1 3 5 6 7 8 9 17 18
Topic: NIST says WTC building # 7 collapse caused by fire.
Optomistic69's photo
Wed 04/18/12 05:25 AM
Another interesting side note. Nine nutcases outwitted the most powerful empire the world has ever known and nobody was brought to book...

RKISIT's photo
Wed 04/18/12 05:29 AM
Contractors do cut cost and use minimum code material to build things so that could be one conclusion...just sayin.

InvictusV's photo
Wed 04/18/12 05:29 AM

Another interesting side note. Nine nutcases outwitted the most powerful empire the world has ever known and nobody was brought to book...


there you go again, trying to make our incompetent government and its agencies into god like immortals..

it isn't going to work...

metalwing's photo
Wed 04/18/12 06:02 AM

Fire, Not Explosives, Felled 3rd Tower on 9/11, Report Says



Published: August 21, 2008


"Conspiracy theorists have pointed to the fact that the building fell straight down, instead of tumbling, as proof that explosives were used to topple it, as well as to bring down the twin towers. Sixteen percent of the respondents in a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll said it was very likely or somewhat likely that explosives were planted.

During the last four decades, other towers in New York, Philadelphia and Los Angeles have remained standing through catastrophic blazes that burned out of control for hours because of malfunctioning or nonexistent sprinkler systems. But 7 World Trade Center, which was not struck by a plane, is the first skyscraper in modern times to collapse primarily as a result of a fire. Adding to the suspicion is the fact that in the rush to clean up the site, almost all of the steel remains of the tower were disposed of, leaving investigators in later years with little forensic evidence.

Using videos, photographs and building design documents, the investigators at the National Institute spent the last three years building an elaborate computer model of 7 World Trade Center that they used to test various chains of events to figure out what caused the collapse, Dr. Sunder said.

The investigators determined that debris from the falling twin towers damaged structural columns and ignited fires on at least 10 floors at 7 World Trade Center, which stood about 400 feet north of the twin towers. But the structural damage from the falling debris was not significant enough to threaten the tower’s stability, Dr. Sunder said. "...



Why conspiracy nuts shouldn't interpret scientific reports.whoa This report from NISC is almost four years old. The new report just says the actual collapse of the building did not originate at the damaged column but nearby fire damaged beams which took the column down.

metalwing's photo
Wed 04/18/12 06:19 AM

Another interesting side note. Nine nutcases outwitted the most powerful empire the world has ever known and nobody was brought to book...


No, actually about a million do it every year walking over from Mexico.

no photo
Wed 04/18/12 09:48 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 04/18/12 09:52 AM
The latest NIST report was correcting its prior boo boo. Why would anyone quote the old report?

And how could the entire building fall evenly all over strait down if only "nearby beams" were damaged. Also, there was no jet engine fuel to feed some raging fire. There was no towering inferno and no raging fire and NIST stated that the building was not taken down by structural damage... but by a normal fire. Not even a very big one.

The most obvious and most likely cause was explosives, and yet they avoided even investigating that.

ASCE's "investigation" was carried out on the behalf of, and under the limits imposed by FEMA as well as other federal agencies. The seriousness of these limits was revealed when ASCE investigators told the House Committee on Science that they did not even have the authority "to impound pieces of steel for examination before they were recycled." !!!

The magazine "Fire Engineering wrote in 2002:

The official investigation blessed by FEMA... is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members --described by one close source as a "tourist trip" --no one's checking the evidence for anything."

I will repeat:

"....NO ONE'S CHECKING THE EVIDENCE FOR ANYTHING"

So according to many sources, the sources that official report defenders here on Mingle are clearly contaminated and government controlled to engineer the cover-up.





Conrad_73's photo
Wed 04/18/12 09:51 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Wed 04/18/12 09:57 AM
http://eaton.math.rpi.edu/Faculty/Kapila/OSX/PREPRINTS/Det%20Symp%20%2798/DE131_Cookoff1.pdf
Explosives wold have cooked off in WTC7!
No Ifs,Buts or Whens!

Someone needs to explain how you take down a Building when the Damn Charges go off Hogwild through Heat,instead of an exact sequence!rofl

no photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:08 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 04/18/12 10:10 AM
Was the planting of explosives possible?

NIST argues that RDX material could not have been deployed without detection.

