Community > Posts By > raiderfan_32
Topic:
Don't Get Sick!
Edited by
raiderfan_32
on
Thu 08/27/09 11:09 AM
|
|
leftist website, so all of that is irrelevant..
wow, that was easy.. didn't have to think all.. what a fantastic debating strategy you've taught me!! |
|
|
|
Edited by
raiderfan_32
on
Thu 08/27/09 10:44 AM
|
|
I LMFAO when I head this, talk about kindergarten busllshit! "NNNNNNO, a republican govenor can't change the law we don't want it! oh wait I'm dying! by gum not only do I need a drink and a whore, but we need to change the law." "A drink and a whore"? Come on Winx it was well known he was a drinker and a womanizer back before he remarried. That is what he was reffering to. you think any of that changed after he got married? Ask Chris Dodd what a "waitress sandwich" is.. |
|
|
|
This is all mute anyway. The special election will happen. It is Mass so all is well for the dems. by chance do you mean "moot"? |
|
|
|
The Kennedys are American royalty and the common people know the good they did for us all down through all these decades.They made this country a better place,and did far more good than bad.We know what the score is There is no such thing as "American Royalty" or "common" people. We are all equals here. Those terms are offensive. yeah, no kidding. I seem to recall there was a hell of a bloody war fought over the issue. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Term Limits For Senators
|
|
I would definately like to see term limits applied to legislators, perhaps not in the way the presidency is term-limited. I would like to see terms limited to maybe 3 terms in the senate (maybe 2) and maybe 6 2-year terms in the house.
The issue that needs to be heeded is to avoid what I'll call the suicide bomber congressmen. I'll tell you what mean by that. The way it's set up presently, congress is held to account in elections (ideally) and when the people are dissatisfied with their representation, they (we) have the power to change that represntation. If we take away the threat of voting them out of office by limiting their time to just one term or maybe two, then you get in a lame-duck situation. When that happens the outgoing legislator cannot be held to account for the legislation they supported or voted for. the concept of the suicide bomber legislator is well embodied in Eric Massa, Democrat House Rep from NY, who was recorded saying that he would vote against the interest and wishes of his constituency if it meant getting the legislation passed that he wanted to see passed. If there is no safe guard of being held accountable to your constituents, whatever party is in power is free to legislate against the interests of the people and free to do so with virtual impunity.. |
|
|
|
Ted Kennedy was a major supporter of women's rights. If you had sex with as many women as Ted, you'd believe in abortion too. He did call the police 10 hours after killing Mary Joe Kopechne. He didn't wait 11 hours, that's a major character plus. Most drunk drivers who leave dead bodies go to prison, for life. But Ted Kennedy is a monument to what money can do. His father got rich smuggling alcohol to America during prohibition. Kennedy, of course, was a major consumer of alcohol, often a little tipsy on airline flights, or at Washington restaurants. Who can forget the "Waitress Sandwich"? A menu item invented by Ted Kennedy and friend Sen. Chris Dodd. Together, in public, at the La Brasserie restaturant they sandwiched a waitress, until she went screaming out of the dining area. It was a real scream, better than Howard Dean. We missed the wise comments and questions of Ted Kennedy during the Clarence Thomas hearings. He just sat there letting others complain about sexual harassment. Then we had the 1991 barhopping incident where Ted and nephew William Kennedy Smith got drunk, had sex, and a little rape problem occurred. Ted knows how to be a good role model for his nephew. The Owl Club was a club kicked off harvard, for gender discrimination. Ted remained a member, even though it did not allow females as members. Ted later did criticize republican supreme court nominees for belonging to similar social clubs. Ted Kennedy is great at education. He hired another student to take a Spanish exam for him at Harvard. He's an inspiration to all, that you can pass exams, even if you know nothing about the subject. Ted got suspended from Harvard and went into the military, where he earned the rank of Private. He rose no higher. This gives inspiration to all veterans who never were promoted. One particularly pointed piece asks the question "What was the Relationship Between Ted Kennedy and Mary Jo Kopechne?" The Chappaquiddick Incident is perhaps a defining moment in the life of Ted Kennedy. It's the day, some say, that he let a woman die while he sought the protection of lawyers. While it was surely a terrible event for him, there are claims that it blatantly illustrates the value he placed on a woman's life... a woman who was campaigning for his brother Robert. It seems that the problems that Ted Kennedy had could be traced back to Joe Kennedy. Joe Kennedy was a "not nice guy." He