| Topic: REBEL FLAG | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Thu 07/31/08 10:33 AM
|
|
|
Next time you think about where the steady erosion of our rights and big government started.
Think about the Civil War and the Confederate flag... You can trace the top of the hill to that point. From there the snowball started growing!! At the very beginnings of the Republican Party!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gotta agree with Fanta on part of this one. States rights, the balance of power and conflicting ideas on the powers of the federal government in areas outside of the issue of slavery were at stake. The Civil War was NOT the pure and good northern states wanting to eliminate slavery. It would be nice to hold onto that illusion, it would make things much more simple wouldn't it? Unfortunately the real world isn't that simple. yes,yes,yes. It WAS a states rights issue. the Southern states wanted to keep the demonic right to own slaves and the federal government did not.
Was there slavery before the Civil War?
Was there slavery after the Civil War?
Therein lies your answer.
Your only disagreeing with me over the details of how it all happened.
I gotta love your cmmitment to your belefs mirror! Rock-on brother!! Same to you buddy Im still not sure what we were disagreeing about
|
|
|
|
|
|
At least we were able to do it in a "CIVIL" manner!!
A little word play for you!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'VE BEEN CURIOUS FOR YEARS NOW WHY PEOPLE KEEP THE REBEL, CIVIL WAR, SOUTHERN FLAG ALIVE AND WEAR IT LIKE A BADGE. I THOUGHT THAT WAS HISTORY AND WE WERE ALL AMERICANS AND ONE UNION. PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME. I'VE BEEN WONDERING THIS FOR 5 DECADES
Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, mama, what have I done here!
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ What color was the owners?
Its as simple as that.
It's not as simple as that, actually. There were many African Americans who owned slaves, both black and Native American. Mirror, I understand you're a history major. But, the thing is, history is not as simplistic as you want it to be. No one is denying that slavery was reprehensible, nor that it was a contributing factor to the civil war. But, it was not the ONLY factor and realistically, it was a minor thing. I don't know what you plan on doing with a history degree but if you plan on actually using it, you might want to consider learning how to research more than one source of information. Textbooks can be an excellent beginning of knowledge but they are severely constrained in that they have to offer the most information in a small space. They are often way too simplistic and even more often, leave very key pieces of information out because of space constraints. Because of this, people who limit their knowledge to only what they learn in a textbook are limiting themselves and tend to look at issues in a very narrow-minded way. |
|
|
|
|
|
5 Northern States were slave holder States at the on-set of the Civil War! Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, and West Virginia were aligned with the Union. If the war was about slavery please explain this?? I am fron Maryland. Maryland 's secession would have Washington behind enemy lines & given Baltimore's shipyards to the south. Securing Maryland was the first milatary campaign. The 1st causalties of the war were in Baltimore in April. 1st Manassas (Bull Run) was in July! |
|
|
|
|
|
I'VE BEEN CURIOUS FOR YEARS NOW WHY PEOPLE KEEP THE REBEL, CIVIL WAR, SOUTHERN FLAG ALIVE AND WEAR IT LIKE A BADGE. I THOUGHT THAT WAS HISTORY AND WE WERE ALL AMERICANS AND ONE UNION. PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME. I'VE BEEN WONDERING THIS FOR 5 DECADES
Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, mama, what have I done here!
You started a great thread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'VE BEEN CURIOUS FOR YEARS NOW WHY PEOPLE KEEP THE REBEL, CIVIL WAR, SOUTHERN FLAG ALIVE AND WEAR IT LIKE A BADGE. I THOUGHT THAT WAS HISTORY AND WE WERE ALL AMERICANS AND ONE UNION. PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME. I'VE BEEN WONDERING THIS FOR 5 DECADES
Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, mama, what have I done here!
You posted an interesting topic that (so far) has prompted an interesting and civil discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Thu 07/31/08 03:11 PM
|
|
|
[ What color was the owners?
Its as simple as that.
