100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Uhoh, gun crazies going crazier.....look out.... | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
JustDukkyMkII
on
Tue 01/15/13 09:41 AM
|
|
Again, no one can dispute that if guns were real deterrents to crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world. There is one gun here for each of us. No criminal knows for sure there is no gun where they commit their crime. Nor do they know if a passerby or whoever won't have one. So the idea of a gun being there doesn't stop them. They aren't afraid of guns.... Guns are not a deterrent to crime. Guns give those who believe it, imaginary protection from imagined fearful intruders. Who in truth are not afraid of the gun. I will accept your offers that 1) "if guns were real deterrents to crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world.", 2) "the idea of a gun being there doesn't stop [criminals]", 3) [criminals] aren't afraid of guns", 4) "Guns are not a deterrent to crime." upon proof of your claims. Failure to prove the above, aforementioned, numbered claims shall be considered proof that your claims are nothing more than your unsubstantiated, erroneous opinion and a fantasy residing only in your own alleged mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Again, no one can dispute that if guns were real deterrents to crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world. There is one gun here for each of us. No criminal knows for sure there is no gun where they commit their crime. Nor do they know if a passerby or whoever won't have one. So the idea of a gun being there doesn't stop them. They aren't afraid of guns.... Guns are not a deterrent to crime. Guns give those who believe it, imaginary protection from imagined fearful intruders. Who in truth are not afraid of the gun. You need to get back on your meds! Reality isn't working for you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Tue 01/15/13 10:10 AM
|
|
Again, no one can dispute that if guns were real deterrents to crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world. There is one gun here for each of us. No criminal knows for sure there is no gun where they commit their crime. Nor do they know if a passerby or whoever won't have one. So the idea of a gun being there doesn't stop them. They aren't afraid of guns.... Guns are not a deterrent to crime. Guns give those who believe it, imaginary protection from imagined fearful intruders. Who in truth are not afraid of the gun. I might add a couple of tidbits to your reasoning..... 1. If guns are no threat or deterrent, why is it so important to take them away? 2. You preach non-violence/gun control from one fork of your tongue saying we must save the children, yet with the other fork you want to send the military/gov't with it's massive force, to do exactly what the 2nd amendment was put in place to prevent, to rain down death and destruction on those simply wanting to protect their rights, family and property. Law abiding citizens legally own and register (an unconstitutional allowance that has been tolerated) their weapons. Criminals on the other hand have no such qualms. So what is the outcome of your mindless tirades of stupidity? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess those pesky criminals are like me, they just aren't afraid of those pesky guns.... What to do? What you THINK you sound like... 
What you really sound like... 
What you are more than likely going to do if a situation got really hostile... 
My past experience is that people who talk brave like you do are the first to flee! Let me see, a 900 pound bear is mauling your child. How exactly are you planning on saving YOUR CHILD WITHOUT A GUN? CALL THE POLICE? How about you are home and it is 3.30 am and two men ingress you home and you are hiding in your bedroom and suddenly you have two men glaring at you and one of them is dropping his trousers and grinning from under his mask. Who you gonna call, GHOSTBUSTERS? Hit them with a broomstick? Threaten them with a curse? Or maybe you are sick in the head and welcome an attack like this and get your freak on! So how would you chose to defend yourself? Call men with guns to help you? Come on smart azz! How would you protect yourself? Maybe you are a Martial Artist? Or did a couple of weekend self defense classes suddenly wake up your mastery of Kung Fu? I got it. YOU OWN A T.A.D.A.R.D.I.S.! Lucky you! Oh Andy, I already told you to stop blowing the hot air my way. You waste it here. Froggie? How do you want it? I have stood my ground to men a lot bigger and more motivated to start something with me than you... I have faced down dogs with a lot more bite than you bare handed. I stopped carrying a knife YEARS ago becasue I did not want to provoke a situation where I have been in fights becasue some jerk has to start something with me becasue of a knife on my side. Only twice have I ever resorted in my life to actually pulling a knife in a fight. These days I just resort to what I learned the hard way. So you are not offering for me to step onto a mat are you? That would be a horrendous mistake on your part especially if you assume a black belt will spare you me. What makes you think I will fight anyone with any rules or decorum? I don't fight. I do however regulate. So hot air? You are the one teasing a dragon here. Be careful, I do breath fire. I just have yet to do it. About that hot air... Froggie? I already am air born! 