believed that women were either to be used or to be kept pregnant. He groomed his boys for public office and the girls for social work. However, because one began to show signs of promiscuity (Rosemary) he had her placed in a mental institution. This was Ted Kennedy's father, his role model and, he lived up to it. Lets post up all the dirty laundry from all politicians, hell, lets get yours up here too for that matter. It is really sad to see people who are so full of hate that they cannot even let someone die in peace. I'm confused about your choice for role models. I find it sad, you consider a woman left for dead, dirty laundry. I once posted here asking how many women would let Ted drive them home and not one would have gotten in the car with him. Not a role model to me. Noone is a role model to me except myself. Irrelavant, the man is dead, let him lie in peace. I would say analyze why you are so full of hate and make a change to save your own life. a dead woman locked in a car at the bottom of a lake is "dirty laundry"?? |
|
|
|
Edited by
raiderfan_32
on
Wed 08/26/09 05:18 PM
|
|
Recently the windows were broken out of the front of the Democrat National Committe Headquarters in Denver, Coloradoa. DNC Denver chairwoman Pat Waak said the damage to her building in Denver's art district was a consequence of "an effort on the other side to stir up hate." By "other side" it's clear Waak meant to point the finger at so-called radical conservatives, and not someone from across the street. Further it's clear that she intended to blame area Republicans for stirring up hate and practicing intimidation. But it turns out that it was a Democrat campaign volunteer that is responsible for the damages done to the Denver DNC offices, not 'radical right wingers'
'08 race worker held in damage to Colorado Democratic HQ By Jessica Fender The Denver Post One of two people suspected of shattering 11 windows Tuesday morning at the state Democratic Party headquarters has an arrest record and a history of helping a Democratic political candidate, public records show. Police said that about 2:20 a.m., 24-year-old Maurice Schwenkler, now in custody, and an at-large accomplice took a hammer to the picture windows displaying posters touting President Barack Obama and his health care reform efforts. Early Tuesday, Democratic Party chairwoman Pat Waak said the damage to her building in Denver's art district was a consequence of "an effort on the other side to stir up hate." She tempered her statement after Schwenkler's political history was revealed. "What I've been saying is there is a lot of rhetoric out there from both sides of the spectrum," Waak said. "That's what's been disturbing to me. People are saying a lot of things not appropriate for civil discourse." For weeks, people on both sides of the health care debate have rallied across the country. Schwenkler is charged with criminal mischief and is to make his first appearance in Denver County Court today. He is accused of doing an estimated $11,000 in damage and could face a felony conviction. On the last day of the 2008 Republican National Convention, he was charged with misdemeanor unlawful assembly in St. Paul, Minn. Court records provided through the St. Paul Pioneer Press show he was jailed about 2 a.m. Schwenkler received $500 in November 2008 to walk door-to-door in support of Democrat Mollie Cullom, who lost her race to Republican state Rep. David Balmer of Centennial. Waak, who was not involved with the group that paid Schwenkler, said she's never heard of the suspect and pointed out that just because he canvassed "doesn't mean he's a good Democrat." Schwenkler was one of dozens of paid canvassers bankrolled by the Colorado Citizens' Coalition, a political 527 committee funded by labor groups and well-known, wealthy liberal donors. In those disclosures, Schwenkler's address is listed as Derailer Bicycle Cooperative, a free community bicycle collective that operates just around the corner from the Democratic headquarters. Multiple volunteers at the collective declined to discuss Schwenkler, though they said he was affiliated with the group. Balmer said he suspects the vandalism might have been aimed at making the GOP look bad. "This sounds like the type of Democratic tactic from the left fringe trying to make Republicans look mean-spirited," Balmer said. "In this case, it blew up in their face. He was caught red-handed." Schwenkler allegedly tried to conceal his identity while committing the crime by wearing a shirt over his face, a hooded sweat shirt and latex gloves, according to police descriptions. When a Denver police officer on patrol spotted two people smashing windows, the suspects fled on bicycles. Schwenkler was arrested after a short foot pursuit, but the other suspect sped away, police Detective Vicki Ferrari said. She declined to release further details. Staff writers Joey Bunch and Felisa Cardona contributed to this report. Jessica Fender: 303-954-1244 or jfender@denverpost.com http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_13203950? |
|
|
|
Edited by
raiderfan_32
on
Wed 08/26/09 03:16 PM
|
|
