Topic: The NO BIBLE ALLOWED Thread can you handle it? | |
---|---|
I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. but you didn't explain what wrong with lustful sex especially since there are lots of things that married couples do together that do not bear Children ...so why did you single out lustful sex as being wrong Because again the flesh is sinful. Lustful desires and actions are sinful. Sex outside of making babies is PURELY for the physical pleasure, nothing productive comes out of it besides your physical pleasures being satisfied. |
|
|
|
Edited by
chocolina
on
Wed 01/05/11 09:49 AM
|
|
CowboyGH wrote: I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. Heaven forbid a couple actually ENJOY each other. Oh how horrible, a married couple in love with each other enjoying the others body. Do you realize how crazy this is? Are you gonna tell us we can't enjoy it even in the process of having kids too?? The creating a life is the greatest feeling ever, nothing compares to such an action. The two people know that the baby is there living flesh and blood, that they conceived that child in a night of great love making. What more is there? What greater pleasure could top that? Sorry to interrupt your divine emotions but I have only 1 down-to-earth question to you: How do you know what the sex is ? |
|
|
|
CowboyGH wrote: I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. Heaven forbid a couple actually ENJOY each other. Oh how horrible, a married couple in love with each other enjoying the others body. Do you realize how crazy this is? Are you gonna tell us we can't enjoy it even in the process of having kids too?? The creating a life is the greatest feeling ever, nothing compares to such an action. The two people know that the baby is there living flesh and blood, that they conceived that child in a night of great love making. What more is there? What greater pleasure could top that? Sorry to interrupt your divine emotions but I have only 1 down-to-earth question to you: How do you know what the sex is ? Doesn't take extra knowledge to learn what sex is lol, it's randomly discussed through school, on TV, over hearing people talk in public, ect. |
|
|
|
Edited by
funches
on
Wed 01/05/11 10:04 AM
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate |
|
|
|
CowboyGH wrote:
CowboyGH wrote: I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. Heaven forbid a couple actually ENJOY each other. Oh how horrible, a married couple in love with each other enjoying the others body. Do you realize how crazy this is? Are you gonna tell us we can't enjoy it even in the process of having kids too?? The creating a life is the greatest feeling ever, nothing compares to such an action. The two people know that the baby is there living flesh and blood, that they conceived that child in a night of great love making. What more is there? What greater pleasure could top that? Sorry to interrupt your divine emotions but I have only 1 down-to-earth question to you: How do you know what the sex is ? Doesn't take extra knowledge to learn what sex is lol, it's randomly discussed through school, on TV, over hearing people talk in public, ect. I'm I get it right that you only know by books , TV and randomly discussed through school what the sex is ? |
|
|
|
CowboyGH wrote: CowboyGH wrote: I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. Heaven forbid a couple actually ENJOY each other. Oh how horrible, a married couple in love with each other enjoying the others body. Do you realize how crazy this is? Are you gonna tell us we can't enjoy it even in the process of having kids too?? The creating a life is the greatest feeling ever, nothing compares to such an action. The two people know that the baby is there living flesh and blood, that they conceived that child in a night of great love making. What more is there? What greater pleasure could top that? Sorry to interrupt your divine emotions but I have only 1 down-to-earth question to you: How do you know what the sex is ? Doesn't take extra knowledge to learn what sex is lol, it's randomly discussed through school, on TV, over hearing people talk in public, ect. I'm I get it right that you only know by books , TV and randomly discussed through school what the sex is ? Well, not only that, but if we take "sex" to it's ultimate physical definition (i.e. penis-vagina penetration), then by the strictest meaning of the term the very concept of "homosexuality" is a meaningless concept. By this definition it would be impossible for two people of the same gender to have 'sex'. Also, if we change the definition of sex to "penis penetration" solely no matter what is being penetrated. Then technically only males could participate in "homosexuality" and there would be no such thing as female homosexuality because the latter would make no sense by this definition. So in order to even have a workable concept of "homosexuality" we'd need to come up with a pretty broad definition for what is meant by 'sex'. ~~~~ I've always said that if I was gay I would totally renounce the term "homosexuality" altogether. I would just flatly refuse to speak in such terms. I would speak only in terms of "Same-gender Loving Relationships". No 'sex' even needs to be implied. After all hugging and kissing isn't considered to be 'sex'. We hug and kiss our parents, our children, our siblings and potentially even our friends and their spouses. Are we having "sex" with all those people? No of course not. So if I were a member of the "Gay Community" I would simply renounce sex as being the focal point of the issue and speak solely in terms of "Same-Gender Loving Relationships" After all look at what Cowboy has been proposing. Even Heterosexual couples who can't have children often marry. Why? Because they want to have a Loving Intimate Relationship. Are they having sex? Who knows? If they believe like Cowboy and they know they can't have kids for whatever reason (or choose not to have children), then clearly they would NOT be having sex. But they may still want to marry and love as partners in an intimately monogamous relationship. No one would object to that. Yet how would that be any different from a "Same-Gender Loving Relationship". It wouldn't be any different at all. So from that perspective, if the gay community were to simply change a few terms around and reject the term "homosexual" and demand to simply be referred to as "Same-Gender Lovers". Then all this religious bigotry and hatred would go away. If these Same-Gender lovers are doing anything in their bedroom that conflicts with God's desires, then that's between them and God, and no one else. So that's really all the gay community needs to do. Just reject the term "homosexual" and start to focus on "Same-Gender Loving Intimacy" Where does the Bible say that intimate relationships are forbidden? I'm sure it doesn't. Unless someone wants to pervert the term "intimacy" for their own hateful agenda. |
|
|
|
I like that Abra
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH wrote: CowboyGH wrote: I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. Heaven forbid a couple actually ENJOY each other. Oh how horrible, a married couple in love with each other enjoying the others body. Do you realize how crazy this is? Are you gonna tell us we can't enjoy it even in the process of having kids too?? The creating a life is the greatest feeling ever, nothing compares to such an action. The two people know that the baby is there living flesh and blood, that they conceived that child in a night of great love making. What more is there? What greater pleasure could top that? Sorry to interrupt your divine emotions but I have only 1 down-to-earth question to you: How do you know what the sex is ? Doesn't take extra knowledge to learn what sex is lol, it's randomly discussed through school, on TV, over hearing people talk in public, ect. I'm I get it right that you only know by books , TV and randomly discussed through school what the sex is ? Well, not only that, but if we take "sex" to it's ultimate physical definition (i.e. penis-vagina penetration), then by the strictest meaning of the term the very concept of "homosexuality" is a meaningless concept. By this definition it would be impossible for two people of the same gender to have 'sex'. Also, if we change the definition of sex to "penis penetration" solely no matter what is being penetrated. Then technically only males could participate in "homosexuality" and there would be no such thing as female homosexuality because the latter would make no sense by this definition. So in order to even have a workable concept of "homosexuality" we'd need to come up with a pretty broad definition for what is meant by 'sex'. ~~~~ I've always said that if I was gay I would totally renounce the term "homosexuality" altogether. I would just flatly refuse to speak in such terms. I would speak only in terms of "Same-gender Loving Relationships". No 'sex' even needs to be implied. After all hugging and kissing isn't considered to be 'sex'. We hug and kiss our parents, our children, our siblings and potentially even our friends and their spouses. Are we having "sex" with all those people? No of course not. So if I were a member of the "Gay Community" I would simply renounce sex as being the focal point of the issue and speak solely in terms of "Same-Gender Loving Relationships" After all look at what Cowboy has been proposing. Even Heterosexual couples who can't have children often marry. Why? Because they want to have a Loving Intimate Relationship. Are they having sex? Who knows? If they believe like Cowboy and they know they can't have kids for whatever reason (or choose not to have children), then clearly they would NOT be having sex. But they may still want to marry and love as partners in an intimately monogamous relationship. No one would object to that. Yet how would that be any different from a "Same-Gender Loving Relationship". It wouldn't be any different at all. So from that perspective, if the gay community were to simply change a few terms around and reject the term "homosexual" and demand to simply be referred to as "Same-Gender Lovers". Then all this religious bigotry and hatred would go away. If these Same-Gender lovers are doing anything in their bedroom that conflicts with God's desires, then that's between them and God, and no one else. So that's really all the gay community needs to do. Just reject the term "homosexual" and start to focus on "Same-Gender Loving Intimacy" Where does the Bible say that intimate relationships are forbidden? I'm sure it doesn't. Unless someone wants to pervert the term "intimacy" for their own hateful agenda. This doesn't work though Abra. One is only homosexual if they participate in sexual actions with the same gender. A male kissing a male isn't homosexual, a female kissing a female isn't homosexual heck that happens almost every day. Two people of the same gender holding hands isn't homosexual, two people of the same gender hugging isn't homosexual. It only becomes homosexual again when the two of the same gender participate in sexual actions with one another. |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. |
|
|
|
What an awful life to live. Hating the flesh you are in all your life. I can understand the resentment felt from Christians after having to life like that.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
CowboyGH
on
Wed 01/05/11 06:58 PM
|
|
What an awful life to live. Hating the flesh you are in all your life. I can understand the resentment felt from Christians after having to life like that. I do not hate the flesh itself. I hate it's sinful desires, sexual desires, alcoholic desires, smoking, ect. |
|
|
|
I pray for forgiveness of my trespasses But nevertheless sex is for child barring, anything outside of that is fleshly lust for the physical pleasure of sex.
