1 2 3 4 6 Next
Topic: For MsHarmony..Sarah Palin Book Sales #1
no photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:54 PM

I look at it this way. We were gonna get screw no matter what so, we had to pick the vice that hurt the least ;)
Also, I do find obama a very intelligent man but, when you see everyone giving him a past on so much you almost have to root for the underdog. The only time that I even remembered him getting bashed some was against Hillary and that didn't even last that long.


Yes and I made my choice. When it was clear that Clinton could not win, I focused on MCCain and Obama, Obama won out, not just because I found him more stable in personality and very intelligent, but because he didn't waver and he did'nt engage in the kind of uglyness that the McCain Palin did..

But the way to only quote the last remark in a post if that is what you are referring to, just remove all 'everything' above the area you want to keep, 'except' the very first quote tag [ quote ] Then respond after the last ending quote tag [ /quote ]

franshade's photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:54 PM



YOU!!! laugh


I am not the problem; I am the solution tongue2

look4you's photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:54 PM





I doubt anything I'm going to show you is going to change your mind. However, you can watch her interview with Katie Couric if you'd like. In my opinion, it does not show her as being vice president material.


Seen it. I think it shows someone who felt she was being put into a corner with unfair interviewing tactics. Was Obama asked what magazines and newspapers he reads?

I think relying on a single interview as an impression that someone is stupid seems a bit ungainly.

Obama is ten months into his presidency and shows absolutely no understanding of how economics work from a Keysian or Austrian school and I don't call him stupid. That's 10 months of evidence. I call him crooked and question his motives, but I wouldn't call him stupid. Even though he is the first president who has refused to release his college grades...just saying...


The difference is that Obama would have handled it with far more grace, instead Palin had to act like the poor little martyred victim. Oh they were so mean to me. Why not just say I prefer not to answer the damn question. I might have had more respect for her than the lame a$$ answers she gave. She was answered very direct and simple questions and couldn't answer them, period. She had many interviews, not just that one, she also said many many things on the campaign trail. Do you assume liberals didn't watch all the campaigns? Or all the interviews.

Your being asked to google, we already know what she has said. You already know our opinion of her, so why bait us, just go do your own research.

Please don't pretend you aren't calling Obama stupid because you are not using the specific word. You don't like Obama, we don't like Palin, not biggy, it's to be expected.

And who the heck are you to call anyone dishonest when you obviously are not aware of all the things she has said. I don't think she's stupid at all, I do however think the way she handled herself was pretty lame, and I do think she's a manipulative fundementalist right winger, who learned pretty quickly that you can say almost anything you want, lie or not and make more money spewing BS than actually sticking to a job.


Really, I respect your P.O.V on everything but, since we are speaking "honest" (tongue and cheek) I'd say that even you must admit that Palin got trashed badly through out this campaign and that there was never any reason in the world to bring her children into it either. And you have to also admit that she was held back by the McCain people sooo much that people started to think that she had no creditablity bc of the McCain camp. That's who I actually blame and not so much the liberal media. McCain basically spoon fed them by refusing to let her go. And being fair here...as I have mention in other posts that she didn't answer the most direct of question wisely.And it did make her look like a fool whether if it was edited or not there was no excuses for answering some question the way that she did.


Ok I can accept that point of view even if there are things I disagree with. Such as, her being trashed. Taking on Palin was an direct insult to the women that voted for Clinton. Mccain thought that we would be so stupid that we would take a woman no matter how we got one as long as women were represented. BS. Typical old man out of touch thinking. Second, she got bashed because of the lame things she said when she was given free run. They held her back because she embarrassed those behind the campaign. I watched McCain's body language at one interview and I swear if they have been alone, he would have read her the riot act for the dumb *** things she said right in front of him.

From lipstick on a pig to the dumber things she just let rip thinking the only people paying attention where the fringe in her own base. That's not a particularly bright. Palin and Joe the plumber aren't doing the republicans a favor, they are just making them look more like the radicals they have become.

