If you believe in them or have seen/ witnessed them, We should talk. I'd like to get a large group. Mostly attractive women, cause that's what attracts them. A few big guns and those who know how to use them. and a big truck to put one in. Then we can haul it off to some scientists somewhere and put it all over the news. Haven't done much outdoors lately cause of my illnesses and health conditions, but I'm getting this done before I get too old. Want a big possie of over a few hundred, Most of action would be standby, then swarm. I'm former 11b10 veteran.

Your idea of getting their body, by shooting or better yet, capturing one is valid. Whether it's these two supposed creatures or an space alien or an actual UFO craft for scientific study, it needs to be accomplished--otherwise such sighting stories without actual proof are just that--stories.

In some states it is illegal to shoot a Sasquatch.

WTF????????

Why would you want to kill one?

https://www.9news.com/article/news/weird/bigfoot-colorado/73-1cfcbcc0-a18b-4417-b997-ac046f068c00


Colorado maybe somewhere to start.

That certainly is one way of saying that you want your own harem.

Shouldn't there be bones of bigfoot and sasquatch laying around that people can do research on?

I'm a believer.

In order to verify a species for science, you need a body, living or dead. It's been that way for centuries. It's unfortunate, but I understand why some people would shoot one for science. I definitely understand why someone would shoot one in self-defense though. Squatches are not friendly forest giants, and I have heard enough stories of hostile behavior from them towards humans, even if it is relatively rare.

That's what I detest about science. It can do good things but in many ways & aspects it's horribly outdated.
How can they claim to be contemporary and to be the 'know it all' in the world when they need to kill a living being in order to say "we have proof!"

There's been tons of proof.
The only reason that's not considered valid is that science is to far behind for the existing proof to be enough for them to say "we have proof!"

Isn't that insane?
Just because one aspect in society has become the gauge, the God of Proof (so they think), we have to kill living beings.
It's 2024 for crying out loud!

As long as they're lagging behind they shouldn't be the gauge for "it's real" or "it's not".
Thanks goodness many scientists are changing and don't operate so b&w anymore. but the mainstream that everyone latches on to, incl. governments, still is.

That's one of the mysteries.
Theory is that they have a specific way of burying their dead.

There's also ample material to support the theory that they can make themselves invisible.
Science is investigating invisibility, probably for military purposes, and have actually come close.
I've seen them do it in the docu series "Expedition Bigfoot".
Scientist proving it is possible.
To us it sounds far-fetched, but scientifically proven and shown.

Another thing is, that wherever there's a lot of Bigfoot activity the US military show up out of the blue.
They've also fenced off vast stretches of nature where there tends to be a lot of Bigfoot activity.
Meaning... US government knows a helluva lot more about them than they're willing to let the public know.
Also means they're real otherwise government wouldn't behave that way.
I think it is also highly likely that US government has captured Bigfoot.

This has been proven to be real with current technology etc.
These days one could hoax such a vid but not at the time this was shot.
The way the muscles move, the shine & movement etc. of the fur is real.
At the time they could not fake that. They didn't even that quality fake fur that would / could drape around someone's body.
Proven fact.
This is a real creature.
They even managed to establish the height of Patty.

Watch "Expedition Bigfoot". That's how I got all that info.
Not only did they go out to try and find definite proof, they also went to see scientists & experts concerning certain matters.

That's how they could say -based on new expert research- that this short film is real.
She -as she has breasts- wasn't very tall. Maybe a younger Bigfoot?