Topic: Length.. - part 2 | |
---|---|
dear kc;
you're welcome. :D p.s; i doubt that. |
|
|
|
anyone dare to try a synopsis? if it can be typed, if it can offend, if it makes no sense, if it's funny, if it's not, it's all here Yo Mama |
|
|
|
Soon to flip! |
|
|
|
keep going.
|
|
|
|
Soon to flip! op should be proud! |
|
|
|
So seriously
type, offend, make no sense, funny, or not all here? |
|
|
|
yes...all!
|
|
|
|
should we go back and read from the start?
|
|
|
|
yes...all! HaHAH! ...I'm so glad there's some width to this Length thread!!! |
|
|
|
ok....that was lame
|
|
|
|
don't forget depth,
ese is contributing too |
|
|
|
wasn't it up to me, kc, and ese to flip this shiiit. gahhh. oh well. /: |
|
|
|
I got out my tape measure, but it appears that this thread has gone astray and it's pointless... |
|
|
|
don't forget depth, ese is contributing too my ex told me that part didn't matter??? |
|
|
|
Edited by
esebulldog
on
Thu 11/18/10 12:47 AM
|
|
There's actually a mathematical ratio that explains this. In scientific circles, it's known as Dunderhead's Postulate; and it says, in short, the less intellectual the topic, the more responses it will receive.
(thanks lex) |
|
|
|
I got out my tape measure, but it appears that this thread has gone astray and it's pointless... who would say such a thing? |
|
|
|
don't forget depth, ese is contributing too my ex told me that part didn't matter??? that's because she wasn't an ex at the time don't ask her now... |
|
|
|
What is the most pages your threads make it to?
My average is like 1-3 with a few exceptions...I had one that made it to part 2, then it got terminated due to a stalker (op first post) |
|
|
|
In the old days "dog" my ex would have said forever
but I don't ask her now "kc" |
|
|
|
looks like it will have to flip with the day crew...
|
|
|