1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 13 14
Topic: There is no sin, there are no commandments
Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:04 PM

I am not sure if what I am actually attempting to discuss is being understood as the conversation has gotten off track.

I would like to know what people think about the idea of HOW "free will" fits into God and the "commandments."

It is not as if these were just laws that had set punishments. And the old testament obviously had a bunch of other so called "laws" besides the ten commandments.

To break any of Gods laws was a "sin" and the Bible states that the wages of "sin" is death.

Therefore by stating that all humans were sinners, all humans are or could be by law, sentenced to death.

These were old Judaic laws. These were the laws of the Jews.

*************************

But today, I hear people, (even Christians) claim or admit that we have "free will." Christians claim that "free will" is a gift from "God." (Their God of course.)

But if we do have "Free will" then there can logically be no "commandments" which will result in "sin" for their disobedience which comes with the punishment of death.

So either we don't have "free will," or there are no commandments which are enforceable by the punishment of death.

*************************

I believe we do have free will and that it comes with no strings.

There are no commandments, therefore there can be no sin.

There can only be the true law of God which is the unwritten law of cause and effect.

No man can wield this law against his fellow man as religions try to do. All men are subject to the true law of God, the law of cause and effect.




I agree the topic has moved Jeannie. Thx for clarifying what you originally wrote. I believe otherwise, but wish you well on your journey for the truth)

Abracadabra's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:06 PM

There are many things I don't understand myself. But I don't seek people out who believe differently than I do and ridicule them. If it was an honest attempt to understand, I could see that, but it's clearly not. No hard feelings, but anyone looking at these topics objectively can see that.


I don't ridicule people either.

I ask them why they believe in such an obviously violent and dismal picture of a creator?

You speak about things being obvious, well isn't it obvious to anyone that the Bible is a very violent and dismal picture of a God?

The Bible claims that all of humanity has failed their creator.

Can you tell me what is not dismal about that premise?

The Bible claims that this same God had his son nailed to a pole to pay for our miserable failings.

Can you tell me what is not dismal about that premise?

I'm supposed to jump for joy over this? huh

According to the Protestants there is no way to get to this God through acts of love, the only way to get in favor with this God is to confess to this God that we were indeed responsible for him having to have his son nailed to a pole.

Can you tell me what is not dismal about that premise?

Who's ridiculing anyone?

All I'm doing is asking why anyone would want to believe in such a dismal picture of God on pure faith.

I certainly don't.

And I have yet to hear any Christian say why they would want to believe that this dismal picture is true if they don't have to believe it.

How is asking such a question 'ridiculing' anyone?

Do you have an answer of why you would like this dismal story to be true?

Krimsa's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:06 PM


Who ridiculed anyone on this thread? huh


Krimsa, I normally make a habit of skipping your remarks, but I'll make an exception this one time..


"There are so much wiser pictures of God that you can choose from. Why choose such an ugly picture of God?

Why put your faith in the idea that you have failed your creator?

Such a dismal picture.

You are only saved by 'grace' because you are totally unworthy of God's love.

That's truly a pathetic picture IMHO.

It would be truly sad if we had no choice but to know that this was our pathetic reality."

That was what I was referring to. That and many statements like it.



Oh yea I remember skad. You were the one that pissed off like 15 people on a thread when you insisted that all Atheists are sad, depressed, lonely hearts around the holidays

You have some nerve. Yeah, I’m not hearing it. I didnt remember you till just now. That was horribly misguided of you.

Abracadabra's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:11 PM
Edited by Abracadabra on Fri 01/02/09 07:13 PM

I would like to know what people think about the idea of HOW "free will" fits into God and the "commandments."


To be honest Jeannie, I don't see any problem with free will and "Commandments".

You have the free will to either do as you're told or suffer the consequences.

Where's the problem? huh

To me, that's not a problem.

However, a God who will judge people for what they supposedly cannot do on their own is utterly ludicious.


MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:18 PM


I would like to know what people think about the idea of HOW "free will" fits into God and the "commandments."


To be honest Jeannie, I don't see any problem with free will and "Commandments".

You have the free will to either do as you're told or suffer the consequences.

Where's the problem? huh

To me, that's not a problem.

However, a God who will judge people for what they supposedly cannot do on their own is utterly ludicious.







no photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:19 PM
I agree the topic has moved Jeannie. Thx for clarifying what you originally wrote. I believe otherwise, but wish you well on your journey for the truth)


Skad,

You believe otherwise but what do you believe about "free will?"

If we have "free will" then why do you think there are commandments?

If all humans are "sinners," and all "sin" is punishable by death, then that very law is what convinces people that they need a savior to die in their place.

Because "The wages of sin is death."

The Bible says that if you believe in Jesus "you will not die and you will have everlasting life."

But people die every day anyway. I don't know of anyone who is more than 150 years old, Christians or non-Christians all die.

And if you are talking about life AFTER DEATH or heaven, that cannot be confirmed or proven.

I believe that spirit is eternal and that I will exist forever if not in this form then in some other form. I believe in free will.
















Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:20 PM



Who ridiculed anyone on this thread? huh


Krimsa, I normally make a habit of skipping your remarks, but I'll make an exception this one time..


