Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 15
Topic: Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons
no photo
Tue 09/20/11 03:01 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 03:02 PM
Air Force pursuing antimatter weapons

Program was touted publicly, then came official gag order


The U.S. Air Force is quietly spending millions of dollars investigating ways to use a radical power source -- antimatter, the eerie "mirror" of ordinary matter -- in future weapons.

The most powerful potential energy source presently thought to be available to humanity, antimatter is a term normally heard in science-fiction films and TV shows, whose heroes fly "antimatter-powered spaceships" and do battle with "antimatter guns."

But antimatter itself isn't fiction; it actually exists and has been intensively studied by physicists since the 1930s. In a sense, matter and antimatter are the yin and yang of reality: Every type of subatomic particle has its antimatter counterpart. But when matter and antimatter collide, they annihilate each other in an immense burst of energy



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/10/04/MNGM393GPK1.DTL#ixzz1YX5lAWta



Read more:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/10/04/MNGM393GPK1.DTL

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 03:49 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 04:03 PM
Our government has spent about half a billion dollars on development of directed energy weapons. I just watched a video I downloaded where Donald Rumsfeld was questioned by a reporter. He and some Military guy standing next to him said yes, they did have these weapons and that yes, they would probably use them. (They are using them in Iraq.)

They explode things but don't make noise. They melt steel and flesh like a microwave...

The cars in the pictures I posted were burning more in the inside than the outside.. This is a microwave energy weapon people.

I captured some pictures of these weapons from that video. These are real. People in Iraq have been hit by these energy weapons. Doctors were interviewed on this tape. They found no bullets or anything that created the injuries they found.

I will upload some pictures of these weapons. Next post.

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:26 PM
Pictures


no photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:27 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 04:27 PM
DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS

Office of the Secretary of defense.
For reading or download:

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA476320.pdf

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:34 PM
Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11

Dr. Judy Wood, a former assistant professor at Clemson University, has developed compelling evidence that a directed energy weapon turned the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles through the process of molecular dissociation. Dr. Wood demonstrates clear evidence that cannot be accounted for by the official 9/11 Commission explanation or alternative theory of military planes, cruise missiles, or other projectiles hitting the World Trade Center buildings, or a controlled demolition caused solely by "advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the World Trade Center dust," or solely by 4th generation mini-nukes.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11 - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/scientist-directed-energy-weapons-turned-world-trade-center-into-nanoparticles-on-9-11#ixzz1YXSd08wL

Continue reading on Examiner.com Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11 - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com

http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/scientist-directed-energy-weapons-turned-world-trade-center-into-nanoparticles-on-9-11



metalwing's photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:37 PM
whoa

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:40 PM
Concerning Dan Brown's book, as well as CERN's reply to it, there are numerous (technical and political) mistakes in both. In particular, the most important technical mistake is to suggest that large quantities of antimatter are needed to make a very powerful bomb: this is wrong. As is explained below, and confirmed by numerous professional publications (see three recent ones at the end of this Web page), tiny amounts of antiprotons are sufficient to initiate huge thermonuclear explosions. Indeed, on the order of one microgram of antiprotons (or antihydrogen) is enough to trigger a multi-ton or multi-kiloton thermonuclear explosion!


Antimatter weapons

Strategic and political consequences

Whether antimatter triggered thermonuclear weapons are realizable or not, or whether other weapons using annihilation energy are feasible or not, the fact that a relatively small quantity of antimatter can set off a very powerful thermonuclear explosion creates serious problems for the future of the strategic balance. In fact, the arms control treaties presently in force deal only with fission related devices and materials [16]: atomic bombs, nuclear reactors and fissile materials. By removing the fission fuse from thermonuclear weapons, antimatter triggered H-bombs and neutron bombs could be constructed freely by any country possessing the capacity, and be placed anywhere, including outer-space.

Read more: http://cui.unige.ch/isi/sscr/phys/antim-BPP.html

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:47 PM
This weapon injects painful shots to entire crowds of people!
Like using a taser gun on a crowd.

The ADS works by firing a high-powered beam of electromagnetic radiation in the form of high-frequency millimeter waves at 95 GHz[8] (a wavelength of 3.2 mm)

It's purpose is to dispense PAIN.

