There is no entity called time.

It does not exist, so it does not move forward or backward. It does not move at all.

There is no time.

There is only perception, and cause and effect.

Cause and effect move in only one direction therefore the perception of time moving forward in one direction.

Time is the space between events. It is the largest of all the dimensions. It is the backdrop which allows existance to be perceived. It is real, it does exist, it's relativity doesn't diminish it's reality.

There is no time, only "spacetime." Time and space are intimately connected. There can be no time without space.

Einstein:

"People like us, who believe in physics, know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion." - Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein and the Fabric of Time

Surprising as it may be to most non-scientists and even to some scientists, Albert Einstein concluded in his later years that the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. In 1952, in his book Relativity, in discussing Minkowski's Space World interpretation of his theory of relativity, Einstein writes:

Since there exists in this four dimensional structure [space-time] no longer any sections which represent "now" objectively, the concepts of happening and becoming are indeed not completely suspended, but yet complicated. It appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence, instead of, as hitherto, the evolution of a three dimensional existence.

Einstein's belief in an undivided solid reality was clear to him, so much so that he completely rejected the separation we experience as the moment of now. He believed there is no true division between past and future, there is rather a single existence. His most descriptive testimony to this faith came when his lifelong friend Besso died.

Einstein wrote a letter to Besso's family, saying that although Besso had preceded him in death it was of no consequence, "...for us physicists believe the separation between past, present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one."


Most everyone knows that Einstein proved that time is relative, not absolute as Newton claimed. With the proper technology, such as a very fast spaceship, one person is able to experience several days while another person simultaneously experiences only a few hours or minutes. The same two people can meet up again, one having experienced days or even years while the other has only experienced minutes. The person in the spaceship only needs to travel near to the speed of light. The faster they travel, the slower their time will pass relative to someone planted firmly on the Earth. If they were able to travel at the speed of light, their time would cease completely and they would only exist trapped in timelessness.

Einstein could hardly believe there were physicists who didn’t believe in timelessness, and yet the wisdom of Einstein's convictions had very little impact on cosmology or science in general. The majority of physicists have been slow to give up the ordinary assumptions we make about time.

The two most highly recognized physicists since Einstein made similar conclusions and even made dramatic advances toward a timeless perspective of the universe, yet they also were unable to change the temporal mentality ingrained in the mainstream of physics and society.

Einstein was followed in history by the colorful and brilliant Richard Feynman. Feynman developed the most effective and explanatory interpretation of quantum mechanics that had yet been developed, known today as Sum over Histories.

Just as Einstein's own Relativity Theory led Einstein to reject time, Feynman’s Sum over Histories theory led him to describe time simply as a direction in space. Feynman’s theory states that the probability of an event is determined by summing together all the possible histories of that event. For example, for a particle moving from point A to B we imagine the particle traveling every possible path, curved paths, oscillating paths, squiggly paths, even backward in time and forward in time paths. Each path has an amplitude, and when summed the vast majority of all these amplitudes add up to zero, and all that remains is the comparably few histories that abide by the laws and forces of nature. Sum over histories indicates the direction of our ordinary clock time is simply a path in space which is more probable than the more exotic directions time might have taken otherwise.

Wrong, moving through time is exactly what we do as we age. But, it's a one way street. We cannot stop or go back.

Funny, I measure time with a clock.

This could go on forever. I need a beer.

Funny, I measure time with a clock.

Time exists, but not as an entity. As a relationship between space, and matter.

Much like gravity exists, but not as an entity, it also exists as a relationship between space and matter . . . just a different relationship.

Of course you do.



and what is a clock? It is a material object that has 'hands' that moves through space which represents "time."

The only way to measure time is by using mental and relative concepts of matter and space.

So what? I also use a yard stick to measure distance. Inches, feet, yards and miles are all mental concepts we use to measure distance in space. Time is exactly the same as space. We just move through it in a different direction.

Time exists, but not as an entity. As a relationship between space, and matter.

Much like gravity exists, but not as an entity, it also exists as a relationship between space and matter . . . just a different relationship.

So what? I also use a yard stick to measure distance. Inches, feet, yards and miles are all mental concepts we use to measure distance in space. Time is exactly the same as space. We just move through it in a different direction.

How does a "thing" have a "relationship" with anything else if it does not exist?

How can a relationship exist unless there are at least two separate things?

Are you now saying that space and time are two separate things? I thought you said they could not be separated, and that they were one thing --->spacetime.

Existence = The fact or state of living or having objective reality.

Do time exist?

From years many have tried to search & provide any evidence for existence of time but no one succeeded,just because it don't exist at all.

Time is such a strong illusion that no one can exclude it from facts of life.

Almost all physical quantities need time as a base to prove their existence & importance...but it is strange & true that time itself
don't have any physical existence.

We can measure how time changes when matter moves at significant percentages of the speed of light.

Your statement about evidence is completely wrong.

That's why I said..time is such a strong illusion...

Funny,You will keep on measuring & knowing time while being into a coma??

There is no division between the past present or future. NONE.

Also NOTHING HAPPENS in the past or the future. An event can only happen in the present.... Now.

Now is all that exists. The past is a memory. The future is a probability. We don't move through time.