The only response that I can reply with...actually more than 1 :wink:
Palin is the only person that can bring a crowd close to whatever obama can do on a bad day. And IF it weren't for Palin NOBODY would have shown up to the rallies for McCain...he was a boring old fart. On top of that she brought in alot of money for the republican party. Like it or not she is a cash cow for the party so that is whyI am confussed as to why in the world would ANY republican politician would move against her. Even run against her would be damaging bc she does have a following. Also, please keep in mind that obama was running for president since 07' I believe and Palin only had a couple of months.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:55 PM




YOU!!! laugh


I am not the problem; I am the solution tongue2


you are the boil on the butt of my humanity

you are not my bridge over troubled waters...you are my troubled waters

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

but I still loves ya more than my luggage

franshade's photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:57 PM





YOU!!! laugh


I am not the problem; I am the solution tongue2


you are the boil on the butt of my humanity

you are not my bridge over troubled waters...you are my troubled waters

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

but I still loves ya more than my luggage


and we know just how much you love ya luggage rofl rofl


offtopic sorry

but when do I stay on topic

rofl rofl

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:58 PM




I look at it this way. We were gonna get screw no matter what so, we had to pick the vice that hurt the least ;)
Also, I do find obama a very intelligent man but, when you see everyone giving him a past on so much you almost have to root for the underdog. The only time that I even remembered him getting bashed some was against Hillary and that didn't even last that long.


People bash Obama here in the forms all the time.

Yes, true but that's the forums and not the media which is watched all over the world. He became president basically, for all the passes that he got.


He became president in my opinion because he didn't make a fool of himself at every turn, like McCain and Palin did with such ease. I found myself really embarrassed for them at times. I couldn't believe how far they would go to try to bring down Obama, instead of focusing on what they would do to help the country, they did all that same old divisive crap they thought worked for Bush. Well ya it worked for Bush but many of us remember just how ugly that all was too. People were fed up with that kind of divisive crapola.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 10/07/09 01:59 PM



and we know just how much you love ya luggage rofl rofl


offtopic sorry

but when do I stay on topic

rofl rofl


hey....it's luggage from the 70's...the hard plastic and IT'S BLUE!!! oooooh aaaah laugh

stop distracting me before I lance you laugh

look4you's photo
Wed 10/07/09 02:04 PM





He became president in my opinion because he didn't make a fool of himself at every turn, like McCain and Palin did with such ease. I found myself really embarrassed for them at times. I couldn't believe how far they would go to try to bring down Obama, instead of focusing on what they would do to help the country, they did all that same old divisive crap they thought worked for Bush. Well ya it worked for Bush but many of us remember just how ugly that all was too. People were fed up with that kind of divisive crapola.


Well, you can give the media the credit for that or you can give credit to obama camp for being the first ones ever to ulitize the media and the internet and the youth movement. You can almsot say "right person,right time" kinda of thing. And you have to see that it was a tough mountain for ANYBODY to climb after following Bush. Really, it got to the point that he (being Bush) was sooo hated that McCain or any republican for that matter that was getting re-elected wanted Bush to support or even stand next to them...lol
That's was an edge that oabam cherish...shoot he still does ;)

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 02:09 PM


the only reason I used that set of quotes was because there were too many other quotes so I went to the source. didn't mean it was supposed to be against you (even though I can see how it could be taken that way) oops laugh


No worries :smile:

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 02:12 PM






I doubt anything I'm going to show you is going to change your mind. However, you can watch her interview with Katie Couric if you'd like. In my opinion, it does not show her as being vice president material.


Seen it. I think it shows someone who felt she was being put into a corner with unfair interviewing tactics. Was Obama asked what magazines and newspapers he reads?

I think relying on a single interview as an impression that someone is stupid seems a bit ungainly.

Obama is ten months into his presidency and shows absolutely no understanding of how economics work from a Keysian or Austrian school and I don't call him stupid. That's 10 months of evidence. I call him crooked and question his motives, but I wouldn't call him stupid. Even though he is the first president who has refused to release his college grades...just saying...


The difference is that Obama would have handled it with far more grace, instead Palin had to act like the poor little martyred victim. Oh they were so mean to me. Why not just say I prefer not to answer the damn question. I might have had more respect for her than the lame a$$ answers she gave. She was answered very direct and simple questions and couldn't answer them, period. She had many interviews, not just that one, she also said many many things on the campaign trail. Do you assume liberals didn't watch all the campaigns? Or all the interviews.

Your being asked to google, we already know what she has said. You already know our opinion of her, so why bait us, just go do your own research.

Please don't pretend you aren't calling Obama stupid because you are not using the specific word. You don't like Obama, we don't like Palin, not biggy, it's to be expected.

And who the heck are you to call anyone dishonest when you obviously are not aware of all the things she has said. I don't think she's stupid at all, I do however think the way she handled herself was pretty lame, and I do think she's a manipulative fundementalist right winger, who learned pretty quickly that you can say almost anything you want, lie or not and make more money spewing BS than actually sticking to a job.


