100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: How To Stop The Rapture | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
CowboyGH said: Because Jesus defeated death. He was resurrected from hell Whaaaaaaat ? ! Show me where in the bible is written that ? Jesus took all our sins on him, he became guilty of every last sin done on the face of this Earth. At that very moment, Jesus was a mass murderer, a theif, and so on. Every little "evil" thing anyone had done on this world or will do was absorbed into Jesus, he died to pay for them all. 2 Corinthians 5:21 21For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him And because of this, Jesus was sent to hell. Then Jesus defeated hell for each and everyone of us. Before Jesus did this, man had to earn forgiveness themselves through sacrifice. Now Jesus has become the ultimate sacrifice so to speak fulfilling that covenant. Then he defeated death and hell so all of us could through him. Acts 2:31 31He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH said: Because Jesus defeated death. He was resurrected from hell Whaaaaaaat ? ! Show me where in the bible is written that ? the fact that Jesus was in Hell only means that he didn't defeat Death, he was "resurrected /reincarnated" from Hell into another body, this is why his body did not have decay and why no one recognized him resurrected from Hell generally refers to the term as to how demons are brought onto Earth this is when it turns into either Zombieism or Possession or Reincarnation if Jesus was resurrected into the same body then the body would have three days of decay and he would be a Zombie, you can't get to many people wanting to become followers if you come back looking like Zombieland ..which means that he did not come back in his original body if the body didn't have decay then it points to "Reincarnation"..but reincarnation begins at conception, and the body that Jesus came back in was an adult since Jesus was in an Adult body which was not at first recognized by those closest to him is why it points to the spirit of Jesus being resurrected like a demon from hell and placed into another body and this would be "Possession" if Jesus was resurrected into the same body then the body would have three days of decay and he would be a Zombie, you can't get to many people wanting to become followers if you come back looking like Zombieland ..which means that he did not come back in his original body Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". Acts 2:31 31He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ya know Funches i bet alot of believers didn't even know that the guy who is the founding father of Abrahamic monotheism Abraham was screwing his sister(Sarah) and married her.So Isaac is actually a product of incest.Later when Moses came into the picture he stated that "no brother shall marry his sister."So God was ok with it but not Moses?
Goes to show how mans writing of "The Great Book" is just that,mans writing not actually what God said.So if this is the case then noone now knows exactly what God said.Also God was gonna punish a King for messing around with Abrahams wife,even though he thought Sarah was just Abes sister.Abraham let the King have his wife/sister for slaves and some wealth.Now ain't that some morals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ya know Funches i bet alot of believers didn't even know that the guy who is the founding father of Abrahamic monotheism Abraham was screwing his sister(Sarah) and married her.So Isaac is actually a product of incest.Later when Moses came into the picture he stated that "no brother shall marry his sister."So God was ok with it but not Moses? Moses's Mother was his Aunt and Issac's Mother was his Aunt ...Like Father like Son...in the biblical days inbreeding was all the fad Goes to show how mans writing of "The Great Book" is just that,mans writing not actually what God said.So if this is the case then noone now knows exactly what God said.Also God was gonna punish a King for messing around with Abrahams wife,even though he thought Sarah was just Abes sister.Abraham let the King have his wife/sister for slaves and some wealth.Now ain't that some morals. today it's called "pimping her out" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. Your statement doesn't even make sense. They did recognize Jesus proves he didn't resurrect in the same body... interesting. Why would they recognize him in a different body? If he would have been in a different body, he would have looked differently. His body did not decay or corrupt in any way. They day he resurrected his body was in the same exact condition as it was in when they put his body in the tomb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. Your statement doesn't even make sense. They did recognize Jesus proves he didn't resurrect in the same body... interesting. Why would they recognize him in a different body? If he would have been in a different body, he would have looked differently. His body did not decay or corrupt in any way. They day he resurrected his body was in the same exact condition as it was in when they put his body in the tomb. you have to read the story in order to know that Mary nor the Disciples recognized Jesus ...he had to convince them that he was Jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. I think you mis-worded this one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