Well when it comes to the science of Star Wars, I only have questions, not answers. The one big one that I don't undrstand is thus: When George Lucas started his project back in the 70's he started in the middle of the book (per se). Why he did that is another question for another time. However, while the technology here on earth got better as we were waiting for him to finish his saga (with chapter 3). While apparently in this Galaxy, Far, Far, Away, in some distant past, their technology actually got worse as their timeline went on. The vessels and weapons were better operating and more high tech the further back in the saga you go. How is that possible? How is this society retrograding as the movie is moving forward (meaning from chapter one to 6)? Now, movie fans will tell you that you have to give George some lattitude considering the differences in movie making from 1977 to 200? (I don't remember). I, though, say this is where you have to stick it in his side. Just because movie making techiniques have improved does not mean that he can just forget to take the fact that he is making "prequiels" into his designs. The man, in his efforts to extort larger profits, went for the shiny, fancy and quite frankly more advanced technology in the newer movies. What is really sad is we bought it hook, line and sinker. If he'd of been true to the story, well he wouldn't have messed up his original creations for one, but he would also have made the ships look a little rougher than the original Falcon, and they'd of deffinately looked a lot more low tech than the sky cars used in Empire. But he went for the CGI and hooking the children, and quite frankly blew it. I tend to agree with you. I grew up with the original trilogy. Star Wars was the first movie I ever saw in the theatres when I was barely a toddler. and I was hooked from the moment forward... that is until 1997 when he made the "updated" re-releases of the original 3 movies.. totally lost me and the magic was kinda gone. especially when he pulled the "Han shot Greedo in self defense" bull. But Han shooting first is another issue, maybe for another thread. I was totally put off by the glitz and glamour of the "new" movies. Episode I was an exercise in total lack of substance.. medicloreans? what the hell was that all about? Here I was thinking that the Force was something mystical and supernatural energy "that surrounds us, binds us, holds the galaxy together.." That to be a Jedi meant to be totally in tune with the fabric of existence and at one with nature, to have achieved enlightenment through hard work, dedication and constant honing of one's mind and body, like the monks of Shaolin.. but noooooo all it turned out to be was hopped up mitochondrial DNA!! Really? Really, George? Really?? And don't get me started about how Aniken turned to the dark side.. what a weenie baby!! Kind of off topic but did anyone see the second season to 'Rome' on HBO? The story behind Vorenus' 'turn to the darkside' was way way way more compelling than some navel gazing brat of a junior jedi feeling dissed by the jedi council and getting all @ss-hurt over Padamame (or whatever the hell her name is).. If it was going to be about her, it needed to be that she got killed by some rogue jedi and Aniken's rage for someone specific was what turned him to the darkside. but as it stands, the story "ends" with Aniken getting played for a chump and it totally ruins the rest of the story for me (ie Episodes 4-6). And the "clone wars" and the 'hunting down' of the jedi knights was a complete let-down for me. When Obi Wan told Luke the story of Vader in Ep IV, he made it sould like Vader went and killed all the jedi one by one.. like some kind of bad-@ss Kaiser Sose, but instead he goes and wipes out a bunch of Jedi Kindergarteners and leaves the killing of the real Jedi to the clones.. the whole Jedi Genocide took place in about 5 movie minutes.. bull crud.. What a cop out! |
|
|
|
for those keeping score at home, the total federal deficit from Washington to Bush 43 was somewhere around $11 trillion.
Barry's only been in office for a few months and his first budget projection is on pace to nearly double that figure over the next 10 years?? I guess Hope and Change means different things to different people.. Bankrupt America? Yes We CAN!! |
|
|
|
AFL-CIO President was just named to the head private-sector board of directors of the NY Federal Reserve Board.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125112547653253819.html AUGUST 25, 2009 Labor Leader Named Head of New York Fed BY JON HILSENRATH The Federal Reserve chose a labor leader to succeed a former Goldman Sachs executive as the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of New York's private-sector board of directors. Denis Hughes, president of the New York state branch of the AFL-CIO, had been serving as acting chairman of the New York Fed board since May, when Stephen Friedman stepped down from the position. |
|
|
|
Edited by
raiderfan_32
on
Tue 08/25/09 11:39 AM
|
|
So we continue to see just who it is that supports Obama and his push to nationalize the healthcare sector of the economy, More Union Thugs.
