Topic: The wife McCain callously left behind | |
---|---|
Edited by
Zapchaser
on
Thu 10/16/08 06:48 PM
|
|
I'll check for your answer in the morning. Four worksites, three workers (temporarily til Obama gets to have em)and 5:00 am will roll around too quickly. Thanks winx, have a great night. I'm confused. What answer? Why do you think Obama's going to have them? I asked you the same question twice. Here is the third time: Going back to your comment that McCain's personal life affects how you see his character in a negative way, how did you view Clinton's character with his marital infidelities? Pertaining to my comment concerning employees, I was being facetious in a way. What I should say is that his economic policies will add great numbers of people to the unemployment lines, kill many small businesses, and increase the size of government. Anyone who thinks they will not have their taxes raised with either candidate is delusional as history shows. It is a question of who will raise your taxes more. At this stage of the game they are both just flapping their jaws and people hear from the chatter what they want to hear. Without going into each of their issues here, I will simply say that applying common sense alone should raise doubts as to whether they are being truthful. Example: Obama states that he will not raise taxes on the middle class. Seeing our HUGE deficit coupled with his desire to increase the size of government. Where do you think that money will come from? Don't forget about the Clinton question. You are delusional if you think Lewinsky was Clinton's first extramarital foray. [/quote Duh if no one knowes about it are we to asume he is? come on zap get real. Seeing what you call "real", I would have to decline your request. Your reality would be better lived under the influence of LSD. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knH-DVyOP_I Party on Garth. No, delusional is the only description I can get away with on here. The point you are making for me is that people of your ilk find fault with anyone who does not agree with you while you turn a blind eye to the faults of those that do. Your extremely hypocritical bias shows your character in a light that is anything but one that is reasonable and willing to try to see from another person's point of view. |
|
|
|
I'll check for your answer in the morning. Four worksites, three workers (temporarily til Obama gets to have em)and 5:00 am will roll around too quickly. Thanks winx, have a great night. I'm confused. What answer? Why do you think Obama's going to have them? I asked you the same question twice. Here is the third time: Going back to your comment that McCain's personal life affects how you see his character in a negative way, how did you view Clinton's character with his marital infidelities? Pertaining to my comment concerning employees, I was being facetious in a way. What I should say is that his economic policies will add great numbers of people to the unemployment lines, kill many small businesses, and increase the size of government. Anyone who thinks they will not have their taxes raised with either candidate is delusional as history shows. It is a question of who will raise your taxes more. At this stage of the game they are both just flapping their jaws and people hear from the chatter what they want to hear. Without going into each of their issues here, I will simply say that applying common sense alone should raise doubts as to whether they are being truthful. Example: Obama states that he will not raise taxes on the middle class. Seeing our HUGE deficit coupled with his desire to increase the size of government. Where do you think that money will come from? Don't forget about the Clinton question. You are delusional if you think Lewinsky was Clinton's first extramarital foray. [/quote Duh if no one knowes about it are we to asume he is? come on zap get real. Seeing what you call "real", I would have to decline your request. Your reality would be better lived under the influence of LSD. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knH-DVyOP_I Party on Garth. No, delusional is the only description I can get away with on here. The point you are making for me is that people of your ilk find fault with anyone who does not agree with you while you turn a blind eye to the faults of those that do. Your extremely hypocritical bias shows your character in a light that is anything but one that is reasonable and willing to try to see from another person's point of view. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Thu 10/16/08 07:15 PM
|
|
I'll check for your answer in the morning. Four worksites, three workers (temporarily til Obama gets to have em)and 5:00 am will roll around too quickly. Thanks winx, have a great night. I'm confused. What answer? Why do you think Obama's going to have them? I asked you the same question twice. Here is the third time: Going back to your comment that McCain's personal life affects how you see his character in a negative way, how did you view Clinton's character with his marital infidelities? Pertaining to my comment concerning employees, I was being facetious in a way. What I should say is that his economic policies will add great numbers of people to the unemployment lines, kill many small businesses, and increase the size of government. Anyone who thinks they will not have their taxes raised with either candidate is delusional as history shows. It is a question of who will raise your taxes more. At this stage of the game they are both just flapping their jaws and people hear from the chatter what they want to hear. Without going into each of their issues here, I will simply say that applying common sense alone should raise doubts as to whether they are being truthful. Example: Obama states that he will not raise taxes on the middle class. Seeing our HUGE deficit coupled with his desire to increase the size of government. Where do you think that money will come from? Don't forget about the Clinton question. I missed the editing. I don't condone marital infidelity with anybody. I highly recommend that you watch this. Obama tells "Joe Plumber" how he is going to affect small business. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ym1-jkuZ8s Thanks for your response winx. I agree. My personal opinion is that we need our elected leaders to be held to a higher standard, no matter what their party affiliation. I am aware of "Joe the plumber" but I am Steve the carpenter. Obama will raise my taxes and I will be forced to raise my rates to make up for the loss. We all will.Higher prices in a poor economy means less work for small businesses. Less workers needed, etc., etc., etc. How does that help the economy? Raising taxes NEVER has stimulated the economy.That causes a cash flow crisis and at this time is a very dangerous thing to have happen. From my understanding with Obama's plan, the small business owner (and everybody, actually) will have increased taxes when income is over $250,000. The income over $250,000 will be taxed 3%. Plus, there is no capital gains tax. He explains that 5% of small business owners go over $250,000. The 95% that don't (and everybody else actually), will be receiving a tax cut. Then he said that if that 95% have more money to spend, the small business owner will be getting more work. I am confused as to why you see that so differently and more negatively. Btw, carpenters like my house. It was built in 1903. It still has the original woodwork and pillars. |
|
|
|
McCain underwent a hell that most people will never experience. The torture was so bad that it left him permanently disabled. Once he was freed, he went overboard. He admits that. His ex wife has forgiven him and plans to vote for him. She understands how he spent months expecting to die at any moment and she understands how that changed him. It's truly despicable that Democrats are attacking the families of McCain and Palin. It's hypocritical that they are so upset that McCain got a divorce when their family values candidate (Clinton...remember his wife and daughter went EVERYWHERE with him) is given a free pass for committing adultery while on the clock and in the oval orifice. Al Gore's son was arrested on drugs charges several times during his time as Vice-President...Rebublicans NEVER made political hay with that. Chelsea Clinton belonged to (and may still) a cult. No Republican made political hay with that. So why don't you give me an example of a mainstream Republican attacking another candidates children? |
|
|
|
I can go out right now and watch "comedy" sketches or buy tee-shirts about the "retarded Palin baby"...Come on! Show me something those "mean spirited" Republicans are doing comparable to making fun of a downs syndrome baby.
|
|
|