funches
on
Tue 02/21/12 11:49 AM
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. I think you mis-worded this one. if you tried to point it out means I didn't mis-word it..and besides Cowboy understood it "or any" places the statement in context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH said: Because Jesus defeated death. He was resurrected from hell Whaaaaaaat ? ! Show me where in the bible is written that ? the fact that Jesus was in Hell only means that he didn't defeat Death, he was "resurrected /reincarnated" from Hell into another body, this is why his body did not have decay and why no one recognized him resurrected from Hell generally refers to the term as to how demons are brought onto Earth this is when it turns into either Zombieism or Possession or Reincarnation if Jesus was resurrected into the same body then the body would have three days of decay and he would be a Zombie, you can't get to many people wanting to become followers if you come back looking like Zombieland ..which means that he did not come back in his original body if the body didn't have decay then it points to "Reincarnation"..but reincarnation begins at conception, and the body that Jesus came back in was an adult since Jesus was in an Adult body which was not at first recognized by those closest to him is why it points to the spirit of Jesus being resurrected like a demon from hell and placed into another body and this would be "Possession" Humanizing. Let me point something out to. Your logic is based on mankind's basic concepts of logic. Anything against that, you deem ridiculous, ludicrous, and fantasy. Granted, I won't condone that, that's how I am. However, once again, as I've tried to point out. This is what I deem 'humanizing' God. Not emotion,s crying, etc; but you are taking 'acts of God' and comparing to what the actual restrictions of humans. Thus, humanizing. RSKIT, you too are a product of inbreeding. FUNCHES, you are too, anyway you slice it. Humans in general are a product of inbreeding. Minus God, YOU ARE STILL A PRODUCT OF INBREEDING. Do you not realize, criticizing the Bible for making it known, or science leaving this fact out; does NOT make the Bible more horrid simply because it 'speaks the undeniable truth'. Tracing your lines back, at some point, place, and time, there was a few humans. Mate, mate, mate; somewhere along the line; it happened. Who cares when, its irrelevant, but it happened. Back to humanizing. Outside of God, whatever created the ENTIRE universe, is beyond our understanding, to this point. Even the Big Bang Theory. Energy met at one spot, exploded, planets were formed, etc. ..but what created that energy? If it was true.. ..why does everything revolve around the sun the way it does? Circular. Does that defeat our own knowledge of science? If you leap from the moon, just straight in the air. What direction would you go? Would you revolve around the moon? No. You'd float in a straight, distinct line until you hit something or something hit you to change your course. Example: Meteors. They fly perfectly straight UNLESS they near a planet and that planet's pull alters their course. So, if you are that against inbreeding, jump off a bridge. You are a product of it to. Because your parents are, and those before them. THAT SAID. You speak of using logic, almost daily. You speak of using common sense, as if that was your bible. So, where is your own logic and common sense? Why do you sit here and constantly use terms like 'zombieism' and 'magic'; when you yourself cannot produce any other viable answers? What purpose does it serve to go into each conversation of someone else's beliefs and merely ridicule them for what they choose to belief? If you notice, I ask questions and do so in a respectful manner to their religion, I don't poke fun or make a mockery of it. There is no point in that. Why? Because you cannot prove otherwise. In doing such, all you do is keep constantly belittling yourself. I give props to Cowboy for merely trying to quell your ridiculous premonitions, ideals, and statements; but truly, he is only trying to do what that very Bible your protest proclaims he should do. Spread the Word. I may not believe in God himself, but I do believe in the message; because, despite the acts of carnage, war, and genocide; it holds a message of love, sacrifice, and commitment. So, why can't you, for once, just act as though you have