I'm glad that someone understands me.

God is a spirit ! He created man human with a spirit. So no God doesn't have a natural body like human man or race.

Well Lady, [Exodus 38:32] The LORD is a man of war.
[1 Samuel 2:6] The Lord Killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave,
and bringeth up. Not SATAN but the LORD KILLS.

If you look up the word IMAGE then an IMAGE has FORM. So to say the least, He must have a body, if we were created in His IMAGE. Right, he is also a spirit.
We too have body and spirit.

In Art there are many images of God, Christ, Apostles and the Angels. Many of them naked or half naked. Especially the baby Angels, with pink and naked buttocks;). How do we know they are pink? Must we accept everything by faith or were we programmed to do so?

If you look up the word “image” you will find it has multiple meanings. If
you pick and choose how you wish to see something and deny others
ability to do the same, you discredit yourself. God transcends color and
race. Regardless of how art perceives it, it is meaningless.
That is the only truth.

There are melanated and non melanated people on earth. If you had watched National Geography you would have known, that the first man was melanated. God didn't give you melanin and you should find out why. So, where did you come from, if you are not shitty brown, and not the 1st man? Who is your progenitor and how did he came to exist?

The truth is that you are not, yet, in the truth. If something DOESN'T HAVE FORM then it has NO image, no matter the definition. Can you show me what the wind looks like? Changing the definition or meaning of the "Wind", will not change what it is. Men doesn't have the power to create ANYTHING that is without form. Only the creator CAN.
My question would indeed be foolish, if I was to give you my own meaning or thoughts or opinion, because they mean NOTHING.

The quote uses “image”, not form. An image can be perceived
without a physical body. Man can create an idea which can have
no physical form.

You should look up the definition of Image. The image is the body.
We can visualize an image of a palace, but that image will not be on the physical plane. A real Palace is physical and does exists. If it didn't exist, we wouldn't know. There is still a challenge waiting for you;). A motivated answer, haha.

He's got a huge colour chart to choose from, and he is in a race with Satan for souls. I think Satan is winning in Babylon.

Those are your thoughts, and this is what God has to say about his ways and his thoughts:
[Isaiah 55:9] For as the Heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

Also, God didn't create man with a spirit, he gave him spirit (life) after his creation.

.... the mother of Harlots.

You deserve to be understood;).

This discussion has already being posted here.
Remember, Moses had an encounter with God and was not allowed to see his FACE.
If God created us in His image, would it not be evident that he does have a face and a body?

Maccabees 3:48 is not even in the Bible. its part of the fake books that Catholic priests add to their books. Its a rare religious book store that will even sell you a Catholic bible. so if you are getting information from there, you are incorrectly informed right from the start. what color is water? ALL water? what color is Wind? Can you hold a cloud? stop thinking that God is an actual touchable man. Only while Jesus lived among the people was God touchable.
Have you heard the expression "the face of a nation" - that encompasses the nature of the government, the people, the actions of the people, the economic status of the people, their religions, occupations and much more. The Face of God does not mean a 6 X 8 inch face like we have - it encompasses spirit and love and conscience and joy and punishments. You should possibly start over with your thinking.

How funny is it then that most of the apocryphal texts (Gospel of Truth, and even Epistles of James in some denominations) are way more historically accurate than what's actually in the Bible, lol

The books of Maccabees are REAL HISTORY, whether you agree with the words in it or not. Out of like, all the stuff Protestants take out of the Bible, I'm curious why this was taken out lol

Edit: Ok book 3 is not historically accurate. It's generally agreed among historians that it was lifted from another text and inserted in the middle of Maccabees.

In all the pics I have seen he is a white man with a big beard , looks a bit like a 60's guitarist

That's because Paul stole the story of Christ from his brother James, and then Nero painted Jesus as a white man and used that image of him to colonize the world.

Thanks for your comment. I like what you had to say. First, in the early 18e century the Protestant removed 14 books from the bible. The bible as we know it today consists of 66 books which are rightfully called the "Protestant bible". The Roman Catholic Church have however, added few, I believe 5, of the 14 lost books to their bible again. In contrary to your thoughts, they felt that not all of these books were deuterocanonical, and discredited the Prostestants.

I would like to remind you that the KJV of 1611 does have 80 books with the lost books intact. Christ spoke of the feast of dedication in the Apochrypha which does make these books canonical, unless Christ is a liar.

The truth of the matter is that these books were removed by wicked church fathers to cause confusion and to make the bible less understandable and agreeable. Often times people will say thinks because they have heard or read something. If you had understood the narrative of the bible, you would have known why these books were removed from the KJV of 1611. Imagine how hard it is to read a book of which a few hundred pages are removed. I am going to leave it up to you to find out why these books were removed from the bible. These books (pages) were simply torn out of the bible because they didn't fit the wicked purposes of these people.

[Revelation 22:19] And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

My thoughts are correct, you just need to study harder and understand what book you are dealing with, namely the "Holy Bible". Holy means separate and so God only gave his words to those whom he had separated. [Isaiah 28:9] Whom shall he teach knowledge and whom shall he make to understand doctrine?

That's how the artist pictured Him to look like, and sometimes naked or half naked. Maybe he didn't have money to buy clothes;).

Dude I'm not religious at all, I just live in a Catholic country and took a lot of classes related to theology. You're preaching to the choir here. I'm asking questions honestly, not asking loaded questions with accusations behind them. ;)

Edit: My bad, dude. I thought you were quoting my post. I'm drunk. It's 8pm here and I need to deal with a cat who's about to give birth. Forgive me hahaha. I was like, "What's this guy on about? I totally agree that church authorities took way too much out of the Bible."