There are at least two problems with this statement. It presupposes that the people in charge of security at WTC 7 would necessarily have been concerned to prevent explosives from being planted. AND

The NIST report fails to mention that the security firm for WTC 7, as for WTC 1 and 2 also, Called Securacom (later called Stratesec) had connections to George W. Bush..., which may have made it possible for agents of our government to place explosives in the buildings and escape "detection."

The connections to which Staelin alluded were close one: Marvin Bush, one of the president's brothers, had been one of Securacom's principals in the 1990's, during which the fireproofing upgrades to bementioned below were made, and Wirt Walker III, kone jof jthe Bush brothers' cousins, was the CEO through 2001 (and hence on 9/11 itself.)

NIST ignores facts.

Although the point made by Staeliln was an important one, NIST IGNORED IT.
In putting out its final Report in November 2008, NIST simply repeats the statement in question, as if Staelin's comment had never been received.

Another interesting fact:
The security at the three airports where the departing planes left from also had connections to the Bush family.


mightymoe's photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:11 AM

Was the planting of explosives possible?

NIST argues that RDX material could not have been deployed without detection.

There are at least two problems with this statement. It presupposes that the people in charge of security at WTC 7 would necessarily have been concerned to prevent explosives from being planted. AND

The NIST report fails to mention that the security firm for WTC 7, as for WTC 1 and 2 also, Called Securacom (later called Stratesec) had connections to George W. Bush..., which may have made it possible for agents of our government to place explosives in the buildings and escape "detection."

The connections to which Staelin alluded were close one: Mavin Bush, one of the president's brothers, had been one of Securacom's principals in the 1990's, during which the fireproofing upgrades to bementioned below were made, and Wirt Walker III, kone jof jthe Bush brothers' cousins, was the CEO through 2001 (and hence on 9/11 itself.)

NIST ignores facts.

Although the point made by Staeliln was an important one, NIST IGNORED IT.
In putting out its final Report in November 2008, NIST simply repeats the statement in question, as if Staelin's comment had never been received.

Another interesting fact:
The security at the three airports where the departing planes left from also had connections to the Bush family.




what connections were those?

no photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:20 AM


Was the planting of explosives possible?

NIST argues that RDX material could not have been deployed without detection.

There are at least two problems with this statement. It presupposes that the people in charge of security at WTC 7 would necessarily have been concerned to prevent explosives from being planted. AND

The NIST report fails to mention that the security firm for WTC 7, as for WTC 1 and 2 also, Called Securacom (later called Stratesec) had connections to George W. Bush..., which may have made it possible for agents of our government to place explosives in the buildings and escape "detection."

The connections to which Staelin alluded were close one: Mavin Bush, one of the president's brothers, had been one of Securacom's principals in the 1990's, during which the fireproofing upgrades to bementioned below were made, and Wirt Walker III, kone jof jthe Bush brothers' cousins, was the CEO through 2001 (and hence on 9/11 itself.)

NIST ignores facts.

Although the point made by Staeliln was an important one, NIST IGNORED IT.
In putting out its final Report in November 2008, NIST simply repeats the statement in question, as if Staelin's comment had never been received.

Another interesting fact:
The security at the three airports where the departing planes left from also had connections to the Bush family.




what connections were those?



To name just one: MARVIN P. BUSH (And of course there's Jeb Bush.)



WHO IS MARVIN P. BUSH?

The public rarely sees Marvin P. Bush, brother of President Bush II.

Marvin P. Bush is the founder (1993) and Managing Partner of Winston Partners Group of Vienna, Virginia. It's a private investment company. He is also the Managing General Partner of Winston Growth Fund, LLP; Winston International Growth Fund, LP; Winston Small Cap Growth Fund, LP; all related companies.

Before this, he spent 12 years in the investment business with the firms of Mosley, Hallgarten, Estabrook and Weeden, Shearson Lehman Brothers, and John Stewart Darrel & Company.

In January, 1998, Marvin Bush was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Fresh Del Monte Produce company, the giant fruit company (major product bananas) that makes the canned goods we buy in our markets. Del Monte is owned by a very wealthy family from Kuwait, the Abu-Ghazaleh family. Mohammed Abu-Ghazaleh is the CEO and he has several family members on the Board alongside Marvin Bush. Another member of the Fresh Del Monte Board of Directors is Stephen Way, who is a major Bush fundraiser. Way is the head of the Houston-based HCC Insurance Holdings Company. In early 2000, Stephen Way acquired the appointment of Marvin Bush to the Board of Directors of HCC. In that transaction, Bush not only landed a very large salary, but a sweet stock option deal. He purchased about $130,000 worth of HCC stock which is now valued at close to $600,000, not even one year later.

