Secure the schools with surveillance cameras and someone to monitor those cams, constantly. self locking doors only opening from the inside and armed personal posted out and inside. Just banning a type of gun or raising the age of ownership will do nothing to stop someone that is hell bent killing innocent children. There IS a reason these lunatics go to schools or malls . These places are ‘ gun free’

their isn’t any evidence showing that he is guilty of trying to overthrow the government. He is no more guilty than some of the democratic politicians that could be accused of instigating riots in 2019 and 2020. Trump even asked for the several thousand national gaurdsmen to be deployed around the Capitol on Jan. 3 because he understood that it could get bad , but Nancy pelosi denied that request. Why would trump want national guard there if he was gonna overthrow. Just because they twist the facts to paint a pretty picture doesn’t make it real or true. The circus on the hill now is nothing but a 3rd world kangaroo court , it’s all one sided. In the world of democrats I think liberty has her blindfold off .

No, the important part was INCORRECTLY saying WHO was responsible.

It's NOT nit picking to point out the FACT that it WASN'T a company or business, it's important. It's important because non-profits get government grants and that is the issue.

You continue to deflect from the issue in a futile attempt to justify saying it was a business which was incorrect. Rogue wasn't the important part....who was responsible is the important part.

Evidently you find facts unnecessary.

There is somewhere between little and no difference between a "company going rogue", a business going rogue" or a "rogue company". Why did you even say anything about my terminology if NOT to be critical? You were being defensive of your incorrect statement rather than correcting your statement.

You were critical of ME saying "rogue companies" because I didn't use YOUR original phrasing while YOU didn't use your original phrasing in your criticism.

I have long had a theory that those who accuse others are guilty of their own accusations. Case in point made to justify my theory.

Semantics? Really?

It wasn't "a business going rogue" (your EXACT words originally), "companies going rogue" or "rogue companies" (my words). It WASN'T companies or a business at all......it was non-profit organizations putting the kits together, and that was the point I was making.

It's "non-profit" organizations, NOT "rogue" COMPANIES, who are putting together the "safe smoking kits".
While "safe smoking kits" are NOT all the same and NOT all of them have "crack pipes" there are SOME that do have them.
If the Federal Government is going to claim that the "safe smoking kits" THEY fund with grands don't contain "crack pipes" the funding should be cut off to "non-profit" organizations that do include crack pipes in their kits, which HAS been PROVEN.

Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure.

First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more.

The real reason some are still waiting trial is because of the democrat DOJs bias against any Trump supporter. Most of the charges are trespassing charges. Over a year before they get their chance to defend themselves . Very unfair and probably illegal. But with the democrats in charge I am not surprised. .. Common sense has been turned inside out since the democrats took over , and the people are taking notice of all these bad democratic policies and we will turn the tide come November. Democrats are polling worse than ever thanks to Joe, Kamala , Nancy and so many more. Modern democrats have ruined that party for many years to come in my opinion , and that will be great for the future of the United States

Yes, but only one of those groups are still being held in jail with resistance to their right to a speedy trial. Can you guess which? And why is their right to a speedy trial being blocked?

LOL people marching on and entering a public building they own, in protest is called an insurrection.
while people taking over whole neighborhoods, looting and burning down business', destroying monuments, busting up police stations and killing police is called a peaceful demonstration.
it's funny how the left was fine with it happening. until it came to their front door.

I believe most of you missed the point. Chris Rock was doing COMEDY. You don't like it, don't listen. Attitudes towards what is acceptable to be made fun of is in the dangerous realm of thought policing. Who decides what's funny for ME? I'll admit, I didn't watch the show, just the clip of Will Smith smacking Chris Rock.

At no point should Will have ever gone up on stage. Wife with medical problems or not - he could have settled it after the show if he had a problem with it. Roasts can be funny, and I'll be the first one to admit that people at the roasts are invited, and aware they may be roasted. It is still unacceptable to interrupt a man doing his craft.

Chris Rock took it the best way he could. He could've never expected Will to come up on stage when he wrote the joke - so he had to do some quick thinking on how to handle the situation and I think he did so, marvelously. I think Will came out with the short end of that stick. He winds up looking like the cuck chump he is and probably taking out his cuck frustrations by smacking a dude that didn't bang his wife, instead of the dudes that ran trains on her, with his permission.

I'm not a big fan of Will Smith, and I think this incident just fortifies that position. Not only is he a shlt actor, with even a shlttier kid actor - he's a 6'2 loser that slaps a 5'2 funny guy. What a hero defending his wife. Wonder if she celebrated by getting pounded by some other dude, while he watched

That’s the difference between adults and children .

If a person commits a murder and is never charged it doesn't mean they are innocent.....it means they
A) Haven't been caught
B) There isn't enough evidence to be charged and/or convicted in a criminal court.

Even if a person is charged with a crime it doesn't mean they ARE "innocent until proven guilty". During a CRIMINAL trial "due process" dictates that there is a "PRESUMPTION of innocents" UNTIL the government "PROVES BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT" that a defendant is guilty.
A "not guilty" verdict in criminal court ISN'T PROOF of innocence.

But while in "criminal case" there CAN be NO doubt about guilt for a "guilty" verdict to be handed down that ISN'T the metric for "civil cases" where defendant CAN be found guilty/responsible by a PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE. In "civil cases" the standard is the evidence shows it's "more likely than not" that the defendant is guilty/responsible for a crime.

There are times when a person is found "not guilty" in a criminal trial and is found guilty/responsible of the SAME crime in civil court.