Community > Posts By > spqr

 
spqr's photo
Thu 02/28/08 11:11 AM

i have a child in school, she is doing well too... no thanks to the school system. if her mother and I hadnt sat down with her and retaught her what the school was mesing up she would be hurting right now and surely on her way to waiting tables(no offense to the waitresses out there).

schools should be held accountable! there are a lot of things wrong with them and if the no child left behind act has put a spot light on it and cause awareness to increase then so be it, we expect everything from the government and hold no one responsible for shotty work, its part of the reason for the decline. throwing good money after bad is irresposible and reckless.


Absolutely! Then try to motivate teachers with a better pay for example instead of closing schools? Or you think that not going to school is better?
How can you make something better cutting funds for it?
Would your military be better with cheaper weapons and less trained soldiers? Or is it better with well paid motivated individuals ?
What would produce better educated kids..a run down school with no funds and crowded classrooms or one with free access to books and computers?
And yes a nation with better educated kids is BETTER for all, since they will be the work force, and the "minds" of the future..
How can anyone be against that is beyond me.

spqr's photo
Thu 02/28/08 11:06 AM

Famous Scientists Who Believed in God


Is belief in the existence of God irrational? These days, many famous scientists are also strong proponents of atheism. However, in the past, and even today, many scientists believe that God exists and is responsible for what we see in nature. This is a small sampling of scientists who contributed to the development of modern science while believing in God. Although many people believe in a "God of the gaps", these scientists, and still others alive today, believe because of the evidence.

Rich Deem

1. Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and urged Copernicus to publish it around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.

2. Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
acon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, "It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity." (Of Atheism)

3. Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!

4. Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, and saw his system as an alternate interpretation of the biblical texts.

5. Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Roman Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences - can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted to see was that his philosophy be adopted as standard Roman Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.

6. Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God is essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent and powerful Being."

7. Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gases, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, 'for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels...' As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.

8. Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday was the son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but led to much of our lifestyles today, which depends on them (including computers and telephone lines and, so, web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. Originating from Presbyterians, the Sandemanians rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.

9. Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was notable for formation of the X-Club, which was dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science while, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.

10. William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered many areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities, which recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, who was certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).

11. Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"

12. Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."




Sweetheart...what the hell are you talking about? Where did you get that (crap) ???
I respect you..but your sources are biased...to say the least...check better, maybe outside of a christian web site,
Geez.

Galileo's championing of Copernicanism was controversial within his lifetime.

The geocentric view had been dominant since the time of Aristotle, and the controversy engendered by Galileo's opposition to this view resulted in the Catholic Church's prohibiting the advocacy of heliocentrism as potentially factual, because that theory had no decisive proof and was contrary to the literal meaning of Scripture.[7]

__because that theory had no decisive proof and was contrary to the literal meaning of Scripture.[7]__





Galileo was eventually forced to recant his heliocentrism and spent the last years of his life under house arrest on orders of the Inquisition.

---forced to recant his heliocentrism and spent the last years of his life under house arrest on orders of the Inquisition.
---



Nicolaus Copernicus (February 19, 1473 – May 24, 1543) was a Polish astronomer and the first person to formulate a scientifically based heliocentric cosmology that displaced the Earth from the center of the universe. His epochal book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), is often regarded as the starting point of modern astronomy and the defining epiphany that began the Scientific Revolution.


Francis Bacon, 1st Viscount St Alban (22 January 1561 – 9 April 1626) was an English philosopher, statesman, and essayist. He is also known as a proponent of the scientific revolution. Indeed, according to John Aubrey, his dedication may have brought him into a rare historical group of scientists who were killed by their own experiments.

His works established and popularized an inductive methodology for scientific inquiry, often called the Baconian method or simply, the scientific method. In the context of his time such methods were connected with the occult trends of hermeticism and alchemy[citation needed]. Nevertheless, his demand for a planned procedure of investigating all things natural marked a new turn in the rhetorical and theoretical framework for science, much of which still informs conceptions of proper methodology today.

Albert Einstein & Spinoza's God:
Harmony in the Universe
I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.

