ok thanks for sharing

I would hope there would be exceptions to that rule, as in the bible, such as adultery or abuse. If so, I could still divorce as those are the only reasons I have. If not,,then I guess Id pray alot instead.

This is an easy fix. Ok, so I am married, and I start to hate my wife. She is mean, unruly, and she took away my PS3. Instead of opting for the murder route, I will just wake up one morning, and pronounce I am gay. Immediately the marriage never existed, I am free to go. Hahahaha. 401K, IRA and savings account in tact.

I tried that. In communist Hungary. What they did? They locked me up in a gay colony. The guys were really nice there, but I still thought it best to skip bail and escape the country. My brother had to serve my term.

you can only get a annulment within a few months after being married and it doesnt matter if your a catholic

have a better idea go to mexcio and get a quick divorce

I'm not the marrying type, so I wouldn't have to worry about it.

I'm sure the drag queen nights in comunist Hungary are the rage. Did you brother come out of that colony a changed man???

I don't believe in marriage and I think the whole institution should be done away with.

With sexy back fat like that! Every guy (or woman) would be proposing to you.. Now just trying to get you to say yes is another question.


If I couldnt get a divorce, I wouldnt shoot them. I would kill myself for making the dumbest mistake of my life and let them live with it.

We'd move to the U.K. and so that law wouldn't matter anymore.

thats interesting,, (not that you dont believe in it for yourself, but that you think it should be done away with altogether)

you don't have a get a divorce in the state you were married in. you can move to a different state and live there for a certain amount of time and file for divorce in your current state. i know that would pose problems if you have children in the state you'd leave, a job, etc. good luck!

As a legal contract, which is what it is, yes. If people want to marry in their respective religion/church, then go ahead. But, it should have no legal ramifications.

I think that California thing was a political statement of one individual who opposed prop 8, it hasnt and probably wont see the light of day. Families are an important part of our lives. We dont need to see the statistics about how children of broken homes are so much more likely for all types of problems in their lives. To secure the basic foundation of potential mother and fathers commitment to each other,,hurts noone and helps plenty.

who will it help?

agree this wont see the light of day as I too stated it's the flip side to Prop 8

Oh, ok. So to be consistent, do you also think the government should remove itself from the child support business and leave people to settle their own financial disputes regarding the children they have made? I think in legal terms the significance of marriage is the endorsement of the state in part, but also the ability of the law to set certain standards within a family unit. For instance, to be able to have law determine how to fairly split things if a divorce occurs, instead of leaving people to duke it out and possibly harm each other. I think it helps to have laws which keep people focused on their responsibility to others,,even spouses.