Notice how I am gracefully embracing the air like a lover? Air under the soles of my webbed feet? Where will I land? Seriously, are you offering to take me on in a fist fight? Is that what you are implying? Is that what you mean by "Froggie?" Do I dare take you on? You are aware you are SOOOO tempting a side of me you really would not want to see! Lucifer himself is scared poopless of my dark side! Or do you fancy yourself a master of a war of whits? Unfair! I am up against an unarmed opponent! The victory would feel hollow! If you want to debate do so with real reason, real facts, and real information. Not lies, propaganda, and self belief! Nope, Facts to you are like soap to you in a bath evidently. You appear to be afraid of one so you must be afraid of the other. How is that for a fallacy? Can you identify it? 
You have nothin for me sweetie. Waste of my time as usual. And what do you bring to the table? HOT AIR! I got a balloon you can fill! And as far as wasting time, well, guess what, YOU DON'T HAVE TO RESPOND TO ME. Face it. I am a lot more MAN than you could or ever would be able to handle. Not like I would want to have anything to do with a frigid hate filled angry woman! But frustrating you like this with sane logic rather than pretense belief well, I am having fun at your expense. I LOVE making people who think they are so smart look stupid over and over and over again! Its a hobby of mine. And you are not so smart although you think you are! So now for your next little quip of intellect... And one more time, you want absolute gun control MOVE TO ENGLAND AND QUIT WHINING! There is a place that will give you what you want including a fairytale royal family, corruption galore, and criminal rights on a all new high! That way YOU can have what you want and the rest of us don't have to put up with your childish arguments! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I was a fear-filled, extremist anti-gunner, I would barricade myself in the basement of the institution and machine-gun anti-gun lunacy.
Old two-faced Barry wants States to enforce Federal Gun Laws. Ain't he the same POS that sues States for enforcing Federal Law??? Claiming they ain't allowed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Liberty and Freedom Foundation
BARACK OBAMA MAKES COWARDLY MOVE, WILL SURROUND HIMSELF WITH CHILDREN TO ANNOUNCE HE IS RESTRICTING YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS - In an absolutely cowardly move, Barack Obama will surround himself with children to try and make his executive power grab more acceptable to Americans. He plans to unilaterally restrict the 2nd amendment and thinks that surrounding himself with children will provide him cover. Obama will unveil a sweeping set of gun-control proposals at midday Wednesday, including an assault weapons ban, universal background checks and limits on the number of bullets that ammunition clips can hold (to as low as 7). He is also expected to include a slate of up to 19 executive actions that he can take on his own to attempt to limit your Constitutional right to bear arms. What a cowardly move to make such a bold attempt to grab power and use kids as his shield. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/30208-nbc-admits-no-assault-rifle-used-in-newtown-shooting/
When the president surrounds himself with children while giving his announcement that reasonable gun control measures are necessary, bear in mind that those ‘assault rifles‘ the government is sure to be going after were not even used in the Newton, Connecticut elementary shooting. As NBC admits in the video above, four handguns were used to carry out that despicable atrocity. This directly contradicts other reports. Pete Williams, who is NBC’s chief Justice correspondent, reported the following in the video posted above: This continues to be a very complex investigation and there is a lot of contradictory information out there, but we have some new information this morning (one month ago) from a couple of federal officials and state officials. They say now that there were actually four handguns inside the school, not just two as we were initially told. Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school. We knew that Adam Lanza, the man said to be the gunman here, also had an ‘assault-style’ AR-15 -style rifle that he had had taken to the school, it was in the car he drove there, his mother’s car, but we have been told by several officials that he had left that in the car. The correspondent makes it clear over and over again that he confirmed this information with federal and state officials. Now, a lot of media reports contradict this one, but somebody’s lying. The report that an ‘AR-15-style’ assault rifle was in the trunk of murderer Adam Lanza’s car is up for dispute as well. If one examines footage from police breaking into Lanza’s car, one sees police clearing a round from a “long gun of some type” that does not appear to be ‘AR-15 style’ or ‘assault-style.’ Whether or not the mainstream media are intentionally spreading disinformation about the Sandy Hook elementary tragedy, there is one thing for certain: not only are violent crime rates at a modern low and going down, but only 323 homicides were committed by rifles in 2011. That includes hunting rifles, assault rifles, military style rifles, semi-automatic rifles and whatever label one comes up with, regardless of magazine or clip capacity. In a nation of 311 million people, the odds of being killed by a rifle is about one homicide per million people, which is far less than the odds of being murdered by a blunt object. But we don’t hear the media arguing about regulating hammers and clubs. Again, when 99.7% of registered gun owners are law-abiding, gun control is not about guns, it’s about control. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Liberty and Freedom Foundation
TEXAS PLANS TO ARREST ANY OBAMA OFFICIAL WHO TRIES TO ENFORE HIS 2ND AMENDMENT RESTRICTING EXECUTIVE ORDER - Texas is standing up to Barack Obama's attack on our freedom and the Constitution and is proposing to JAIL any federal officials Trying to Barack Obama's gun Restrictions in the State. The Texas legislature plans to file the Firearms Protection Act, which would make any federal laws that may be passed by Liberals or imposed by An Obama order which would ban or restrict ownership of firearms or limit the size of gun magazines illegal in the state. State Rep. Steve Toth says the measure also calls for felony criminal charges to be filed against any federal official who tries to enforce the rule in the state. "If a federal official comes into the state of Texas to enforce the federal executive order, that person is subject to criminal prosecution," Toth said. WAY TO GO TEXAS! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/30208-nbc-admits-no-assault-rifle-used-in-newtown-shooting/ When the president surrounds himself with children while giving his announcement that reasonable gun control measures are necessary, bear in mind that those ‘assault rifles‘ the government is sure to be going after were not even used in the Newton, Connecticut elementary shooting. As NBC admits in the video above, four handguns were used to carry out that despicable atrocity. This directly contradicts other reports. Pete Williams, who is NBC’s chief Justice correspondent, reported the following in the video posted above: This continues to be a very complex investigation and there is a lot of contradictory information out there, but we have some new information this morning (one month ago) from a couple of federal officials and state officials. They say now that there were actually four handguns inside the school, not just two as we were initially told. Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school. We knew that Adam Lanza, the man said to be the gunman here, also had an ‘assault-style’ AR-15 -style rifle that he had had taken to the school, it was in the car he drove there, his mother’s car, but we have been told by several officials that he had left that in the car. The correspondent makes it clear over and over again that he confirmed this information with federal and state officials. Now, a lot of media reports contradict this one, but somebody’s lying. The report that an ‘AR-15-style’ assault rifle was in the trunk of murderer Adam Lanza’s car is up for dispute as well. If one examines footage from police breaking into Lanza’s car, one sees police clearing a round from a “long gun of some type” that does not appear to be ‘AR-15 style’ or ‘assault-style.’ Whether or not the mainstream media are intentionally spreading disinformation about the Sandy Hook elementary tragedy, there is one thing for certain: not only are violent crime rates at a modern low and going down, but only 323 homicides were committed by rifles in 2011. That includes hunting rifles, assault rifles, military style rifles, semi-automatic rifles and whatever label one comes up with, regardless of magazine or clip capacity. In a nation of 311 million people, the odds of being killed by a rifle is about one homicide per million people, which is far less than the odds of being murdered by a blunt object. But we don’t hear the media arguing about regulating hammers and clubs. Again, when 99.7% of registered gun owners are law-abiding, gun control is not about guns, it’s about control. But it's not propaganda when you hear it on the lamestream news!  
