100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: I'DE LOVE TO CHANGE THE WORLD...... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Wed 06/01/11 11:48 AM
|
|
Like attracts like.
Communities attract basically people of like natures who agree to live by the rules of that community. If they absolutely refuse or can't, then they will chose to leave or face the consequences. But in this world as a whole you can basically do as you please. You can probably find a community that agrees with you. If you like to be naked, there are communities that live like that. If you want to be sovereign, look at what the Amish have done. We are part of a community by choice. If you want no part of it, you can hopefully move to a remote place in Alaska where you never see anyone if you so chose. The world is a very diverse place. I fantasize living in a remote village of natives in South America where the weather requires very little clothing and the natives run around very scantily clad or naked and take baths in waterfalls. Maybe in my next life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? I dont think blanket ban is the answer, I think majority rules is the answer and finding a majority that most suits our own standard of life or we could go with apartheid,, where minority rules but someone is gonna determine common rules and regulations somehow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like attracts like. Communities attract basically people of like natures who agree to live by the rules of that community. If they absolutely refuse or can't, then they will chose to leave or face the consequences. But in this world as a whole you can basically do as you please. You can probably find a community that agrees with you. If you like to be naked, there are communities that live like that. If you want to be sovereign, look at what the Amish have done. We are part of a community by choice. If you want no part of it, you can hopefully move to a remote place in Alaska where you never see anyone if you so chose. The world is a very diverse place. I fantasize living in a remote village of natives in South America where the weather requires very little clothing and the natives run around very scantily clad or naked and take baths in waterfalls. Maybe in my next life. or as my elders used to put it 'get in where you fit in' lol,,,theres still time in THIS life jeannie,, go for it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like attracts like. Communities attract basically people of like natures who agree to live by the rules of that community. If they absolutely refuse or can't, then they will chose to leave or face the consequences. But in this world as a whole you can basically do as you please. You can probably find a community that agrees with you. If you like to be naked, there are communities that live like that. If you want to be sovereign, look at what the Amish have done. We are part of a community by choice. If you want no part of it, you can hopefully move to a remote place in Alaska where you never see anyone if you so chose. The world is a very diverse place. I fantasize living in a remote village of natives in South America where the weather requires very little clothing and the natives run around very scantily clad or naked and take baths in waterfalls. Maybe in my next life. I love your attitude! 
Your so cool! 
I can totally see you there, in the wild... 
Do it! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? I dont think blanket ban is the answer, I think majority rules is the answer and finding a majority that most suits our own standard of life But what if the majority rule IS to blanket ban? Does what the others say mean nothing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? I dont think blanket ban is the answer, I think majority rules is the answer and finding a majority that most suits our own standard of life But what if the majority rule IS to blanket ban? Does what the others say mean nothing? it means LESS if its not the majority opinion,, in a democracy,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Kleisto
on
Wed 06/01/11 01:06 PM
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? I dont think blanket ban is the answer, I think majority rules is the answer and finding a majority that most suits our own standard of life But what if the majority rule IS to blanket ban? Does what the others say mean nothing? it means LESS if its not the majority opinion,, in a democracy,, See but that's exactly where democracy fails, because what you get in effect, is that those that don't like something can take the right to do that away from those that do. That's not what a free society is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? I dont think blanket ban is the answer, I think majority rules is the answer and finding a majority that most suits our own standard of life But what if the majority rule IS to blanket ban? Does what the others say mean nothing? it means LESS if its not the majority opinion,, in a democracy,, See but that's exactly where democracy fails, because what you get in effect, is that those that don't like something can take the right to do that away from those that do. That's not what a free society is. a democracy is not a FREE society, it is a society where the people have a voice and the majority vote usually makes the decision there is no COMPLETELY FREE society unless its a society of one because part of a COMMUNITY is to organize around things in COMMON to be considerate of your PART in the community instead of just concerned with your INDIVIDUAL desires and longings,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think its simple to find the balance. I think the extreme of allowing everyone COMPLETE freedom with no guidelines or rules(Which have to be decided upon by SOMEONE), is as dangerous an idea as not allowing anyone FREEDOM without others deciding their every step the former is my idea of chaos and LACK of true COMMUNity the idea is my idea of prison and LACK of true FREEDOM a balance is where individuals COMMUNE together in a way that they can remain their individuallity WHILE considering the INDIVIDUALITY and comfort and feelings of others Ok, but how do you do that, if the answer to solving an issue, is to blanket ban something? I dont think blanket ban is the answer, I think majority rules is the answer and finding a majority that most suits our own standard of life But what if the majority rule IS to blanket ban? Does what the others say mean nothing? it means LESS if its not the majority opinion,, in a democracy,, See but that's exactly where democracy fails, because what you get in effect, is that those that don't like something can take the right to do that away from those that do. That's not what a free society is. a democracy is not a FREE society, it is a society where the people have a voice and the majority vote usually makes the decision there is no COMPLETELY FREE society unless its a society of one because part of a COMMUNITY is to organize around things in COMMON to be considerate of your PART in the community instead of just concerned with your INDIVIDUAL desires and longings,,, What I think we need to go back to in short, is personal responsibility. You are responsible for yourself and what you do or don't, no one else. You do wrong or bad, you take the consequence and you alone. That's what would make things a lot better than group think in effect of what is good and bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I dont know what it wears. 
What would you change if you could??? 
I'd adjust gravity to a graceful floaty kind of level. You know, like the guys on the moon, minus the stupid suits and far more elegant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But I dont know what it wears.
What would you change if you could???
I'd adjust gravity to a graceful floaty kind of level. You know, like the guys on the moon, minus the stupid suits and far more elegant. Niccccccccce!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. thats kind of an endless circle though isnt it? how do they get two years work without entering the field, and how do they enter the field if they first must have experience? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. thats kind of an endless circle though isnt it? how do they get two years work without entering the field, and how do they enter the field if they first must have experience? anyone can get a retail job..no exp. necessary..I meant that before going into the work force in their chosen field, they simply would be required to give two years in the retail industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. thats kind of an endless circle though isnt it? how do they get two years work without entering the field, and how do they enter the field if they first must have experience? anyone can get a retail job..no exp. necessary..I meant that before going into the work force in their chosen field, they simply would be required to give two years in the retail industry. So like would I have to sell cars or what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. Who pokes fun at retail??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. thats kind of an endless circle though isnt it? how do they get two years work without entering the field, and how do they enter the field if they first must have experience? anyone can get a retail job..no exp. necessary..I meant that before going into the work force in their chosen field, they simply would be required to give two years in the retail industry. So like would I have to sell cars or what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
luv2roknroll
on
Wed 06/01/11 05:32 PM
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. thats kind of an endless circle though isnt it? how do they get two years work without entering the field, and how do they enter the field if they first must have experience? anyone can get a retail job..no exp. necessary..I meant that before going into the work force in their chosen field, they simply would be required to give two years in the retail industry. So like would I have to sell cars or what?
What??? Blow up dolls??? I dont know! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the fun that gets poked at those in retail, I'd make it mandatory that EVERYONE, before going into their chosen field of work, work two years in the industry. thats kind of an endless circle though isnt it? how do they get two years work without entering the field, and how do they enter the field if they first must have experience? anyone can get a retail job..no exp. necessary..I meant that before going into the work force in their chosen field, they simply would be required to give two years in the retail industry. So like would I have to sell cars or what?
What??? Blow up dolls??? I dont know! 
|
|
|
|
|