- Albert Einstein, responding to Rabbi Herbert Goldstein's question "Do you believe in God?" quoted in: Has Science Found God?, by Victor J Stenger

Albert Einstein was born into a Jewish family and had a lifelong respect for his Jewish heritage. Around the time Einstein was eleven years old he went through an intense religious phase, during which time he followed Jewish religious precepts in detail, including abstaining from eating pork. During this time he composed several songs in honor of God. But during most of his life Einstein was not a practicing Jew.
Einstein was opposed to atheism. Various sources refer to him as a mostly non-practicing Jew, an agnostic, or simply as a person with an idiosyncratic personal worldview.


mostly from Wikipedia.org


spqr's photo
Thu 02/28/08 09:12 AM

"You forgot the tax cuts to the oil companies, after their record profits, and the no child left behind policy that is closing the schools cutting their budget if the kids don't "perform" "

I can see where the liberal socialists have a big problem with No Child Left Behind. What a sinister concept, requiring that children actually learn something in school and requiring they demonstrate that they have in fact learned. This has created to the previous learn nothing but feel good about yourself Liberal Socialist daycare education program that turned out waves of burger filppers. That is a threat to the very existance of the Liberal Socialist Party. If we turn kids out of school that are educated they will be smart enough to see through the BS put out by the Liberal Socialists and will register and vote Republican. laugh laugh laugh laugh


"waves of burger flippers"? Where? Do you actually have kids in school now? No according to your profile, I have 2, they are doing great, but the notionism pushed by that program is ridicolous, and if you think the goal is to promote study you are wrong, the goal is to close schools.
Now that would provide a "wave of burger flippers" way better than anything else. How that can be good?

spqr's photo
Thu 02/28/08 12:02 AM




damn it's just like the waltons round here....:smile:


the waltons happened to be a most excellent show in its time byn the way, where feelin and sayin the love was still cool....nice seein it is round here and why i just feel compelled to stick around.


No idea what the Waltons is/was, but there's plenty of love here. Make yourself at home. Here, have a drink. drinker


thanks man, last of the night i think, and perhaps a short drinker drinker drinker back at ya


ok I leave you the honors David...
Ejecting from the virtual..back in the real..

sort of...

nite all.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:59 PM



I can't read wwwaaaaaaaasad

will someone teach me:cry:


I think the alien dino-babies already got to him!

Kasey, quick, the shotgun!!!


dude...What the heck are you doing in that pic ? LoL

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:56 PM

so say you fall in love with this man or woman, everything is amazing between you two, nothing could be better. Everything you ever wanted you finally found, love, sex is great, same goals shared, everything is picture perfect.

then one day you found out they was actually a dinosaur from the planet x-49 in the yogurt galaxy. they took human form to slowly take over the planet. one by one they slowy made thier way here. knocking up men and women. Men start bloating with dino babies as well as the women.

My question is, do you still love them, even though thier child shall eat you from the inside out, or do you take up shotguns and start blowing the infiltrating dino's away.

love or the end of the world, your call?


Dude...you've gotta share that stuff..I can't sleep..
I mean really.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:54 PM


damn it's just like the waltons round here....:smile:


the waltons happened to be a most excellent show in its time byn the way, where feelin and sayin the love was still cool....nice seein it is round here and why i just feel compelled to stick around.


because we're social creatures...and now we have the internet.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:53 PM



Good night! I think I shall partake in some comatose-esque activities myself...

http://xkcd.com/203/

says it better than me
haha... love that comic.


lol
hmm no time for ahallucinating now, I have to work tomorrow, but a joint could do.


The hallucinating is the best part! Especially if you didn't sleep much the night before, because then you get even MORE REM sleep, and even crazier dreams! At least, for me anyway.


OH
Plenty of crazy dreams...and yes I didn't sleep much yesterday either, I hit REM and wake up..but it's getting better...
withdrawal anyone? lol

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:50 PM



Hi: I would like to talk about addiction be it alcoholic ao drugs.

I myself grew up in a aloholic home and by the age of 2 I was hospitalized because of a skipping rope beating from my mother who was a alcoholic,she died by the age of 58.