Really, I respect your P.O.V on everything but, since we are speaking "honest" (tongue and cheek) I'd say that even you must admit that Palin got trashed badly through out this campaign and that there was never any reason in the world to bring her children into it either. And you have to also admit that she was held back by the McCain people sooo much that people started to think that she had no creditablity bc of the McCain camp. That's who I actually blame and not so much the liberal media. McCain basically spoon fed them by refusing to let her go. And being fair here...as I have mention in other posts that she didn't answer the most direct of question wisely.And it did make her look like a fool whether if it was edited or not there was no excuses for answering some question the way that she did.


Ok I can accept that point of view even if there are things I disagree with. Such as, her being trashed. Taking on Palin was an direct insult to the women that voted for Clinton. Mccain thought that we would be so stupid that we would take a woman no matter how we got one as long as women were represented. BS. Typical old man out of touch thinking. Second, she got bashed because of the lame things she said when she was given free run. They held her back because she embarrassed those behind the campaign. I watched McCain's body language at one interview and I swear if they have been alone, he would have read her the riot act for the dumb *** things she said right in front of him.

From lipstick on a pig to the dumber things she just let rip thinking the only people paying attention where the fringe in her own base. That's not a particularly bright. Palin and Joe the plumber aren't doing the republicans a favor, they are just making them look more like the radicals they have become.

The only response that I can reply with...actually more than 1 :wink:
Palin is the only person that can bring a crowd close to whatever obama can do on a bad day. And IF it weren't for Palin NOBODY would have shown up to the rallies for McCain...he was a boring old fart. On top of that she brought in alot of money for the republican party. Like it or not she is a cash cow for the party so that is whyI am confussed as to why in the world would ANY republican politician would move against her. Even run against her would be damaging bc she does have a following. Also, please keep in mind that obama was running for president since 07' I believe and Palin only had a couple of months.


Well considering the damage she did to McCain in that short period, it's a damn good thing she didnt have more time. As for him being boring, gotta give ya that one, he was truely boring, but she didn't do him any favors.

She brought the far right nutcases and the fringe out in number, yes, but that is what was their downfall. people were so fired up it didn't matter if the things she said were out and out lies, she represented the nutcases and those who wanted their power to continue.

The crazies made for some entertainment but they also made the party look like mean spirited buttheads out to win at any cost. That is why my republican friends voted for Obama. They thought McCain has snapped.

Palin appealed to the fundementalist crazies, and all the rest that didn't like Obama for whatever other reasons. She brought down the McCain campaign faster than McCain would have done it alone. I watched every thing non stop of 2 years, there wasn't much I didn't see happening. Hell I didn't watch anything else on tv for those two years.

Bottom Line, Palin is clever and manipulative, and frankly using the republican base to rack it in. If I were a republican that would piss me off.

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 02:27 PM
Edited by boo2u on Wed 10/07/09 02:50 PM

He became president in my opinion because he didn't make a fool of himself at every turn, like McCain and Palin did with such ease. I found myself really embarrassed for them at times. I couldn't believe how far they would go to try to bring down Obama, instead of focusing on what they would do to help the country, they did all that same old divisive crap they thought worked for Bush. Well ya it worked for Bush but many of us remember just how ugly that all was too. People were fed up with that kind of divisive crapola.


Well, you can give the media the credit for that or you can give credit to obama camp for being the first ones ever to ulitize the media and the internet and the youth movement. You can almsot say "right person,right time" kinda of thing. And you have to see that it was a tough mountain for ANYBODY to climb after following Bush. Really, it got to the point that he (being Bush) was sooo hated that McCain or any republican for that matter that was getting re-elected wanted Bush to support or even stand next to them...lol
That's was an edge that oabam cherish...shoot he still does ;)


The republicans can't blame bush for the election, they have to blame tired old strategy of division. They used the same old exhausted issues of gays and abortion and then threw in socialist and every other mud slinging tactic they would find.. they blew it, and will again for the same damn reason.

Let's face it, the republicans thought there was no way Obama could win, they also thought why try a new strategy when the one for Bush worked. You know the divide crapola. Yes Obama was a organizer, but the right was so busy putting down organizers they didn't bother to realize just how good Obama was at organizing. They were so focused on throwing crap out there and hoping something worked, they didn't bother viewing themselves from another point of view. Republicans are still kicking themselves for the glaring mistakes they made. The media did try to tell them they were getting way to out there, but they wouldn't listen.


look4you's photo
Wed 10/07/09 02:33 PM







I doubt anything I'm going to show you is going to change your mind. However, you can watch her interview with Katie Couric if you'd like. In my opinion, it does not show her as being vice president material.


