1 2 4 Next
Topic: Economic Stimulus Package
Lindyy's photo
Tue 02/19/08 09:22 AM
Lindyy says:

HONESTLY HONESTLY HONESTLY

I never in my life thought I would hear people complain about getting moneyhuh huh huh huh

Lindyy

no photo
Tue 02/19/08 09:45 AM
Edited by northrn_yanke on Tue 02/19/08 09:55 AM
Northrn Yanke also needs to Read Marbury vs. Madison over again, read it all the way through the whole thing to the end. Sorry, I am not going to let you people get away with false accusing me on this topic. It is a long read. But it is serious matter. Among other things it shows that all so called laws passed that are repugnant to the Constitution, never were a law even from the minute they were supposedly passed(from their inception)


your wrong but it seems you are reading without understanding

here is a synopsis of the case...

"Marbury v. Madison, case decided in 1803 by the U.S. Supreme Court. William Marbury had been commissioned justice of the peace in the District of Columbia by President John Adams in the “midnight appointments” at the very end of his administration. When the new administration did not deliver the commission, Marbury sued James Madison, Jefferson's Secretary of State. (At that time the Secretary of State was charged with certain domestic duties as well as with conducting foreign affairs.) Chief Justice John Marshall held that, although Marbury was entitled to the commission, the statute that was the basis of the particular remedy sought was unconstitutional because it gave the Supreme Court authority that was implicitly denied it by Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution. The decision was the first by the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional and void an act passed by Congress that the Court considered in violation of the Constitution. The decision established the doctrine of judicial review, which recognizes the authority of courts to declare statutes unconstitutional."


did you read this part?...The decision established the doctrine of judicial review, which recognizes the authority of courts to declare statutes unconstitutional."

If you think that case defines the limitations on laws passed on the right of Americans to bear arms then you best notify all the convicted felons that the laws that deny them the right to bear arms is against the Constitution. You can tell that they can go out and buy a gun...oh one more thing..I guess there is no reason to have a person checked before the purchase of the gun since anyone and everyone has the right to bear arms..

1 2 4 Next