Between Paul and Barry, which one had the countries interests at heart and who had the most experience?

experience at what? Obama has more legal and constitutional, Paul has more political and medical...of course he is also nearly twice OBamas age

Wow! This seems like a competition or "gotcha game" or ??...Like "who" has the "most" of "what" and "who doesn't?" (Etc.)...Maybe we'd do better asking each other about our priorities... What skills and expertise and qualities and policies matter the most to us? (As individuals!)...Life would be simple and easy if "one size" fit everybody! But unfortunately this just isn't the case!...I don't usually do "biggest" or "best" or "most" etc. One candidate may have decades of experience and another candidate may be more of a "newcomer." Yet the "newcomer" may seem more qualified for the job to me based on a multitude of factors ..Or it could be that the person with lengthy experience seems better qualified to me...And I know that I am subject to make mistakes when it comes to my "picks" at times. (Just like in gambling!)...But I try to learn from my mistakes and be a little more "savvy" and wise in the future. (Until my next blunder!)...It helps when we have a "clear-cut choice." And it's harder when we are "iffy" about both candidates. Don't you think??

Paul works within the Constitution and has many more years experience than Barry.

Barry was voted in because he is not Caucasian. His political history or, lack of, is proof.

Like I stated before.

With McCain as an opponent, even Regan's chimp could have won.

I'm not big on "shoulds." (Or absolutes.) As in: "You should vote for my candidate because ___." (Fill In the blank!)...Or: "You're stupid to vote for him or her because ___." (Fill in the blank!)