Community > Posts By > Tromeo

 
Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:34 PM





People dont have to support him if they dont agree with his views. You dont have to in a Democracy.

If people didnt support Hitler, did that make them un-German?

The majority of your people did not supoprt Bush for the best part of his career.


Yep. And "my people" (seriously?) were called traitors and unAmerican for it.

What's the difference?


Your people, as in American people. I am British.

Who cares what the difference is, just bacuase someone calls you a traitor it doesnt mean that you are one.


Ah, sorry. Didn't realize you were a limey. It's mostly the "We can call you a traitor because we're real Americans, but we can bad mouth the President without being traitors because...." and the lack of logic past that.


ummm isn't saying 'limey' racist?




Wasn't intending it that way. My Brit friends all call themselves Limey Bastards, so take what you will.

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:31 PM


Isn't is also un-American to not say the Pledge of Allegiance and also NOT place your hand over your heart during it.. refusing to wear an American flag pin and saying you're ashamed to be an American?




Yes well LIBS don't want to be confused with the facts.


hahaha. Ironic considering McCain provided no facts what-so-ever during his campaign regarding any of Obama's policies.

Or that whole "war over WMD's" when there were no facts.

Also, I'm not a liberal.

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:30 PM



Isn't is also un-American to not say the Pledge of Allegiance and also NOT place your hand over your heart during it.. refusing to wear an American flag pin and saying you're ashamed to be an American?


You realize none of that, aside from wearing the pin, ever happened, right? Like, never? And the Pledge of Allegiance didn't have the fun "Under God" portion until 1954, right?
Have you read any of Obamas books? I think not you need to before you go posting something like this againdevil


I corrected myself, sorry.

How is that less American than sending our servicemen to die for no reason? Or dismantling our Constitution and Bill of Rights?

Or just saying you don't support the President? Right wing people seem to forget it works both ways.

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:24 PM
Edited by Tromeo on Thu 11/06/08 12:27 PM

Isn't is also un-American to not say the Pledge of Allegiance and also NOT place your hand over your heart during it.. refusing to wear an American flag pin and saying you're ashamed to be an American?


Whoops, my bad. Incorrect aside from when Under God went in. Sorry.

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:22 PM



People dont have to support him if they dont agree with his views. You dont have to in a Democracy.

If people didnt support Hitler, did that make them un-German?

The majority of your people did not supoprt Bush for the best part of his career.


Yep. And "my people" (seriously?) were called traitors and unAmerican for it.

What's the difference?


Your people, as in American people. I am British.

Who cares what the difference is, just bacuase someone calls you a traitor it doesnt mean that you are one.


Ah, sorry. Didn't realize you were a limey. It's mostly the "We can call you a traitor because we're real Americans, but we can bad mouth the President without being traitors because...." and the lack of logic past that.

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:15 PM

The only ones that are Un american are the counter culture LIBS.

Gee! I guess OBAMA falls into that group.


Riiiight...

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:14 PM

Because they wanted to work on the fear and confusion of the American people I do agree with you that they started it all (IE dixie chicks ) but You do not have to stoop to thier kind of politics, rise above it dude, we are all Americans and a country devided will soon fall.
stop being part of the problem and work on finding solutions, without the name calling and grand standing


Your logic fails on the "We did it but we don't want you to do it cuz when we did it it was right but now you're wrong."

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:11 PM

People dont have to support him if they dont agree with his views. You dont have to in a Democracy.

If people didnt support Hitler, did that make them un-German?

The majority of your people did not supoprt Bush for the best part of his career.


Yep. And "my people" (seriously?) were called traitors and unAmerican for it.

What's the difference?

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:09 PM

I did not vote for Obama but it does not mean I will not support him in office. It is niether traitorous or un-Amrerican to oppose any elected official but part of OUR right as Americans to question our leaders. Under free speech we can say what we like without fear of reprisals. It is usually those that do not vote that complain the most I have found and all this blue state/ red state BS has now got to stop. We have a new president and must work together now to put things back on the right track that the soon to be former administation has totally wrecked.


So why did the right call everyone that didn't support Bush or his wars in the Middle East traitors and unAmerican?

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:07 PM

:banana:


yawn


So I take it you disagree? Can you provide any reasoning aside from a stupid emoticon?



Awesome. I guess not. Please refrain from posting in this thread since you obviously won't add anything relevant or useful.

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 12:05 PM

yawn


So I take it you disagree? Can you provide any reasoning aside from a stupid emoticon?

Tromeo's photo
Thu 11/06/08 11:57 AM
To everyone bashing Obama saying they will not support him...Do you realize that makes you traitorous and un-American? This runs on the same logic that all of you were calling anyone who didn't support the Bush regime as traitors. It works both ways.

