see, all you people do is read the truther websites and don't learn the truth. read the very first sentence on the abstract of this page...

http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=861610

oh, and by the way, this is the NIST website, so i can tell that none of you people have ever been there...

It won't help. It just used real science and real investigative techniques. There are no aliens, ray guns, George Bush clones, or evil midgets sneaking explosives into the buildings for years.

Exactly. It does not say that the structural damage from the impact of debris caused the collapse. It says that THE FIRES caused the collapse.

DUH!

Popular Mechanics totally jumped the gun on their report in 2006. The structural damage did not cause the collapse. The diesel fuel did not play an important role either.

But you keep insisting that old information is the gospel fact.

Now, starting with what NIST actually says caused the collapse, (FIRES AND ONLY FIRES) It is from there that you follow the real evidence and find that the fires did not get hot enough, or last long enough to cause the collapse.

End of story.

I'm done.

Actually even by your own post you say the structural damage did not initiate the collapse. This is true because if it did the collapse would have started at that time. That does not mean it didn't contribute to or effect the outcome of.

If only that was true.