'Millionaire Matchmaker' client Michael Bernback -- the guy accused of raping three women -- just had all charges against him dismissed.

Law enforcement sources tell us prosecutors from the L.A. County District Attorney's Office stated Tuesday in court they were unable to proceed with the case and filed a motion in the interest of justice to drop the case. The judge then dismissed all 8 felony and 3 misdemeanor charges.

TMZ broke the story, Bernback claimed in legal docs he met all three women on sexual hookup websites and at least two of those women knew they'd engage in bondage and/or **** sex.

The documents also revealed during one sexual encounter, Bernback tied a woman up with several bondage devices and she allowed him to urinate in her mouth in the shower.

Bernback's attorney, Blair Berk, tells TMZ, "Michael Leslie Bernback was vindicated today when the L.A. County District Attorney's Office asked the Court to dismiss all charges against him. Mr. Bernback maintained his innocence from the start."

Berk continues, "His attorneys presented evidence to prosecutors that contradicted the claims of his accusers and requested that the L.A. District Attorney undertake a thorough re-examination of the case, initially investigated by the LAPD. It is now clear that Mr. Bernback should have never been arrested and charged."

Berk tells us, "Moving forward, Mr. Bernback will attempt to regain his reputation and put this terrible ordeal behind him."

http://www.tmz.com/2018/05/01/millionaire-matchmaker-client-michael-bernback-rape-charges-dropped/?adid=hero5

WTF is wrong with people, pissing in someone's mouth........ Disturbing.

https://www.amazon.com/Queening-Domination-Worship-sitting-Facesitting/dp/0982119712

I've read that a queening stool facilitates the practice for women to pee on dude slaves.

You can get them on Amazon...

I don't know "WTF is wrong with people," I'm just reminded of Freud's stages of psycho-sexual development.

Some people never grow up.

And if one persons inner child wants to peeplay with another persons inner child, facilitated by Amazon products made in China...that's not statutory.

Personally, I'm not into that stuff. To each their own and all that.

However, your response causes me to consider that it is typical human morality that is the baseline for predjudice.

The inability to tolerate other's unique preferences even when they do not affect us directly.
It drives conflict in individuality.
Individuality is anti-social.
Society is based on unity.
Unity is prejudicial.

I think most of this type of case is perused more for the benefit of legal people as they get off on all the little details!

Okay, OP, before you judge, have you ever tasted urine?

I am totally joking right now.

Well it smells to me like beer, and people drink that stuff by the BUCKET ...lol

Ummmmm hell no. There is a reason getting pissed on is a slam on someone and never referenced as a good thing.

While I agree, I also understand that people like what they will.
There are people that like being tied up, people that like being belittled, people that like feet, people that like sex missionary style and a whole range of different combinations of anything you might imagine.

Rape is wrong. There are people that get turned on by rape. If rape were not against the law, I think there would be more rape than there is. I'm happy it is against the law. Yet there is porn that depicts rape and people of both genders enjoy it.

There's also porn that shows beastiality and just about any perversion you can imagine.
Some people are turned on by some really weird stuff.
Just because I'm not turned on by something doesn't mean I should dictate my beliefs on others.
I think all porn is stupid.

On most dating websites including Mingle, you will find some practices or relationship desires that do not reflect what many view as the norm in society. It is not for us to judge what is right and wrong for others when they see it as mutually acceptable. For instance, some enjoy **** sex while others have no interest; then comes the question is it between a man and a woman or between 2 men? What they choose to do is not my concern; my concern is what I and my partner choose. That choice is ours and none of your business or concern!

Be Hold!!!!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"humans are unlogical~~~~~~" --------Stephen William Hawking

I can't imagine poor old Steven like being wee'd on, for a start it would have made his wheelchair rusty

As tom say it's a free world (apparently) so as long as it's consentual then have fun

Porn is a huge addiction for many Men and some keep. It their secret.
They don't want others to know.

OP is discussing. Many things some people do is terrible, sexual and non sexual.

Totally won't debate that Tood.

...sorry i opened this one up

for the peace and all seen eye~~~~~~~America prevail~~~~~so will those muhalins~~~~~

yea, they drink it from a bottle or can not from someone's junk.

traditional rules brings the darkness the modern rules brings the chaos......which one you would Aye so? get use to it......it's about time~~~~~

The real tricky part of cases like this, isn't in the sordid details of the exact acts.

It's in the difficulty we as a society have, determining where the line is between consensual and non-consensual activities.

The source of the trouble for us, is the sloppiness of human nature. The sloppiness of MOST people's approach to right and wrong, and the sloppiness of how they go about supporting their own claimed beliefs and principles.

The question for the courts for this particular case, was whether or not the women involved gave their willing consent for what happened, or not. Mainly, whether their consent or lack of consent, was clear enough TO US AS A SOCIETY, to decide against the man for his actions.

The courts did NOT decide that everything that happened was wonderful, they decided that they could not reasonably prove that what happened was not consensual at the time.

The sloppiness I referred to, is what I see quite often between people, where someone eager to have whatever "favors" they hope for from someone, will volunteer to subjugate themselves to activities that they may not really actively or directly want themselves. And then later, after all is said and done, when they DON'T get the rewards they fantasized they would get from what they did, they want to go back and declare that they were "duped" or used, or in this case, sexually assaulted.

Ironically, many instances where we think that someone got away with horrendous acts because they are rich, were actually coincidentally so.

That is, the only reason why the events took place at all, WAS because the guy was rich, and the other person hoped to get his money. When we hear that the rich guy did disgusting things, even potentially illegal things, we might LIKE to punish him for it, but we have to let him go, because the law requires that we prove there was no consent, regardless of the money, and it's a lot harder to be certain of that when there IS money, than when there is not.

but god accept the free will....... and that's why some time many people are more trusting the Nazi can change the world turn better.......like I say~~~~no war no how then people will lern the truth it self what it realy is and was.......just like why those raman had created the Fascism......but still~~~~"The God Accept The Free Will....."