The Active Denial System

(ADS) is a non-lethal, directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. military.[1] It is a strong millimeter-wave transmitter primarily used for crowd control (the "goodbye effect"[2]). Some ADS such as HPEM ADS are also used to disable vehicles.[3] Informally, the weapon is also called the heat ray.[4] Raytheon is currently marketing a reduced-range version of this technology.[5] The ADS was deployed in 2010 with the United States military in the Afghanistan War, but was withdrawn without seeing combat.[6] On August 20, 2010 the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department announced its intent to use this technology on prisoners in the Pitchess Detention Center in Los Angeles, stating its intent to use it in "operational evaluation" in situations such as breaking up prisoner fights.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 04:52 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 05:47 PM
The previous stuff was posted to demonstrate that YES we do have the advanced technology to demolish buildings into dust, burn holes into tanks and cars, melt steel beams, and kill people with no bullets.

We have used these weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan. I live in Colorado, some of these weapons are tested here. The Military has been trying to buy up our national grasslands and farms to expand their testing range for these new weapons.

I hope I don't live to see them used here or even tested here.

I feel bad for our descendants. I don't have any children. Do you?


no photo
Tue 09/20/11 05:05 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 05:05 PM
DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS

Office of the Secretary of defense.
For reading or download:

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA476320.pdf

Here is the Table of Contents:


Peccy's photo
Tue 09/20/11 05:21 PM
laugh noway whoa

Kleisto's photo
Tue 09/20/11 05:26 PM
What predictable responses..........

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 05:30 PM
In reading the PDF I found something a bit alarming:

Here is just one of the "findings and recommendations."


Findings and reccomendations:

The Department needs a concerted education effort to replace the “death ray” myth of directed weapons with a comprehensive understanding of the potential benefits and limitations of low, medium and high power laser applications, high power microwave and millimeter wave applications.

-->>The military departments should accelerate efforts to credibly assess effects on human targets and widely publicize the facts.<---

Here is probably the reason these weapons were tested on people in Iraq.

To assess effects on human targets.

mmmmm... I didn't get the publicized report though, on the effects. It is still all very hush hush.

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 05:36 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 05:37 PM
There are only two reasons we would be continuing to develop such powerful weapons.

1. To take total control of the world.

2. To defend against an advanced race of aliens.

We already have the most advanced Military force on the earth, and the only perceived enemy they can dig up are terrorists with box cutters on airplanes who work out of caves.

So how many people are going to be ready when their government announces that we are under threat from little grey men from space and that is why we have to have these advanced weapons?

Will you believe the official story then?






metalwing's photo
Tue 09/20/11 06:34 PM
I would explain the reality of these weapons to you but you, once again, have created your own reality and would not be interested in the truth.

mightymoe's photo
Tue 09/20/11 06:45 PM
i'm not sure i understand the point to this post...people have been making weapons for around 100,000 years already... so now they are a bit more technical.

Kleisto's photo
Tue 09/20/11 06:48 PM

i'm not sure i understand the point to this post...people have been making weapons for around 100,000 years already... so now they are a bit more technical.


The point she is making the government uses them for evil. That's the point.

Kleisto's photo
Tue 09/20/11 06:48 PM

I would explain the reality of these weapons to you but you, once again, have created your own reality and would not be interested in the truth.


Pot. Kettle. Black.

no photo
Tue 09/20/11 07:00 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 09/20/11 07:23 PM

I would explain the reality of these weapons to you but you, once again, have created your own reality and would not be interested in the truth.


I did not create it. I have found it on the Internet, and I present it here for those who are interested. If you are not interested fine. It does not really matter to me one way or another.

I don't want this thread to be locked down so please people refrain from getting sarcastic or insulting. I am not here to engage anyone only to present this information. If you don't like it, disagree with it, have some answers that make sense to a reasonable person, I'm happy to read what you have to say BUT DON'T MAKE IT PERSONAL PEOPLE.




mightymoe's photo
Tue 09/20/11 07:01 PM


i'm not sure i understand the point to this post...people have been making weapons for around 100,000 years already... so now they are a bit more technical.


The point she is making the government uses them for evil. That's the point.


evil is just a word, they are weapons, what to weapons do? help win wars, help keep the peace...and create jobs...

Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 15