I thought that it was deeply sad when Joe Boden introduced one of his grand daughters as his dead son Beau and the crowd still cheered. So yes, elder abuse.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Rate me
|
|
Minimal information and looking for dating while married? That rates a 0 in my book.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
dating and ****ing rates
|
|
The member is no longer, so probably quite soon .
|
|
|
|
Topic:
dating and ****ing rates
|
|
hot topic is going on Not for long, you can be sure. |
|
|
|
7c (feels like 6c. Rising to 9c and falling to 4c overnight). Mostly sunny, with a light 11kph NW wind.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Coronavirus
|
|
Sounds like the UK had a stricter lockdown than we did. We didn't have a rule like only 1 hour a day for exercise / going outdoors. Now I completely forgot what I was going to post, hihi. It’s not the UK as a whole Crystal as Scotland has different restrictions to England. It changes daily and I can’t keep up! Oh yes, you said something like that before. A good thing for sure, especially since Scotland was doing better, right? But keeping up with it all is a thing. I'm not busy with it a lot and as soon as the news comes on the radio (2x an hour) I completely turn down the volume. So occasionally I go to the special government site to get updated on the rules. Wales, Scotland and Ulster have their own Parliaments and broad legislative powers within their region, so they do have different rules. In England, the rules were quite strict but did relax a bit towards the end of the first lockdown when the numbers of infections and deaths began to fall significantly.The lockdown was supposed to last six weeks but lasted six months instead. I think that with this new lockdown, the rules will be relaxed for a week around Christmas before being imposed again until sometime in March. The last person to ban Christmas was the Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell in 1640 because, as an extreme Puritan Protestant, he considered it a frivolous, gaudy and gluttenous offence against Christianity. No sane politician would risk that kind of comparison, it's worse than being caracatured as Ebeneezer Scrooge from Dickens. |
|
|
|
5c (feels like 2c. Rising to 7c and falling to 3c overnight). Cloudy, with an 80% chance of rain and a light 14 kph SW wind.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
" HAPPY BIRTHDAY DI"
|
|
🥂
Happy Birthday! |
|
|
|
Topic:
reigion is bad
|
|
Religion is bad, mmkay?
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Coronavirus
Edited by
Seamus
on
Mon 11/02/20 07:30 AM
|
|
Yes it must be an unenviable task to have to decide the balance between individual freedom and protecting the lives of over 65 million people in the UK but governments are constantly faced with doing just this, especially during a pandemic. I think that you should prioritize saving as many lives as possible but this is where my confusion begins.
The Covid restrictions mean that the NHS cannot run normal clinics and routine treatments. According to government projections, this lack of routine treatment and surgery means that at least twice as many people will die from this as will die from covid-19. As an example of this that I know about, my oldest brother who is sixty five has two worn out knee joints that need replacing and a bowel hernia that needs surgery. He tells me that the pain wakes him screaming at night but has been told that he can't have pain meds because of the risk of addiction due to the eighteen month to two years backlog of patients. He also tells me that he doesn't think that he can stand that much pain for that long. We would undoubtedly have a much better capacity to cope with the current crisis if successive governments over the last thirty years hadn't reduced the number of Hospitals, despite our growing population. In the town where I grew up there used to be two large Hospitals and several Hospices for the terminally ill. There's now one Hospital and no Hospices. This is something which happened across the entire country. We would also be in a better position to cope if many of the most senior consultants and surgeons hadn't been exposed during the first Covid crisis earlier this year. Several of the people that my younger brother worked with were exposed and subsequently died from Covid. During the last lockdown all 'non-essential' businesses were closed for approximately six months. About a third of local businesses never reopened, while Amazon increased its profits by a third, this bringing us ever closer to a few monopolies controlling the majority of business, something that is in no one's interest except for these monopolies (which mostly cleverly avoid paying taxes). Monopolies inevitably lead to increased prices and poorer service because they have no competition and the legislation intended to control these situations has been largely rendered toothless. Unemployment due to the loss of businesses directly related to lockdown restrictions is expected to triple or quadruple, leading inevitably to increased poverty and other related problems. Many of these people will have families and mortgages but these mortgages will not be paid due to the legislation that says rent can be paid but mortgages cannot. The results seem inevitable. Universal Credit, which has been slowly introduced by this and previous governments pays £73 per person per week (except if you're part of a couple when it pays less). Earlier this year, the processing backlog for these benefits was running at between five and six months before you received your first payment. That was before the pandemic, so how long those newly unemployed because the government ordered their businesses to close, will have to wait for payment is anyone's guess. The toll on mental health during the last lockdown, where people were only allowed to leave their homes for "essential" purposes or to exercise for one hour a day, is said to be enormous but since mental health treatment is run by the NHS, it will not be available for the foreseeable future. I can't help wondering how many additional deaths will be a direct result of these two things (unemployment and poor mental health). As it stands, if I were of school age then I could and must attend school despite evidence showing that the recent spike in Covid infections is directly related to this. If I worked, I could and should attend work (unless of course the business that I worked for had been shut by government order). If I wasn't being responsible and self-isolating due to being infected with Covid, I could wander around a supermarket with hundreds of other people (wearing a mask). The only thing that I can't do and would be fined for, is visiting my family. What do I think would be a more measured and reasonable approach to the current pandemic? How about, if all those who were elderly and vulnerable were supported and encouraged to self isolate and the rest of us were allowed to go about our business subject to whatever precautions were deemed necessary, such as masks, hygiene etc? Of course, all of these poor decisions could be due to simple incompetence but this begs the question. Should such incompetent people be allowed to govern so many millions of people or escape punishment for such remarkable failures? |
|
|
|
8c (feels like 4c. Rising to 10c and falling to 4c overnight). Cloudy, with an hundred percent chance of rain and a moderate 24kph W wind.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
kinky women
|
|
Repent! Or be punished . |
|
|
|
Topic:
Out of towner
Edited by
Seamus
on
Sun 11/01/20 03:21 AM
|
|
It's entirely your choice and you don't have to do anything that you don't want to .