"There are so much wiser pictures of God that you can choose from. Why choose such an ugly picture of God?

Why put your faith in the idea that you have failed your creator?

Such a dismal picture.

You are only saved by 'grace' because you are totally unworthy of God's love.

That's truly a pathetic picture IMHO.

It would be truly sad if we had no choice but to know that this was our pathetic reality."

That was what I was referring to. That and many statements like it.



Oh yea I remember skad. You were the one that pissed off like 15 people on a thread when you insisted that all Atheists are sad, depressed, lonely hearts around the holidays

You have some nerve. Yeah, I’m not hearing it. I didnt remember you till just now. That was horribly misguided of you.



Was just quoting the spokesman for the Humanists' response to questioning around the holidays. He said it, I didn't. (Again, I won't make things personal) It was over the whole bus ad controversy. Here it is again...

"We are trying to reach our audience, and sometimes in order to reach an audience, everybody has to hear you," said Fred Edwords, spokesman for the humanist group. "Our reason for doing it during the holidays is there are an awful lot of agnostics, atheists and other types of non-theists who feel a little alone during the holidays because of its association with traditional religion."

Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:26 PM

I agree the topic has moved Jeannie. Thx for clarifying what you originally wrote. I believe otherwise, but wish you well on your journey for the truth)


Skad,

You believe otherwise but what do you believe about "free will?"

If we have "free will" then why do you think there are commandments?

If all humans are "sinners," and all "sin" is punishable by death, then that very law is what convinces people that they need a savior to die in their place.

Because "The wages of sin is death."

The Bible says that if you believe in Jesus "you will not die and you will have everlasting life."

But people die every day anyway. I don't know of anyone who is more than 150 years old, Christians or non-Christians all die.

And if you are talking about life AFTER DEATH or heaven, that cannot be confirmed or proven.

I believe that spirit is eternal and that I will exist forever if not in this form then in some other form. I believe in free will.





I believe we have the free will to choose life through Christ or death through ourselves, personally. Thx for asking) flowerforyou

Abracadabra's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:28 PM

Because "The wages of sin is death."

The Bible says that if you believe in Jesus "you will not die and you will have everlasting life."

But people die every day anyway. I don't know of anyone who is more than 150 years old, Christians or non-Christians all die.

And if you are talking about life AFTER DEATH or heaven, that cannot be confirmed or proven.


Well, not only that, but according John 3:16 implies that only those who believe in Jesus will have everlasting life, and those who don't will perish.

Yet, Christians hold that non-believers go to hell.

Clearly according to John, you must even believe in Jesus to get to hell. Because even hell would require everlasting life.

You can't very well go to hell if you just perish.

So according to the gospel of John, only those who believe in Jesus are even eligible for hell as well.

According to John, those who don't believe in Jesus will merely perish and not have everlasting life in any form.

Krimsa's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:32 PM
skad, you took that snippet from this website

http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=92186

If you recall hellkitten busted you by presenting the actual article from the Humanists Association and that was what infuriated a dozen or more atheists and agnostics on the thread.

Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:35 PM
Edited by Skad on Fri 01/02/09 07:42 PM

skad, you took that snippet from this website

http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=92186

If you recall hellkitten busted you by presenting the actual article from the Humanists Association and that was what infuriated a dozen or more atheists and agnostics on the thread.


nope, from this one..

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450445,00.html

but thanks for the interest)

and maybe the agnostics and atheists did get angry at the humanists.. idk, idc really. but they at least tackled the source and not some nobody on a mingle website who quoted it, like myself.. ;p yawn

Krimsa's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:42 PM
Edited by Krimsa on Fri 01/02/09 07:44 PM
This was the one that caused the uproar. And besides, it wasn’t merely that you misrepresented an article. You yourself insisted that Atheists are sad, lonely and depressed around the holidays because they don’t have Christ. You have no right as a Christian to presume to know how Atheists or Agnostics feel about anything. That was what caused the anger directed towards you on the thread.

http://www.americanhumanist.org/press/BusAds.php

"Humanists have always understood that you don't need a god to be good," said Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association. "So that's the point we're making with this advertising campaign. Morality doesn't come from religion. It's a set of values embraced by individuals and society based on empathy, fairness, and experience."


AllenAqua's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:45 PM


I agree the topic has moved Jeannie. Thx for clarifying what you originally wrote. I believe otherwise, but wish you well on your journey for the truth)


Skad,

You believe otherwise but what do you believe about "free will?"

If we have "free will" then why do you think there are commandments?

If all humans are "sinners," and all "sin" is punishable by death, then that very law is what convinces people that they need a savior to die in their place.

Because "The wages of sin is death."

The Bible says that if you believe in Jesus "you will not die and you will have everlasting life."

But people die every day anyway. I don't know of anyone who is more than 150 years old, Christians or non-Christians all die.

And if you are talking about life AFTER DEATH or heaven, that cannot be confirmed or proven.

I believe that spirit is eternal and that I will exist forever if not in this form then in some other form. I believe in free will.