some level, even if small, of decency and respect? Did Jesus doubt God? No, but he did feel as though his destiny was meant to be easier. His faith in his father wasn't shaken, but his faith in his destiny was. Jesus, and maybe even God himself, made mistakes. So what. Maybe they were partially human; but his acts, those were not, if they did happen. Will you read all of this? Probably not, because your response will cut out half of what I said and you will only ridicule one portion of it. I don't criticize you for doubting, I am in the same, as with RSKIT, but the way you portray your disbelief, makes you a tool, a lesser body; because all you do is ridicule and make a mockery of it. The bible came from an age when everything was different. There wasn't massive cities, skyscrapers, and billions upon billions of people. Maybe most parts are just analogies that we can't understand because they are no longer evident because we manipulated they very foundation of the planet we call Earth. They didn't have 'science' to the extent we do now; but even so, he can't disprove everything. And even if someone were to rewrite the bible so it made more sense, it would no longer be a historical document; and would give you only more space to doubt and criticize. Lastly. How is it you believe in zombieism and not God? ..is it mainstream media? Guess what, God was in Hollywood too. Geez, man.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. I think you mis-worded this one. if you tried to point it out means I didn't mis-word it..and besides Cowboy understood it "or any" places the statement in context Oh really? The fact (a proven point) That Mary or any of the disciples (Mary or these people) Recognized (to know) Jesus (Christ) proves (to not be disputed, or to back said claim) that he didn't (to not do) resurrect (return from the dead; be born again) into the same body (to retake the same physical form) So in other words. You are saying that Mary and the Disciples did not recognize Jesus because he had in fact returned to his same exact previous form? ..that makes sense? Cowboy knew what you meant, but doesn't mean it actually made any sense at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH said: Because Jesus defeated death. He was resurrected from hell Whaaaaaaat ? ! Show me where in the bible is written that ? the fact that Jesus was in Hell only means that he didn't defeat Death, he was "resurrected /reincarnated" from Hell into another body, this is why his body did not have decay and why no one recognized him resurrected from Hell generally refers to the term as to how demons are brought onto Earth this is when it turns into either Zombieism or Possession or Reincarnation if Jesus was resurrected into the same body then the body would have three days of decay and he would be a Zombie, you can't get to many people wanting to become followers if you come back looking like Zombieland ..which means that he did not come back in his original body if the body didn't have decay then it points to "Reincarnation"..but reincarnation begins at conception, and the body that Jesus came back in was an adult since Jesus was in an Adult body which was not at first recognized by those closest to him is why it points to the spirit of Jesus being resurrected like a demon from hell and placed into another body and this would be "Possession" Humanizing. Let me point something out to. Your logic is based on mankind's basic concepts of logic. Anything against that, you deem ridiculous, ludicrous, and fantasy. Granted, I won't condone that, that's how I am. However, once again, as I've tried to point out. This is what I deem 'humanizing' God. Not emotion,s crying, etc; but you are taking 'acts of God' and comparing to what the actual restrictions of humans. Thus, humanizing. RSKIT, you too are a product of inbreeding. FUNCHES, you are too, anyway you slice it. Humans in general are a product of inbreeding. Minus God, YOU ARE STILL A PRODUCT OF INBREEDING. Do you not realize, criticizing the Bible for making it known, or science leaving this fact out; does NOT make the Bible more horrid simply because it 'speaks the undeniable truth'. Tracing your lines back, at some point, place, and time, there was a few humans. Mate, mate, mate; somewhere along the line; it happened. Who cares when, its irrelevant, but it happened. Back to humanizing. Outside of God, whatever created the ENTIRE universe, is beyond our understanding, to this point. Even the Big Bang Theory. Energy met at one spot, exploded, planets were formed, etc. ..but what created that energy? If it was true.. ..why does everything revolve around the sun the way it does? Circular. Does that defeat our own knowledge of science? If you leap from the moon, just straight in the air. What direction would you go? Would you revolve around the moon? No. You'd float in a straight, distinct line until you hit something or something hit you to