but you still have not explain why fleshly lustful sex for married couples beyond child bearring age is wrong You had the answer in your question. Because it's fleshly lust. but you didn't explain what wrong with lustful sex especially since there are lots of things that married couples do together that do not bear Children ...so why did you single out lustful sex as being wrong Because again the flesh is sinful. Lustful desires and actions are sinful. Sex outside of making babies is PURELY for the physical pleasure, nothing productive comes out of it besides your physical pleasures being satisfied. beg to differ... for an animal sex is to procreate... For a human, sex is also to procreate... and yet sex with love is greater for it creates a oneness between seperate entities... and that oneness is greater than simple 'physical' pleasure, transending both into a spiritual realm. |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. your post is a contradiciton... (Cowboy 1) said that he do intentionlly get weak and commit sin and (Cowboy 2) said that he don't intentionaly commit sin... so (Cowboy 3) which is it ...it keep appearing that it's ok for you to sin as you judge and condemn others for doing so but anyway that is not what I asked you....I asked if you believe that your flesh is sin......can you explain why that isn't self hatred |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. He need not return to free you... You were freed when he asked mercy from the cross. |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. He need not return to free you... You were freed when he asked mercy from the cross. amen!! very true. I was referring more towards our father bringing heaven to earth and removing all sin, thus we are freed from sin. |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. your post is a contradiciton... (Cowboy 1) said that he do intentionlly get weak and commit sin and (Cowboy 2) said that he don't intentionaly commit sin... so (Cowboy 3) which is it ...it keep appearing that it's ok for you to sin as you judge and condemn others for doing so but anyway that is not what I asked you....I asked if you believe that your flesh is sin......can you explain why that isn't self hatred lol funches. Getting weak and intentionally sinning at that moment is the same thing as not intentionally committing sin. It's for the brief moment one gets weak letting go and sins. But in all reality didn't mean to do as such or even want to completely. Just got weak and let the walls come down for that moment. |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. your post is a contradiciton... (Cowboy 1) said that he do intentionlly get weak and commit sin and (Cowboy 2) said that he don't intentionaly commit sin... so (Cowboy 3) which is it ...it keep appearing that it's ok for you to sin as you judge and condemn others for doing so but anyway that is not what I asked you....I asked if you believe that your flesh is sin......can you explain why that isn't self hatred lol funches. Getting weak and intentionally sinning at that moment is the same thing as not intentionally committing sin. It's for the brief moment one gets weak letting go and sins. But in all reality didn't mean to do as such or even want to completely. Just got weak and let the walls come down for that moment. you still are avoiding the question ...it isn't about you getting weak and lusting with the same lustful desires that you claim that homosexuals have... it's about your belief that your flesh is sin which is the same as calling yourself worthless....it's clearly a sign of someone that do not like themselves...I've simply asked you to explain why such a belief is not due to self hatred |
|
|
|
Because again the flesh is sinful. Cowboy...if it is your belief that flesh is sinful and you yourself have flesh....then isn't this an indication that you have self hatred for yourself and for all those that have flesh I hate no one. aren't you someone? simple logic...if you have come to the conclusion that the flesh you have on your own body is sinful then it can only be due to self hate and not liking the skin that you are in....can you explain why it's not self hate A person that sins all over the place, murdering, raping, ect. I do not hate that person. I hate the sin. Yes I fail time to time when I get weak and relaxed and just not really paying much attention to what I'm doing. Which I will be judged on. Nevertheless I do not do something intentionally that I know is sinful. So I will live in this sinful flesh, fighting it all the way, until our Lord returns and frees us of sin. your post is a contradiciton... (Cowboy 1) said that he do intentionlly get weak and commit sin and (Cowboy 2) said that he don't intentionaly commit sin... so (Cowboy 3) which is it ...it keep appearing that it's ok for you to sin as you judge and condemn others for doing so but anyway that is not what I asked you....I asked if you believe that your flesh is sin......can you explain why that isn't self hatred lol funches. Getting weak and intentionally sinning at that moment is the same thing as not intentionally committing sin. It's for the brief moment one gets weak letting go and sins. But in all reality didn't mean to do as such or even want to completely. Just got weak and let the walls come down for that moment. you still are avoiding the question ...it isn't about you getting weak and lusting with the same lustful desires that you claim that homosexuals have... it's about your belief that your flesh is sin which is the same as calling yourself worthless....it's clearly a sign of someone that do not like themselves...I've simply asked you to explain why such a belief is not due to self hatred Oh but you're wrong. I am not this flesh. This flesh is temporary, i'm not. |
|
|