Topic: Does God have a Race and Color? | |
---|---|
So you say... 28 years. You have been taught, wrongly. [Isaiah 28:9] Whom shall he (GOD) teach knowledge? And whom shall he make to understand doctrine? Them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breast. Did He make you understand Doctrine, and did you drink the milk? God will open your eyes if he wishes to do so, and then you will be re-taught. I have been a life student of mysticism, astrology, (Talismanic) magic and even yoga. But somehow He had pity on me, and gave me the milk. And I drank it, and it tasted like honey! Sweet in the mouth and sweet in the belly! __________________________________________________________________________ Funny, that HUMANS IN THIS EVANGELISTIC RELIGION, judge, brag, belittle, deflect, manipulate, and sometimes bully others. shameful! If you've been out-of-body, you could go and visit at any time, and would KNOW WITHOUT QUESTION that there are many different entities, NOT RACES. forms of life you never knew existed, shimmering beings (no, not angels, and no, not demons either) that are way above the HUMAN station. They merely have LEARNED MORE, and EXPERIENCED more. It's funny how SOME humans think that THEY are the owners of this massive place, and their god will "give this universe" to them.... and how bloodthirsty they are over this war that's supposed to take place between heaven and hell.... they can't wait for the world to end, and the rapture to take place, and watch be-headings and carnage "from the clouds of heaven" and evangelists stand next to their god, beaming, watching this bloody fiasco. This..... is in your "revelations" and your panflets that you either pass out or leave everywhere.... sounds like Roman Coliseum days to me. Most of the evangelists I have met are pretty friggin mean. not all, as some are pretty alright, and are trying to help in places like Haiti that REALLY NEED help... Too bad there's an ulterior motive that's always attempted to be shoved into their brain. Most also want me to go to their hell, calling me Memnoch. I'm not. Djinn, well, yes, absolutely, but not anything to do with Lucifer. Lucifer is not SATAN but the light bearer. The statue of liberty represents the people who are to carry the torch. Are they doing it as to expectation? [Isaiah 14:12] How art thou fallen from Heaven, O Lucifer son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! Who weakens the nations, bullies them and never have enough? Gold was not enough, not even the Gold and riches of King David and Solomon, and now it's the petrodollar. [Exodus 15:3] The LORD is a man of war. The LORD is stirring up the nations, to go to war in a FINAL battle. Armageddon, Rapture? You name it! There are indeed many type of entities, some have a body, others don't. But that's not the topic. It's best not to delve into these unseen worlds, not by astral projection nor any other means, because spirits can be more deceptive and destructive than humans. The wicked countries are being visited by God for their wickedness. [Isaiah 29:6] Thou shalt be visited of the LORD of hosts with thunder, and with earthquake, and great noise, with storm and tempest, and the flame of devouring fire. I never mentioned Satan, that's a whole other subject. I Mentioned Memnoch. .... and I'll project out where I see fit. Nothing bothers me. I'm the thing that goes bump in the night. Those out there that harbour fear should heed that. I'm NOT the baddest, toughest thing out there by any means, but I AM by far the meanest and most tenacious to a fault, rage, off the charts, and have eternity to rip holes in others, and I absolutely don't care. No entity, no matter how badass, wants to screw with that kinda energy.. synopsis:... don't poke a Djinn in the Root Chakra(butt) while he's smelling the plasma flowers. best idea for any entity out there?? don't bring any energy to my attention period. You seem to love fairy tails;). Memnoch is fiction and those that drain energy, not blood, are vampires. I know, but I mentioned SATAN because he is not an adversary of God but His servant. God is the one who does all the killing on earth and SATAN is his follower, hence the warning. SATAN walks the earth up and down looking to victimize those with evil thoughts, evil intentions and plans. That's why murder and blood shed, have becomes daily events. We may think a lot of our self, but our names, without exceptions, are written in the book of life. And when our sins reach heaven we are cut off from the earth. [Deut. 32:39] See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no God with me. I kill, and I make alive, I wound and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand. No man can deliver us out of the hands of God and the LORD doesn't play with us. |
|
|
|
well sure. Historically speaking, god is Middle Eastern. And he was most probably slightly tanned. I represent him more than all the fake paintings out there. Pray to me, it's much more accurate Historically speaking, when Jesus walked the dusty roads of Bethlehem and Judea, there was no such thing as a middle East. The name came into existence after the Suez canal was build in the early 20th century. Prior to Middle-East the region was Africa and prior to Africa it was the land of Ham. The continent was named Africa, after it was conquered by an European general named Escipio Africanus, who defeated Hannibal in the 2nd punic wars (218 - 201 B.C.). It was a custom for war lords to name continents and countries after themselves as the bible tells us. [Psalm 49:11] Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue for ever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. Further more, they diligently search out iniquities and the inward thoughts of every one of them, till this day, is very deep. The topic is actually about the Heavenly father, unless you think they are one and the same being. I wasn't refering to the political idiom, I meant racially he belonged to that part of the world called now the Middle East. And as long as, if existed, he is considered by many as the god then yeah...The Christian god was a Middle Eastern guy |
|
|
|
Unless you guys are talking about Zeus the Greek god, or Jupiter the Roman god. Well, they were both racially white guys. And since this is a general religion forum, I can safely assume any god of those can be the one referred to as the heavenly father.