Seen it. I think it shows someone who felt she was being put into a corner with unfair interviewing tactics. Was Obama asked what magazines and newspapers he reads?

I think relying on a single interview as an impression that someone is stupid seems a bit ungainly.

Obama is ten months into his presidency and shows absolutely no understanding of how economics work from a Keysian or Austrian school and I don't call him stupid. That's 10 months of evidence. I call him crooked and question his motives, but I wouldn't call him stupid. Even though he is the first president who has refused to release his college grades...just saying...


The difference is that Obama would have handled it with far more grace, instead Palin had to act like the poor little martyred victim. Oh they were so mean to me. Why not just say I prefer not to answer the damn question. I might have had more respect for her than the lame a$$ answers she gave. She was answered very direct and simple questions and couldn't answer them, period. She had many interviews, not just that one, she also said many many things on the campaign trail. Do you assume liberals didn't watch all the campaigns? Or all the interviews.

Your being asked to google, we already know what she has said. You already know our opinion of her, so why bait us, just go do your own research.

Please don't pretend you aren't calling Obama stupid because you are not using the specific word. You don't like Obama, we don't like Palin, not biggy, it's to be expected.

And who the heck are you to call anyone dishonest when you obviously are not aware of all the things she has said. I don't think she's stupid at all, I do however think the way she handled herself was pretty lame, and I do think she's a manipulative fundementalist right winger, who learned pretty quickly that you can say almost anything you want, lie or not and make more money spewing BS than actually sticking to a job.


Really, I respect your P.O.V on everything but, since we are speaking "honest" (tongue and cheek) I'd say that even you must admit that Palin got trashed badly through out this campaign and that there was never any reason in the world to bring her children into it either. And you have to also admit that she was held back by the McCain people sooo much that people started to think that she had no creditablity bc of the McCain camp. That's who I actually blame and not so much the liberal media. McCain basically spoon fed them by refusing to let her go. And being fair here...as I have mention in other posts that she didn't answer the most direct of question wisely.And it did make her look like a fool whether if it was edited or not there was no excuses for answering some question the way that she did.


Ok I can accept that point of view even if there are things I disagree with. Such as, her being trashed. Taking on Palin was an direct insult to the women that voted for Clinton. Mccain thought that we would be so stupid that we would take a woman no matter how we got one as long as women were represented. BS. Typical old man out of touch thinking. Second, she got bashed because of the lame things she said when she was given free run. They held her back because she embarrassed those behind the campaign. I watched McCain's body language at one interview and I swear if they have been alone, he would have read her the riot act for the dumb *** things she said right in front of him.

From lipstick on a pig to the dumber things she just let rip thinking the only people paying attention where the fringe in her own base. That's not a particularly bright. Palin and Joe the plumber aren't doing the republicans a favor, they are just making them look more like the radicals they have become.

The only response that I can reply with...actually more than 1 :wink:
Palin is the only person that can bring a crowd close to whatever obama can do on a bad day. And IF it weren't for Palin NOBODY would have shown up to the rallies for McCain...he was a boring old fart. On top of that she brought in alot of money for the republican party. Like it or not she is a cash cow for the party so that is whyI am confussed as to why in the world would ANY republican politician would move against her. Even run against her would be damaging bc she does have a following. Also, please keep in mind that obama was running for president since 07' I believe and Palin only had a couple of months.


Well considering the damage she did to McCain in that short period, it's a damn good thing she didnt have more time. As for him being boring, gotta give ya that one, he was truely boring, but she didn't do him any favors.

She brought the far right nutcases and the fringe out in number, yes, but that is what was their downfall. people were so fired up it didn't matter if the things she said were out and out lies, she represented the nutcases and those who wanted their power to continue.

The crazies made for some entertainment but they also made the party look like mean spirited buttheads out to win at any cost. That is why my republican friends voted for Obama. They thought McCain has snapped.

Palin appealed to the fundementalist crazies, and all the rest that didn't like Obama for whatever other reasons. She brought down the McCain campaign faster than McCain would have done it alone. I watched every thing non stop of 2 years, there wasn't much I didn't see happening. Hell I didn't watch anything else on tv for those two years.

Bottom Line, Palin is clever and manipulative, and frankly using the republican base to rack it in. If I were a republican that would piss me off.