change your course. Example: Meteors. They fly perfectly straight UNLESS they near a planet and that planet's pull alters their course. So, if you are that against inbreeding, jump off a bridge. You are a product of it to. Because your parents are, and those before them. THAT SAID. You speak of using logic, almost daily. You speak of using common sense, as if that was your bible. So, where is your own logic and common sense? Why do you sit here and constantly use terms like 'zombieism' and 'magic'; when you yourself cannot produce any other viable answers? What purpose does it serve to go into each conversation of someone else's beliefs and merely ridicule them for what they choose to belief? If you notice, I ask questions and do so in a respectful manner to their religion, I don't poke fun or make a mockery of it. There is no point in that. Why? Because you cannot prove otherwise. In doing such, all you do is keep constantly belittling yourself. I give props to Cowboy for merely trying to quell your ridiculous premonitions, ideals, and statements; but truly, he is only trying to do what that very Bible your protest proclaims he should do. Spread the Word. I may not believe in God himself, but I do believe in the message; because, despite the acts of carnage, war, and genocide; it holds a message of love, sacrifice, and commitment. So, why can't you, for once, just act as though you have some level, even if small, of decency and respect? Did Jesus doubt God? No, but he did feel as though his destiny was meant to be easier. His faith in his father wasn't shaken, but his faith in his destiny was. Jesus, and maybe even God himself, made mistakes. So what. Maybe they were partially human; but his acts, those were not, if they did happen. Will you read all of this? Probably not, because your response will cut out half of what I said and you will only ridicule one portion of it. I don't criticize you for doubting, I am in the same, as with RSKIT, but the way you portray your disbelief, makes you a tool, a lesser body; because all you do is ridicule and make a mockery of it. The bible came from an age when everything was different. There wasn't massive cities, skyscrapers, and billions upon billions of people. Maybe most parts are just analogies that we can't understand because they are no longer evident because we manipulated they very foundation of the planet we call Earth. They didn't have 'science' to the extent we do now; but even so, he can't disprove everything. And even if someone were to rewrite the bible so it made more sense, it would no longer be a historical document; and would give you only more space to doubt and criticize. Lastly. How is it you believe in zombieism and not God? ..is it mainstream media? Guess what, God was in Hollywood too. Geez, man.. dude...re-read the post....I was talking about Jesus ....perhaps that's why I was humanizing him because he was a human..DUH do you think he was one of the teletubbies? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH said: Because Jesus defeated death. He was resurrected from hell Whaaaaaaat ? ! Show me where in the bible is written that ? the fact that Jesus was in Hell only means that he didn't defeat Death, he was "resurrected /reincarnated" from Hell into another body, this is why his body did not have decay and why no one recognized him resurrected from Hell generally refers to the term as to how demons are brought onto Earth this is when it turns into either Zombieism or Possession or Reincarnation if Jesus was resurrected into the same body then the body would have three days of decay and he would be a Zombie, you can't get to many people wanting to become followers if you come back looking like Zombieland ..which means that he did not come back in his original body if the body didn't have decay then it points to "Reincarnation"..but reincarnation begins at conception, and the body that Jesus came back in was an adult since Jesus was in an Adult body which was not at first recognized by those closest to him is why it points to the spirit of Jesus being resurrected like a demon from hell and placed into another body and this would be "Possession" Humanizing. Let me point something out to. Your logic is based on mankind's basic concepts of logic. Anything against that, you deem ridiculous, ludicrous, and fantasy. Granted, I won't condone that, that's how I am. However, once again, as I've tried to point out. This is what I deem 'humanizing' God. Not emotion,s crying, etc; but you are taking 'acts of God' and comparing to what the actual restrictions of humans. Thus, humanizing. RSKIT, you too are a product of inbreeding. FUNCHES, you are too, anyway you slice it. Humans in general are a product of inbreeding. Minus God, YOU ARE STILL A PRODUCT OF INBREEDING. Do you not realize, criticizing the Bible for making it known, or science leaving this fact out; does NOT make the Bible more horrid simply because