Cattle walking blindly to the slaughter while the lemmings follow the leader off the cliff..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/30208-nbc-admits-no-assault-rifle-used-in-newtown-shooting/ When the president surrounds himself with children while giving his announcement that reasonable gun control measures are necessary, bear in mind that those ‘assault rifles‘ the government is sure to be going after were not even used in the Newton, Connecticut elementary shooting. As NBC admits in the video above, four handguns were used to carry out that despicable atrocity. This directly contradicts other reports. Pete Williams, who is NBC’s chief Justice correspondent, reported the following in the video posted above: This continues to be a very complex investigation and there is a lot of contradictory information out there, but we have some new information this morning (one month ago) from a couple of federal officials and state officials. They say now that there were actually four handguns inside the school, not just two as we were initially told. Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school. We knew that Adam Lanza, the man said to be the gunman here, also had an ‘assault-style’ AR-15 -style rifle that he had had taken to the school, it was in the car he drove there, his mother’s car, but we have been told by several officials that he had left that in the car. The correspondent makes it clear over and over again that he confirmed this information with federal and state officials. Now, a lot of media reports contradict this one, but somebody’s lying. The report that an ‘AR-15-style’ assault rifle was in the trunk of murderer Adam Lanza’s car is up for dispute as well. If one examines footage from police breaking into Lanza’s car, one sees police clearing a round from a “long gun of some type” that does not appear to be ‘AR-15 style’ or ‘assault-style.’ Whether or not the mainstream media are intentionally spreading disinformation about the Sandy Hook elementary tragedy, there is one thing for certain: not only are violent crime rates at a modern low and going down, but only 323 homicides were committed by rifles in 2011. That includes hunting rifles, assault rifles, military style rifles, semi-automatic rifles and whatever label one comes up with, regardless of magazine or clip capacity. In a nation of 311 million people, the odds of being killed by a rifle is about one homicide per million people, which is far less than the odds of being murdered by a blunt object. But we don’t hear the media arguing about regulating hammers and clubs. Again, when 99.7% of registered gun owners are law-abiding, gun control is not about guns, it’s about control. But it's not propaganda when you hear it on the lamestream news!
Cattle walking blindly to the slaughter while the lemmings follow the leader off the cliff.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Liberty and Freedom Foundation TEXAS PLANS TO ARREST ANY OBAMA OFFICIAL WHO TRIES TO ENFORE HIS 2ND AMENDMENT RESTRICTING EXECUTIVE ORDER - Texas is standing up to Barack Obama's attack on our freedom and the Constitution and is proposing to JAIL any federal officials Trying to Barack Obama's gun Restrictions in the State. The Texas legislature plans to file the Firearms Protection Act, which would make any federal laws that may be passed by Liberals or imposed by An Obama order which would ban or restrict ownership of firearms or limit the size of gun magazines illegal in the state. State Rep. Steve Toth says the measure also calls for felony criminal charges to be filed against any federal official who tries to enforce the rule in the state. "If a federal official comes into the state of Texas to enforce the federal executive order, that person is subject to criminal prosecution," Toth said. WAY TO GO TEXAS!  
I knew I could count on Texas! I hope Colorado follows suit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Again, no one can dispute that if guns were real deterrents to crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world. There is one gun here for each of us. No criminal knows for sure there is no gun where they commit their crime. Nor do they know if a passerby or whoever won't have one. So the idea of a gun being there doesn't stop them. They aren't afraid of guns.... Guns are not a deterrent to crime. Guns give those who believe it, imaginary protection from imagined fearful intruders. Who in truth are not afraid of the gun. I will accept your offers that 1) "if guns were real deterrents to crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world.", 2) "the idea of a gun being there doesn't stop [criminals]", 3) [criminals] aren't afraid of guns", 4) "Guns are not a deterrent to crime." upon proof of your claims. Failure to prove the above, aforementioned, numbered claims shall be considered proof that your claims are nothing more than your unsubstantiated, erroneous opinion and a fantasy residing only in your own alleged mind. Not too hard to prove. There is a gun for each person in this country even the children. And...our crime rate is not the lowest in the world Done. Too damn easy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh Andy
Your not going to get me banned, you are not worth it.
I will take your offer and stop addressing your self impressing posts. 
Have a good life. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not too hard to prove.
Wow, who knew proving things was soo easy, and here I let science make me think it was hard work that required testable premises with conclusions that follow from them with no contradiction showing nearly perfect correlation and no inconsistencies. Man science is tough, they even want me to preemptively address any possible criticism that could arise against my theory.
There is a gun for each person in this country even the children. And...our crime rate is not the lowest in the world Done. Too damn easy. Pew! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Nations sure is busy to try push that Treaty through!
We hear the same Garbage from our Brady-Bunch here day after day! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not too hard to prove.
Wow, who knew proving things was soo easy, and here I let science make me think it was hard work that required testable premises with conclusions that follow from them with no contradiction showing nearly perfect correlation and no inconsistencies. Man science is tough, they even want me to preemptively address any possible criticism that could arise against my theory.
