Topic: Above the Law?
MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:11 PM








assuming (yup there I go) that you have read the same articles that I have, both were in the wrong.

However, am I right to assume (yup I did it again) that as Mr. Gates was arrested this arrest will forever stay in his record?




and it should

why should it not

he refused to co-operate with an officer there to protect him and his proberty

read my last post




:smile: He didnt want or need any help protecting his property (from himself?) and no it wont stay on his record.:smile: The charges were dropped because they were bogus:smile:


and how was the officer supposed to know it was his house if he refused to verify it by showing his id

again you need to realize one must prove what they say or what they say is of know value

maybe he should get to know his neighbors better so they know not to call the police when he breaks into his own house

it is not like he just walked up to the door and walked in

he was having issues getting in the home

get real with what you expect




:smile: So,if a white guy threatens to kill telemarketers and burn down their building and gets arrested thats an infringment of his rights, but if an elderly black man gets arrested for being "disorderly" in his own home then thats okay?:smile:


Read my last post...last sentence... and besides, Mirror...you didn't answer my last question to you. (speeding ticket example)
:smile: Yes, I know that charges sometimes get dropped out of kindness of the officer or prosecuter but most of the time they get dropped when the arrest was uncalled for:smile:


OK...I agree there are always going to be 2 sides to every story!

Also, I'm assuming you have never been in law enforcement!

Given that the statements above are true, it would be very easy for you to assume the conclusions that you have apparently come to.

The arresting officer was/is a "profiler expert", even taught classes on the subject.

There was also a black officer with Sgt.James Crowley as well, at the scene. He also says the the arresting officer was well within his rights to arrest the prof! That Gates was way out of line!

Why Gates don't just accept the fact that he was in the wrong(by his outburst of anger)and take the idea of "dropped charges" as the end of it.

Personally, if it were me that was the arresting officer...I would have never dropped any charges that I deemed were justifiable!

I could go on all night with this subject...but I'm not...I've been on both sides of the fence in my life time...and I side with the police in this matter. Besides, if I don't stop now...I don't want to say anything that might be construed as offensive/or argumentative towards a fellow Mingle'r/Minglette!

So, lets go have a cold one...and see what is on the news for tomorrow's discussions. drinks drinker drinks




drinks I hear ya.drinks I think this story is being blown out of proportion.drinks

adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:12 PM


Mirror, the Professor did not give his ID at first. It's not like he walked to the officer and handed it to him and explained the situation...he was defensive and verbally aggressive.jmo
:smile: In his own home.:smile: And once the cop seen the professors ID then the situation should have ended and the officer should have left.:smile:


Police said he flew into a verbal rage after Crowley asked him to show identification to prove he should be in the home.


adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:13 PM
Edited by adj4u on Fri 07/24/09 02:14 PM







assuming (yup there I go) that you have read the same articles that I have, both were in the wrong.

However, am I right to assume (yup I did it again) that as Mr. Gates was arrested this arrest will forever stay in his record?




and it should

why should it not

he refused to co-operate with an officer there to protect him and his proberty

read my last post




:smile: He didnt want or need any help protecting his property (from himself?) and no it wont stay on his record.:smile: The charges were dropped because they were bogus:smile:


and how was the officer supposed to know it was his house if he refused to verify it by showing his id

again you need to realize one must prove what they say or what they say is of know value

maybe he should get to know his neighbors better so they know not to call the police when he breaks into his own house

it is not like he just walked up to the door and walked in

he was having issues getting in the home

get real with what you expect




:smile: So,if a white guy threatens to kill telemarketers and burn down their building and gets arrested thats an infringment of his rights, but if an elderly black man gets arrested for being "disorderly" in his own home then thats okay?:smile:


the white guy charged was on the phone there was no possibility of immediate harm

the black person was disobeying a law enforcement officer in the carrying out of his duties to protect his home and body

the officer was called by the neighbor that said someone is breaking into his house

if he had shown his id as is required by law none of this would have taken place

the guy on the phone was provoked by the company representative when the company representative called him a profane name

the guy on the phone was also three states away


:smile: The professor did show his ID.:smile: And I think saying that your going to kill people and their families and burn down buildings is worse than breaking into your own house.:smile:


wrong not until after he was disorderly


Police said he flew into a verbal rage after Crowley asked him to show identification to prove he should be in the home.

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:14 PM



Mirror, the Professor did not give his ID at first. It's not like he walked to the officer and handed it to him and explained the situation...he was defensive and verbally aggressive.jmo
:smile: In his own home.:smile: And once the cop seen the professors ID then the situation should have ended and the officer should have left.:smile:


Police said he flew into a verbal rage after Crowley asked him to show identification to prove he should be in the home.


:smile: so? :smile: I think most people would be agitated:smile:

cabot's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:15 PM
Seeing an ID does not prove anything. It must be checked out. The Professor did not cooperate at any stage of the process, in fact, verbally assaulting the officers...there are lines you don't cross. I'm sure the police told him to calm down plenty of times before finally citing him. Now the Professor wants an apology. Paaleeze..he should thank the police for doing a good job..jmo Or was the fact that he is a good friend of the President, motivate his actions?

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:15 PM








assuming (yup there I go) that you have read the same articles that I have, both were in the wrong.