|
|
|
|
Unless you guys are talking about Zeus the Greek god, or Jupiter the Roman god. Well, they were both racially white guys. And since this is a general religion forum, I can safely assume any god of those can be the one referred to as the heavenly father. We are referencing the God of the Holy Bible and not the Greek Gods. |
|
|
|
truthfully I just found out that the word God is actually a verb acting as a noun. Even more than that God has set himself apart from everyone by not revealing his skin color, his true Name Ehyeh is proof of his Mysterio nature
|
|
|
|
Stands to reason if something is invisible it has no color.
|
|
|
|
Why define the creator by the limits of its creation? Race and color are a function of tracing mortal humans through a timeline, God was before everything, so that would not be relevant.
|
|
|
|
That's a good comment. The bible clearly tells us that God created man in His image. The reasoning might be "what it means to be created in the image and likeness of God". An image is not invisible and has form, as has previously been discussed and established in this forum. When the disciples questioned Christ about the looks of his father, Christ was clearly surprised, and made them understand that he looked like his father.
For centuries theologians have debated "the image of God" and tried to proof that the image is not what we think it is. They concluded that the Image of God that was present in Adam at creation, was partially lost because of our sins. The other part is consciousness. National Geography made an image of Adam (the first man) after a decade of study and research. So, could that image be how Christ and God look like? Many books have been written and many religions had delve into this subject, even Judaism and Christianity. What we must understand is that if the debates resulted into conclusions, which are contrary to what have been taught in the earth, then the church fathers will NEVER tell the truth. Therefore, sound debate and reasoning is NOT possible with Christianity at the core of that debate. |
|
|
|
Edited by
tdion
on
Wed 01/29/20 12:57 AM
|
|
Why define the creator by the limits of its creation? Race and color are a function of tracing mortal humans through a timeline, God was before everything, so that would not be relevant. God wants us to know that we are created in His image, else he would have kept silent about it. Knowing this we can better obey and worship him. Race and color does matter, although many will say it's foolish thinking, and that's why the image is so very important. When someone is robbed the 1st question will be, how the robber looks like, primarily his race and color. I understand the difficulties, issues and effects of this topic. Hence, I don't want to be the one to reveal the image and hopefully some one else does. |
|
|
|
Stands to reason if something is invisible it has no color. That's a good comment. The bible clearly tells us that God created man in His image. The reasoning might be "what it means to be created in the image and likeness of God". An image is not invisible and has form, as has previously been discussed and established in this forum. When the disciples questioned Christ about the looks of his father, Christ was clearly surprised, and made them understand that he looked like his father. For centuries theologians have debated "the image of God" and tried to proof that the image is not what we think it is. They concluded that the Image of God that was present in Adam at creation, was partially lost because of our sins. The other part is consciousness. National Geography made an image of Adam (the first man) after a decade of study and research. So, could that image be how Christ and God look like? Many books have been written and many religions had delve into this subject, even Judaism and Christianity. What we must understand is that if the debates resulted into conclusions, which are contrary to what have been taught in the earth, then the church fathers will NEVER tell the truth. Therefore, sound debate and reasoning is NOT possible with Christianity at the core of that debate. |
|
|
|
truthfully I just found out that the word God is actually a verb acting as a noun. Even more than that God has set himself apart from everyone by not revealing his skin color, his true Name Ehyeh is proof of his Mysterio nature That's basically the question. Please elaborate if you know his race or color. Most names have a meaning like the name Jesus, which means "he that saves" Ehyeh is a Hebrew word and means "I am that I am". These words have no meaning and therefore can't be the true name. |
|
|
|
Edited by
tdion
on
Wed 01/29/20 01:38 AM
|
|
truthfully I just found out that the word God is actually a verb acting as a noun. Even more than that God has set himself apart from everyone by not revealing his skin color, his true Name Ehyeh is proof of his Mysterio nature That's basically the question. Please elaborate if you know his race or color. Most names have a meaning like the name Jesus, which means "he that saves" Ehyeh is a Hebrew word and means "I am that I am". These words have no meaning and therefore CAN'T be the true name. The Jews of antiquity had the word "YAH" in their names, which is the abbreviation of the name of the Heavenly Father. For the true name you must study the word "YAH" and find it's 'full" meaning. |
|
|
|