it 'speaks the undeniable truth'. Tracing your lines back, at some point, place, and time, there was a few humans. Mate, mate, mate; somewhere along the line; it happened. Who cares when, its irrelevant, but it happened. Back to humanizing. Outside of God, whatever created the ENTIRE universe, is beyond our understanding, to this point. Even the Big Bang Theory. Energy met at one spot, exploded, planets were formed, etc. ..but what created that energy? If it was true.. ..why does everything revolve around the sun the way it does? Circular. Does that defeat our own knowledge of science? If you leap from the moon, just straight in the air. What direction would you go? Would you revolve around the moon? No. You'd float in a straight, distinct line until you hit something or something hit you to change your course. Example: Meteors. They fly perfectly straight UNLESS they near a planet and that planet's pull alters their course. So, if you are that against inbreeding, jump off a bridge. You are a product of it to. Because your parents are, and those before them. THAT SAID. You speak of using logic, almost daily. You speak of using common sense, as if that was your bible. So, where is your own logic and common sense? Why do you sit here and constantly use terms like 'zombieism' and 'magic'; when you yourself cannot produce any other viable answers? What purpose does it serve to go into each conversation of someone else's beliefs and merely ridicule them for what they choose to belief? If you notice, I ask questions and do so in a respectful manner to their religion, I don't poke fun or make a mockery of it. There is no point in that. Why? Because you cannot prove otherwise. In doing such, all you do is keep constantly belittling yourself. I give props to Cowboy for merely trying to quell your ridiculous premonitions, ideals, and statements; but truly, he is only trying to do what that very Bible your protest proclaims he should do. Spread the Word. I may not believe in God himself, but I do believe in the message; because, despite the acts of carnage, war, and genocide; it holds a message of love, sacrifice, and commitment. So, why can't you, for once, just act as though you have some level, even if small, of decency and respect? Did Jesus doubt God? No, but he did feel as though his destiny was meant to be easier. His faith in his father wasn't shaken, but his faith in his destiny was. Jesus, and maybe even God himself, made mistakes. So what. Maybe they were partially human; but his acts, those were not, if they did happen. Will you read all of this? Probably not, because your response will cut out half of what I said and you will only ridicule one portion of it. I don't criticize you for doubting, I am in the same, as with RSKIT, but the way you portray your disbelief, makes you a tool, a lesser body; because all you do is ridicule and make a mockery of it. The bible came from an age when everything was different. There wasn't massive cities, skyscrapers, and billions upon billions of people. Maybe most parts are just analogies that we can't understand because they are no longer evident because we manipulated they very foundation of the planet we call Earth. They didn't have 'science' to the extent we do now; but even so, he can't disprove everything. And even if someone were to rewrite the bible so it made more sense, it would no longer be a historical document; and would give you only more space to doubt and criticize. Lastly. How is it you believe in zombieism and not God? ..is it mainstream media? Guess what, God was in Hollywood too. Geez, man.. dude...re-read the post....I was talking about Jesus ....perhaps that's why I was humanizing him because he was a human..DUH do you think he was one of the teletubbies? Jesus was a human? lmao Briefly. He existed prior to his human years. He existed long after his human years. And again, there is your pathetic deflection tactic. I stated all that and even proclaimed you'd only take one part of it. Furthermore, this isn't the first time you mentioned zombieism as if it existed more as a 'fact' than God himself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sin_and_Sorrow
on
Tue 02/21/12 12:38 PM
|
|
