Topic: Do you belive? | |
---|---|
no but when i see more than one person who shows credentials and has been called in on trials to verify taped conversations and have years in the industry say that the tape is real and they cant explain where the voice came from then why say its a hoax when so many people,, witnesses, pros, and what you hear with your own ears says diffrent? Well i havent heard the same things as you obviously. All i have heard is mumbo jumbo from people that are either lying or are mistaken, where logical explanations can be given to suggest what they are saying is not true. But, Dan. Do you not realize how illogical the " radio waves " argument sounds when taken in the context of what Thumper was saying? Someone is standing there asking questions. Nothing is heard at the time. Upon review of the recordings, there is a voice answering the questions as they are asked. What are the chances of the correct radio waves, with the precise words needed to answer the questions, coming through with the exact timing needed to provide the answers?? The odds of that would have to be absolutely astronomical. Logic would dictate that it simply isn't possible for those waves to come through with the correct conversation at the proper time. To think that " explanation " is even remotely factual is beyond just about ANY person who bases their thinking on logic. |
|
|
|
IM A ZOMBIE!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND IM HUNGRY FOR MORE BRAINSSSSSSS!!!! haha I have brains! Does it matter if a majority of the cells are cooked? |
|
|
|
believe
|
|
|
|
no but when i see more than one person who shows credentials and has been called in on trials to verify taped conversations and have years in the industry say that the tape is real and they cant explain where the voice came from then why say its a hoax when so many people,, witnesses, pros, and what you hear with your own ears says diffrent? Well i havent heard the same things as you obviously. All i have heard is mumbo jumbo from people that are either lying or are mistaken, where logical explanations can be given to suggest what they are saying is not true. But, Dan. Do you not realize how illogical the " radio waves " argument sounds when taken in the context of what Thumper was saying? Someone is standing there asking questions. Nothing is heard at the time. Upon review of the recordings, there is a voice answering the questions as they are asked. What are the chances of the correct radio waves, with the precise words needed to answer the questions, coming through with the exact timing needed to provide the answers?? The odds of that would have to be absolutely astronomical. Logic would dictate that it simply isn't possible for those waves to come through with the correct conversation at the proper time. To think that " explanation " is even remotely factual is beyond just about ANY person who bases their thinking on logic. thank you,, thats a reasonable response to the radio wave question. |
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpHfnamrQzY&feature=related
this is the link for the st aug lighthouse in florida,,, the reveal of the evidence they caught. check it out,, theres things in there that cannot be explained. |
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpHfnamrQzY&feature=related this is the link for the st aug lighthouse in florida,,, the reveal of the evidence they caught. check it out,, theres things in there that cannot be explained. |
|
|
|
ghosts, no, paranormal activity, yes.
|
|
|