Ok...just curious, did you have the t.v shut off for 2yrs? Bc, I don't know what campaign that you were watching. I think that I was more than reasonable with my outlook on both candidates and your POV was all leaning left. You must be on soemthing to think that the liberals/democrats are all nice and dandy bc IF you happen to remember the Democrat conventions you saw the police everywhere when they were breaking window and creating chaos OR do you remember the "Truth Squad" OR I could go all day with obama and ACORN as well. Palin didn't destroy anything for McCain. McCain destroyed himself by not utilizing Palin in a better way. How many times was Biden told to STFU and he kept on spouting crap that didn't make sense.You mentioned "clever and manipulative"...LMAO! You must be speaking about the Messiah himself, Mr.obama bc he is the one with how many books again? None the less at what age,lol? Or was it obama that had 120 plus No Votes, or was he the guy that had to mention his poor background,white mother, the father that left him, the aunt hiding out in a project in Brooklyn,Ny and his boo-hoo up bringing. College, hmmm...are there even transcripts that he did anything when he was there except for what he said that he did and there is no proof what so ever. Was it the gay activtist that went into a church to push their agenda but meanwhile you have the nerve to say that the republicans are the crazies...LMAO!!! Get your story straight before approaching me with nonsense.

no photo
Wed 10/07/09 03:58 PM
Edited by quiet321 on Wed 10/07/09 04:31 PM


I agree. I'm cracking up reading this thread. I thought Palin was a breath of fresh air. So much for the left supporting women. ;)






Im a black woman, I did not feel obligated to support Sharpton when he run, nor did I feel obligated to support Palin's irrelevant winks which came off , to me at least, as very condescending. I find it kind of insulting that in this day and age people are expected to support someone else because of superficial things like gender or race or political association instead of supporting who is the best candidate.



I am not suggesting to support someone just because she is a woman.

It was surprising the hits she took just because she is a woman. Most of the hatred aimed at her was because she did not come off as polished. She was a down to earth, beautiful woman who made gaffes but so do men. Biden made them but few people attack him as stupid. The woman had very little time to prepare herself but she energized McCain's campaign. I don't know if that struck fear in the opposition but to me the attacks were extremely vicious. She was bashed for her faith, questions raised about her large family and working away from them, the clothes she wore, you name it.

I'm sure if she held the same political ideology as those bashing her Palin would be held up as a beautiful, intelligent woman who is just human. Just like Obama was just human when he compared his bowling scores to the scores in the Special Olympics. Or the 57 states and one more to go remark that has been mentioned in this thread. The 10,000 dead by tornadoes when 12 died, the Selma, Ala. remark his parents united as a direct result in 1961 when the march took place in 1965....











no photo
Wed 10/07/09 05:12 PM








I doubt anything I'm going to show you is going to change your mind. However, you can watch her interview with Katie Couric if you'd like. In my opinion, it does not show her as being vice president material.


Seen it. I think it shows someone who felt she was being put into a corner with unfair interviewing tactics. Was Obama asked what magazines and newspapers he reads?

I think relying on a single interview as an impression that someone is stupid seems a bit ungainly.

Obama is ten months into his presidency and shows absolutely no understanding of how economics work from a Keysian or Austrian school and I don't call him stupid. That's 10 months of evidence. I call him crooked and question his motives, but I wouldn't call him stupid. Even though he is the first president who has refused to release his college grades...just saying...


The difference is that Obama would have handled it with far more grace, instead Palin had to act like the poor little martyred victim. Oh they were so mean to me. Why not just say I prefer not to answer the damn question. I might have had more respect for her than the lame a$$ answers she gave. She was answered very direct and simple questions and couldn't answer them, period. She had many interviews, not just that one, she also said many many things on the campaign trail. Do you assume liberals didn't watch all the campaigns? Or all the interviews.

Your being asked to google, we already know what she has said. You already know our opinion of her, so why bait us, just go do your own research.

Please don't pretend you aren't calling Obama stupid because you are not using the specific word. You don't like Obama, we don't like Palin, not biggy, it's to be expected.

And who the heck are you to call anyone dishonest when you obviously are not aware of all the things she has said. I don't think she's stupid at all, I do however think the way she handled herself was pretty lame, and I do think she's a manipulative fundementalist right winger, who learned pretty quickly that you can say almost anything you want, lie or not and make more money spewing BS than actually sticking to a job.