Marvin Bush is also on the Board of Directors of something called the Kerrco Company.

Marvin also was named to the Board of Directors of the Stratesec Company, another large publicly-traded firm. This company is very secretive and you can find virtually nothing about it. Their website does not allow entry to several links unless one has a password. Virginia-based Stratesec is a provider of high-tech security systems. Two of the major customers for which they provide security are the Dulles International Airport at Washington, D.C. and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Stratesec's revenues recently went up by 60%, due to what the company describes as "new customers" Prominent people at Stratesec also include former Reagan operatives including Barry McDaniel and Air Force General James A. Abrahamson (who was involved in the Reagan "Star Wars" project). Stratesec is a company is heavily inter-related with the Kuwam Corporation ("Kuw" = Kuwait; "am" = America). Kuwam is a major Kuwaiti Company into many, many activities including the aircraft business. Stratesec's Chief Executive is also the Managing Director of Kuwam Corporation and Kuwam's Chairman Mishal Yousef Saud Al Sabah sits on Stratesec's Board of Directors. Stratesec is providing the primary security for one of the most sensitive airports in the world. Dulles in D.C., has a heavy middle eastern airline connection.



Conrad_73's photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:22 AM

Was the planting of explosives possible?

NIST argues that RDX material could not have been deployed without detection.

There are at least two problems with this statement. It presupposes that the people in charge of security at WTC 7 would necessarily have been concerned to prevent explosives from being planted. AND

The NIST report fails to mention that the security firm for WTC 7, as for WTC 1 and 2 also, Called Securacom (later called Stratesec) had connections to George W. Bush..., which may have made it possible for agents of our government to place explosives in the buildings and escape "detection."

The connections to which Staelin alluded were close one: Marvin Bush, one of the president's brothers, had been one of Securacom's principals in the 1990's, during which the fireproofing upgrades to bementioned below were made, and Wirt Walker III, kone jof jthe Bush brothers' cousins, was the CEO through 2001 (and hence on 9/11 itself.)

NIST ignores facts.

Although the point made by Staeliln was an important one, NIST IGNORED IT.
In putting out its final Report in November 2008, NIST simply repeats the statement in question, as if Staelin's comment had never been received.

Another interesting fact:
The security at the three airports where the departing planes left from also had connections to the Bush family.


you still haven't got a Clue what it takes to prepare a Structure to be taken down with Explosives,do you?bigsmile

mightymoe's photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:25 AM
never heard of marvin bush... why did you say jeb? he didn't have anything to do with this....

InvictusV's photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:55 AM

Was the planting of explosives possible?

NIST argues that RDX material could not have been deployed without detection.

There are at least two problems with this statement. It presupposes that the people in charge of security at WTC 7 would necessarily have been concerned to prevent explosives from being planted. AND

The NIST report fails to mention that the security firm for WTC 7, as for WTC 1 and 2 also, Called Securacom (later called Stratesec) had connections to George W. Bush..., which may have made it possible for agents of our government to place explosives in the buildings and escape "detection."

The connections to which Staelin alluded were close one: Marvin Bush, one of the president's brothers, had been one of Securacom's principals in the 1990's, during which the fireproofing upgrades to bementioned below were made, and Wirt Walker III, kone jof jthe Bush brothers' cousins, was the CEO through 2001 (and hence on 9/11 itself.)

NIST ignores facts.

Although the point made by Staeliln was an important one, NIST IGNORED IT.
In putting out its final Report in November 2008, NIST simply repeats the statement in question, as if Staelin's comment had never been received.

Another interesting fact:
The security at the three airports where the departing planes left from also had connections to the Bush family.




I suppose the bomb sniffing dogs that roamed the building with their port authority police handlers missed the tons of explosives planted in the 90's..

That's a good one..

mightymoe's photo
Wed 04/18/12 10:58 AM


Was the planting of explosives possible?

NIST argues that RDX material could not have been deployed without detection.