Tromeo's photo
Wed 11/05/08 12:44 AM


It was all about RACE anyway...
what do you mean ....:smile:


I think he's referring to the fact that people would vote for McCain instead of Obama purely because Obama is black.

Tromeo's photo
Wed 11/05/08 12:40 AM

Tromeo's photo
Wed 11/05/08 12:22 AM
Why wouldn't they be honest on their deathbed? And if they weren't being truthful, would you really call them on it? I mean, they're dying. That's just harsh. Dying and getting picked on.

Tromeo's photo
Wed 11/05/08 12:17 AM

I must have the two confused then, I thought it was McCain that came up with the extended financial plan (my memory is not all that good, sorry). I'm not expecting a four year resolve as I know that is near impossible, however the plan that he spoke of was limited and he wasn't really able to go into detail about it (by choice or time allowance). I want a set plan for the future, something that I know has a chance of working to get our country out of debt...we get deeper, we are screwed.


Nah, it was Obama with the future plan. One good idea is pulling out of Iraq in the next two years, as opposed to McCain who did not want to set a date (or, more probable, pull out) and end the war. We're spending twelve billion dollars a month there, which actually comes out to five thousand dollars per second.

There really isn't a set way to make a plan like that, otherwise it would have been done in any presidency previous.

Well, aside from any of the Bush family terms...

Tromeo's photo
Wed 11/05/08 12:07 AM


I think Obama actually stayed on topic with real issues during all the debates. Can you point to anything specific?


I'm not saying he didn't, I'm saying the topics at the debate were childish...the real issues (that extend far beyond the scope of 4 years) were not looked at like they should have been, such as the debt our country is currently in...aside from the agreement that the bailout was a good idea and they are going to enact policies within their own term to get us out of debt. Unfortunately that is not possible, we are 20 years in debt with far too many countries to even imagine getting anywhere near out of it in the next 4. This country needs an extended plan (which McCain did mention if I recall correctly but even it was limited in the scope of ability).


How can you fault Obama for moderators asking soft questions? At least he stayed on topic.

Despite being twenty years in debt, Obama was speaking ten years in the future. Might not be twenty, but he is looking forward. Are you expecting anyone to have a plan to solve twenty years of debt over four years? That's a bit unrealistic.

Also, McCain mentioned nothing about economics aside from the fact that he is very forthcoming about not understanding it in the slightest.

Tromeo's photo
Wed 11/05/08 12:02 AM

obama talked around the issues.im scared for our country.socialism is not the way to go.you dont grow an economy from the bottom up.has anyone ever worked a stable job that paid good and the owner of the company was living below poverty level?if you tax the employers and punish there success they will take there company to another country where taxes are lower and labor is cheaper.and the ones who have left already will stay gone.where am i wrong???/he wants to raise taxes not to pay down the deficet but to redistribute it,right out o carl marxes playbook.we cant depend on the government to take care of our needs.its not the governments place.its job is to provide a millitary that protects us from harm.he wants to cut back funding our millitary.i dont think he can talk the terrorists into loving us.i dont tink he can fool them the way he has the american public.i dont want anymore gorge bush.and there needed to be a change. but obamas socialist plan is not the answer.


This is some rough grammar. Forgive me if I miss a point or two. Obama is in no way, shape or form a socialist. If you're looking at it that way, the Bush tax credit was socialism. He was redistributing the wealth.

What happened with the redistribution to keep banks afloat was fascism, not socialism. Socialism would actually have the money coming down to the common man, not just the banks and executives themselves.

Saying that Obama will hurt the economy and send jobs overseas is just ridiculous. That's been happening for the past eight years already. We've seen more tax cuts for big business than anything else. He stated outright that small business will get tax credits to offset this. Why is it wrong to tax a company like Shell or Enron (ha) or Exxon or IBM more money instead of giving executives million dollar bonuses?

The socialism call is really uneducated. Ideas that Obama espouses are far from socialism, to the point where I am starting to believe that those who claim he's a socialist don't even know what it means.

Also, please, spell check. For the love of all that is good and holy, spell check. There is a place, their is possessive, they're is a contraction for they are.

Tromeo's photo
Tue 11/04/08 11:31 PM
I think Obama actually stayed on topic with real issues during all the debates. Can you point to anything specific?

Tromeo's photo
Tue 11/04/08 11:23 PM
Everyone lamenting Obama's victory...Are you upset at the actual beliefs and ideas that he stands for or the fact that an African-American is now in office? I am asking this in all seriousness, I am not (NOT) attempting to start a racial debate. I know that might be strange given the question, but I don't think it's a completely racial issue. I am looking for actual policy issues (not taken from attack ads, but actual policy planned out) that actually make more sense from the McCain camp.