Really, I respect your P.O.V on everything but, since we are speaking "honest" (tongue and cheek) I'd say that even you must admit that Palin got trashed badly through out this campaign and that there was never any reason in the world to bring her children into it either. And you have to also admit that she was held back by the McCain people sooo much that people started to think that she had no creditablity bc of the McCain camp. That's who I actually blame and not so much the liberal media. McCain basically spoon fed them by refusing to let her go. And being fair here...as I have mention in other posts that she didn't answer the most direct of question wisely.And it did make her look like a fool whether if it was edited or not there was no excuses for answering some question the way that she did.


Ok I can accept that point of view even if there are things I disagree with. Such as, her being trashed. Taking on Palin was an direct insult to the women that voted for Clinton. Mccain thought that we would be so stupid that we would take a woman no matter how we got one as long as women were represented. BS. Typical old man out of touch thinking. Second, she got bashed because of the lame things she said when she was given free run. They held her back because she embarrassed those behind the campaign. I watched McCain's body language at one interview and I swear if they have been alone, he would have read her the riot act for the dumb *** things she said right in front of him.

From lipstick on a pig to the dumber things she just let rip thinking the only people paying attention where the fringe in her own base. That's not a particularly bright. Palin and Joe the plumber aren't doing the republicans a favor, they are just making them look more like the radicals they have become.

The only response that I can reply with...actually more than 1 :wink:
Palin is the only person that can bring a crowd close to whatever obama can do on a bad day. And IF it weren't for Palin NOBODY would have shown up to the rallies for McCain...he was a boring old fart. On top of that she brought in alot of money for the republican party. Like it or not she is a cash cow for the party so that is whyI am confussed as to why in the world would ANY republican politician would move against her. Even run against her would be damaging bc she does have a following. Also, please keep in mind that obama was running for president since 07' I believe and Palin only had a couple of months.


Well considering the damage she did to McCain in that short period, it's a damn good thing she didnt have more time. As for him being boring, gotta give ya that one, he was truely boring, but she didn't do him any favors.

She brought the far right nutcases and the fringe out in number, yes, but that is what was their downfall. people were so fired up it didn't matter if the things she said were out and out lies, she represented the nutcases and those who wanted their power to continue.

The crazies made for some entertainment but they also made the party look like mean spirited buttheads out to win at any cost. That is why my republican friends voted for Obama. They thought McCain has snapped.

Palin appealed to the fundementalist crazies, and all the rest that didn't like Obama for whatever other reasons. She brought down the McCain campaign faster than McCain would have done it alone. I watched every thing non stop of 2 years, there wasn't much I didn't see happening. Hell I didn't watch anything else on tv for those two years.

Bottom Line, Palin is clever and manipulative, and frankly using the republican base to rack it in. If I were a republican that would piss me off.


Ok...just curious, did you have the t.v shut off for 2yrs? Bc, I don't know what campaign that you were watching. I think that I was more than reasonable with my outlook on both candidates and your POV was all leaning left. You must be on soemthing to think that the liberals/democrats are all nice and dandy bc IF you happen to remember the Democrat conventions you saw the police everywhere when they were breaking window and creating chaos OR do you remember the "Truth Squad" OR I could go all day with obama and ACORN as well. Palin didn't destroy anything for McCain. McCain destroyed himself by not utilizing Palin in a better way. How many times was Biden told to STFU and he kept on spouting crap that didn't make sense.You mentioned "clever and manipulative"...LMAO! You must be speaking about the Messiah himself, Mr.obama bc he is the one with how many books again? None the less at what age,lol? Or was it obama that had 120 plus No Votes, or was he the guy that had to mention his poor background,white mother, the father that left him, the aunt hiding out in a project in Brooklyn,Ny and his boo-hoo up bringing. College, hmmm...are there even transcripts that he did anything when he was there except for what he said that he did and there is no proof what so ever. Was it the gay activtist that went into a church to push their agenda but meanwhile you have the nerve to say that the republicans are the crazies...LMAO!!! Get your story straight before approaching me with nonsense.
Where the hell did I say the dems/republicans were all dandy?

The people on the left that didn't like Obama didn't have to do anything really (though they did their share), the right was doing it for them, frankly. I never said that the republicans were the only crazies. If you didn't know about Obama's education you obviously didn't bother looking either. But hey I am not going to spend hours arguing with you. Our observations are in conflict, period. I don't know what the hell your talking about with the gay activist thing.

'Get your story straight before approaching me with nonsense.'

My observation is my story, if you don't like it, that is your problem, no? Unless you can prove that your observation is the correct one, I think we might have a problem.

BeautifulNTV's photo
Wed 10/07/09 05:34 PM
Does anyone take Sarah Palin seriously ....you have got to be kidding.

1 2 3 4 6 Next