There are at least two problems with this statement. It presupposes that the people in charge of security at WTC 7 would necessarily have been concerned to prevent explosives from being planted. AND

The NIST report fails to mention that the security firm for WTC 7, as for WTC 1 and 2 also, Called Securacom (later called Stratesec) had connections to George W. Bush..., which may have made it possible for agents of our government to place explosives in the buildings and escape "detection."

The connections to which Staelin alluded were close one: Marvin Bush, one of the president's brothers, had been one of Securacom's principals in the 1990's, during which the fireproofing upgrades to bementioned below were made, and Wirt Walker III, kone jof jthe Bush brothers' cousins, was the CEO through 2001 (and hence on 9/11 itself.)

NIST ignores facts.

Although the point made by Staeliln was an important one, NIST IGNORED IT.
In putting out its final Report in November 2008, NIST simply repeats the statement in question, as if Staelin's comment had never been received.

Another interesting fact:
The security at the three airports where the departing planes left from also had connections to the Bush family.




I suppose the bomb sniffing dogs that roamed the building with their port authority police handlers missed the tons of explosives planted in the 90's..

That's a good one..



no, apparently, there was a bush brother at every airport, and cousins that were everywhere else. they would no problem putting a bush inside the dog sniffers core. it makes perfect sense, so it must be true...

Chazster's photo
Wed 04/18/12 11:04 AM
They are not talking detection from security but detection from anyone in the building. Not to mention there were no cascading explosions thus your point is moot. There could be no demolition explosives if there were no demolition like explosions preceeding the colapse. I love how you guys keep ignoring this fact.

no photo
Wed 04/18/12 11:33 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 04/18/12 11:33 AM

never heard of marvin bush... why did you say jeb? he didn't have anything to do with this....


He was involved with the whole thing. The so-called hi-jackers spent most of their time in Florida, which is something the official report fails to elaborate on.

The Bush Cartel are into smuggling drugs and also guns. They are a criminal organization, a family, who totally work together.

For details on the Florida criminal connection to 9/11s, go to madcowprod.com.

http://www.madcowprod.com/05022005.html

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 04/18/12 11:34 AM





Read my post again invictus and you owe mebigsmile


What are you talking about?




So how can you possibly say that debris falling from WTC-1 had no bearing on WTC-7 collapsing..

I didn't say that....that is what I am talking about


I don't see a quote or a link in that post, so unless I am a mind reader or you hid the link in some sort of irish cipher it would have occurred to me that was your theory.




Between you and the Swiss Genius not paying attention I despairbigsmile .

Past my Bedtime now so I will say Oiche Maith
Feicfidh mé thú amárach
still waiting for you to make a viable Argument,instead of some dark Conspiratorial Innuendos!

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 04/18/12 11:34 AM





Read my post again invictus and you owe mebigsmile


What are you talking about?




So how can you possibly say that debris falling from WTC-1 had no bearing on WTC-7 collapsing..

I didn't say that....that is what I am talking about


I don't see a quote or a link in that post, so unless I am a mind reader or you hid the link in some sort of irish cipher it would have occurred to me that was your theory.




Between you and the Swiss Genius not paying attention I despairbigsmile .

Past my Bedtime now so I will say Oiche Maith
Feicfidh mé thú amárach
still waiting for you to make a viable Argument,instead of some dark Conspiratorial Innuendos!

no photo
Wed 04/18/12 11:36 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 04/18/12 11:37 AM

They are not talking detection from security but detection from anyone in the building. Not to mention there were no cascading explosions thus your point is moot. There could be no demolition explosives if there were no demolition like explosions preceeding the colapse. I love how you guys keep ignoring this fact.



Oh but there were explosions preceding the collapse and there were dozens of witnesses to that, some of them were injured before the collapse. You have not really done any research on these things at all. You have turned a blind eye to credible witnesses, and qualified professionals simply because you want to believe what you want to believe.

You can't handle the truth.


no photo
Wed 04/18/12 11:40 AM

The fact is, there is plenty of clues and evidence (a lot of it has been suppressed and covered up.)that put the Bush-Cheney administration in the position of being at the very least, a suspect.

And yes indeed that is a dark conspiratorial innuendo. But it is a fact.

You don't let suspects investigate the crime they are suspected of being part of.

1 3 5 6 7 8 9 17 18