dude...re-read the post....I was talking about Jesus ....perhaps that's why I was humanizing him because he was a human..DUH do you think he was one of the teletubbies? Furthermore. If Bible is true. He may have HAD a human form. But he showed no true signs he was such. Healing the sick. Predicting the future in grand detail. Walking on water. etc, etc, etc ..and a teletubbie? Really? ..they are humans in costumes. So, yeah, made your sarcastic point utterly pointless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. I think you mis-worded this one. if you tried to point it out means I didn't mis-word it..and besides Cowboy understood it "or any" places the statement in context Oh really? The fact (a proven point) That Mary or any of the disciples (Mary or these people) Recognized (to know) Jesus (Christ) proves (to not be disputed, or to back said claim) that he didn't (to not do) resurrect (return from the dead; be born again) into the same body (to retake the same physical form) So in other words. You are saying that Mary and the Disciples did not recognize Jesus because he had in fact returned to his same exact previous form? ..that makes sense? Cowboy knew what you meant, but doesn't mean it actually made any sense at all. as I once said...compare to you Cowboy is a freaking Einstein...since it was Cowboy I was adressing in the post and he understood it and replied to it...that is all that matters.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus did resurrect into the same body. His body did not see corruption or in our terms "decay". the fact that Mary or any of the disciples recognized Jesus proves that he didn't resurrect into the same body.. I think you mis-worded this one. if you tried to point it out means I didn't mis-word it..and besides Cowboy understood it "or any" places the statement in context Oh really? The fact (a proven point) That Mary or any of the disciples (Mary or these people) Recognized (to know) Jesus (Christ) proves (to not be disputed, or to back said claim) that he didn't (to not do) resurrect (return from the dead; be born again) into the same body (to retake the same physical form) So in other words. You are saying that Mary and the Disciples did not recognize Jesus because he had in fact returned to his same exact previous form? ..that makes sense? Cowboy knew what you meant, but doesn't mean it actually made any sense at all. as I once said...compare to you Cowboy is a freaking Einstein...since it was Cowboy I was adressing in the post and he understood it and replied to it...that is all that matters.... ..which makes you as smart as dirt if he is smarter than me. All I said, was that post was mis-worded and meant no offense by it. But your neanderthal frame of mind, can't take a simple notion without resorting to childish name calling. ..it's quite pathetic and sad and I can't help but laugh at you. I'm sorry, I try not to.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as I once said...compare to you Cowboy is a freaking Einstein...since it was Cowboy I was adressing in the post and he understood it and replied to it...that is all that matters.... ..and if Cowboy was smarter than me. He would have pointed out your flaw in your statement. Instead of just answering because we both knew what you meant. ..but we could have resorted to Funch tactics. We are just above that childish crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dude...re-read the post....I was talking about Jesus ....perhaps that's why I was humanizing him because he was a human..DUH do you think he was one of the teletubbies? Furthermore. If Bible is true. He may have HAD a human form. But he showed no true signs he was such. Healing the sick. Predicting the future in grand detail. Walking on water. etc, etc, etc ..and a teletubbie? Really? ..they are humans in costumes. So, yeah, made your sarcastic point utterly pointless. dude you make a mistake and read the post wrong and thought I was talking about God ....just admit your mistakes instead of trying to find ways out of your being incorrect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dude...re-read the post....I was talking about Jesus ....perhaps that's why I was humanizing him because he was a human..DUH do you think he was one of the teletubbies? Furthermore. If Bible is true. He may have HAD a human form. But he showed no true signs he was such. Healing the sick. Predicting the future in grand detail. Walking on water. etc, etc, etc ..and a teletubbie? Really? ..they are humans in costumes. So, yeah, made your sarcastic point utterly pointless. dude you make a mistake and read the post wrong and thought I was talking about God ....just admit your mistakes instead of trying to find ways out of your being incorrect Um, there is no mistake. I am, and have proven, to be far superior in intellect to you over and over and over and over and over again. Ask Bushido, Spider, or anyone else.. ..if I'm wrong. I admit it. I don't Funch it. xD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as I once said...compare to you Cowboy is a freaking Einstein...since it was Cowboy I was adressing in the post and he understood it and replied to it...that is all that matters.... ..and if Cowboy was smarter than me. He would have pointed out your flaw in your statement. Instead of just answering because we both knew what you meant. ..but we could have resorted to Funch tactics. We are just above that childish crap. this is not English 101 so only someone anal would be in here pointing out mistakes.....I'm pretty if I decided to waste time and search your posts I can find where you made many of them Mr. Perfect |
|
|
|
|