I stuck the first needle in my arm at age 15 and became alcoholic by the age of 19. I continued to do drugs and alcohol off and on til about a little over 2 months ago and this time I really want to continue with my sobriety.

The book says "that probably no human power could have relieved my alcoholism but God could and would if He were sought.

This is why for me there is a God because I have seen many miracles along the way. I ended up getting my social work degree and have worked in detox and before that I volunteered there cleaning rooms and socializing with other drunks.

So I would like to hear from anyone who wishes to post something with your views on this subject.

Thanks:smile:


I think you did it man..not god.
Good job!

gotta second this notion, but what if god is just the love part in us, that is all, as it was said that love was god....how complex can it be...religion make war, love make love.



still he did it...loving himself.
good point thou!

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:49 PM

Good night! I think I shall partake in some comatose-esque activities myself...

http://xkcd.com/203/

says it better than me
haha... love that comic.


lol
hmm no time for ahallucinating now, I have to work tomorrow, but a joint could do.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:47 PM
last cigarette countdown..

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:46 PM

where is the absolute must see place?


Alps?
Austria was awesome...I remember a 5 mile run in the woods.
I was 14

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:40 PM


Count me in sox!



There were a scant few options previously, but Cuba has made itself...hmm how to put this..."available" in the last week or so. Plans could be commencing shortly.


Ahh Cuba was nice...really cheap scuba diving there.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:39 PM
Jack Daniels right now..for lack of anything better.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:37 PM


Thailand?


Been there and I have to say the palmtrees are not good to me. As a matter of fact they were very evil when I was walking a long drunk. Had to go to the doc afterwards for some plaster and stiches.
But if you know where the kind palmtrees in Thailand are please let me know.

Well I would have said Bali, Indonesia, been there 12 years ago, but probably now it's a mess with the islamic Tamil Tigers raging and all.
The palm trees were speaking to me after the mushrooms had effect one time.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:33 PM

Hi: I would like to talk about addiction be it alcoholic ao drugs.

I myself grew up in a aloholic home and by the age of 2 I was hospitalized because of a skipping rope beating from my mother who was a alcoholic,she died by the age of 58.

I stuck the first needle in my arm at age 15 and became alcoholic by the age of 19. I continued to do drugs and alcohol off and on til about a little over 2 months ago and this time I really want to continue with my sobriety.

The book says "that probably no human power could have relieved my alcoholism but God could and would if He were sought.

This is why for me there is a God because I have seen many miracles along the way. I ended up getting my social work degree and have worked in detox and before that I volunteered there cleaning rooms and socializing with other drunks.

So I would like to hear from anyone who wishes to post something with your views on this subject.

Thanks:smile:


I think you did it man..not god.
Good job!

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:32 PM
Thailand?

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:27 PM

although the hillary barack campains are entertaing..im thinking america will come to its senses and vote for mcain..then again there are so many conservatives hell bent on helping the democrats gain momentum by bashing mcain ...which im really in a learning process about politics myself...but i really dont get the viciousness in which hes being attacked.mcain has the experiance..the record of patriotism which is so important in staying on our guard when it comes to terrorist threats.which if a plan goes uncontested it can devastate our economy and may even eclipse 9-11.security is most important to me.my opinion.i just hope that world leaders dont see a unexperianced naive aproach to world affairs headed their way.im not pro-war..i am pro security.i do belive that as americans our way ofvoting is the best and if barrack wins i will respect that and see if he delivers what he says he will,or if hillary wins i will respect her as the president.majority rules.thats what voting is about.with that said i also respect your views and opinions..we all meet in the middle...as americans


I agree with you. Personally I just want someone with a brain for a change.
either side.

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:25 PM
Thanks..but I take no credit for that...it's all georgie's work.
:)

It's a hard work!

spqr's photo
Wed 02/27/08 11:23 PM

the other day. So I was curious as to the overall opinion. What's your take on pro wrestling?


Circus with fattish guys dressed like cheap super-heroes.
It's not a sport.