Obama

Or

Hillary

i hope neither , i think its all one big joke..

BOTH PARTIES ARE A JOKE...............

Hillster

I would think Hillary.

I don't like either, but I'm guessing Hillary would win.

in the end they will be running mates

just as I thought,Hillary still on top............

Hillary wins the nomination, you might as well just put the republican candidate into office, no matter whom it is.

I've really struggled with this. I really like Obama's ideals, but Hillary has the experience. I think the key issue for me is healthcare since it's my business & Hillary understands this issue & has a real plan. Obama is weak on this. I worry about her 'electability', but right now it's Hillary for me.

does anyone really give a sh*t. No matter who is in office, the rich get richer and the poor stay poor

Hilary is a bitc*. She is against the war but voted for it. Obama did not vote for the war. Case closed........

It is going to be Obama. The DNC has snubbed Hillary twice. The first was when Ted Kennedy endorsed Obama. The second time was when the female governor who gave the rebutal to Bush's State of the Union endorsed Obama.

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2004/pulpit_20040311_000805.html

Prints of Darkness: A Year Into the E-voting Crisis, Shouldn't We Have Noticed the Printer That's Already Built into Each Diebold Voting Machine?

[ burst | diebold | hava | help america vote act | jim allchin | microsoft | touchscreen voting | voting | voting machines ]
Status: [CLOSED]
By Robert X. Cringely
bob@cringely.com
The press, of which I consider myself some vestigial part -- a little toe or an appendix at best -- works in mysterious ways. How does a newsworthy event turn into news? And why does it seem we cover follicle by follicle every Julia Roberts hair color change, yet big stories are often overlooked completely? Of course, I have a theory. Celebrity news is cheap and easy, it is delivered straight to the reporter and causes little controversy, so it gets covered a lot. But more complex stories -- especially technology stories -- have to go through a vetting process that involves both the standards of the news organization and the knowledge of the reporter, which is often minimal. That's the major reason I think it took so long for Bev Harris to break through with her touchscreen voting scandal story: The major news media had never heard of her and they didn't really understand the technology. And apparently they still don't, because they appear to be missing an obvious and important new development in this story.

By now we know that touchscreen voting machines are suspect. They can be tampered with by determined folks, potentially changing an election. And most of them appear to be incapable of supporting effective vote recounts, even if those recounts are mandated by law. I wrote about this long ago and now many writers cover the same material, but I don't think we have been doing a very good job. For example, the tide appears to have turned, and voting officials are now starting to demand that touchscreen voting machines be able to generate a paper audit trail of every vote. This has the voting machine vendors crying foul ("We know that requirement was always in the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), but we talked you out of it, right?") and asking for more money -- lots more money -- to add printers to their touchscreen machines. That is IF the printers can even be added, the technical challenge is so great.

Then this week I heard from reader Jed Rothwell, fresh from a day working the polls as a voting clerk. Jed says in the case of Diebold machines at least, there was a printer inside already...

the rest
www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2004/pulpit_20040311_000805.html

....like it really makes a defference....

Obama ,I hope . If Hillary gets in there ,she will want to collect up your hunting rifles,(a criminal offense) and naturally ,I would feel that she was personally threatening my(safety) life, and that of my family and would be forced to protect myself from her goons.She would not have the guts to do that herself, but I have no doubt that she has the nerve to try and further violate our Constitutional rights. If the people really do put her in there, then they really do deserve all that will be coming to them for giving up on our rights. I wish there was someway Ron Paul could win this thing(Smiles)

Let's see what we have.

Hillary: "I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all."

Or

We have Obama who was the most liberal Senator in 2007 according to the National Journal report (http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings). Oh yes, he is really coming together to meet in the middle on issues.

"By far the best presentation as a candidate, among all the candidates in both parties, is that of Barack Obama. But if he actually believes even half of the irresponsible nonsense he talks, he would be an utter disaster in the White House." - Thomas Sowell

shes too angry...got too much axe to grind.
thats a dangerous trait for anybody-
but especially so in a woman who wants to be in charge.