Topic: Anti-Gay Marriage Activists say | |
---|---|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. prove it... show me a gay animal couple... This has been discussed many times before. Here is a link that has been provided several times: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx that link proves nothing... just another gay try to prove he's right... there is no such thing as a gay animal couple, besides humans... the gayness your seeing there is confusion, nothing else... the same as a puppy humping your leg... If you disagree with the research, prove they're wrong. Let's see your research to back it up. my research? it mainly stays on the fact when animals couple up, it's ALWAYS a male and female... if you cannot tell the difference between confusion and real gayness, then it's on you... |
|
|
|
If gayness is so common how come a male dog will snap at another if it tries to hump him?????
|
|
|
|
If gayness is so common how come a male dog will snap at another if it tries to hump him????? because they are trying to justify their position with silliness... |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. prove it... show me a gay animal couple... This has been discussed many times before. Here is a link that has been provided several times: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx that link proves nothing... just another gay try to prove he's right... there is no such thing as a gay animal couple, besides humans... the gayness your seeing there is confusion, nothing else... the same as a puppy humping your leg... If you disagree with the research, prove they're wrong. Let's see your research to back it up. my research? it mainly stays on the fact when animals couple up, it's ALWAYS a male and female... if you cannot tell the difference between confusion and real gayness, then it's on you... real gayness, anus....nobody can make sense of your gibberish if they tried, you create words as you go |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. prove it... show me a gay animal couple... This has been discussed many times before. Here is a link that has been provided several times: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx that link proves nothing... just another gay try to prove he's right... there is no such thing as a gay animal couple, besides humans... the gayness your seeing there is confusion, nothing else... the same as a puppy humping your leg... If you disagree with the research, prove they're wrong. Let's see your research to back it up. my research? it mainly stays on the fact when animals couple up, it's ALWAYS a male and female... if you cannot tell the difference between confusion and real gayness, then it's on you... real gayness, anus....nobody can make sense of your gibberish if they tried, you create words as you go the why are you trying? go be gay and be happy, and quit worrying about what i think... |
|
|
|
So, not only can moe not tell us how homosexuality is harmful, he can't prove that homosexuality does not happen in nature. Got it.
|
|
|
|
So, not only can moe not tell us how homosexuality is harmful, he can't prove that homosexuality does not happen in nature. Got it. when did you prove that it does? |
|
|
|
Moe, I gave you a link that discusses homosexuality in nature. It won't matter how many more I provide, you're not going to agree anyway.
|
|
|
|
Moe, I gave you a link that discusses homosexuality in nature. It won't matter how many more I provide, you're not going to agree anyway. You can lead a tree hugger to water but you can't make him drink |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. prove it... show me a gay animal couple... You prove there's not! Exactly! You can't! Face on you! Besides it's already been proven! Do your research! thats your answer? prove it's not? lol, how childish.. every animal in the world is proof,male and female... show me your gay animal couple... you can't, because they don't exist but in your imagination... Fool! It's already been proven! It's not confusion! You're in such denial that you refuse to acknowledge the facts! Pathetic! Are you afraid that you yourself are gay or will turn gay if you accept the truth!? Deny! Deny! Deny! Homosexuality is still there! It's in nature! It's in life! You have been Checkmated! Now have a nice day! lol... i can't be "checkmated" by an idiot... The only idiot is the one who denies facts with none of their own other than theories. Which would be you. Nice try though. Finish your research and then come back and play again. lol... you have the weakest argument on here.. present your "facts" as you call them, and then when can decide who is or isn't an idiot... show me a gay animal couple, or any "fact" that says there is a gay animal besides humans... Incorrect. It is you with the weakest argument as you are without facts. Only theories of confusion that you have not proven. Homosexuality in nature has already been proven to be factual. Look into it. Plenty of facts. Once again you have lost your argument. |
|
|
|
Moe, I gave you a link that discusses homosexuality in nature. It won't matter how many more I provide, you're not going to agree anyway. You can lead a tree hugger to water but you can't make him drink |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? I never posted that such information existed on the other hand, the poster claims there is,, that's why Im asking for an example of such information,,, |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? I never posted that such information existed on the other hand, the poster claims there is,, that's why Im asking for an example of such information,,, So, you don't think it actually harms people, but you want to prove it doesn't hurt people? |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. so is cannabilism,, never been sure how that's a rational response to the discussion of HUMAN homosexual behaviors... |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. so is cannabilism,, never been sure how that's a rational response to the discussion of HUMAN homosexual behaviors... Your argument is invalid. Try again. |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? I never posted that such information existed on the other hand, the poster claims there is,, that's why Im asking for an example of such information,,, So, you don't think it actually harms people, but you want to prove it doesn't hurt people? really? I do think it is harmful,, others think it is not harmful that's not the point someone made the claim that there is a large 'case history' that proves its not harmful I am sking for an example of what someone else is claiming,, I have no interest in trying to prove a claim I never made to justify the absence of anything to back up a claim someone else made |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. so is cannabilism,, never been sure how that's a rational response to the discussion of HUMAN homosexual behaviors... Your argument is invalid. Try again. |
|
|
|
any examples of the said 'case history' which proves it doesn't hurt anyone? Can you show instances where same sex marriage is harming people? since when is it not harmful to go against nature? Homosexuality is actually in nature. Doesn't matter whether you agree with it or deny it. It's still there. so is cannabilism,, never been sure how that's a rational response to the discussion of HUMAN homosexual behaviors... Your argument is invalid. Try again. its not invalid what is 'natural' to one species isn't therefore 'natural' for all species,,,, |
|
|