It's not as simple as that, actually. There were many African Americans who owned slaves, both black and Native American. Mirror, I understand you're a history major. But, the thing is, history is not as simplistic as you want it to be. No one is denying that slavery was reprehensible, nor that it was a contributing factor to the civil war. But, it was not the ONLY factor and realistically, it was a minor thing. I don't know what you plan on doing with a history degree but if you plan on actually using it, you might want to consider learning how to research more than one source of information. Textbooks can be an excellent beginning of knowledge but they are severely constrained in that they have to offer the most information in a small space. They are often way too simplistic and even more often, leave very key pieces of information out because of space constraints. Because of this, people who limit their knowledge to only what they learn in a textbook are limiting themselves and tend to look at issues in a very narrow-minded way. I understand what you are saying but I must disagree with you about the issue of slavery being the minor factor for the Civil War. Im saying that it was the MAIN factor for the Civil War. Maybe not the only factor but it was the MAIN factor. Not rascism, Im talking about human slavery. That was the main factor. It was a states rights issue to the South because these states wanted the right to own slaves for the explotation of slave labor in the cotton industry. It was an economic reason to the non-slave states because the South had an unfair and evil economic advantage over them due to the slave labor.I maintain my position that slavery was the primary issue of the factors leading to the Civil War because all of the other issues you and other keep bringing up stem from the core issue of slavery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was the main factor because the Union polititians made it so. Just like Bush's WMD. They had to have a cause that the people would stand behind, a cause so passion filled that they would attack neighbors & be willing to die for it. A cause that would demonize the "enemy".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gotta agree with Fanta on part of this one. States rights, the balance of power and conflicting ideas on the powers of the federal government in areas outside of the issue of slavery were at stake. The Civil War was NOT the pure and good northern states wanting to eliminate slavery. It would be nice to hold onto that illusion, it would make things much more simple wouldn't it? Unfortunately the real world isn't that simple. yes,yes,yes. It WAS a states rights issue. the Southern states wanted to keep the demonic right to own slaves and the federal government did not.
Was there slavery before the Civil War?
Was there slavery after the Civil War?
Therein lies your answer.
Your only disagreeing with me over the details of how it all happened.
Logical fallacies, got to love them. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was the main factor because the Union polititians made it so. Just like Bush's WMD. They had to have a cause that the people would stand behind, a cause so passion filled that they would attack neighbors & be willing to die for it. A cause that would demonize the "enemy". Just as the history books teach us, slavery was the primary factor. All of the other issues stem from this central issue. Just as I have already explained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was the main factor because the Union polititians made it so. Just like Bush's WMD. They had to have a cause that the people would stand behind, a cause so passion filled that they would attack neighbors & be willing to die for it. A cause that would demonize the "enemy". I understand what you are saying but I must disagree with you about the issue of slavery being the minor factor for the Civil War. Im saying that it was the MAIN factor for the Civil War. Maybe not the only factor but it was the MAIN factor. Not rascism, Im talking about human slavery. That was the main factor. It was a states rights issue to the South because these states wanted the right to own slaves for the explotation of slave labor in the cotton industry. It was an economic reason to the non-slave states because the South had an unfair and evil economic advantage over them due to the slave labor.I maintain my position that slavery was the primary issue of the factors leading to the Civil War because all of the other issues you and other keep bringing up stem from the core issue of slavery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Thu 07/31/08 03:31 PM
|
|
|
Gotta agree with Fanta on part of this one. States rights, the balance of power and conflicting ideas on the powers of the federal government in areas outside of the issue of slavery were at stake. The Civil War was NOT the pure and good northern states wanting to eliminate slavery. It would be nice to hold onto that illusion, it would make things much more simple wouldn't it? Unfortunately the real world isn't that simple. yes,yes,yes. It WAS a states rights issue. the Southern states wanted to keep the demonic right to own slaves and the federal government did not.
Was there slavery before the Civil War?