First it was SEIU members stonewalling townhall meetings and beating up protesters. Now more union goons, in Obama's back pocket (or id he in theirs?) target someone with the gall not only to voice opposition to Obama's designs on healthcare reform but to offer and explain an alternative approach to the problems that exist. He also goes on to explain how his company covers its employees and how the system Whole Foods uses generates a high degree of employee satisfaction and empowerment. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=bw-20010714:20090825005791:1&show_article=1 Whole Foods CEO’s Efforts to Undermine Obama Health Care Reform Draws Widespread Condemnation
Aug 25 10:33 AM US/Eastern In response to a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed by Whole Foods’ Chief Executive Officer John Mackey, activists, consumers and labor groups around the country have been organizing in opposition to his efforts to undermine meaningful health care reform. Over the course of the next few weeks, members and staff from the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) will be disseminating educational information to Whole Foods shoppers. The purpose of these efforts will be to set the record straight about health care reform and to raise serious concerns about Whole Foods CEO’s position on this critical issue. These events will be part of a series of regional educational efforts being planned for the coming weeks. On Tuesday, August 25, 2009, UFCW Local 75 will be in front of the Whole Foods in Cincinnati, Ohio, at 2693 Edmondson Rd., at approximately 5:00 p.m. For UFCW members, health care reform is a top legislative priority. UFCW members around the country are organizing and mobilizing their communities in support of comprehensive health care reform. And here is the Op-Ed piece from the WSJ for which he and his company is under fire. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare Eight things we can do to improve health care without adding to the deficit. By JOHN MACKEY "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." —Margaret Thatcher With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both Medicare and Social Security entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of other people's money. These deficits are simply not sustainable. They are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation, or they will bankrupt us. While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone: • Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts (HSAs). The combination of high-deductible health insurance and HSAs is one solution that could solve many of our health-care problems. For example, Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members who work 30 hours or more per week (about 89% of all team members) for our high-deductible health-insurance plan. We also provide up to $1,800 per year in additional health-care dollars through deposits into employees' Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness. Money not spent in one year rolls over to the next and grows over time. Our team members therefore spend their own health-care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully. Our plan's costs are much lower than typical health insurance, while providing a very high degree of worker satisfaction. • Equalize the tax laws so that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits. Now employer health insurance benefits are fully tax deductible, but individual health insurance is not. This is unfair. • Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines. We should all have the legal right to purchase health insurance from any insurance company in any state and we should be able use that insurance wherever we live. Health insurance should be portable. • Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover. These mandates have increased the cost of health insurance by billions of dollars. What is insured and what is not insured should be determined by individual customer preferences and not through special-interest lobbying. • Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors to pay insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. These costs are passed back to us through much higher prices for health care. • Make costs transparent so that consumers understand what health-care treatments cost. How many people know the total cost of their last doctor's visit and how that total breaks down? What other goods or services do we buy without knowing how much they will cost us? • Enact Medicare reform. We need to face up to the actuarial fact that Medicare is heading towards bankruptcy and enact reforms that create greater patient empowerment, choice and responsibility. • Finally, revise tax forms to make it easier for individuals to make a voluntary, tax-deductible donation to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren't covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Many promoters of health-care reform believe that people have an intrinsic ethical right to health care—to equal access to doctors, medicines and hospitals. While all of us empathize with those who are sick, how can we say that all people have more of an intrinsic right to health care than they have to food or shelter? Health care is a service that we all need, but just like food and shelter it is best provided through voluntary and mutually beneficial market exchanges. A careful reading of both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution will not reveal any intrinsic right to health care, food or shelter. That's because there isn't any. This "right" has never existed in America Even in countries like Canada and the U.K., there is no intrinsic right to health care. Rather, citizens in these countries are told by government bureaucrats what health-care treatments they are eligible to receive and when they can receive them. All countries with socialized medicine ration health care by forcing their citizens to wait in lines to receive scarce treatments. Although Canada has a population smaller than California, 830,000 Canadians are currently waiting to be admitted to a hospital or to get treatment, according to a report last month in Investor's Business Daily. In England, the waiting list is 1.8 million. At Whole Foods we allow our team members to vote on what benefits they most want the company to fund. Our Canadian and British employees express their benefit preferences very clearly—they want supplemental health-care dollars that they can control and spend themselves without permission from their governments. Why would they want such additional health-care benefit dollars if they already have an "intrinsic right to health care"? The answer is clear—no such right truly exists in either Canada or the U.K.—or in any other country. Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health. Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices. Recent scientific and medical evidence shows that a diet consisting of foods that are plant-based, nutrient dense and low-fat will help prevent and often reverse most degenerative diseases that kill us and are expensive to treat. We should be able to live largely disease-free lives until we are well into our 90s and even past 100 years of age. Health-care reform is very important. Whatever reforms are enacted it is essential that they be financially responsible, and that we have the freedom to choose doctors and the health-care services that best suit our own unique set of lifestyle choices. We are all responsible for our own lives and our own health. We should take that responsibility very seriously and use our freedom to make wise lifestyle choices that will protect our health. Doing so will enrich our lives and will help create a vibrant and sustainable American society. Mr. Mackey is co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market Inc. |
|
|
|
Topic:
I'm amazed
Edited by
raiderfan_32
on
Tue 08/25/09 09:24 AM
|
|
spiro agnew first identified the "silent majority" back in 1971. think they still exist? if so, do they really have any power? you have it wrong. it's the *formerly* silent majority that has started the new tea party movement, the ones who started standing up at the townhall meetings and telling the "representatives" to represent them, the ones who sat out of the last election and stayed home rather than vote the RINO McCain into office (remember it was just last week that McCain made the news by siding with his own party ) The (formerly) silent majority has been awakened and has the Democrats scared to death. That's why Obama has been sending his Union cronies to the townhall meetings, has his campaign apparatus (OFA/ACORN) astroturfing the townhalls and holding his own "townhall meetings" that look more like 'Yes We Can' campaign rallies.. |
|
|
|
Just checking.