Stands to reason if something is invisible it has no color. That's a good comment. The bible clearly tells us that God created man in His image. The reasoning might be "what it means to be created in the image and likeness of God". An image is not invisible and has form, as has previously been discussed and established in this forum. When the disciples questioned Christ about the looks of his father, Christ was clearly surprised, and made them understand that he looked like his father. For centuries theologians have debated "the image of God" and tried to proof that the image is not what we think it is. They concluded that the Image of God that was present in Adam at creation, was partially lost because of our sins. The other part is consciousness. National Geography made an image of Adam (the first man) after a decade of study and research. So, could that image be how Christ and God look like? Many books have been written and many religions had delve into this subject, even Judaism and Christianity. What we must understand is that if the debates resulted into conclusions, which are contrary to what have been taught in the earth, then the church fathers will NEVER tell the truth. Therefore, sound debate and reasoning is NOT possible with Christianity at the core of that debate. My middle son is the image of me. He doesn't look like me but his personality and manner is the same. He's "just like dad" his brothers and sister say. Perhaps your religion is referring to that type of image. Your God obviously possesses the ability to reason and we have the ability to reason. "Man was made in the image of God" may not be a physical comparison. It may be a comparison of essence. Your God is capable of love. We are capable of love. Your God is capable of forgiveness. We are capable of forgiveness. Your God is capable of wrath. We are capable of wrath. Perhaps "made in the image" means we possess the same qualities as your creator. Siri is our creation. It possesses some of our qualities so we can interact with it. We work towards building AI computers. These computers look nothing like us but we make them in our own image so they think and feel like we do. We build into them our interaction capacity. |
|
|
|
Edited by
tdion
on
Wed 01/29/20 02:21 PM
|
|
Stands to reason if something is invisible it has no color. That's a good comment. The bible clearly tells us that God created man in His image. The reasoning might be "what it means to be created in the image and likeness of God". An image is not invisible and has form, as has previously been discussed and established in this forum. When the disciples questioned Christ about the looks of his father, Christ was clearly surprised, and made them understand that he looked like his father. For centuries theologians have debated "the image of God" and tried to proof that the image is not what we think it is. They concluded that the Image of God that was present in Adam at creation, was partially lost because of our sins. The other part is consciousness. National Geography made an image of Adam (the first man) after a decade of study and research. So, could that image be how Christ and God look like? Many books have been written and many religions had delve into this subject, even Judaism and Christianity. What we must understand is that if the debates resulted into conclusions, which are contrary to what have been taught in the earth, then the church fathers will NEVER tell the truth. Therefore, sound debate and reasoning is NOT possible with Christianity at the core of that debate. My middle son is the image of me. He doesn't look like me but his personality and manner is the same. He's "just like dad" his brothers and sister say. Perhaps your religion is referring to that type of image. Your God obviously possesses the ability to reason and we have the ability to reason. "Man was made in the image of God" may not be a physical comparison. It may be a comparison of essence. Your God is capable of love. We are capable of love. Your God is capable of forgiveness. We are capable of forgiveness. Your God is capable of wrath. We are capable of wrath. Perhaps "made in the image" means we possess the same qualities as your creator. Siri is our creation. It possesses some of our qualities so we can interact with it. We work towards building AI computers. These computers look nothing like us but we make them in our own image so they think and feel like we do. We build into them our interaction capacity. The God of the bible, that's the God I am referencing, created the earth and gave it to man for an inheritance. We are the highest form of life on earth and it was Adam who named the animals. In order to possess the earth to the fullest, God gave us the power of creation, but limited that power to be manifest in the earth. In other words, everything that has form and is not natural in the earth, was created by men. God however, did not give us His glory and power to create in the Heavens, for all that has form or is formless and Natural was created by Him and his Son. So, we do possess many of His qualities but not all, and because we sin, we die like men. Every man is unique and has his/her own personality and every man will be judged by his works, and no two men for the works of one. |
|
|
|
Edited by
SeantheChristian
on
Tue 03/10/20 09:40 PM
|
|
God's race is the human race. His color is all colors otherwise there would be only one color. Humans come in different races and there is no such thing as the "Human Race". In other words, we can make a list of humans races but can't say that all humans are of one race. Yes, there are large groups of people that look similar to each other and different to others, BUT are they of different races. NO! In the beginning yes God created Adam and Eve, but when the Flood came, there were only 8 survivors. Noah, his sons AND their wives. |
|
|
|
I'm sure he's really fast, and if you race him, you're gonna lose for sure.
I think he's lemon yellow, and has a yellow uniform with a black stripe on it. |
|
|
|
Edited by
tdion
on
Wed 03/11/20 12:22 PM
|
|
God's race is the human race. His color is all colors otherwise there would be only one color. Humans come in different races and there is no such thing as the "Human Race". In other words, we can make a list of humans races but can't say that all humans are of one race. Yes, there are large groups of people that look similar to each other and different to others, BUT are they of different races. NO! In the beginning yes God created Adam and Eve, but when the Flood came, there were only 8 survivors. Noah, his sons AND their wives. If you look around you then you can't argue that there are NOT many races on earth. Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Vietnamese and Philippines look alike but are of different races. The same with Dark people. We have the Hamites and the Chemites. The Hamites are known today as the Africans and the Chemites are the so called Jews. The bible names the descendants of Ham, Chem and Japheth. |
|
|