I believe we have the free will to choose life through Christ or death through ourselves, personally. Thx for asking) flowerforyou


:smile: flowerforyou

Abracadabra's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:47 PM

Because "The wages of sin is death."


Actually this is another oxymoron here as well.

In some places the Bible seems to say that the wages of sin is death.

So how did that get turned into the idea of eternal damnation? huh

Also, where does it ever say that to not believe that Jesus is the sacrificial lamb of the God of Abraham is a sin? huh

Jesus himself said:

John 12:47 "And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world."

Clearly if Jesus was God and he said in his own words that he will not judge those who don't believe his words, then being a non-believer cannot possibly be a sin.

And therefore it could not be grounds for either eternal damnation, or even death.

Where do Christians come up with all their hateful conclusions about God being so anxious to punish people?

It clearly didn't come from Jesus.

According to Jesus it's not even important to believe in his words, much less that he was any sacrifical lamb of God.

So where do the Christians get off even claiming that this is the case? huh

I'm, sure they can dig up verses that contradict what John claims that Jesus said. But if they do all that proves is that the Bible is full of contraditions. Either people have been misquoting Jesus or Jesus himself was sending mixed messages.

Neither scenario would be good.

Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:50 PM
skip...again, it's just becoming insanely humorous to try to keep up with this.

I'll just let the readers of the thread read what's presented and make their own decision.

Krimsa's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:51 PM

skip...again, it's just becoming insanely humorous to try to keep up with this.

I'll just let the readers of the thread read what's presented and make their own decision.


Im skippin you based on that Humanist fiasco, thats for sure. huh

Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:53 PM


Because "The wages of sin is death."


Actually this is another oxymoron here as well.

In some places the Bible seems to say that the wages of sin is death.

So how did that get turned into the idea of eternal damnation? huh

Also, where does it ever say that to not believe that Jesus is the sacrificial lamb of the God of Abraham is a sin? huh

Jesus himself said:

John 12:47 "And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world."

Clearly if Jesus was God and he said in his own words that he will not judge those who don't believe his words, then being a non-believer cannot possibly be a sin.

And therefore it could not be grounds for either eternal damnation, or even death.

Where do Christians come up with all their hateful conclusions about God being so anxious to punish people?

It clearly didn't come from Jesus.

According to Jesus it's not even important to believe in his words, much less that he was any sacrifical lamb of God.

So where do the Christians get off even claiming that this is the case? huh

I'm, sure they can dig up verses that contradict what John claims that Jesus said. But if they do all that proves is that the Bible is full of contraditions. Either people have been misquoting Jesus or Jesus himself was sending mixed messages.

Neither scenario would be good.


What's the point of quoting what you don't believe? Aren't there better things to do?

AllenAqua's photo
Fri 01/02/09 07:55 PM


Because "The wages of sin is death."


Actually this is another oxymoron here as well.

In some places the Bible seems to say that the wages of sin is death.

So how did that get turned into the idea of eternal damnation? huh

Also, where does it ever say that to not believe that Jesus is the sacrificial lamb of the God of Abraham is a sin? huh

Jesus himself said:

John 12:47 "And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world."

Clearly if Jesus was God and he said in his own words that he will not judge those who don't believe his words, then being a non-believer cannot possibly be a sin.

And therefore it could not be grounds for either eternal damnation, or even death.

Where do Christians come up with all their hateful conclusions about God being so anxious to punish people?

It clearly didn't come from Jesus.

According to Jesus it's not even important to believe in his words, much less that he was any sacrifical lamb of God.

So where do the Christians get off even claiming that this is the case? huh

I'm, sure they can dig up verses that contradict what John claims that Jesus said. But if they do all that proves is that the Bible is full of contraditions. Either people have been misquoting Jesus or Jesus himself was sending mixed messages.

Neither scenario would be good.



John 12, verses 44 through 50,

"44Jesus cried out and said, "Whoever believes in me believes not only in me but also in the one who sent me,
45
and whoever sees me sees the one who sent me.
46
I came into the world as light, so that everyone who believes in me might not remain in darkness.
47
And if anyone hears my words and does not observe them, I do not condemn him, for I did not come to condemn the world but to save the world.
48
Whoever rejects me and does not accept my words has something to judge him: the word that I spoke, it will condemn him on the last day,
49
because I did not speak on my own, but the Father who sent me commanded me what to say and speak.
50
And I know that his commandment is eternal life. So what I say, I say as the Father told me."


These verses together put what Jesus said in context.

Krimsa's photo
Fri 01/02/09 08:02 PM
12:47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.

Does Jesus Judge people or not?

John 5:26-27 (Judgment)
The Father ... hath given him authority to execute judgment.

John 8:15 (NO Judgment)
Ye judge after the flesh; judge no man.

huh

Skad's photo
Fri 01/02/09 08:07 PM

12:47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.

Does Jesus Judge people or not?

John 5:26-27 (Judgment)
The Father ... hath given him authority to execute judgment.

John 8:15 (NO Judgment)
Ye judge after the flesh; judge no man.

huh



That was Jesus speaking about his time on earth. The judgement comes later at the judgment seat of Christ (2 Cor. 5:10) and at the Great White Throne (Rev. 20:11)

1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 13 14