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Coronavirus
|
|
Something to consider .. Hypothetically .. if all covid infections resulted in death .. would that change your personal risk assessment and how you react to covid ?? At what stage would you prioritise health over economy ??
100% fatal covid...Depends how fast it kills. Fast killing plagues are less viral because infection rates drop significantly with isolation and since it kills its host fast, it dies out. If it is a slow viral rate, more infected people have a higher degree of spread resulting in a larger portion of the population becoming infected and eventually dying. Of the two, I think a slow viral rate would be worse because it would change society in very significant ways from isolation. It would be a ramped up response of what we currently experience. I believe a 100% fatal virus would change the economy significantly. I believe job markets would change to support isolation standards and some countries would change from service-oriented to self-sufficiency. I imagine there would be an online market for "How-To" tutorials where consumers would buy video packages on a whole new range of subjects to teach self-sufficiency. There might even be a change in money standards geared to virtual wealth. Robotics would be extensive in manufacturing and resource collection. Until automation becomes standard, people might work from home using a joystick or controller to operate drone machines at a distance. In special circumstances, work crews might have to be tested each day before beginning a job and carry 'Certified Virus Free' credentials with daily stamps or punch holes. Work crews might be augmented with virtual-helper machines operated by home remote systems which would allow increased on-job isolation. With the right cameras, microphones and feedback sensors many jobs could be done by remote from home. From running a bulldozer to building computers. World economy could potentially increase once the change to virtual business takes hold. On a flip-side, all strangers might be considered a threat and it could result in an increase in personal attacks if someone violates another person's safety cushion. I imagine more privacy fences and home protection devices would be in high demand. City populations would decrease and many office buildings would be abandoned. We already see a decrease in brick & mortar stock levels. I imagine store layouts and shelf stock would significantly change to reflect fewer shoppers. Paper and coin money may be phased out. Is the potential for viral mutation worthy of caution ?
Potential for mutation is always worthy of caution. Do you feel science knows enough about covid to provide any absolute certainties ?
No, but science has the potential. In long-term, I believe nearly all viruses could be cured/rendered inert thru nanotechnology. Nanotechnology has the potential to not only heal the body but also heal the environment. See https://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/reports/reportpdf/report47.pdf Engines of Creation by K. Eric Drexler This would seem to make a personal reply pointless. I'm not interested in conspiracy theories as most of them require too many assumptions as well as a level of competence that you simply don't see in government or people in general. However, the response to Covid makes no sense whatsoever given the threat level and in this case I am forced to the conclusion that something else is happening. |
|
|
|
9c (feels like 6c. Rising to 14c and falling to 9c overnight). Cloudy, with an 100% chance of rain this afternoon and overnight with a moderate 24kph W wind.
|
|
|
|
Very nice. I'll be performing a short commemorative rite for my familial dead later this evening. I was thinking of a similar thing, although simple & short. Wishing you a beautiful ritual! Thank you |
|
|
|
Very nice.
I'll be performing a short commemorative rite for my familial dead later this evening. |
|
|
|
Never approach them straight on. Instead, adopt a slanting crab-wise approach and speak to them diagonally from two feet away. Works every time . Should it not be 2 metres? You're right, I was forgetting about the two metre rule |
|
|
|
Never approach them straight on. Instead, adopt a slanting crab-wise approach and speak to them diagonally from two feet away. Works every time .
|
|
|
|
Topic:
RIP Sir Sean Connery
|
|
R.I.P. A long and distinguished caree. My favourite film of his is "The Man who would be King" with his old friend Michael Caine.
|
|
|