Halfwits like a good performance. They're attention span won't allow them to grasp a qualified, experienced adult.
Ron Paul isn't a sweet-talking jackwad like Barry.
So, more than likely, MSNBS will sell the "progressabators" another Hussein.

2 - 2 1/2 years ago

Id just love to know the political definition of an 'honest days pay'....lol

when I look at the whole contexts of what is going on the last few years.

I see we have to bail out banks. when banks are bailed out the taxpayer has to pay.

mostly by the 99% that has lost major buying power in the last 30 years as the 1% has gained alot and how much work did they do?

so if eating is a equation of working we have a whole lot of rich people who should not eat. they live off old money. get off your rich AZZZZZes and work.

I do not see that. so why are we cutting ssn and such.. is that not old money?

The New Deal.. we paid in its our inheritance as an American.

what else can it be? ssn recipients are being Taxed. the lazy old ones have been getting tax breaks.. why.. because its what right to do.

the rich need more or they will let you starve.

how can you not see washingtons pundents in any other light?

Can you provide a source?

Let it go spider ...Let it Go

Back away slowly

I have a thing about lies, I don't like them. Why are you so comfortable with lies?

No, it was too long ago. Just because someone says something about one of your heroes doesn't mean its a lie.

I'm not a big fan of hers, but what you said is a lie or perhaps you are just mistaken. Regardless, it's not true.

http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8&ion=1&nord=1#q=BACHMANN+BELIEVES+WORLD+IS&hl=en&nord=1&site=webhp&prmd=imvns&ei=t7q-Tp-CIoiFtgfA78DbBg&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=72d2f4c2b73b7f76&ion=1&biw=1280&bih=687

There you go, 29 million odd links about the crazy stuff this religious nut believes.

how would those beliefs be relevant to her position as President if she were elected though?

I would never vote for her because I think she is extreme in her views about social programs and fairly ignorant of foreign affairs for which a President is mainly responsible for creating and maintaining


but I do tire of non issues being thrown into the already confusing electoral process,,

Oh I'd say that some of those beliefs represent the kind of person she is and would be, as they do with anyone.

its a small part of who she is , but how does that correlate with what her job duties will be or how she has performed her job duties in the past

I think THOSE are more important issues than focusing on personal beliefs or issues in ones personal life

Does the fact that her and her husband have provided a foster home for 23 girls all with eating disorders say anything about her character?

This means that technically people who are unemployed should eat, and those who are extremely rich, and chose to be idle, or somewhat rich and choose to be idle and really poor and choose to be idle ough not be eating.

Also those on vacations, or during week ends, or after coming home from work must be kept away from food.

Children definitely must be starved to death.

--------

But being not stuppid and accepting the underlying assumptions that establishes exceptions, why is this idea a good one? Why should those who don't work not eat?

To lose weight?

This means that technically all people who don't plant potatoes should not eat.

If you say that a lawyer or a doctor 'should not' plant potatoes, then there is going to be a lot of arguments about the shoulds and shouldn'ts. Where is it defined for a lawyer or doctor what they should and what they should not do? Has anyone seen the comprehensive national job-related compilation of shoulds and shouldn'ts?

The person who coined the quote is a complete moron. A neo-nazi of sorts. A bloodthirsty idiot, a flaming manganese baron. A boron, a moron, a proton, a crouton. A coupon.

She's obviously taking about people who can provide for themselves, but choose not to. So a rich person or a retired person or a child or a vacationer wouldn't be included in those who shouldn't eat. She's saying that if a man can work, but chooses not to in order to pursue other interests, he shouldn't be supported by the Government. It's really not a hard concept to get guys, I'm baffled by all the difficulty in understanding the concept. Then again, maybe all of you are living on the dole and don't want to understand what she's saying.



So you feel that able bodied adults should be allowed to choose to not work and they should be supported by other people? Why should they be supported? Supported by whom?

I shan't define self-reliance, but it sure don't mean the quote claims it means.

Self reliance: starvation.

Self reliance: not eating when others tell you not to eat.

Self reliance: working, and eating, and that's about the size of it.

The three sentences right here above are exact equivalents or near enough to what they quote says.

Why is everyone stupid?

I maintain even more vigorously and with growing concern for the well-being of our good neihbours to the south, that idiots are rampantly raping the reasoning ability of the regular raggedly rouge renegades and hand granades of their nation.

its irrelevant in most situations , because most assistance has fairly rigorous requirements that people

A) are trying to

or

B) are unable to work


so it is not set up to help those who WILL NOT work,,,

What is obvious to you may not be obvious to others.

If we are to talk about what she says, we must talk about what she says, not what we think she obviously meant.

If we accept that we know better than she does what she means when she says something, then we are degradign ourselves to the level of scummy Bible scholars, who purport to know better what God means than God himself.

So let's stick with what she said, please, not what we think she obviously meant.