However, am I right to assume (yup I did it again) that as Mr. Gates was arrested this arrest will forever stay in his record?




and it should

why should it not

he refused to co-operate with an officer there to protect him and his proberty

read my last post




:smile: He didnt want or need any help protecting his property (from himself?) and no it wont stay on his record.:smile: The charges were dropped because they were bogus:smile:


and how was the officer supposed to know it was his house if he refused to verify it by showing his id

again you need to realize one must prove what they say or what they say is of know value

maybe he should get to know his neighbors better so they know not to call the police when he breaks into his own house

it is not like he just walked up to the door and walked in

he was having issues getting in the home

get real with what you expect




:smile: So,if a white guy threatens to kill telemarketers and burn down their building and gets arrested thats an infringment of his rights, but if an elderly black man gets arrested for being "disorderly" in his own home then thats okay?:smile:


the white guy charged was on the phone there was no possibility of immediate harm

the black person was disobeying a law enforcement officer in the carrying out of his duties to protect his home and body

the officer was called by the neighbor that said someone is breaking into his house

if he had shown his id as is required by law none of this would have taken place

the guy on the phone was provoked by the company representative when the company representative called him a profane name

the guy on the phone was also three states away


:smile: The professor did show his ID.:smile: And I think saying that your going to kill people and their families and burn down buildings is worse than breaking into your own house.:smile:


wrong not until after he was disorderly


Police said he flew into a verbal rage after Crowley asked him to show identification to prove he should be in the home.

:smile: so?:smile:

adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:16 PM




Mirror, the Professor did not give his ID at first. It's not like he walked to the officer and handed it to him and explained the situation...he was defensive and verbally aggressive.jmo
:smile: In his own home.:smile: And once the cop seen the professors ID then the situation should have ended and the officer should have left.:smile:


Police said he flew into a verbal rage after Crowley asked him to show identification to prove he should be in the home.


:smile: so? :smile: I think most people would be agitated:smile:


that does not give them the right to attack an officer doing his job

whether physically or verbally

he deserves charges


MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:17 PM
:smile: I personally think this story is barely newsworthy and is being blown out of proportion. :smile: The idiot threatening to kill people and burn down buildings on the phone seems like a bigger story to me:smile:

adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:19 PM

:smile: I personally think this story is barely newsworthy and is being blown out of proportion. :smile: The idiot threatening to kill people and burn down buildings on the phone seems like a bigger story to me:smile:


they are both being sensationalized

and both have had the wrong outcome


MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:19 PM





Mirror, the Professor did not give his ID at first. It's not like he walked to the officer and handed it to him and explained the situation...he was defensive and verbally aggressive.jmo
:smile: In his own home.:smile: And once the cop seen the professors ID then the situation should have ended and the officer should have left.:smile:


Police said he flew into a verbal rage after Crowley asked him to show identification to prove he should be in the home.


:smile: so? :smile: I think most people would be agitated:smile:


that does not give them the right to attack an officer doing his job

whether physically or verbally

he deserves charges


:smile: The accounts of what happened vary. :smile: And the charges have already been dropped.:smile: No, its not a good idea to piss off a cop:smile: I would think you would be concerned about cops protecting peoples property from themselves in their own home:smile:

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:20 PM


:smile: I personally think this story is barely newsworthy and is being blown out of proportion. :smile: The idiot threatening to kill people and burn down buildings on the phone seems like a bigger story to me:smile:


they are both being sensationalized

and both have had the wrong outcome


:smile: An elderly scholar breaking into his own house and getting into an arguement with an officer hardly compares to a guy threatening to kill people and their families and burn down buildings:smile:

cabot's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:22 PM

:smile: I personally think this story is barely newsworthy and is being blown out of proportion. :smile: The idiot threatening to kill people and burn down buildings on the phone seems like a bigger story to me:smile:


Agreed. The news worthy part of it to me were the remarks by the President on a close friend of his. That is why it made the news. Peace and good day. Let's see if the actions here make other people cry wolf as well.

Just remember people, the Professor was more white than black by his own admission. That fact seems to always get overlooked.

Atlantis75's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:24 PM
Get the full story, before commenting out of thin air:



Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Police Report
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0723092gates1.html

cabot's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:30 PM
Atlantis...good link. Thanks. The details are in the pudding.

adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:34 PM
Edited by adj4u on Fri 07/24/09 02:38 PM



adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:37 PM
Edited by adj4u on Fri 07/24/09 02:38 PM


statement of second officer

the previous post is of arresting officers statement

adj4u's photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:43 PM
notice six lines up from the end of the arresting officers report

gates said door not securable from break in

so it is not like there were no break ins going on in the area he had one himself and knew it

he should be charged and the charge should have remained


no photo
Fri 07/24/09 02:51 PM

notice six lines up from the end of the arresting officers report

gates said door not securable from break in

so it is not like there were no break ins going on in the area he had one himself and knew it

he should be charged and the charge should have remained




NOW...maybe this will soak into the heads of the people that still have their heads in the sand!!:banana: :banana:

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 07/24/09 03:01 PM

notice six lines up from the end of the arresting officers report

gates said door not securable from break in

so it is not like there were no break ins going on in the area he had one himself and knew it

he should be charged and the charge should have remained




:smile: Like I said before I think this is being blown out of proportion.:smile: No,I dont think the officer is rascist.:smile: I also dont think its a good idea to piss off a cop.:smile: The cop did not have to make an arrest.:smile: The Professor shown that it was his house, the cop could have just left then.:smile: I would think a person trained in profiling would understand that an african american man of a certain age group would feel threatened by a cop in his own house.:smile: The officer could have had thicker skin and not let an elderly university professor get to him.:smile:The oldman is a prestigious citizen and hardly any sort of threat to anyone.:smile: And I feel its all being blown out of proportion.:smile:The officer didnt really do anything wrong except overreact slightly by arresting the Professor.:smile:It was the right move to drop the charge:smile:

cabot's photo
Fri 07/24/09 03:02 PM
I'm starting to think Gates and President Obama sat next to each other at the good Rev. Wright's sermons. "The Chickens Have Come Home to Roost"...laugh sorry, I couldn't resist. Many people forget the past, but I don't.