk about theater massacres and amish massacres,,,, we are allowed to 'relate' to those things but we dare not empathize with one black kid being killed and no one held accountable,,,, or relate to their family,, see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil we aren't supposed to see race, in our colorblind society,,, until we start quoting the 'subculture' statistics, or posting the 'ferals' pictures,, that is I keep forgetting, or is it rather, I remain in a state of I don't care what other people think I should see or relate to,,, he is a parent who could relate to parents losing a child and to the outrage of no one being held accountable if that makes some people upset,, says more about them than it does him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like I said.
Looks like you calling anyone who disagrees an idiot. Says a lot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ur words
intelligent people disagree with me all the time on all sorts of things,,, but my words here are pretty clear if, you cannot understand why people would feel outrage that an unarmed minor is shot, with the SHOOTER AT THE SCENE and then permitted to WALK with no charge than, YOU MAY have a low iq,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a person thinks the topic is about a dead thug just might have a low IQ.
The topic is about an old war Vet being murdered by two chickenshit punks. ADD perhaps? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say. sure not,, except to make big deal over a statement the president makes while relating to the incident,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a person thinks the topic is about a dead thug just might have a low IQ. The topic is about an old war Vet being murdered by two chickenshit punks. ADD perhaps?
and here I thought the very TITLE, involved OBama ,,,,, tunnelvision , perhaps? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say. sure not,, except to make big deal over a statement the president makes while relating to the incident,,, Everybody can't be pleased all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say. sure not,, except to make big deal over a statement the president makes while relating to the incident,,, no, it's about a two faced lying president that says its not ok to kill children, while ordering their deaths at the same time... there's more of that perfect sense... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say. sure not,, except to make big deal over a statement the president makes while relating to the incident,,, no, it's about a two faced lying president that says its not ok to kill children, while ordering their deaths at the same time... there's more of that perfect sense... so no president should speak out about any death,, by your logic as all presidents reside over a military that sends troops and weapons to other countries which end up with children dying,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 08/25/13 12:14 PM
|
|
give it a rest folks,,, any president is going to be presiding in time when OUR country can be held accountable for the deaths of children in other countries its not proof they approve, want, or decided to kill children its a cost of weapons in general, they hit whom they hit and the alternative of doing NOTHING at all, to prevent being the one who kills kids,, defeats the purpose of trying to DEFEAT those who would kill children and innocents,, its a decision all PResidents are making in that white house I don't think you have any accurate statistic that proves that our bombing of other countries saves more lives than "doing nothing at all." Wow, You sound like a person who would defend Moses and Joshua for slaughtering entire cities, and kingdoms killing men, women children without mercy, just because they were presumed to have been worshiping a different God and sacrificing children to that God. Oh, that's right! YOU are! You do defend and support that... I forgot. How about solving the problem of poverty by killing all the poor? move on, trying to use that as proof of whether a parent in the white house cares about children,,,, and ,, my GOSH, is someone here above a 100 IQ "The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing" the outrage about TREYVON martin stemmed from no one being held ACCOUNTABLE for the boys death "The Boy" is as much responsible for his death as the man who pulled the trigger. "The outrage" is fake and it is a scam perpetrated by he media who pretty much works for the corporations who love causing strive and unrest and racial tension so as to justify more police control over the world. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 08/25/13 12:13 PM
|
|
The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing"
unless there is ANY Risk children might die, and then the preferred action is inaction right? 
and the 'outrage' wasn't fake,,from anyone I know someone shot someone,, someone WITH the weapon and AT The scene one with a gun , an adult, instructed NOT TO FOLLOW THE OTHER and one with no gun, a minor, trying to get home in an unfamiliar place at night ,, and the only one standing claims self defense and can WALK,,, many people feel that was bs..... understandably , people who feel its proper to respond to a broken nose with a bullet,, disagree and that's their prerogative,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say. sure not,, except to make big deal over a statement the president makes while relating to the incident,,, no, it's about a two faced lying president that says its not ok to kill children, while ordering their deaths at the same time... there's more of that perfect sense... so no president should speak out about any death,, by your logic as all presidents reside over a military that sends troops and weapons to other countries which end up with children dying,,, you keep saying that over and over, and it still doesn't have much to do with what i'm saying... i'm sorry you cannot/willnot understand the lies and two-faceness from your beloved barry... if he really cared about kids dying, he would stop the drones... but instead, he orders more more missions and more drones to be made...can you explain why he sends unmanned planes into foreign countries that we are not at war with to kill people? and isn't that unconstitutional? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 08/25/13 12:26 PM
|
|
We still talking about martin? A jury let him off after hearing all evidence. Not much left to say. sure not,, except to make big deal over a statement the president makes while relating to the incident,,, no, it's about a two faced lying president that says its not ok to kill children, while ordering their deaths at the same time... there's more of that perfect sense... so no president should speak out about any death,, by your logic as all presidents reside over a military that sends troops and weapons to other countries which end up with children dying,,, you keep saying that over and over, and it still doesn't have much to do with what i'm saying... i'm sorry you cannot/willnot understand the lies and two-faceness from your beloved barry... if he really cared about kids dying, he would stop the drones... but instead, he orders more more missions and more drones to be made...can you explain why he sends unmanned planes into foreign countries that we are not at war with to kill people? and isn't that unconstitutional? same reason we send troops to countries in civil unrest or swat teams out to homes with dangerous citizens or weapons to aide other countries that are facing threats from others ,,,'war' and 'drones' are not the only way that American government kills people, including children, and no president has been immune from residing over the government that sanctions those actions,,, so, like I said, it means NO PRESIDENT Has the right to speak out about any death anywhere,, RIGHT? |
|
|
|
|