So everyone's ok with the Congress restricting offshore exploration on the US continental shelf and ANWR but $2B of your dollars (as much as $10B) is going to one of the world's biggest oil companies to help prop up the stock position of one of our president's closest (and richest) benefactors? |
|
|
|
Can't really say. I did see an interview once with an Air Force weapons researcher. He worked on things like rail guns, energy weapons, EM weapons etc. And one of the things he said that stuck in my mind was that he couldn't wait for the Air Force to come to him and ask him to build a lightsaber.
I want a lightsaber. |
|
|
|
racism is alive and well, in this country and all over the world. and guess what, white people don't have the market cornered on it. Far from it. I grew up in a highly "diverse" neighborhood and I can't tell you how many times someone called me 'white boy', 'cracker', 'honkey', ' milkweed', 'guero', 'gringo', etc.
Even now, I don't hesitate to mix with people of different color and races. Whenever I'm around mainly hispanics, they usually speak to each other in spanish and typically don't know I can understand near every word they say. They'd probably not talk about the things they talk about if they knew the 'guero' could understand them. No, racism is alive and well and it's not the sole dominion of white people. people of all kinds and creeds have potential to be racist. And I find it every bit as racist as burning a cross on someone's front lawn for someone to insinuate that only white people have the capacity for racism or that only 'white' racism really counts as racism.. |
|
|
|
problem is that solar and wind will never supply more than about 20% of our energy. there just isnt the acreage to support more than that. But it can help alleviate some of the demand the technology for affordable alternative energy just doesnt exist yet. Electric cars are cool but the generation of the electricity to charge em uses as much energy as the petroleum based engines. And there are no electric motors or batteries that can power fully loaded 18-wheelers. But in the meantime, we do have more natural gas in america than oil in the rest of the world. The first best thing we could do would be to transition all the 18-wheeler transports to natural gas because Canada has large gas shale plays and tight gas sands, think woodbine shale and barnett shale. quiteman is correct though. wind and solar cannot make up the gap if oil suddenly went away. I'd even be skeptical that the two combined could generate 20% of demand. but regardless, it's not how much "alternative energy" can be generated, it's about how much and when it can be generated. Wind and solar cannot be throttled like hydrocarbons can. Once they're on, they're on and that's it. Contrast that to natural gas that can be stored, transported from place to place, and converted to electricity when, where and in the amounts needed. That's a capability that wind and solar don't have. The only alt energy I know of that has that capabilty/flexibility is nuclear. oooooh, I said the 'N' word... |
|
|
|
Wahington State has a huge oil puddle just off the coast--been sitting there for years.--can't get it out cuz it will kill all the fish in the world if they do. like all the dead fish in the gulf---all the fish are dead there ---Right---Best thing to do is stop voting for the same a$$ h---s time after time after time-ETC ETC ETC-------yada yada bla bla bla--- No private land out there that i know of???? that's just completelt untrue. the fish in the gulf are not dead! there are plenty of fish in the gulf of mexico. kill all the fish in the world! seriously, do you know what a kook you make yourself look like when you say that? get real! |
|
|
|
Might as well. Takes the mystery and stigma away from being sexualized over the stupid cancer-prone baby feeders!! And, seriously, we've been so fortunate all this time to get to see men's mams all along and have learned to behave. Hopefully American men can get it right. Oh, and we'd save so much on underwear and prothetic breasts, too!!! but we really like those "stupid cancer-prone baby feeders" Soldier on, Ladies! Soldier on!! |
|
|
|
Looking for friends in this area- for c/w dancing, going out in groups, dating, etc. you're from St. Jo?? does the -H still hold their mtn bike race in the spring? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Un-desirable genes?
|
|
sorry, I'm not a mod and I don't mean to be a thread-nazi but i felt the need to step in and be 'teacher' for a spell..
now everyone, shake hands and be friends again... |
|
|