There is a gun for each person in this country even the children. And...our crime rate is not the lowest in the world Done. Too damn easy. Pew! When the facts are so obvious, there is no work to be done. There is a gun for each person in this country, check on it, if you don't believe me. And so obviously if guns were a deterrent to crime, see above, then we would be almost crimeless here in this country. Not too much science involved in common sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
TJN
on
Wed 01/16/13 10:57 AM
|
|
Not too hard to prove.
Wow, who knew proving things was soo easy, and here I let science make me think it was hard work that required testable premises with conclusions that follow from them with no contradiction showing nearly perfect correlation and no inconsistencies. Man science is tough, they even want me to preemptively address any possible criticism that could arise against my theory.
There is a gun for each person in this country even the children. And...our crime rate is not the lowest in the world Done. Too damn easy. Pew! When the facts are so obvious, there is no work to be done. There is a gun for each person in this country, check on it, if you don't believe me. And so obviously if guns were a deterrent to crime, see above, then we would be almost crimeless here in this country. Not too much science involved in common sense. First one needs common sense before they can use it. Second each person doesn't legally own a gun. Look at Switzerland. If you want to learn about owning guns and low crime rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not too hard to prove.
Wow, who knew proving things was soo easy, and here I let science make me think it was hard work that required testable premises with conclusions that follow from them with no contradiction showing nearly perfect correlation and no inconsistencies. Man science is tough, they even want me to preemptively address any possible criticism that could arise against my theory.
There is a gun for each person in this country even the children. And...our crime rate is not the lowest in the world Done. Too damn easy. Pew! When the facts are so obvious, there is no work to be done. There is a gun for each person in this country, check on it, if you don't believe me. And so obviously if guns were a deterrent to crime, see above, then we would be almost crimeless here in this country. Not too much science involved in common sense. First one needs common sense before they can use it. Second each person doesn't legally own a gun. Look at Sweden. If you want to learn about owning guns and low crime rates. Sweden, hell Europe has a whole different mind set than we do here anyway so it really isn't comparable, just to let you know so when I ignore it again it won't be felt as a slight against you. If guns were a deterrent to crime our country would have the lowest crime rate in the world. We have most of the guns in the world here. Check that out. So gun are not a deterrent to crime. So once we get that lie out of the conversation maybe we can have some constructive ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh Andy Your not going to get me banned, you are not worth it.
I will take your offer and stop addressing your self impressing posts.
Have a good life.
Oh Willowdraga, I am not working hard enough to get you banned then evidently! OH YES! I am part of a fiendish conspiracy. Me and my Republican Cronies and Right Wing wackos have teamed up with the NRA to get you thrown off of Mingle2. ROTFLSHMNH! stands for; Rolling On The Floor Laughing So Hard My Neck Hurts!
All you can do is answer with Ad Hominums, baseless ideologies, and you attempt to trivialize those who argue against you. You ague fallaciously and if you really were as smart as you think you are we probably would not be arguing. Well, I am debating while you choose to argue, like a spoiled brat child. What, daddy didn't hug you enough or he didn't hug you the way you wanted him too? ----That is me taking a cheap shot! But you make it SOOO damn easy and the more I get to know you you fit a stereotype I am finally nailing down! But I am not going to make summations here. That is not the topic at hand. You are under some impression disarming people will end crime. Well, that was tried in japan and the Meji Era was when the Samurai lost their swords and Japan picked up RIFLES! They disarmed the Samurai who were the nobility of Japan and centralized power around the emperor who was the only ARMED MAN (behind his army of men with Rifles and Cannons!). That did not end crime or stop it all all. Corruption went RAMPANT in Japan for a long time and still is in its own ways! Most uneducated Westerners don't see it though! All you see of Japan is Cherry Blossoms and Karate. You don't even know what a Yakuza is! And here is another thing, only cops and criminals have guns in Japan. VERY FEW PEOPLE ACTUALLY OWN ANY KIND OF FIREARM THERE AT ALL! So what fact can I dump on you to piss you off so much you go over the bridge so to speak? 
Can you smellllllllllllllllllll, lllll, llll, l, l, what the Rock is cooking? Burning Angry Liberal is my favorite smell! If we are lucky it leads to Spontaneous Human Combustion! 
|
|
|
|
|