Was there slavery after the Civil War?
Therein lies your answer.
Your only disagreeing with me over the details of how it all happened.
Logical fallacies, got to love them. I understand what you are saying but I must disagree with you about the issue of slavery being the minor factor for the Civil War. Im saying that it was the MAIN factor for the Civil War. Maybe not the only factor but it was the MAIN factor. Not rascism, Im talking about human slavery. That was the main factor. It was a states rights issue to the South because these states wanted the right to own slaves for the explotation of slave labor in the cotton industry. It was an economic reason to the non-slave states because the South had an unfair and evil economic advantage over them due to the slave labor.I maintain my position that slavery was the primary issue of the factors leading to the Civil War because all of the other issues you and other keep bringing up stem from the core issue of slavery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have to be white, a north American or a member of any particular organization to be a racist. Racism comes in every color, from every region of the world and from people of every political party. All people are somewhat guilty of making generalizations and prejudging those they do not know. The key difference is that some people are willing to set those aside long enough to get to know others, engage in dialog and broaden their horizons. What really bothers me about this slavery issue is that it's going on now all over the world but I see little being done. Was it an injustice? Yes Was it solely something whites in North America imposed on blacks in the U.S. pre-civil war? No A question for posters with children. Do they teach history in public schools anymore? What color were the slaves?
What color was the owners?
Its as simple as that.
so the fact that there are documented black slave owners dosent even cross your mind mirror,, but that might mean that your wrong about something and we cant have that now can we |
|
|
|
|
|
Not all slaves were black either. The 1st slaves in this country were Indians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have to be white, a north American or a member of any particular organization to be a racist. Racism comes in every color, from every region of the world and from people of every political party. All people are somewhat guilty of making generalizations and prejudging those they do not know. The key difference is that some people are willing to set those aside long enough to get to know others, engage in dialog and broaden their horizons. What really bothers me about this slavery issue is that it's going on now all over the world but I see little being done. Was it an injustice? Yes Was it solely something whites in North America imposed on blacks in the U.S. pre-civil war? No A question for posters with children. Do they teach history in public schools anymore? What color were the slaves?
What color was the owners?
Its as simple as that.
so the fact that there are documented black slave owners dosent even cross your mind mirror,, but that might mean that your wrong about something and we cant have that now can we I understand what you are saying but I must disagree with you about the issue of slavery being the minor factor for the Civil War. Im saying that it was the MAIN factor for the Civil War. Maybe not the only factor but it was the MAIN factor. Not rascism, Im talking about human slavery. That was the main factor. It was a states rights issue to the South because these states wanted the right to own slaves for the explotation of slave labor in the cotton industry. It was an economic reason to the non-slave states because the South had an unfair and evil economic advantage over them due to the slave labor.I maintain my position that slavery was the primary issue of the factors leading to the Civil War because all of the other issues you and other keep bringing up stem from the core issue of slavery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not all slaves were black either. The 1st slaves in this country were Indians. The Indians did not have natural immunities to the illnesses brought to this continent by the Europeans.They were nearly driven to the brink of extinction by illnesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
but you are the one that says no matter what a confederate is racist. people can have something and make it mean almost anything,, good or bad. its what is explained that gives it the real meaning that it should have. should i feel bad that im southern, and have respect for a rebel flag cause they got off their asses and did something to protect their way of life, hell no. and since slavery has been around for thousands of years, and still continues to this day, and no one man will change that, that means any nation that allows slavery should be dealt a swift and devistating blow by truly good countries like ours right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not all slaves were black either. The 1st slaves in this country were Indians. The Indians did not have natural immunities to the illnesses brought to this continent by the Europeans.They were nearly driven to the brink of extinction by illnesses.
True , but they were still bought & sold as slaves as soon as Europeans came to the new world. We are off topic
|
|
|
|
|
yes,yes,yes.
It WAS a states rights issue.
Therein lies your answer.
